تاثیر شاخص کفایت سرمایه بر میزان کارایی و ریسک‌پذیری بانک‌ها

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تأکید بر اجرای الزامات سرمایه‌­ای هم با استفاده از فشارهای قانونی و هم نیروی بازار به منظور افزایش توان بانک‌­ها در مواقع بحران و نیز ابزاری برای کاهش ریسک بانک‌­ها، هدف اصلی قانون‌­گذاران حوزه بانکی است. از سویی نقش بانک­‌ها به عنوان واسطه‌­های پولی، در فعالیت­‌های اقتصادی بر کسی پوشیده نیست. طی دو دهه گذشته صنعت بانکداری در سرتاسر جهان دستخوش تغییرات گسترده­ای گردیده است و نیز عوامل داخلی و خارجی بر ساختار، کارایی و عملکرد تمامی بانک‌­ها تاثیرات زیادی داشته است. در این تحقیق تلاش می­شود تا تاثیر شاخص کفایت سرمایه بر میزان کارایی و ریسک‌­پذیری بانک­‌های اسلامی و متعارف با استفاده از روش کوانتایل برای 51 بانک اسلامی و متعارف در دوره زمانی 2012-2017 مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. نتایج این بررسی نشان می­‌دهد که در گروه بانک­های متعارف، با افزایش کفایت سرمایه، کارایی نیز افزایش می­یابد. همچنین نتایج چندک­‌های مورد بررسی نشان می‌­دهد که در چندک‌­های بالای کارایی، تاثیر کفایت سرمایه بر کارایی افزایش می‌­یابد. به عبارتی با افزایش سطح کارایی، تاثیر کفایت سرمایه بر کارایی نیز افزایش می‌­یابد. همچنین نتایج برآورد برای گروه بانکی اسلامی نیز نشان می­‌دهد که شاخص کفایت سرمایه تاثیر منفی و معناداری بر کارایی بانکی داشته است، اما در نرخ‌­های بالای کارایی، تاثیر منفی شاخص کفایت سرمایه بر کارایی بانکی کاهش یافته است. به عبارتی با افزایش کارایی بانک­‌های اسلامی، تاثیرات منفی کفایت سرمایه نیز کاهش یافته است. همچنین نتایج حاصل از برآورد مدل ریسک برای بانک­های اسلامی نشان می­دهد که مدل دارای عرض از مبدا با علامت مثبت است؛ متغیرهای بانکی شامل نسبت خالص وام به دارایی کل، کفایت سرمایه و دارایی کل، رابطه منفی و معناداری با ریسک بانک‌­های اسلامی دارند و نیز نتایج حاصل از برآورد مدل ریسک برای بانک‌­های متعارف نشان می­دهد که مدل دارای عرض از مبدا با علامت مثبت است؛ متغیرهای بانکی شامل نسبت خالص وام به دارایی کل، کفایت سرمایه و دارایی کل، رابطه منفی و معناداری با ریسک بانک­‌های اسلامی دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact of capital adequate index on banks' efficiency and risk

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somyeh Naserzade 1
  • Asghar Abolhasani 2
  • Bita Shaygani 3
  • Samira Motaghi 4
1 PHD student
2 Professor of Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran
3 Associate Professor of Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran
4 Payame Noor University, Tehran
چکیده [English]

 Introduction: Islamic banking is an emerging research in the field of banking studies. Studies can be further expanded due to the lack of extensive research in this area. In this study, an attempt is made to investigate the effect of capital adequacy index on the efficiency and risk-taking of Islamic and conventional banks for 51 Islamic and conventional banks in the period 2012-2017.
Methodology:  The present article intends to evaluate the effect of capital adequacy on the efficiency and risk-taking of Islamic and conventional banks with an analytical-descriptive approach and examines the role of various indicators in this analysis. The method used in this The research is to provide a model of the quantum method and the software used by Eviews. This study also examined data related to 51 Islamic and conventional banks in 8 countries in the period 2012-2017.
Results and Discussion:   A major part of  literature includes a comparative study of Islamic banking and its conventional counterparts based on their performance and the subject matter of their legislation. Islamic banking and finance have emerged as an attractive field in academic research over the past decade. Islamic countries are among the developing and less developed countries of the global economic community. With financial assets valued at approximately $ 1.8 trillion worldwide, Islamic banking and finance have led to friction between Islamic and non-Islamic financial markets over the past decade. The growing severity of the recurring financial crises seen in the recent financial crises of 2008-2007 has put a lot of pressure on the conventional financial system and put it back under the microscope. While some have turned their attention to methods and tools for resolving instability in an interest-based system, others are looking for alternative financial systems. In this regard, the Islamic financial system seems to offer a promising path to future financial resilience and stability. So far, however, this view has largely been published mainly in professional circles and has recently become the subject of academic research. Islamic financial institutions act as major hubs in about 75 countries, mainly in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Bahrain and Malaysia. Islamic financial products have grown rapidly in recent decades in competition with the conventional financial industry in both Muslim and Muslim minority countries. As a non-competitive industry, the Islamic financial industry is becoming a market that can compete in many countries. The growth of Islamic financial services has attracted a great deal of attention from around the world, with nearly 25 percent of Islamic financial institutions operating in non-Muslim countries; At the same time, the conventional banking system has begun to open the windows of Islamic banking around the world, primarily in Europe and North America.  The results of this study showed that in the conventional banking group, the capital adequacy index had a positive and significant effect on efficiency. According to other results, in the Islamic banking group, the capital adequacy index has a negative and significant effect on banking efficiency.
 Conclusion: The results of this study show that in the group of conventional banks, efficiency also increases with increasing capital adequacy. The results of the studied quantiles also show that in high quantities (rates) of efficiency, the effect of capital adequacy on efficiency increases. In other words, with increasing the level of efficiency, the effect of capital adequacy on efficiency also increases. Also, the estimation results for the Islamic banking group show that the capital adequacy index has a negative and significant effect on banking efficiency, but at high efficiency rates, the negative impact of the capital adequacy index on banking efficiency has decreased. In other words, with the increase in the efficiency of Islamic banks, the negative effects of capital adequacy have decreased. Also, the results of estimating the risk model for Islamic banks show that the model has a width of origin with a positive sign; Banking variables including net loan to total assets ratio, capital adequacy and total assets, have a negative and significant relationship with the risk of Islamic banks and also the results of risk model estimation for conventional banks show that the model has a width of origin. With a positive sign; Banking variables including net loan to total assets ratio, capital adequacy and total assets, have a negative and significant relationship with the risk of Islamic banks.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Islamic Bank
  • Capital adequacy
  • Efficiency
  • Random boundary analysis
  1. Ghosh, S. (2014). Risk, capital and financial crisis: Evidence for GCC banks. Borsa Istanbul Review14(3), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2014.06.003
  2. Ayouzloo, H., & Mismi, H. (2009). Theoretical study of the stability and efficiency of Islamic banking in comparison with conventional banking. Islamic Economics, 8(31), 161-189. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/99817/fa
  3. Mousavian, S. A. (2015). Islamic banking, more stability and efficiency. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Interest-Free Banking, Higher Banking Institute of Iran. .(In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/209546
  4. Alam, N., & Rizvi, S. A. R. (2017). Empirical research in Islamic banking: past, present, and future. Islamic Banking: Growth, Stability and Inclusion, 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45910-3_1
  5. Saberi, M. (2017). Investigating the relationship between auditor reputation and profit management and capital adequacy ratio in the banking sector, Master Thesis. (In Persian)
  6. Talibnia, Q, Ahmadi, M. and Bayat, M. (2014). Investigating the relationship between the quality of accruals and unsystematic risk. Financial Accounting Research, 7(2 (24)), 33-52. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/155103/fa
  7. Rostami, M. R., Nabizadeh, A., & Shahi, Z. (2018). Investigating the factors affecting the credit risk of Iranian commercial banks with emphasis on specific banking and macroeconomic factors. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 4(23), 92-79.(In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22108/amf.2018.105889.1156
  8. Rahmani, T., Mehrara, M., Mohseni Cheraghloo, A., & Shakeri, G. (2018). The effect of the degree of competition in the banking system and capital requirements on the level of riskiness of Iranian banks. Economic Journal, 53(1), 44-25. 22059/JTE.2018.65069
  9. Sepehrdoost, H., & Aini, (2013). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Capital Adequacy Ratio in Iranian Banks during 2006-2010. Journal of Financial Accounting Research. 5(18), 50-35. 1001.1.23223405.1392.5.4.5.4

10.  Samani, H. and Mozafari, F, (2015), Investigating the relationship between capital adequacy and efficiency in Iranian banks during the years (1382-1393), 10th Congress of Pioneers, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/581001

  1. Abusharba, M. T., Triyuwono, I., Ismail, M., & Rahman, A. F. (2013). Determinants of capital adequacy ratio (CAR) in Indonesian Islamic commercial banks. Global review of accounting and finance4(1), 159-170. External Link: http://wbiaus.org/grafjnew.html
  2. Büyükkşalvarcı, A., & Abdioğlu, H. (2011). Determinants of capital adequacy ratio in Turkish Banks: A panel data analysis. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM11.1957
  3. Hasman, A., & Samartín, M. (2017). Capital and liquidity in a dynamic model of banking. Economic Modelling64, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.04.002
  4. Koenker, R. and Hallock, K. (2001) Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143-156.http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.143

15.  Powell, F. (2013), The Politics of Civil Society: Big Society and Small Government (Second Edition). Bristol: Policy Press. £24.99, pp. 236, pbk. Doi:10.1017/s0047279413000937

 

  1. Koenker, R. and Machado, A.F. (1999) Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1296-1310.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473882
  2. Anginer, D., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Zhu, M., 2014, "How does bank competition affect systemic stability?", Journal of Financial Intermediation, V. 23, N. 1, p. 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2020584
  3. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical economics20(2), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
  4. Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of econometrics6(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  5. Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Risk in Islamic banking. Review of Finance17(6), 2035-2096. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs041
  6. Pasiouras, F. (2008). International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting30(2), 187-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0046-7
  7. Chortareas, G. E., Girardone, C., & Ventouri, A. (2012). Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Financial Stability8(4), 292-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2011.12.001
  8. Newey, W. K., & Powell, J. L. (1987). Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 819-847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911031
  9.  
  10. Aggarwal, R., & Jacques, K. T. (1998). Assessing the impact of prompt corrective action on bank capital and risk. Economic Policy Review4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1024839
  11. Alandejani, M., & Asutay, M. (2017). Nonperforming loans in the GCC banking sectors: Does the Islamic finance matter? Research in International Business and Finance42, 832-854. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.020
  12. Avery, R. B., & Berger, A. N. (1991). Risk-based capital and deposit insurance reform. Journal of Banking & Finance15(4-5), 847-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(91)90103-S
  13. Ayadi, R., Naceur, S. B., Casu, B., & Quinn, B. (2016). Does Basel compliance matter for bank performance? Journal of Financial Stability23, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.12.007
  14. Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1992). Measurement and efficiency issues in commercial banking. In Output measurement in the service sectors(245-300). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7237.pdf
  15. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & finance37(2), 433-447. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
  16. Berger, A. N., Bouwman, C. H., Kick, T., & Schaeck, K. (2016). Bank liquidity creation following regulatory interventions and capital support. Journal of Financial Intermediation26, 115-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2016.01.001
  17. Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. (2013). How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of financial economics109(1), 146-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.008
  18. Blum, J. (1999). Do capital adequacy requirements reduce risks in banking? Journal of Banking & Finance23(5), 755-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00113-7
  19. Bonilla, C. A. O. (2011). Macroeconomic Determinants of the Non-Performing Loans in Spain and Italy. University of Leicester(Doctoral dissertation, Thesis in Finance Course).
  20. Cathcart, L., El-Jahel, L., & Jabbour, R. (2015). Can regulators allow banks to set their own capital ratios? Journal of Banking & Finance53, 112-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.11.017
  21. Chiaramonte, L., & Casu, B. (2017). Capital and liquidity ratios and financial distress. Evidence from the European banking industry. The British Accounting Review49(2), 138-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.04.001
  22. Dermine, J. (2015). Basel III leverage ratio requirement and the probability of bank runs. Journal of Banking & Finance53, 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.007
  23. Demirguc‐Kunt, A., Detragiache, E., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Bank capital: Lessons from the financial crisis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking45(6), 1147-1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12047
  24. Flamini, V., McDonald, C. A., & Schumacher, L. B. (2009). The determinants of commercial bank profitability in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Papers2009(015). RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2009/015
  25. Faqih Nasiri, M., Souri, A. R., &Garshasbi, A. (2011). Comparison of the efficiency of Post Bank of Iran supervisors using two non-parametric and parametric methods. Journal of Macroeconomics (Journal of Economic Sciences), Volume 10, Number 2 (39), Pages 151-174. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/150910/fa
  26. Ghosh, A. (2017). Sector-specific analysis of non-performing loans in the US banking system and their macroeconomic impact. Journal of Economics and Business93, 29-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2017.06.002
  27. Greene, W. H. (2002). The behavior of the fixed effects estimator in nonlinear models. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1292651
  28. Gup, B. E., & Kolari, J. W. (2005). Commercial banking: The management of risk. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
  29. Hellmann, T. F., Murdock, K. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation: Are capital requirements enough? American economic review90(1), 147-165. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.1.147Top of Form

 

  1. Iannotta, G., Nocera, G., & Sironi, A. (2007). Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of banking & finance31(7), 2127-2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.013
  2. Jacques, K., & Nigro, P. (1997). Risk-based capital, portfolio risk, and bank capital: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Economics and business49(6), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00038-6
  3. Johnes, J., Izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2009). Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banks: A comparison based on financial ratios and data envelopment analysis. Economics Working Paper Series. The Economics Department, Lancaster University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46455840
  4. Johnes, J., Izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2014). A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004–2009. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization103, S93-S107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.016

 

  1. Khodadad Kashi, F., & Hajian, M. R. (2013). Evaluation of cost efficiency in the Iranian banking industry during the years 2001 to 2007. Quarterly Journal of Planning and Management, 18(1), 3-24. https://sid.ir/paper/241035/fa
  2. Khodadad Kashi, F., Hajian, M. R. (2014). Calculating market power in the Iranian banking industry during 2010-2011. Journal: Economic Modeling Research, 15, 95-116.(In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/790367
  3. Khatibi, Somayeh and Ali Asghar Salem (2015). Assessing the ability of Islamic banks to compete with conventional banks in terms of comparing cost efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 57. https://civilica.com/doc/1407015
  4. Kumbhakar, S. C., Ghosh, S., & McGuckin, J. T. (1991). A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy farms. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics9(3), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391292
  5. Manzoor, D., Rahimi, A. M., & Mohammadi, M. (2009). Islamic Banking in Competition with Conventional Banking, Obstacles and Challenges Ahead. Proceedings of the 19th Islamic Banking Conference.
  6. Manzoor, D., & Yadipour, M. (2009). Adequacy of capital in Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(29), 143-162. https://sid.ir/paper/99722/fa.
  7. Mehrara M., & Mehranfar, M. (2013). Banking performance and macroeconomic factors in risk management. Economic Modeling, 7(1), 37-21. https://sid.ir/paper/176188/fa.
  8. Mehrara, M., & Ramin Abdi (2014). Evaluating the technical efficiency of the Iranian banking industry and determining the factors affecting it; Stochastic boundary models approach. Journal of Economic Sciences, 8(28), 83-105. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1570327
  9. Mansoorian Nezamabad, R., Sheikhi, Kh., & Mahjoub, M. R. (2012). Investigating the effect of accounting financial ratios on capital adequacy ratio in the country's banking network, a case study: commercial, public and private banks. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development), 16(3), 66-44. URL: http://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-5600-fa.html
  10. Reifschneider, D., & Stevenson, R. (1991). Systematic departures from the frontier: a framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. International economic review, 715-723. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527115
  11. Suri, A. R., Garshasbi, A., & Naked, B. (2007). Comparative comparison of the efficiency of Iranian commercial banks using two methods DEA and SFA. New Economy and Trade, 8. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/474627/fa
  12. Shahchera, M., & Jozdani, N. (2015). Diversification of revenues and profitability in the country's banking network. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policy. 14(4), 52-33. URL: http://qjfep.ir/article--332-1-fa.html

 

  1. Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of money, Credit and Banking, 853-882. DOI: 10.1353/mcb.2004.0076
  2. Stiroh, K. J. (2006). A portfolio view of banking with interest and noninterest activities. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1351-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0075
  3. Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2013). Risk, capital and efficiency in Chinese banking. Journal of international financial Markets, Institutions and Money26, 378-393. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2013.07.009
  4. Taybi, K., Omidnejad, M., & Motahari Nejad, A. (2009). Comparison of efficiency of private banks with state-owned banks by parametric method. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 13(41), 1-28. .(In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/682154