مدل راهبردی شبکه‌سازی فرآیند تولید، ذخیره‌سازی و بهینه توزیع

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری،‌ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین، ایران.

2 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین، ایران.

3 استاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قزوین، ایران.

4 استادیار، دانشگاه دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

راهبرد شبکه‌سازی از جمله این راه­کارها، برای گذر از چالش‌ها است. مسئله مهم در این پژوهش راهبری امور درون شبکه است. مطابق یافته‌های پژوهش این مهم توسط نمایندگان سازمان با استفاده از تئوری نمایندگی‌ها انجام می‌شود. با استفاده از روش بنیادین-کاربردی؛ مدل این پژوهش در نظر دارد با استفاده از مفاهیم زنجیره تأمین و نظریه نمایندگی‌ها به‌­طور همزمان، الگوی بهره­‌گیری از ظرفیت‌های خارج از مرز سازمان و شبکه نمایندگان صنعتی را برای نیازمندی قطعات در محصول نهایی را ارائه نماید. هدف این رویکرد افزایش مطلوبیت طرفین در رابطه میان نماینده مالک و مشتری است. مدل طراحی شده از انواع مدل‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندهدفه و برای حل آن از روش تصمیم‌گیری چندهدفه فازی استفاده شده است. مطابق نتایج به­دست آمده متوسط مطلوبیت در وضعیت فعلی مناسب نیست با انجام تخصیص بهینه منابع توسط این مدل می‌توان مطلوبیت به حد مناسب رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Strategic model of production network, storage and optimization of distribution process

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Moradi 1
  • Alireza Iradjpour 2
  • Morteza Musakhni 3
  • Mahmood Sheykhhassani 4
1 Ph.D,Student in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Associate, in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 Associate, in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
4 Associate Prof., National Security group of National Security Faculty National Defense Supreme Faculty of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Aim and introduction: The Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics is responsible for the planning, coordination, support, and expansion of the defense power; this ministry is responsible for equipping the defense forces to encounter the possible threats. The ministry has been subject to international sanctions and pressure due to the production of defense industries. It is imperative that the defense industry, following the creation of restrictions that prevent them from carrying out their inherent missions, seeks a change of course in order to maintain the level of its products to meet the needs of its customers. In this regard, it is necessary to know the exact problem and its aspects, to consider a suitable solution in this regard, considering that the defense industry in each country is part of the governing industry, so it is important that this issue is explored centrally. One of the important ways to do this is to use the capabilities and capacities available in networking. This approach is done by creating supply networks, product production, storage, and even timely distribution, outside the organization's borders and is used to use the final product. Network organization is placed between the two ends of the market and the organization. The important issue here is how to get things done in the heart of the network. Based on the findings of this study, this is done by agencies. One of the theories that can explain some of the costs and problems in a variety of financial contracts is agency theory. This theory has been widely used in many fields such as economics, management, finance, accounting, and even politics. This theory is closely related to game theory and deals with issues arising from the conflict of interest in bilateral or multilateral relations. The model seeks to exploit the capabilities of networking to address constraints and crises, taking into account the concepts of supply chain theory and agency theory at the same time as how to use existing capacities and capabilities beyond the organization's boundaries and to organize the network of industrial agencies to supply parts in the final product in accordance with the order of the stakeholders.
Methodology: Based on the findings of this study, this will be done by the representatives of the organization using the theory of agency. The method of this research is fundamental and applied, and the model of this research, considering the concepts of supply chain and agency theory simultaneously, intends to use the strategic model of utilizing existing capabilities beyond the organization's borders and organizing the network of industrial agencies. In this approach, the goal is not only to reduce costs but also to increase the willingness of the parties to the relationship between the owner and the customer. The proposed model is a variety of multi-objective decision-making models and the fuzzy multi-objective decision-making method has been used to solve the model.
Findings: According to the results obtained from the conducted studies, the average utility of the organization is currently 19% of other different parts. Based on the model’s result, it can be said that by changing the resource allocation, the owner utility can be increased by 60%. Therefore, it can be claimed that the method of allocation in this model leads to improvement in the organization’s situation.
Discussion and Conclusion: This study is research, considering the concepts of supply chain and agency theory simultaneously, intends to use the strategic model of utilizing organizing the external network. The conclusion of the research show that increasing the financial resources will not essentially result in the increase in the utility of the members of the supply chain and the actors in the relationship between the owner and the agency but the method of optimal allocation of the resources and proper assignment of the tasks to the agency can increase the satisfaction of the parties of the owner-agency relationship. Therefore, it suggested that the mentioned organization execute the model in the research by using the predicted parameters for the next year and accordingly, regulate the budgeting related to the member of the network. Furthermore, the organization is able to change the input parameters in the center of the different scenarios based on the model’s sensitivity and measure it and make stronger decisions based thereon. In order to conduct the future studies, it is recommended that the researchers who are interested in this topic, measure the effect of the allocation of other resources such as information, knowledge share, equipment and tools and so on in addition to the financial resources and formulate the relationships related to its effectivity on the utility of the members. Also, it is recommended that the future researchers identify the possible scenarios for the future using the integration of the futurism methods and calculate the Pareto solutions by using the proposed model of this research and obtain the final answer of the model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supply chain
  • Defense Industry
  • Agent Theory
  • Multi-objective decision making
  • Networking
  1. Afjeh, S.A.A., Salehi Sadghiani, J., Mahmoudzadeh, E., & Adabi Firoozjaei, M. (2015). Presenting a Model for Determining Organizational Power Strategies (Case study: Business companies of the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics), Journal of Police Management Studies (Police Management Studies), 10(1), In Persian.
  2. Antikchi, S., & Kazemi, S.A. (2014). The effect of knowledge management on downsizing strategies (Case study: Power Data Processing and Water Monitoring Pars Company)”, General Policy in Management (Government Management Mission), 5, 15-16, In Persian.
  3. Amiri, M.K., Feizi, A.M., Fakoor, S., & Olfat, L. (2014). A model of supply chain resilience for competitiveness in Iranain automotive companies, journal of Production and Operation management, 5(1), 143-164.
  4. Ander P., Cruz, E., Borges, I., Oribe, G., Cristina, M., & Anioha, A. V. (2015). Agent based simulations for the estimation of sustainability idicators, procedia omputer Scinence, 12-38.
  5. Basu, P., Liu, Q., & Stallaert, J. (2019). Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57(6), 1772-1796.
  6. Ciliberti, F., De Haan, J., De Groot, G., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2011). CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 885-894.
  7. Christoph, A., Jory, S., Arend, H. (2016). Evolutionary game theory using agent -based metods, Scinence Direct, 52-103.
  8. Christopher, M. (2016). Logestics & supply chain management, Pearson Education Limited, 14-33.
  9. Delbufalo, E. (2018). Agency theory and supply chain management: a literature review. In Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain, Springer, Cham. 12-30.
  10. Ed, M., & Tao, Ch. (2018). Expoloring the rol of spatial cognition in predicting urban traffic flow through agent- based modeling, Transportation Research Part A. 12-37.
  11. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J. & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for grren supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, journal of Cleaner production, 66-83.
  12. Hoor Ali, M., Montazeri, A., & Eliasi, M. (2015). Identifying and prioritizing the principles needed to improve the innovation space of Iranian defense firms with an open approach”, Innovation Management Journal, 4(2), In Persian.
  13. Igor T., Vivient, C., Kamla, S., Galland, J., & Claude, K. (2017). Toward, multilevel agent -based model for traffic simulation, Scinence Directprocedia Computer Scinence, 42-113.
  14. Junior, F.R.L, & Osiro, L. C. R. (2014). Carpinetti, A comparision between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Topsis metods to supplier, Applied Soft Computing, 194-209.
  15. Kar, A.K. (2015). A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy set theory and neural network, journal of Computational Scince, 23-33
  16. Liang, X., Shen, G. Q., & Guo, L. (2019). Optimizing incentive policy of energy-efficiency retrofit in public buildings: a principal-agent model. Sustainability, 34-
  17. Lavayi Adriani, R., Kalantari, Kh., Asadi, A., & Alam Beigi, A. (2019). Content analysis of business-based theories with emphasis on networking functions, Business Management (Management Knowledge), 11(1), In Persian.
  18. Mian Abadi, A.A. (2010). Supply chain management: definition, history, goals, processes, benefits and obstacles, Management Strategy, 13(3), In Persian.
  19. Moghadam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logestics systems under supply and demend uncertainty , Exoert System with Applications, 6237-6254.
  20. Nielsen, I., Banaeian, L., Golinska, P., Mobli, H., & Omid, M. (2004). Green supplier selection criteria: form a literature review to a flexible framework for determination of suitable criteria, in Logestic Operation, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability, springer, 79-99.
  21. Pettit, T., Keely, J., Croxton, L., & Joseph, F. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supplychain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56-65.
  22. Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerablility: an integrated framework, International journal of physical distrbutation & logestics management, 210-232.
  23. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M.C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience, the international journal of logestics Management, 124-143.
  24. Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S., & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 299-314.
  25. Rasouli, M. R., Kusters, R. J., Trienekens, J. J., & Grefen, P. W. (2019). Service orientation in business networking: a demand-supply chain perspective. Production Planning & Control, 2-19.
  26. Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M., & Seuring, S. (2019). System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of cleaner production: 1265-1280.
  27. A.C. Van der Veen, Kisjes, KH. & Nikolc, I. (2017). Expoloring policy impacts for servicing in product-based markets: a generic agent-based model, Journal of Cleaner Production-[4] Ahmad taimoor, Zainab Asif, Fahad Javed, Right-sizing Solar PV and storage for Household Consumer Using Agent-Based Modeling, Scinence DirectEnergy Procedia, 45-67.
  28. Rafal, C., Ziebinski, A., Huczala, L., & Erdogan, H. (2016). Agent -based Manufactoring execution system for short-series production scheduling, Computers in Industry, 47-73.
  29. Safriliana, R., Subroto, B., Subekti, I., & Rahman, A. F. (2019). Overviews of contracting theory & agency theory: determinants public accounting firms switching on voluntary. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 115-186.
  30. Sun, D. Q., Ma, X. Y., Wang, D. J., & Li, J. J. (2019). Principal –agent problem for returns handling in a reverse supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing dealers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 66, 118-140.
  31. Simon, M., Djamila, O., Patrick, B., & Ender, O. (2016). A multi-agent based cooperative approach to scheduling and ruting, European Journal of Operational Research, 12-37.
  32. Theresa, Th., & Kai, N. (2016). Braess’s paradox in an agent-based transport model, Scinence Direct procedia Computer Scinence, 42-78.
  33. Takemura, K. (2019). Nonlinear utility theory and prospect theory: eliminating the paradoxes of linear expected utility theory. In Foundations of Economic Psychology. 83-119.
  34. Yawar, S. A., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 621-643.
  35. Yazan, M., Bai, W., Galland, S., & Christophe, N. (2018). Comparison of agent-based simulation frameworks for unmanned aerial transportation applications, Scinence Directprocedia Computer Scinence, 52-112.