شناسایی عوامل تجاری‌سازی طرح‌های فناورانه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان نوپا

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 استاد، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

چکیده

شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان با توجه به دارا بودن ظرفیت‌هایی نظیر اقتصاد مبتنی بر دانش بومی و اتکاء به توان علمی و پژوهشی داخلی از ارکان بسترساز توسعه در چارچوب اقتصاد به شمار می‌روند، ولیکن شناسایی و استفاده از ظرفیت‌های شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان به ویژه در تجاری‌سازی طرح‌های فناورانه هنوز مغفول مانده است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی عوامل موثر تجاری‌سازی طرح‌های فناورانه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان نوپا می‌باشد. به این منظور از ترکیبی از روش‌های کیفی و کمی استفاده شده است. در گام نخست معیارهای مهم با مرور ادبیات، بررسی اسناد و مصاحبه با خبرگان متشکل از 20 مدیر ارشد شرکت دانش‌بنیان نوپا مستقر در مرکز رشد پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه شیراز و مشاوره از 2 تن از اساتید دانشگاه شناسایی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی، معیارهای تاثیرگذار در تجاری‌سازی طرح‌های فناورانه و تکنیک روش بهترین- بدترین تعیین شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، توجه به 5 معیار فناوری، مهارت، دانش، بازار و سیاست و قانون برای تجاری‌سازی طرح‌های فناورانه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان نوپا حائز اهمیت می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the factors of commercialization of technological projects in new knowledge-based companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamzeh Aghababayi 1
  • Azim Zarei 2
  • Davoud Feiz 3
1 PhD Student, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
3 Professor, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Today, the role of knowledge, technology and related skills in companies gaining competitive advantages in the market has become increasingly important. Failure to pay attention to the correct process of converting an innovative idea into a suitable technology or product and its entry into the market can turn into a big business failure. Knowledge-based companies, due to having capacities such as an economy based on local knowledge and relying on domestic scientific and research power, are considered as the foundational elements of development in the framework of the economy, but the identification and use of the capacities of knowledge-based companies, especially in the commercialization of technological projects, is still neglected. Is. The purpose of the present research can be presented in this way, which factors are effective in the commercialization of technological projects, especially in new knowledge-based companies, and what is their importance.de a new approach to evaluating organizational strategies
Methodology: The current research is an applied research in terms of its purpose. Also, in terms of how to collect information, a descriptive-survey type of research has been used using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to achieve the research objectives. In order to achieve the desired criteria in explaining the model of commercialization of technological projects in new knowledge-based companies, in addition to collecting and translating articles and texts from the most reliable domestic and foreign scientific databases, from reviewing the documents in some committees for evaluating and approving proposed projects and interviewing Science and technology activists and a group of university professors were used to complete the list of criteria. In the next step, while analyzing the content of the interviews and documents and comparing the criteria with the criteria extracted from the literature in related researches, out of 222 criteria identified, 65 criteria have the highest number of repetitions in 7 financial, technological, cultural, environmental, market, political and Law, knowledge and skills were considered for designing and setting up the questionnaire.
Results and Discussion: This research has two questions:

What factors are effective in the commercialization of technological projects, especially in new knowledge-based companies?
In what order is the importance of the above factors?

In order to calculate the criteria of commercialization of technological projects of new knowledge-based companies, three available sources of literature, interviews and review of documents and plans in recent years were used.
Conclusion: The present research used a mixed method. In the first step, in the qualitative method, in addition to collecting and translating relevant articles and texts, the review of documents in some committees for evaluating and approving proposed projects and interviewing science and technology activists and a group of university professors were used to complete the list of criteria. Is. And after that, BMW has investigated the factors affecting the commercialization of innovative projects in new knowledge-based companies using a quantitative method and calculated the weight of each. While analyzing the content of interviews and documents and comparing the criteria with the criteria extracted from the literature in related researches, out of 222 identified criteria, 46 criteria with the highest number of repetitions in 5 categories of finance, technology, market, policy and law, and knowledge and skills were determined. In order to determine the weight of the criteria and sub-criteria, the fuzzy best-worst method and the paired comparison questionnaire tool based on the mentioned method have been used. The results show that the highest weight belongs to the technology criterion, and then the financial, market, knowledge and skill criteria, and finally politics and law, were given the best to worst weight. Also, in the sub-criteria of each main criterion, production of technological knowledge, risk-taking, government policies, innovation in design and idea have the best weight.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Commercialization
  • Technological designs
  • Knowledge-based companies
  • Technology criterion
  1. Allahyari Fard, N., & Abbasi, R. (2011). A study of the appropriate model of organizational structure of knowledge-based companies. Quarterly journal of parks and growth centers8(33), 05.
  2. Cheraghali, M. R., Sharifzadeh, M. S., & Arabi, A. (2021). Developing a Commercialization Process Model of Knowledge with an International Approach in Knowledge Based Companies. Educational Development of Judishapur11(4), 716-728.
  3. Baek, S. H., & Lee, H. (2019). Effects of Interdisciplinary R&D on Technology Commercialization. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology9(1), 28-37
  4. Bandarian, R. (2013). Strategies for implementation of technology development and commercialization projects at the Research Institute of Oil Industry. Quarterly of Technology Development Management2, 87-101.
  5. Beck, L. (2020). Carbon capture and storage in the USA: the role of US innovation leadership in climate-technology commercialization. Clean Energy4(1), 2-11.
  6. Cheraghali, M. R., Sharifzadeh, M. S., & Arabi, A. (2021). Developing a Commercialization Process Model of Knowledge with an International Approach in Knowledge Based Companies. Educational Development of Judishapur11(4), 716-728
  7. Danesh Fard, K. (2016). Prioritizing the role of basic & supporter knowledge-based structures in the innovation process of knowledge-based companies. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 5(4), 217–248. [In Persian]
  8. DeGeeter, M. J. (2004). Technology commercialization manual: Strategy, tactics, and economics for business success. Med-Launch, Inc.
  9. Dehdashti Shahrokh, Z., Mohammadian Mahmoudi Tabar, M., Taghva, M. R., & Faraj Shoushtari Poor, H. R. (2019). The process model of services commercialization in the knowledge-based companies in information and communication technology industry. Organizational Culture Management17(1), 1-20. [In Persian]
  10. Delavar, A., Mohammadi, M., Salami, S. R., & Manteghi, M. (2012). The Process of Commercialization of the Products with Advanced Technology _A Case Study of Civil Airplanes. Journal of Improvement Management6(1), 81-104. [In Persian]
  11. Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research policy32(2), 333-350.
  12. Goldsmith, H. R. (2003). Model of commercialization, Arkansas small business and technology development center, pp. 1-24, available at: http:/asbdc.ualr.edu
  13. Hajipour, B., Motameni, A., & Tayebi Abolhasani, A. (2017). Meta-synthesis of success factors for commercialize of products with advanced technology. Innovation Management Journal5(4), 19-54. [In Persian]
  14. Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2022). From discovery to commercialization: Accretive intellectual property strategies among small, knowledge-based firms. Small Business Economics58(3), 1367-1377.
  15. Ismail, K., Anuar, M. A., Omar, W. W., Aziz, A. A., Seohod, K., & Akhtar, C. S. (2015). Entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurial orientation of faculty and students towards commercialization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences181, 349-355.
  16. Kakwan, S., & Modiri, M. (2018). Ranking Solutions to Overcome Barriers to the Adoption of Knowledge Management in the Supply Chain Considering a Combined Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach (Case Study: SAPCO Company). Industrial Management Journal10(4), 651-676.
  17. Kim, Y. K., & Park, S. T. (2018). Effects of absorptive capacity on technology innovation and commercialization capacities and management performance. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society9(12), 217-225.
  18. Kumar, V., & Jain, P. K. (2003). Commercialization of new technologies in India: an empirical study of perceptions of technology institutions. Technovation23(2), 113-120.
  19. Laurell, H. (2018). An international new venture’s commercialization of a medical technology innovation: The role of institutional healthcare settings. International Marketing Review35(1), 136-163.
  20. Magnus, K. (2004). Commercialization of research results in the United States. ITPS, Swedish Institute for growth policy studies, 14-15.
  21. Min, J. W., Vonortas, N. S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Commercialization of transferred public technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change138, 10-20.
  22. Plagnol, A. C., Rowley, E., Martin, P., & Livesey, F. (2009). Industry perceptions of barriers to commercialization of regenerative medicine products in the UK. Regenerative Medicine4(4), 549-559.
  23. Pournaghi, R., & Hejazi, A. S. (2018). Investigating factors affecting knowledge commercialization from the viewpoints of postgraduate students of shahid Rajaee University. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34, 686-696.
  24. Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152-9164.
  25. Salehi, T. (2021). The share of knowledge-based companies in competitive production, https://www.iribnews.ir/00D6MB
  26. Salimi, N. (2017). Quality assessment of scientific outputs using the BWM. Scientometrics, 112(1), 195-213.
  27. Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating Firms’ R&D Performance Using Best Worst Method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 147-155
  28. Sanoubar, N., Salmani, B., & Tajvidi, M. (2012). The effect of innovation stimuli on innovation capacity of knowledge-based firms. Journal of Science&Technology Policy, 4(2), 91–107. [In Persian].
  29. Sexton, K. B., & Ligler, F. S. (2018). Strategies to close the gender gap in invention and technology commercialization. Technology & Innovation19(4), 701-706.
  30. Shakeel, S., Takala, J., & Zhu, L. (2017). Commercialization of renewable energy technologies: A ladder building approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 78, 855–867.
  31. Stefan, I., & Bengtsson, L. (2017). Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 252-260.
  32. Taleb Bidokhti, A., & Anvari, A. (2004). Creativity and innovation in humans and organizations. Tadbir Monthly, 152, 21–25. [In Persian].
  33. Tang, X., Wei, G., & Gao, H. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators in multiple attribute decision making for evaluating of emerging technology commercialization. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 1667-1696.
  34. Touhill, C., Joseph, G. J., & O'Riordan, T. A. (2008). Commercialization of Innovative Technologies, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  35. Tran, D. P., Pham, T. T. T., Wolfrum, B., Offenhäusser, A., & Thierry, B. (2018). CMOS-compatible silicon nanowire field-effect transistor biosensor: Technology development toward commercialization. Materials11(5), 785.
  36. Yamada, M., & Prow, T. W. (2020). Physical drug delivery enhancement for aged skin, UV damaged skin and skin cancer: Translation and commercialization. Advanced drug delivery reviews153, 2-17.
  37. Yang, F., & Zhang, H. (2018). The impact of customer orientation on new product development performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(3), 590-607.
  38. Zahedi, A.E., Mirghfoori, S.H., & Morovati Sharif Abadi, A. (2018). An integrated map to developing the innovation and commercialization potential of Iranian knowledge-based companies. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1523345.