تحلیل فازی شکاف تسهیم دانش با کاربرد آن

نوع مقاله: علمی-

نویسندگان

دانشگاه سمنان

چکیده

     هدف اصلی تحقیق، تجزیه‌وتحلیل شکاف میان تسهیم دانش و کاربرد دانش است. این تحقیق کاربردی با رویکردی فازی در شرکت صنایع شیر ایران-پگاه گیلان صورت گرفته است. در این پژوهش از روش آلفای کرونباخ برای بررسی پایایی و از روش بررسی محتوا برای بررسی روایی استفاده‌ شده است. جنب نوآوری تحقیق را می‌توان بهره‌گیری از منطق فازی برای بررسی شکاف میان تسهیم و کاربرد دانش و ارائه راهکارهای مناسب برای کاهش این شکاف و افزایش سطح دانش به اشتراک گذاشته ‌شده و نیز به‌کارگیری دانش دانست. بر اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده شکاف میان تسهیم دانش و به‌کارگیری دانش در این سازمان بسیار ناچیز و کمتر از 10 درصد است. یافته دیگر بیانگر وجود سطح متوسطی از به اشتراک‌گذاری و کاربرد دانش در این سازمان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Gap Fuzzy Analysis of Sharing with Related Applying Knowledge

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Shafiee Nikabadi
  • Seyed Ali Rouholamini
  • Zahra Safari
Semnan University
چکیده [English]

The main purpose of the study is analyzing the gap between knowledge sharing and knowledge application. This applied study has taken on Iran milk industries - Pegah Gilan company by fuzzy approach. In this study, Cronbach's alpha is used to check the reliability and the Content Analysis Method is used to check the validity. The innovative aspects of the research are using fuzzy logic to measure the gap between knowledge sharing and knowledge application and offering appropriate solutions to reduce the gap and to increase the level of knowledge sharing and applying knowledge. Based on the results, the gap between knowledge sharing and applying knowledge in the organization is minimal and is less than 10 percent. Other findings indicate a moderate level of sharing and application of knowledge in the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Gap Analysis
  • knowledge sharing
  • knowledge application
  • Fuzzy logic
 

1. تارخ، م.، و میرزایی سروکلائی، ر.، و الوندی، ن (1390). بررسی شکاف‌های پیاده‌سازی دستگاه‌های مدیریت دانش با استفاده از تکنیک آنالیز فاصله، مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 9 (25): 84-51.

2. دعائی، ح.، و دهقانی سائیچ، ج (1389). تحلیل شکاف استراتژیک ابعاد مدیریت دانش مؤسسات دانش محور، مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 1 (1): 68-47.

3. شفیعی نیک آبادی، م، و فارسیجانی، ح (1392). مدیریت دانش در زنجیره تأمین، تهران، باور عدالت.

4. Ameri, F., Dutta, D. (2005). Product Lifecycle Management: Closing the Knowledge Loops. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 2(5): 577-590.

5. Bartol, K. M & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies; 9 (1): 64-76.

6. Chakraborty, D. (1975). Optimization in impressive and uncertain environment, Ph.D Thesis, Dept. of Mathematics, IIT Kharagpur.

7. Ching-Torng, L. & Hero Ch. & Po-Young Ch. (2005). Agility index in the supply chain, Int. J. Production Economics Journal, 100: Issue 2.

8. Civi, E. (2000). Knowledge management as a competitive asset: A review Marketing Journal.

9. Davenport, T. H & Prusak, L. (2000). working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know?. Harvard business school press, Boston, MA.

10. Dragoi, G. & Rosu, S.M & Pavaloiu, I.B & Draghici, A. (2013). Knowledge Applications Development at the SMEs Level in a Virtual Bus siness Environment. Procedia Technology Journal; 9: 431 – 441.

11. Hall, R. & Andrian, P. (2002). Managing Knowledge for Innovation. Long Range Planning, from: www. Lrpjournal.com 35(3), 1-25.

12. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Harvard University Press.London.

13. Jacobs, E. & Roodt, G. (2007). The development of a knowledge sharing construct to predict turnover intentions, Emerald Group; 59 (3): 229-248.

14. Liao C. & Chuang, S-H. & To P-L. (2011). How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. Journal of Business Research 64(7), 728-736.

15. Lovrich, N.P. & Pierce, J. C. Jr. (1984). Knowledge gap phenomena effect of situation-specific and transsituational factors. Communication Research Journal, 11 (3): 415-433.

16. Massa, S. & Testa, S. (2009). A knowledge Management approach to Organizational Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the food. Sector European Management Journal, 27, 129-141.

17. McDermott, R. & O'Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming culture barriers to sharing knowledge, Journal of Knowledge Management; 5(1): 76-85.

18. Morgan, N.A. & Zou, S. & Vorhies, D.W. & Katsikeas, C.S. (2003). Experiential & informational knowledge, architectural marketing capabilities & the adaptive performance of export ventures: A cross-national study. Decision Sciences Journal, 34 (2). 287-321.

19. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review; 23(2): 242-266.

20. Nevo, D. & Chan, Y. E. (2007). A Delphi of knowledge Management Systems: Scope of Requirements. Information & Management Journal, 44 (6). 583-597.

21. Ngai, E.W.T. & Chan, E.W.C. (2005). Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications Journal, 29: 889–899.

22. Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, November-December: 96-104.

23. Nonaka, I. & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review; 40(3): 40-54.

24. Nonaka, I. &Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.

25. O'Leary, D. (1999). Using AI in Knowledge Management: Knowledge bases & Anthologies. the Knowledge Management Yearbook. Butterworth-Heinemann Journal.

26. Polany, M. (1997). The Tacit Dimension, in: Laurence Prusak (ed), Knowledge in Organizations. Butterworth-Heinemann Journal, Newton, MA.

27. Sarvari, M. (1999). Knowledge Management & Competition in the Consulting Industry. California Management Review, 41 (2). 95-107.

28. Seemann, P. & De Long, D. & Stucky, S. & Guthrie, E. (1999). Building intangible assets:a strategic frame work for investing in intellectual capital PAKeM99 Proceedings. The Practical Application Company Ltd, 229

29. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Currency/Doubleday Journal, New York, NY.

30. Sharma, P. (2004). Knowledge management. India: APH Publishing Corporation.

31. Sousa, C. A. A. & Hendriks, P. H. J. (2006). The Diving bell & the Butterfly the need for grounded theory in developing Knowledge based view of Organizations. Organizational Research Methods Journal. 9 (3). 315-339.

32. Stenmark, D. (2000). Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems; 17: 9-24.

33. Teece, D.J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets. California Management Review, 40 (3): 55-79.

34. Yen, J., Langari, R. (1999). Fuzzy Logic Intelligence, Control, and Information, Prentice Hall Publishing Company.

35. Zack, M. H. (2002). Developing a knowledge strategy. In C.W.Choo, N. Bontis, The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, 255-277

36. Zadeh, L.A., (1975). The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Inform. Sci. (8): 199–249, 310–357, (9): 43–80.

37- Zadeh, L.A., (1987). Fuzzy sets, usuality and common-sense reasoning, in: L.M. Vaina (Ed), Matters of Intelligence. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp:289–309