فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

شناخت بازیگران تدوین خط مشی عمومی موثر بر اجرای خط مشی های سلامت نظام اداری

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
فرهاد قیصری 1
سنجر سلاجقه 2
فرزانه بیگ زاده عباسی 2
ایوب شیخی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه آمار، دانشکده ریاضی و کامپیوتر، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران
چکیده
درصورتی‌که تدوین‌کنندگان خط‌مشی عمومی با اجرا ارتباط داشته باشند بسیاری از مشکلات از بین خواهند رفت اما در عمل این‌گونه نیست. هدف از پژوهش حاضر شناخت بازیگران تدوین خط‌مشی عمومی مؤثر بر اجرای خط­مشی­های سلامت نظام اداری در دستگاه­های اجرایی استان خوزستان به‌منظور ارائه یک مدل است. در این تحقیق از پرسش­نامه بازیگران تدوین خط­مشی­های عمومی با 51 سؤال و آلفای کرونباخ 815/0 و پرسش­نامه سلامت نظام اداری با آلفای کرونباخ 790/0 با 74 سؤال استفاده شد. جامعه آماری در مرحله تدوین بازیگران خط‌مشی شامل 15 نفر از خبرگان بوده و در بخش اجرای خط­مشی­ها شامل 10377 نفر از مدیران دستگاه­های اجرایی بوده که با نمونه­گیری طبقه­­ای ساده 382 نفر انتخاب شدند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده­ها از نرم‌افزارهای Spss 22 و Amos 22 استفاده شد. یافته­ها نشان داد که بازیگران تدوین خط‌مشی عمومی شامل سیزده بازیگر بوده که به بازیگران رسمی و غیررسمی تقسیم شدند و خط­مشی­های سلامت نظام اداری شامل چهارده خط‌مشی هستند. همچنین نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که بین بازیگران تدوین خط‌مشی عمومی و اجرای خط­مشی­های سلامت نظام اداری رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. در نهایت نیز مدل مطلوب ارائه شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تدوین خط مشی عمومی
اجرای خط مشی عمومی
سلامت نظام اداری

عنوان مقاله English

Understanding the actors in formulating a public policy affecting the implementation of administrative health policies

نویسندگان English

farhad gheisari 1
Sanjar Salajegheh 2
farzaneh Bigzade Abbasi 2
Ayyub sheikhy 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Kerman University, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 Assistant Prof, Department of Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
3 Assistant Prof, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of the present study is to identify the actors of formulating a public policy affecting the implementation of administrative health policies in the executive agencies of Khuzestan province in order to present a model. In this study, a public policy formulation questionnaire with 51 questions and Cronbach's alpha of 0.815 and a questionnaire of administrative system health with Cronbach's alpha of 0.790 with 74 questions were used. The statistical population consisted of 15 experts in the formulation stage of policy actors and 10377 executives in the policy implementation section who were selected by simple stratified sampling of 382 individuals. Spss 22 and Amos 22 software were used for data analysis. Findings showed that public policy formulation actors included thirteen actors divided into formal and informal actors and administrative system health policies consisted of fourteen policies. The results also showed that there is a significant relationship between the actors of public policy formulation and implementation of administrative policies. Finally, the optimal model was presented.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Public Policy Formulation
Public Policy Implementation
Health System Administration
  1. Abbasi, M. & Jamalpour, M. (2011). The role of organizational culture in promoting the Health of the Administrative System and the Satisfaction Level of People. Cultural Engineering, 55 and 56, 54-44. (In Persian)
  2. Abuagela, M.A. (2012). Examination of the public policy process in LIBYA. School of Built Environment University of Salford, Salford, UK December.
  3. Akreman, J., et al. (2011). How to manage barriers to formation and implemenation of policy pakages in transport, s.l.: Optic. optimal policies for Transport in Combination.
  4. Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. & Davis, G. (2007). The australian policy handbook. 4thed, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  5. Alvani, S. M., & Sharifzadeh, F. (2011). Public policy process. tehran: allameh tabatabai university press and university. (In Persian)
  6. Alvani, S. M. (2013). Government policy making and decision making. Tehran: Post Publications. (In Persian)
  7. Alvani, S.M., & Sarafzadeh, A. (2001). Analysis of factors influencing the formation of public policies in the islamic republic of iran and presenting an optimal Model. Transition Management Studies, 30, 142-117. (In Persian)
  8. Amani, N. (2011). Office health: the organizational development communication pathway. City Economics, 9, 18-25. (In Persian)
  9. Anderson, E. J. (2011). Public policymaking: an introduction. boston: wadsworth publishing.
  10. Apergis, N., Dincer, O., & Payne, J. (2012). Live free or bribe: on the causal dynamics between economic freedom and corruption in U.S. states. European Journal of Political Economy. 28, 215-226.
  11. AsliPour, H., Zahedi, Sh. S., Sharifzadeh, F., & Ghorbanizadeh, W. (2014). Explaining the native pattern of formulation of the country's environmental policies by using data theory. Strategic Management Thought, 1, 66-41. (In Persian)
  12. Bagheri, M. R, Pourazat, A. A, Mazaheri, M. M., & Bagheri Miab, Sh. (2013). Developing a future cultural policy-making system using model synergies. Culture Strategy, 22, 165-135. (In Persian)
  13. Beekman, G., Bulte, E., & Nillesen, E. (2013). Corruption and economic activity: micro level evidence from rural Liberia. European Journal of Political Economy. 30, 70-79.
  14. Berg, K. (2004).  implementing chicago›s to transform public housing. chicago, s.n.
  15. Birkland, T.A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. new york: routledge.
  16. Blind, P.K. (2014). Policy-driven democratization:­ Geometrical perspectives on transparency, accountability, and corruption. New York: Springer.‏
  17. Bobrow, D.B. (2006). Social and cultural factors: constraining and enabling; In: Moran M., Rein M. and Goodin R. E. (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Brynard, P. A. (2005). Policy implementation: Lessons for service delivery. Livingstone, Zambia, s.n.
  19. Danaei Fard, H., Azar, A., & Ebrahimi, S. A. (2013). Investigating strategies for promoting the political, social, administrative and technical capacity of the country's public policies using the evidence-based policy approach. Journal of Management of Public Organizations, 3, 17-17. (In Persian)
  20. Daneshfard, K. (2014). Barriers to public policy implementation in ngos (+10 police services and government accounts offices). Resource Management in Law Enforcement, 2, 23-50. (In Persian)
  21. Daneshfard, K. (2010). Public policy process. tehran: islamic azad university publications research Branch. (In Persian)
  22. De Benedetto, M. (2014). Administrative corruption. encyclopedia of law and economics. New York: Springer.
  23. Diaby, A., & Sylwester, K. (2014). bureaucratic competition and public corruption: evidence from transition countries, european journal of political economy. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.04.002
  24. Eminue, O.E. (2005). Public policy analysis and decision-making. Nigeria: Concept Publications Limited.
  25. Ezeani, E.O. (2006). Fundamentals of public administration (revised ed.). Enugu, Nigeria: Snaap Press Ltd.
  26. Fletcher, P. (2002). The government paperwork elimination act. berlin: INT'L. J. of Public Admin, 53, 162-175.
  27. Galston, W.A. (2006). Political feasibility: Interests and power; In: Moran M., Rein M. and Goodin R.E. (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Gerston, L.N. (2004). Public policy-making: process and principles. New York: ME Sharpe.
  29. Ghafouri, Ma., & Kamali, Y. (2010). Public opinion and public policy (theoretical thought). Journal of Politics, 2, 188-171. (In Persian)
  30. Ghahramani, M., & Heidari, R. (2012). Investigating the relationship between the health of the administrative system and improving the performance of human resources of public financial organizations of west azerbaijan province. Quantitative Studies in Management, 2, 186-155. (In Persian)
  31. Gholipour, R. (2005). Analyzing the relationship between good governance pattern and corruption. Organizational Culture Management. 3. 127-103. (In Persian)
  32. Ghorbanizadeh, Sharifzadeh, F., & Motazedian, R. (2015). Analysis of administrative policy issues, Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, No. 24, pp. 19 - 76.
  33. Graeff, P., & Mehlkop, G. (2003). The impact of economic freedom on corruption: different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 605-620.
  34. Gyourian, H., & Rabiei, Mandejin, M. R. (2015). Decision Making and State Policy. Tehran: Yekhan Publications. (In Persian)
  35. Hajian, H. (2012). Law on the promotion of the health of the administrative system and the fight against corruption and threats and opportunities for working members of the society of certified public accountants. Auditor, 63, 78-90. (In Persian)
  36. Hanekom, S.X. (1987). public policy: framework and instrument for action. Johannesburg: Macmillan.
  37. Hay, C. (2006). Globalization and public policy; In: Moran M., Rein M. and Goodin R. E. (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  38. Hejazi Far, S. (2012). Policy environment. Development Strategy. 30, 194-172. (In Persian)
  39. Iranzadeh, Sand Davoodi, K. (2012). Investigating the relationship between e-government deployment and health of the iranian administrative system, Beyond Management, 22, 74-55. (In Persian)
  40.  Jafari, M. H. (2011). Governmental jurisprudence and public policy. Islam and Managerial Research, 3, 13-34. (In Persian)
  41. Jafarloo, H. R, Goodarzi, M, Sajjadi, S. N, Ghorbani, M. H., & Darabi, H. (2009). Determining the effective factors on the occurrence and extent of administrative corruption and its control methods in the physical education organization of the islamic republic of iran from the experts' viewpoints. Sport Management Studies (Institute of Physical Education), 4, 108-80. (In Persian)
  42. Kamali, Y. (2014). The role of decentralization in the realization of administrative health. Strategic and macro policies. 5, 111-132. (In Persian)
  43. Kennedy, M. (2011). Cybernetics and system dynamics: impacts on public policy. Kybernetes, 40, 124-140.
  44. Khlid, H.M. (2008). Policy Implementation Models: The case of library and documentation service in Pakistan 1998-2008. New Library World, 102 (1162).
  45. Kostka, G. (2014). Barriers to the implementation of environmental policies at the local level in China, s.l.: World Bank.
  46. Krutwaysho, M.O. (2003). Obstacles to the implementation of tourism policies and regulations in Phuket. Retrieved form http://www.esade.es/cedit2003/pdfs/krutwayshoratai.pdf.
  47. Makinde, T. (2005). Problems of policy implementation in developing nations: the Nigerian experience. Journal of social sciences, 11, 63-69.
  48. Malek Mohammadi, H. R. (2015). Fundamentals and principles of public policy. Tehran: Post Publication. (In Persian)
  49. Meier, j. Bothe. (2008). Politics and the bureaucracy, 2-108.
  50. Monurian, A., & Golshan, A. (2015). A Study of the general policy of policy cycles and policy subsystems. Tehran: Mehraban Book Institute Publications. (In Persian)
  51. O’Tool, L.J., & Meier, J.R. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 53-86.
  52. Palumbo, D.J., & Calista. D.J. (1990). Implementation and policy process: opening up the black box. USA: Greenwood Press Inc.
  53. Pope, J. (2000). Confronting corruption the element of a national integrity system. TI sourse Book: Transparency International.
  54. Quiggin, J. (2006). Economic constraints on public policy; In: Moran M., Rein M. and Goodin R. E. (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  55. Rabiei, A., & Bigdeli, M. (2010). Cultural pathology in promoting the administrative health of governmental and non-governmental organizations. Religion and Communication, 1, 205-187. (In Persian)
  56. Richardson, W. (2007). Public policy failure and fiasco in education: perspectives on the British examinations crises of 2000-2002 and other episodes since 1975, Oxford Review of Education Routiedge, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 143-160.
  57. Roman, A. (2015). The Determinants of public administrators’ participation in policy formulation. American Review of Public Administration, 89, 1–28.
  58. Saghafi, A. (2008). Public policy implementation: investigating the role of rationality in policy development. Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University Press. (In Persian)
  59. Saha, Sh., Rukmani, G., Neil, C., & J.J. Su. (2014). Democracy and corruption: A complex relationship. Crime, Law and Social Change. 61(3): 287–308.
  60. Sam Aram, E., & Amin Aghaei, M. (2010). administrative health and administrative identity in Iran. Research paper, 52, 54-37. (In Persian)
  61. Sanaee Alam, F, Memarzade Tehran, GH. & Danshfrd, K. (2016). Modeling the implementation of the poverty reduction policy in iran based on twenty-year perspective document, Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, 28, 266-223. (In Persian)
  62. Serra, D., & Wantchekon, L. (2015). experimental research on corruption: introduction and overview. New York: Published online.
  63. Shakrollahi, M. (2000). capacity building for the health of the administrative system, improving the health of the administrative system, Tehran: Government Management Training Center. (In Persian)
  64. Sharifzadeh, F., Alvani, S. M, Rezaei Manesh, B., & Mokhtarpourian, M. (2013). barriers to implementing national cultural policies during the first to fourth development plans: a study of the experiences of cultural managers. Strategic Management Thought, 13, 78-33. (In Persian)
  65. Sheikhi, M. H. (2011). Factors affecting the health of the administrative system and the development of ethical values ​​in it. Islam and Managerial Research, 2, 129-199. (In Persian)
  66. Sidney, M.S.  (2007). Policy formulation: design and tools. handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods. New York.
  67. Sinai, Vand Zamani, S. (2011). The role of legislatures in the policy-making process towards a theoretical model. Strategy, 58, 93-65. (In Persian)
  68. Staley, S.R. (2006). Institutional consideration for sustainable development policy implementation: A US case study; Property Management, 24(3), 84-96.
  69. Strehlenert, H., Richter-Sundberg, L., Nyström, M.E., & Hasson, H. (2015). Evidence-informed policy formulation and implementation: a comparative case study of two national policies for improving health and social care in Sweden. Implementation Science, 10, 169.
  70. Taqavi Rafsanjani, M. (2002). The health role of government agents in the stability and efficiency of political systems from the perspective of amir al-momen ali. Islamic Law Journal. 8 and 9, 78 – 83. (In Persian)
  71. Yanow, D.J. (1987). Toward a policy culture approach to implementation. Public Studies Review, 7(1).
  72. Yilmaz, A., & Akif, M. (2011). Determinants of economic corruption: a cross-country data analysis. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2.
  73. Zhang, X. (2014). Study on the participation of citizens in public policy formulation. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 687, 5128-5130.
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 10، شماره 38
تابستان 1398
صفحه 175-205

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 مرداد 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 شهریور 1398