حاکمیت شرکتی در سرمایه‌گذاری‌های مشترک بین‌الملل

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی دانشکده مدیریت، علم و فن آوری - دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر

2 دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه تهران

3 کارشناس

چکیده

حاکمیت شرکتی از جمله عوامل کلیدی موفقیت اتحادهای استراتژیک از نوع سرمایه‌گذاری‌های مشترک بین‌المللی به شمار می‌آید. با وجود این سطح از اهمیت، تاکنون در مورد اینکه نظام حاکمیت‏ شرکتی در این نوع از تشکل‌های مشترک چه حالت‌هایی می‌تواند داشته باشد و همچنین هرکدام از این حالت‌ها، خروجی چه عواملی می‌باشند، پژوهش جامعی صورت نگرفته است. به همین دلیل، این مقاله سعی دارد تا ضمن استخراج حالت‌های گوناگون حاکمیت‌‎شرکتی در تشکل‌های یاد شده، عوامل مؤثر و تعیین کننده حالت‌های مذکور را نیز شناسایی نماید. برای دستیابی به هدف فوق با استفاده از روش مرور نظام‌مند، از میان 400 پژوهش منتخب، 60 مقاله مورد بررسی عمیق و نظام‌مند قرار گرفتند. در نهایت نیز 4 حالت حاکمیت شرکتی نرم، سخت، مشارکت‌محور و کنترل‌محور که در سرمایه‌گذاری مشترک ‌بین‌المللی امکان وقوع دارند و همچنین 8 عامل (مانند شرایط محیطی، منطق والدین، منابع تسهیمی، ریسک و...) که بر بودن یا نبودن حالت‌های مذکور تأثیر دارند، به همراه تبیین نحوه این اثرگذاری، شناسایی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Corporate governance in international joint ventures

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hadi Sadegh 1
  • Maryam Parchami sarghein 2
  • Mostafa Ghandi baghbanzadeh 3
1 Department of Management, Science & Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran. Iran
2 PhD of Business Administration- Faculty of Management - University of Tehran.
3 analyst
چکیده [English]

Aim and Introduction: Despite its high complexity, the strategy of forming international joint venture (as one of the main types of strategic alliances) is one of the strategies to be frequently used because of its numerous benefits. Corporate governance is also considered as one of the factors that lead to the successful implementation of this strategy. In spite of the importance of this key success factor which is corporate governance, the lack of a research which has been determined corporate governance different types and recognized the factors which have effect on them is considerable. Therefore, this article intends to first recognize various types of corporate governance in international joint ventures and then distinguish how the determined factors playing role.
Methodology: The present research is conducted based on the systematic literature review method. For this purpose, the related literature was systematically reviewed over a period of one year (from September 2018 to September 2019). In the first step, while determining and specifying the subject of study, the research questions were developed in accordance with the research design. In the next step, the research protocol was designed and an appropriate mental model was designed accordingly. Subsequently, inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined. Accordingly, the comprehensive and systematic search began within the literature and 400 studies were considered. After classification, screening, and measurement of their quality (methodological assessment based on Caldwell's proposed method), 60 studies were finally examined in depth (through a detailed review of their abstracts, introduction, methodology, and results) and the required data were collected. Then, in the last step, the obtained data were classified, codified (using open coding method through Excel software) synthesized and finally summarized.
Findings: Finally, recognition of 4 corporate governance types which are soft, rigid, control based and corporative based, 8 factors (such as environmental factors, risks, shared resources, parent’s logic and etc.) which have effect on determined types presence and the visual illustration of mentioned results, are the main findings of this article.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to the diversity of detected factors, it can be concluded that formation of corporate governance in international joint ventures is a complex process and multi-dimensional concept which cannot be undermined and treated like other types of organizations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "International Joint Venture"
  • "Corporate Governance Types"
  • "Effective factors"
  • "Systematic Literature Review"
  1. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1997). What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 845-864.
  2. Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2012). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide, McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2004). Corporate governance in international joint ventures: Toward a theory of partner preferences, Working Paper, 89-112.
  4. Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. (2012). Multi-party international joint ventures: Multiple post-formation change processes, Journal of World Business, 47(4), 648-663.
  5. Clarke, T. (2004). Theories of corporate governance, The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance,
  6. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework, Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283.
  7. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
  8. Dess, Gregory. Lumpkin, G.T., Eisner, Alan. & McNamara, Gerry. (2013). Strategic management, Text and cases 7th edition, McGraw-Hill.
  9. Etemad, H. (2004). Internationalization of small and medium‐sized enterprises: A grounded theoretical framework and an overview, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 21(1), 1-21.
  10. Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., & Looy, B. V. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application, Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1053-1078.
  11. Freeman, S., Edwards, R., & Schroder, B. (2006). How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization, Journal of International Marketing, 14(3), 33-63.
  12. Guidice, R. M., & Mero, N. P. (2007). Governing joint ventures: Tension among principals’ dominant logic on human motivation and behavior, Journal of Management and Governance, 11(3), 261-283.
  13. Hsieh, L. H., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2014). Revisiting the trustworthiness–performance–governance nexus in international joint ventures, Management International Review, 54(5), 675-705.
  14. Hsieh, L. H., Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2010). Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner, Journal of International Management, 16(3), 288-303.
  15. Killing, P. (1983). Strategies for Joint Venture success, New York: Routledge.
  16. Klijn, E., Reuer, J. J., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2017). Ex-post governance in joint ventures: Determinants of monitoring by JV boards of directors, Long Range Planning.
  17. Krishnan, R., Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust‐based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty, Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2521-2542.
  18. Lojacono, G., Misani, N., & Tallman, S. (2017). Offshoring, local market entry, and the strategic context of cross-border alliances: The impact on the governance mode, International Business Review, 26(3), 435-447.
  19. Lorange, P., & Roos, J. (1993). Strategic alliances, John Wiley and Sons.
  20. Miller, R., Glen, J., Jaspersen, F., & Karmakolias, Y. (1997). International joint ventures in developing countries, Finance and Development, 34(1), 26-29.
  21. Mjoen, H., & Tallman, S. (1997). Control and performance in international joint ventures, Organization Science, 8(3), 257-274.
  22. Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Herrmann, P. (2009). Ownership structure and CEO compensation: Implications for the choice of foreign market entry modes, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 321-338.
  23. Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 92-112.
  24. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms, Management science, 25(9), 833-848.
  25. Park, S. H., and Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure, Organization Science, 12(1), 37-53.
  26. Reuer, J. J., Klijn, E., van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2011). Bringing corporate governance to IJVs, Global Strategy Journal, 1(1‐2), 54-66.
  27. Reuer, J. J., & Miller, K. D. (1997). Agency costs and the performance implications of international joint venture internalization, Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 425-438.
  28. Sadegh, M. H. (2019). Provide a model for the formation of corporate governance for international strategic alliances. Doctorate Thesis. (in Persian)
  29. Sadegh, M. H., Parchami Sarghein, M., & Shahhosseini. M. A. (2020). Determining the corporate governance mechanisms in international joint ventures and recognizing the effective factors. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 43(76), 13-39. (in Persian)
  30. Sadegh, M. H., Shahhosseini, M. A., & Heidari. A. (2020). Extracting the effective factors on corporate governance formation in strategic alliances with focus on international joint ventures through systematic literature review. Business Management, 12(1), 64-93. (in Persian)
  31. Schaan, J. L. F. (1983). Parent control and joint venture success: The case of Mexico, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
  32. Tong, T. W., & Li, S. (2013). The assignment of call option rights between partners in international joint ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 34(10), 1232-1243.
  33. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(2), 204-211.