الگوی راهبردی مدیریت آموزش عالی با تاکید بر مفهوم حکمرانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

2 استاد، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

3 دانشیار، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

چکیده

   مقاله حاضر درصدد ارائه الگویی است که بر اساس آن بتوان جذب و اثرگذاری دانش‌آموختگان مدیریت آموزش عالی را در نظام حکمرانی آموزش عالی در ایران تبیین نمود. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ ماهیت توصیفی -پیمایشی می‌باشد و در چارچوب رویکرد کیفی و با به‌کارگیری روش تحقیق داده بنیاد انجام گرفته است. ابزار جمع‌­آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه‌های عمیق و غیرساختار یافته بوده و به منظور گردآوری داده‌ها با به‌کارگیری روش نمونه‌­گیری نظری با 18 نفر از خبرگان، مدیران و صاحب‌نظران آموزش عالی مصاحبه انجام شد. پس از طی کدگذاری­های سه‌­گانه باز، محوری و انتخابی، مدل مفهومی تحقیق براساس الگوی زاویه‌ای طراحی شد. یافته‌­های تحقیق بیانگر آنست که این مدل در قالب 25 مقوله اصلی و 82 متغیر شامل جذب و به‌کارگیری دانش‌آموختگان به عنوان هسته یا مقوله اصلی مدل؛ متغیرهای علّی (عوامل سازمانی، عوامل فراسازمانی، آمادگی برای جذب و به‌کارگیری، شایستگی­‌های درون فردی، شایستگی­‌های شخصی و شایستگی­‌های کارآفرینی)؛ متغیرهای زمینه‌­ای (زمینه‌­کاری، اسناد بالادستی)؛ شرایط مداخله‌­گر (فرهنگ اشتغال‌­زایی، پایداری سیستم‌­های موجود کشف استعدادها، مسولیت­‌پذیری)؛ مقولات راهبردی (نهادینه‌­سازی سیستم مدیریت استعداد کارآفرینانه، طراحی فرایند مدیریت استعداد کارآفرینانه چندگانه و طراحی نظام تخصیص منابع) و نهایتاً مقولات پیامدی (اشتغال‌زایی، ارزش آفرینی و مزیت رقابتی چندگانه، ایجاد تضمین کیفیت در نظام آموزش عالی) قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A strategic pattern of higher education management with emphasis on the concept of governance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Khosravi 1
  • Mohammad Hassani 2
  • Behnaz Mohajeran 3
1 PhD Student, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 Professor, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده [English]

   Introduction: The present article seeks to provide a model based on which the attraction and effectiveness of higher education management graduates in the higher education governance system in Iran explained. The need to examine this issue explored in the sense that the issue of lack of effective and useful attraction of graduates of higher education courses in the labor market is one of the problems arising from an inefficient education system. Therefore, formulating and designing a set of strategies and policies that can be relied on to create the conditions for the proper presence of graduates of the higher education system in a suitable and correct job environment is very necessary for any system. Given the importance of achieving efficiency, success and productivity in higher education and governance of higher education, it seen that some important aspects of attracting graduates have been neglected or forgotten. The main concern in this study is what are the components of attracting and influencing graduates of higher education management in the governing system of higher education in Iran to provide a favorable model in Iran? The present study has two categories of objectives. Theoretically, it seeks to provide a comprehensive perspective in order to provide a clearer understanding of the components of attracting and influencing graduates of higher education management in the governing system of higher education in Iran. From a practical point of view, since the higher education system and its scientific and human resources are considered as the most important assets of any country, so strengthening the expertise in this field and helping decision makers to recognize challenges and adopt Policies appropriate to the country's higher education system are considered by the authors. The present study has two categories of objectives. Theoretically, it seeks to provide a comprehensive perspective in order to provide a clearer understanding of the components of attracting and influencing graduates of higher education management in the governing system of higher education in Iran. In practical terms, since the higher education system and its scientific and human resources are considered the most important assets of any country, so strengthening the expertise in this area and helping decision-makers to recognize challenges and adopt Policies appropriate to the country's higher education system are considered by the authors.
   Methodology: The present study is qualitative in terms of type and is based on data strategy and formed by Corbin and Strauss approach. According to the purpose of this study, which is to identify and study the components of attracting and influencing graduates of higher education management in the higher education system of Iran, the research design is a qualitative research design with data method. This approach is based on the three main steps of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding and was performed using Max qda software version 2018. The validity of the qualitative part with continuous and long-term involvement strategies of the researcher was achieved through the process of collecting and analyzing research data, reviewing and controlling colleagues, and validating the participation of participants used. And the researcher will benefit from semi-structured interviews based on data foundation theory.
   Results and Discussion: The main categories and sub-components presented based on open and centralized coding of data obtained from in-depth and exploratory interviews with key experts and refinement of conceptual codes. Accordingly, in order to perform open and pivotal coding in the first stage, the data at the sentence and phrase level for each of the interviews examined and conceptual codes extracted from the transcripts of the interviews. By refining and reducing, these components organized into sub-categories and named by continuous review. In order to ensure the proper organization of each of the concepts and categories, the transcripts of the interviews were re-examined and reviewed by these categories in order to achieve a logical saturation for the main categories and sub-categories. In general, from the analysis of qualitative data of the research in the coding stage, 329 initial conceptual codes obtained. After reviewing and matching these codes and removing duplicate codes, common codes counted.
    Conclusion: One of the things that needs to explain is identifying possible barriers to attracting graduates of higher education management and trying to overcome them in governing higher education. In this regard, the scope of studies and views is very limited. In fact, the possibility of attracting graduates of higher education management, on the one hand, motivates them and participates in decision-making, and on the other hand, it includes responsibility, improving managerial capacity and planning, improving the quality of education and research for them. , That these competencies can prevent them from being passive because if policies and programs are formulated by graduates, they will consider themselves partners in the decisions they have made and will try to Fulfill their goals and missions and no longer have an excuse to blame others for the failure of programs. Given that the university is the workplace of professional students and they are able better than anyone else to formulate a system of governance, neglecting to attract and influence them will motivate students. Therefore, it is worth investing more in attracting graduates.
The present article seeks to provide a model based on which the attraction and effectiveness of higher education management graduates in the higher education governance system in Iran can be explained. The present research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of descriptive-survey nature and has been done within the framework of a qualitative approach and using the data research method of the foundation. Targeted interviews were conducted with 18 experts, managers and higher education experts. After open, axial and selective triple coding, the conceptual model of the research was designed based on a paradigm model. The research findings indicate that this model is in the form of 25 main categories and 82 variables, including the recruitment and use of graduates as the core or main category of the model; Causal variables (organizational factors, extra-organizational factors, readiness to absorb and apply, intrapersonal competencies, personal competencies and entrepreneurial competencies); Background variables (work context, upstream documents); Interventional conditions (culture of job creation, sustainability of existing systems, talent discovery, accountability); Strategic categories (institutionalization of entrepreneurial talent management system, design of multiple entrepreneurial talent management process and design of resource allocation system) and finally consequential categories (job creation, value creation and multiple competitive advantage, creating quality assurance in higher education system) were included. The present article seeks to provide a model based on which the attraction and effectiveness of higher education management graduates in the higher education governance system in Iran can be explained. The present research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of descriptive-survey nature and has been done within the framework of a qualitative approach and using the data research method of the foundation. Targeted interviews were conducted with 18 experts, managers and higher education experts. After open, axial and selective triple coding, the conceptual model of the research was designed based on a paradigm model. The research findings indicate that this model is in the form of 25 main categories and 82 variables, including the recruitment and use of graduates as the core or main category of the model; Causal variables (organizational factors, extra-organizational factors, readiness to absorb and apply, intrapersonal competencies, personal competencies and entrepreneurial competencies); Background variables (work context, upstream documents); Interventional conditions (culture of job creation, sustainability of existing systems, talent discovery, accountability); Strategic categories (institutionalization of entrepreneurial talent management system, design of multiple entrepreneurial talent management process and design of resource allocation system) and finally consequential categories (job creation, value creation and multiple competitive advantage, creating quality assurance in higher education system) were included.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Higher education
  • Strategic model
  • Governance
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Recruitment and employment
  1. Addink, H. (2019). Good governance: concept and context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bagheri Moghadam, N., & Ahmadi, H. (2019). Pathology of governance in Iran's higher education system. Public Policy Quarterly, 4 (4), 55-74. [In Persian]
  3. Bakhshi, J., Yousefi SaeiAbadi, R., & Salehi, M. (2020). The effect of good governance with the development approach of Fourth Generation universities on the educational quality of macro medical universities in region one. Teb va tazkiye journal, 29(4), 43-64. [In Persian]
  4. Balzer, W. (2020). Lean higher education: increasing the value and performance of university processes, New York: Productivity Press.
  5. Craig, K., & Tracy, K. (2020). Grounded practical theory: investigating communication problems, London: Cognella Academic Publishing.
  6. Creamer, E. (2021). Advancing Grounded Theory with Mixed Methods, London:
  7. DadashKarimi, Y., Mirsepasi, N., & Najafbeigi, R. (2018). Studying of governance evolution theories in the higher education system and universities to improve productivity. Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 14(1), 1-26. [In Persian]
  8. Darvishan, A., Taslimi, M., & Hakimzadeh, R. (2020). Designing a model of employability skills for higher education graduates (Case Study: SMEs in Tehran Province). Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 10(19), 7-39. [In Persian]
  9. Dhar, U. (2021). Good governance in higher education. The Times of India. Journal of Education, 6(4), 74-89.
  10. Geiger, (2021). American higher education since World War II: A History, ‎ NewJersey: Princeton University Press.
  11. Ghorbanpour, M., Ghahremani, M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2021). Identifying the Components of Good Governance in Iranian Higher Education System. Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 17(1), 53-82. [In Persian]
  12. Hartman, L., & Bennett, A. (2021). Employment Law for Business, New York: McGraw Hill.
  13. Jackson, D. (2017). Exploring the challenges experienced by international students during Work-Integrated Learning in Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(3), 344-359.
  14. Kazempour, E., Khalkhali, A., Nasirnateri, J., Shakibaei, Z., & Soleimanpour, J. (2020). Conceptualization of Good Governance in Iran's Public Education System by Phenomenological Approach. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 11(41), 191-208. [In Persian]
  15. Mahfar, M., & Shahbazi, B. (2021). How to design and compile a higher education curriculum based on employment in the field of educational sciences. Quarterly Journal of Psychological Studies and Educational Sciences, (58), 93-110. (in Persian).
  16. Mok, K., Wen, Z., & Dale, R. (2016). Employability and mobility in the valorization of higher education qualifications: The experiences and reflections of Chinese students and graduates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(3), 264-281.
  17. Nikbin, M., ZakerSalehi, G., & Mahouzi, R. (2017). The model of internationalization of higher education from cultural policy perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 10(3), 33-43. [In Persian]
  18. Orr, D. (2019). Democracy Unchained: How to Rebuild Government for the People, New York: The New Press.
  19. Parajuli, D., Vo, K., Salmi, J., & Tran, N. (2021). Improving the performance of higher education in Vietnam, Washington: international Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  20. Parchami, D., & Ashoori, Y. (2021). The study of social policy in the field of higher education and employment and its Outcomes: A Case Study of Shahid Beheshti University. Social Welfare Quarterly, 20(79), 229-274. [In Persian]
  21. Perry, J. (2020). Public service and good governance for the twenty-first century, ‎ Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  22. Roshan, A., & Motevasseli, M. (2018). Designing a stakeholder-oriented pattern, Based on good governance for improving the quality of the ministry of science, Research and Technology (MSRT). Journal of Research in Educational Science, 12(41), 49-71. [In Persian]
  23. Sharifzadeh, F. (2011). The necessity of recognizing the higher education system and its role in the scientific and social development of the country: a research on the undergraduate course in public management of universities and higher education centers. Cultural Research Society Quarterly, 2(1), 79-112. [In Persian]
  24. Small, L., Shacklock, K., & Marchant, T. (2018). Employability: A contemporary review for higher education stakeholders. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 148–166.
  25. Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to increase the employability of graduates: Comparing the perceptions of students and employers, Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 1-14.
  26. Thelin, J. (2019). A history of American higher education, Maryland: ‎Johns Hopkins University Press.
  27. Yousefi, H., Alamalhoda, J., Khorsandi Taskouh, A., & ZakerSalehi, G. (2021). Path dependence in the formation of higher education governance in Iran. Iranian Journal of Culture in the Islamic University, 11(39), 207-230. [In Persian]