فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

شناسایی و تبیین شاخص‌های واگذاری بنگاه‌های دولتی به تعاونی‌های توسعه و عمران شهری در استان ایلام

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران
2 دانش‌آموختة دکتری، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم ‌آباد، ایران
10.22034/smsj.2025.515416.2143
چکیده
اقتصاد ایران مملو تجربه‌های تلخ از واگذاری بنگاه‌های دولتی به بخش خصوصی است، به طوری که تعداد کثیری از آنها یا به بدنة دولت بازگشته‌اند و یا برای همیشه چرخ آنها متوقف شده‌‌ است. به همین سبب سیاست‌گذاران و دولت‌مردان به منظور احتراز از شکست‌های پیشین و تقویت همیاری اجتماعی جهت واگذاری‌ها را به سمت‌وسوی تعاونی‌های توسعه و عمران شهری هدایت کرده‌اند. اگرچه می‌توان مصادیقی از عدم توفیق این سِنخ تعاونی‌ها در حکمروایی بنگاه‌ها نام برد و دلایل متعددی را ردیف کرد اما حاذقان امر فقدان شاخص‌ در تعیین صلاحیت تعاونی‌های که برای اداره و مدیریت بنگاه‌ها وارد گود شده‌اند را از دلایل اساسی آن می‌دانند. از این رو پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تبیین شاخص‌های واگذاری بنگاه‌های دولتی به تعاونی‌های توسعه و عمران شهری در استان ایلام اجرا شده بود. این پژوهش، از نظر روش تحقیق، ترکیبی است. در فاز کیفی از استراتژی تحلیل مضمونی استفاده شده و در مرحلة کمی، رویکرد دلفی فازی مطمح نظر بوده است. جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌های مرحلة نخست به شیوة گروه کانونی از تعداد 12 نفر از خبرگان علمی و عملی به روش هدفمند دعوت به عمل آمد تا در باب موضوع به گفتگو بنشینند و در مرحلة دوم از تعداد 9 نفر از آنها به منظور حضور در پنل دلفی دعوت به عمل آمد. نتایج نشان داد تصمیم‌گیران می‌بایستی برای واگذاری یک بنگاه دولتی به تعاونی‌ توسعه و عمران شهری 6 شاخص صلاحیت حرفه‌ای مجریان، انسجام تشکیلاتی، شفافیت و پاسخگویی، توان مالی و مدیریت اقتصادی، توان فنی و مدیریت اجرایی و توسعة محلی را مورد توجه قرار دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and explaining the indicators of assigning governmental enterprises to development and civil of counties cooperatives in Ilam province

نویسندگان English

Ardeshir Shiri 1
Seydmehdi Vayseh 1
Hamed Ghasempour 2
1 Associate Proffessor, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
2 PhD, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The Iranian economy has experienced numerous setbacks in the transfer of state-owned enterprises to the private sector, with many enterprises either reverting to government ownership or ceasing operations permanently. These repeated failures have not only caused economic inefficiencies but have also eroded public trust in privatization policies and hindered sustainable economic development. In response, policymakers and government officials have increasingly directed transfers toward Development and Civil Cooperatives of Counties, aiming to strengthen social cooperation, promote participatory management, and enhance local economic and social development. Despite these efforts, evidence suggests that these cooperatives have not always been successful in managing transferred enterprises. Various explanations have been proposed, ranging from structural and financial limitations to inadequate managerial expertise. Among these, experts consistently highlight a critical gap: the absence of clear and systematic indicators to assess the competence and readiness of cooperatives undertaking enterprise management. Without such benchmarks, transfers are vulnerable to inefficiency, mismanagement, and eventual failure, leading to repeated economic and social losses. Against this backdrop, the present study was conducted with the objective of identifying and conceptualizing the key indicators for transferring state-owned enterprises to Development and Civil Cooperatives in Ilam Province, thereby providing policymakers with a structured and evidence-based framework for decision-making. This research not only addresses a critical knowledge gap but also contributes to broader discussions on cooperative governance and sustainable local development.
Methodology:
This research adopts an exploratory, mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, experiences of 12 employees from public organizations in Ilam city were collected through purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding, employing participants’ own terminology to ensure authenticity and richness of meaning. Open codes were first extracted from interviews and subsequently merged into axial codes, with MAXQDA 2020 software utilized for systematic analysis. In the quantitative phase, the extracted components were further refined and prioritized using the fuzzy Delphi method, allowing for consensus among experts on the relative importance and validity of each indicator. This combination of qualitative exploration and quantitative validation ensures a robust framework that reflects both practical experience and expert judgment.
Findings:
The study identified six key indicators, each with multiple sub-indicators, that are essential for a reliable transfer of state-owned enterprises to urban development cooperatives in Ilam Province: Professional competence of executives, encompassing specialized, ethical, and financial skills necessary for effective leadership, strategic decision-making, and ethical stewardship. Organizational cohesion, reflected in systematic organizational structures, clear hierarchies, program-oriented planning, and alignment of goals across departments. Transparency and accountability, represented by continuous performance monitoring, compliance with legal frameworks, rule-based operations, and financial transparency. Financial capacity and economic management, including credibility, resource efficiency, financial planning, and the ability to mobilize and allocate resources effectively. Technical capacity and executive management, consisting of skilled human resources, applied technology, market orientation, and strong networks both within and beyond the cooperative. Local development, characterized by the capacity to generate employment, promote social participation, foster social responsibility, and enhance community well-being. Collectively, these indicators provide a comprehensive and actionable framework for evaluating the readiness, suitability, and long-term viability of cooperatives in managing state-owned enterprises, thereby reducing the risk of repeating failures observed in previous privatization initiatives.


Discussion and Conclusion
the findings of this study highlight the necessity of a multidimensional assessment framework for the successful transfer of state-owned enterprises to urban development cooperatives. Six key indicators—executive competence, organizational cohesion, transparency and accountability, financial capacity and economic management, technical capacity and executive management, and local development—collectively ensure that cooperatives are adequately prepared to manage enterprises effectively. Executive competence is foundational, as skilled and ethically responsible leaders directly influence strategic decision-making and operational efficiency. Organizational cohesion ensures alignment of internal structures, communication channels, and programmatic objectives, which minimizes inefficiencies and enhances policy implementation. Transparency and accountability build stakeholder trust, reduce mismanagement risks, and support legal and ethical governance. Financial capacity and economic management provide cooperatives with the resources and credibility needed to sustain operations, invest in growth, and withstand economic challenges. Technical capacity and executive management emphasize the importance of human resources, applied technology, market orientation, and network relationships, enabling cooperatives to adapt to changing conditions and maintain competitiveness. Local development highlights the broader socio-economic role of cooperatives, including job creation, promotion of social participation, and fulfillment of social responsibility, ensuring that enterprise transfers contribute to community welfare and sustainable regional growth. The study also underscores a common challenge: cooperative managers often start with high motivation but gradually disengage, jeopardizing enterprise performance. By systematically assessing the six indicators, policymakers can mitigate this risk and ensure that transfers are more strategic, accountable, and socially beneficial. Overall, the research provides a validated and actionable framework that can guide decision-makers in selecting capable cooperatives, supporting sustainable enterprise performance, and promoting broader economic resilience and regional development in Iran. Implementing these indicators ensures that transfers are effective, efficient, and aligned with both organizational and community goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban development and civil cooperatives
Ilam province
Managerial competence
Transparency and accountability
1.      Arefi, M., Aleme, K., & Ghasemi, M. (2022). Identification and prioritization of factors influencing the empowerment of cooperatives. Cooperation and Agriculture, 12(45), 134–147. DOI: 10.22034/ajcoop.2023.378147.1814 (in Persian)  
2.      Atri Borzanjeh, R., Taj Khosravi, M., Eyvazi, M. R., & Soltani, A. (2017). Pathology of governmental public policy in the cooperative sector of Iran after the Revolution. The Islamic Revolution Approach, 11(39), 161–181. (in Persian)
3.      Brandao, J. B., & Breitenbach, R. (2019). What are the main problems in the management of rural cooperatives in Southern Brazil?, Land Use Policy, 85, 121–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.047
4.      Camargo Benavides, A. F., & Ehrenhard, M. (2021). Rediscovering the cooperative enterprise: A systematic review of current topics and avenues for future research. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 964–978. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-021-00328-8
5.      Chen, L., Li, X., Kang, X., Liu, W., & Wang, M. (2024). Analysis of the cooperative development of multiple systems for urban economy–energy–carbon: A case study of Chengdu–Chongqing economic circle. Sustainable Cities and Society, 108, 105395. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105395
6.      Damato, A., Festa, G., Dhir, A., & Rossi, M. (2022). Cooperatives’ performance relative to investor-owned firms: A non-distorted approach for the wine sector. British Food Journal, 124(13), 35–52. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0275.
7.      Glumac, B., Han, Q., Smeets, J., & Schaefer, W. (2011). Brownfield redevelopment features: Applying fuzzy Delphi. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 4(2), 145–159. DOI: 10.1108/17539261111157316
8.      Gundlach, K., Marlow, F., Peters, N., & Wall, R. (2022). Model projects as tools for cooperative urban development: The case of Haus der Statistik in Berlin. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1078(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012110
9.      Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01567.x
10.   Hussain, M. S. (2014). The role of cooperative organizations in rural community development in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Academic Research International, 5(3), 189–197.
11.   Jafarpour, M. (2021). An investigation on results of privatization in Iran. Commercial Surveys, 18(104), 9–30. DOI: 20.1001.1.26767562.1399.18.104.1.2 (in Persian)
12.   Karkonannasrabadi, M., & Niazi, M. (2012). Social foundations of cooperation. Tehran: Sokhanvaran. (in Persian)
13.   King, R., & Ortmann, G. (2007). Agricultural cooperatives II: Can they facilitate access of small-scale farmers in South Africa to input and product markets?, Agrekon, 46(2), 219–244. DOI:10.1080/03031853.2007.9523769
14.   Koetter, T., Sikder, S. K., & Weiss, D. (2021). The cooperative urban land development model in Germany: An effective instrument to support affordable housing. Land Use Policy, 107, 105481. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105481
15.   Lal, T. (2019). Measuring impact of financial inclusion on rural development through cooperatives. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(3), 352–376. DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-02-2018-0057
16.   Mohammadpour, A. (2025). Counter-method: The philosophical underpinnings and practical procedure of qualitative methodology. Tehran: LOGOS.
17.   Nouri, Z. (2022). Studying the impact of investment in the cooperative sector on employment in Iran (Master’s thesis). Tabriz University. (in Persian)
18.   Novkovic, S., & Golja, T. (2014). Cooperatives and civil society: Potential for local cooperative development in Croatia. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 4(1), 153–169. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5947/jeod.2015.008
19.   Perić, A., Hauller, S., & Kaufmann, D. (2023). Cooperative planning under pro-development urban agenda? A collage of densification practices in Zurich, Switzerland. Habitat International, 140, 102764. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102922
20.   Planix, M. (2016). The rise of community cooperatives: Community cooperatives as a tool for citizens’ participation in urban regeneration projects in Milan (Master’s thesis). University of Milano.
21.   Rastin, J. (2024). Financial discipline and its role in the growth and development of cooperatives. Noval Exploration in Computational Science and Behavioral Management, 2(1), 42–63. DOI: 10.22034/necsbm.2024.448665.1049 (in Persian)
22.   Rojs, D. V., Hawlina, M., Gračner, B., & Ramšak, R. (2020). Review of the participatory and community-based approach in the housing cooperative sector. In Participatory Research and Planning in Practice (pp. 91–106).
23.   Rostami Shahrebabaki, H. (2022). Study of cooperative development and construction companies in cities. Tehran: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour, and Social Welfare. (Research Project Report, in Persian)
24.   Roustakhiz, B., & Kazemi, S. (2023). Analysis of opportunities and challenges facing development and civil counties cooperatives in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Development Strategy, 72(18), 48–91. DOI: 20.1001.1.17352460.1402.18.72.2.1 (in Persian)
25.   Sadeghvaziri, F. (2020). Qualitative research method in brand management. Tehran: Fozhan. (in Persian)
26.   Sajadi, M. S. (2014). Pathology of the macro dimensions of the divestment of state-owned enterprises to compensate for the budget deficit. Public Management, 53–68. (in Persian)
27.   Sánchez-Lezama, A. P., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Albavera-Hernández, C. (2014). Applying the fuzzy Delphi method for determining socio-ecological factors that influence adherence to mammography screening in rural areas of Mexico. Methodological Issues, 30(2), 245–258. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00025113
28.   Silva, M. M., Casta, A., & de Gusmao, P. H. (2014). Continuous cooperation: A proposal using a fuzzy multicriteria sorting method. International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 67–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.022
29.   Sun, B., Xiao, W., Lin, S., Shao, Y., Li, W., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cooperation with partners of differing social experience: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Brain and Cognition, 154, 105798. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105803
30.   Sutton, S. (2019). Cooperative cities: Municipal support for worker cooperatives in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(8), 1081–1102. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2019.1584531
31.   Tesfamariam, K. (2015). Cooperative movement in Ethiopia: Development, challenges and proposed intervention. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(5), 38–45.
32.   Vakil Alroaia, Y., & Eslami Mofid Abadi, H. (2022). Public participation and development foundations in development cooperatives and urban development in Semnan. Cooperation and Agriculture, 11(42), 1–14. DOI: 10.22034/ajcoop.2021.133333 (in Persian)
33.   Zokaei, M. S. (2020). The art of conducting qualitative research: From problem identification to writing. Tehran: Agah. (in Persian)
دوره 17، شماره 65
بهار 1405
صفحه 161-185

  • تاریخ دریافت 04 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 31 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 20 مهر 1404