ارزیابی پویای اثربخشی سیاست‌های توسعه سیستم مدیریت ایمنی و بهداشت شغلی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه ایوان‌کی، گرمسار، ایران

چکیده

توسعه سیستم مدیریت ایمنی و بهداشت شغلی در هر سازمان به‌منظور ایجاد محیط کار بدون ترس از حادثه و نیز اجتناب از بیماری‌های شغلی ضروری است. حفاظت از کارگران در مقابل عوارض سوء ناشی از مواجهه با عوامل مخاطره‌زا، نیازمند مداخلات اثربخش پیشگیری در محیط کار و توسعه سیستم مدیریت ایمنی و بهداشت شغلی است. حوادث شغلی، حاصل وجود مجموعه‌ای از موارد ناایمن شامل اعمال و شرایط ناایمن هستند که به همراه عوامل کمک‌کننده دیگر منجر به بروز سوانح و آسیب‌های شغلی می‌شوند. ازاین‌رو درک و فهم ساختار مولد حوادث شغلی با تأکید بر شناسایی روابط فی‌مابین اجزا به نگاهی همه‌جانبه‌نگرانه به‌منظور ایجاد مداخلات لازم ضروری است. همچنین وجود یک سیستم پشتیبان تصمیم به‌منظور ارزیابی مبتنی بر مدل اثربخشی سیاست‌های بهبود سیستم، امکان توسعه اثربخش آن را فراهم می‌نماید. با هدف پاسخ به این نیاز، پژوهش حاضر با به‌کارگیری روش‌شناسی پویایی‌شناسی سیستم، برای مدل شبیه‌سازی حوادث شغلی و بازنمایی روابط اجزا ارائه می‌نماید. همچنین نتایج اجرای سه راه­کار ایجاد مهندسی عوامل انسانی، ایجاد فرهنگ ایمنی و استانداردسازی محیط روی مدل شبیه‌سازی گردید. نتایج نشان ‌می‌دهد سیاست‌های ایجاد فرهنگ ایمنی و مهندسی عوامل انسانی هر دو قدرت بالایی در کاهش حوادث در کوتاه‌مدت دارند اما در بازه زمانی طولانی‌مدت، ایجاد فرهنگ ایمنی، اثربخش‌ترین سیاست توسعه سیستم مدیریت ایمنی و بهداشت شغلی با ایجاد روند نزولی در رخداد حوادث شغلی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Model-Based Assessment of Effectiveness of Occupational Safety and Health Management System’s Policies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Bastan
  • Leila Azizi Baraftabi
  • Alimohammad Ahmadvand
چکیده [English]

The development of occupational safety and health management system is essential for all organization, to create a work environment without fear of incident and to avoid occupational diseases. Protecting workers against adverse effects from exposure to risk factors requires effective workplace prevention interventions and the development of occupational safety and health management systems. Occupational accidents are the result of a range of unsafe situations involving unsafe acts and unsafe conditions that, together with other contributing factors, can lead to injuries. Therefore, understanding and understanding of the work-creating disaster structure, with an emphasis on identifying the relationships between components, is necessary for a comprehensive look at the necessary interventions. Also, there is a decision support system to evaluate the effectiveness model of the system improvement policy, which allows for its effective development. With the aim of responding to this need, the present study presents the dynamic modeling methodology for simulation model of occupational accidents and representation of component relationships. Also, the results of implementing three strategies for creating human factors engineering, creating a safety culture and standardizing based on the environment on the simulation model. The results show that policies for creating a safety culture and human resource engineering have both a high power in reducing disasters, but in the long run, creating a safety culture is the most effective policy for developing a health and safety management system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Unsafe act
  • unsafe condition
  • Safety Culture
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • system dynamics

مراجع

  1. Abbasi, E., Bastan, M. & Ahmadvand, A. (2016). A system dynamics model for mobile banking adoption. The 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IIEC2016), Tehran, Iran.
  2. Altenbach, T.J. (1995). A comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA.
  3. Azizi, L., Bastan, M. & Ahmadvand, A. (2017). Occupational health and safety management system development: a qualitative system dynamics approach. The 13th International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Babolsar, Iran.
  4. Baron-Puda, M. (2015). Occupational risk asssessment in management of health and safety in workplaces. Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem, 18(3), 2-10. doi:
  5. Bastan, M. (2018). Sustainable development of agriculture: a system dynamics model. Kybernetes, 47(1), 142-162. doi:
  6. Bastan, M., & Shakouri, G. (2018). A system dynamics model for policy evaluation of energy dependency. The 2nd IEOM European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
  7. Brauer, R.L. (2016). Safety and health for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Cooper, M.D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety science, 36(2), 111-136. doi:
  9. Cooper, M.D., & Phillips, R.A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of safety research, 35(5), 497-512. doi:
  10. Cunningham, T.R., & Geller, E.S. (2008). Organizational behavior management in health care: applications for large-scale improvements in patient safety. doi:
  11. Erni, W. (2009). Physics performance report for PANDA: strong interaction studies with antiprotons. arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.3905. doi:
  12. Garavan, T.N., & O'Brien. F. (2001). An investigation into the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviours in Irish organisations. Irish Journal of Management, 141, 22(1).
  13. Hall, J.L. (2003). Columbia and challenger: organizational failure at NASA. Space Policy, 19(4), 239-247. doi:
  14. Han, S., S. Lee, & Peña-Mora, F. (2010). System dynamics modeling of a safety culture based on resilience engineering. Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice.
  15. Hopkins, A. (2001) Managing major hazards: the lessons of the Moura mine disaster. Allen & Unwin.
  16. Hoyos, C.G. (1995). Occupational safety: Progress in understanding the basic aspects of safe
  17. Huchler, N., & Sauer. S. (2015). Reflexive and experience-based trust and participatory research: Concept and methods to meet complexity and uncertainty in organisations. International Journal of Action Research, 11. doi:
  18. Hudson, P. (2001). Safety culture-theory andpractice. Leiden univ (netherlands) centre for safety science.
  19. Hynes, T., & Prasad, P. (1997). Patterns of ‘mock bureaucracy’in mining disasters: an analysis of the Westray coal mine explosion. Journal of Management Studies, 34(4), 601-623. doi:
  20. Inspection, A.O.L. (2019). Work-Related accident status in Iran. from https://bazresikar.mcls.gov.ir/fa/workaccident/statistics
  21. Madnick, S., & Lyneis, J. (2008). Preventing accidents and building a culture of safety: Insights from a Simulation Model.
  22. Magnus, R., Teh, C.I., & Lau, J.M. (2004). Report on the incident at the MRT Circle Line worksite that led to the collapse of the Nicoll Highway on 20 April 2004. 2005, Singapore: Ministry of Manpower.
  23. Minami, N.A., & Rhodes, D.H. (2008). Dynamic analysis of the brigade combat team's C2 architecture. Journal of Battlefield Technology, 11(2), 9. doi:
  24. Mohammadfam, I. (2010). Application of safety signs in controling unsafe acts rate. Journal Mil Med, 12(1), 39-44.
  25. Moizer, J.D. (1999). System dynamics modelling of occupational safety: a case study aproach.
  26. Niu, Y. (2019). Towards the “third wave”: An SCO-enabled occupational health and safety management system for construction. Safety Science, 111, 213-223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.013
  27. Radu, L.-D. (2009). Qualitative, semi-quantitative and, quantitative methods for risk assessment: case of the financial audit. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii" Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi-Stiinte Economice, 56, 643-657. doi:
  28. Reason, J. (2016). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge.
  29. Sheridan, T.B. (2008). Risk, human error, and system resilience: fundamental ideas. Human factors, 50(3), 418-426.
  30. Shin, M., (2014). A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers’ safety attitudes and behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 95-105. doi:
  31. Skład, A. (2019). Assessing the impact of processes on the Occupational Safety and Health Management System’s effectiveness using the fuzzy cognitive maps approach. Safety Science, 117, 71-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.021
  32. Sterman, J.D. (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw Hill.
  33. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Austin, J. (2000). Does BBS work. Professional Safety, 45(7), 19.  
  34. Varianou-Mikellidou, C. (2019). Occupational health and safety management in the context of an ageing workforce. Safety Science, 116, 231-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03009.
  35. Wallace, I.G. (1995) Developing effective safety systems. IchemE.
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 11، شماره 41
فروردین 1399
صفحه 175-198

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 تیر 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 16 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 02 مهر 1398
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 30 فروردین 1399

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار