تأثیر چابکی راهبردی بر پاسخگویی عملیاتی و عملکرد سازمانی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تاثیر چابکی راهبردی بر عملکرد سازمانی از طریق پاسخگویی عملیاتی شرکت­‌های تولیدی بزرگ استان خوزستان، انجام شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کاربردی را 180 شرکت­ تولیدی بزرگ استان خوزستان تشکیل می­دهد. واحد آماری جامعه، مدیران عملیاتی/ مالی/بازاریابی آن شرکت­هاست که 122 شرکت با استفاده از فرمول کوکران برای جوامع محدود، به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد و پرسشنامه­‌ای در اختیار مدیر عملیاتی/ مالی/بازاریابی هر یک از شرکت­‌ها قرار گرفت. ابزار جمع­آوری داده‌­ها، پرسشنامه شین و همکاران (2015) است که روایی محتوایی آن را خبرگان و اساتید دانشگاهی تأیید کردند و روایی سازه آن، از طریق تحلیل عاملی تأییدی بررسی شد. تحلیل داده­‌ها و آزمون فرضیه­‌ها با بهره گرفتن از نرم‌­افزار22  SPSS و روش معادلات ساختاری صورت پذیرفت. نتایج نشان داد چابکی راهبردی بطور مستقیم و غیرمستقیم (از طریق پاسخگویی عملیاتی)، عملکرد سازمانی را بهبود می­‌بخشد. چابکی راهبردی، پاسخگویی عملیاتی سازمانی را افزایش می‌­دهد. همچنین، پاسخگویی عملیاتی موجب ارتقا عملکرد سازمانی می‌­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact of strategic agility on operational responsiveness and organizational performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Belghis Bavarsad
  • Abdoul Hosien Nias
  • Pegah Darabian
Shahid Chamran Univercity of Ahvaz
چکیده [English]

: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the impact of strategic agility on organizational performance with mediate role operational responsiveness in large manufacturing firms in Khuzestan province. The population of this applied research consisted of 180 manufacturing firms and with using Cochran's formula for limited society, 123 firms were selected. Statistical unit of society were manufacturing/operation managers of said firms and research questionnaire was distributed to them for each firm. The data collection instrument is Shin (2015) questionnaire, which its content validity was evaluated through experts and academics and its construct validity was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis. Structural equation models and SPSS 22 have been used in order to analysis the data. The results showed that, strategic agility have a positive and direct impact and also indirect impact through operational responsiveness on organizational performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • strategic agility
  • organizational performance
  • operational responsiveness

مراجع

  1. Alhadid, A., Y. (2013). The effect of organization agility on organization performance. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(1), 173-278.
  2. Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness.  International Business Review, 26(2), 324-336.
  3. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A., (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
  5. Bolívar-Ramos, M.T., García-Morales, V.J. Encarnación García-Sánchez, E.G. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331-452.
  6. Brannen, M.Y., Doz, Y.L. (2012). Corporate languages and strategic agility: trapped in your jargon or lost in translation? California Management Review, 54 (3), 77-97.
  7. Braunscheidel, M.J., Suresh, N.C., (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (2), 119-140.
  8. Büyüközkan, G., Kayakutlu, G. & Karakadilar. İ. S. (2015). Assessment of lean manufacturing effect on business performance using Bayesian Belief Networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (19), 6539–6551.
  9. Capon, N., Farley, J.U., Hoeing, S., (1990). Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis. Management Science, 36 (10), 1143-1159.
  10. Choi, T.Y., Krause, D.R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction Page | 28 costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (5), 637-652.
  11. Divesh, O. (2008): Impact of strategic agility on competitive capabilities and financial performance; in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy management.
  12. Fang, E., A.  Li, X., Lu, J. (2016). Effects of organizational learning on process technology and operations performance in mass customizers. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 68–75.
  13. Goodman, P., Fichman, M., Lerch, F., Snyder, P. (1995). Customer-firm relationships, involvement, and customer satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (5), 1310-1324.
  14. Hazen, B.T., Bradley, R.V., Bell, J.E., In, J., Byrd, T.A., (2017). Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 96-108.
  15. Inman, R.A., Sale, R.S., Green Jr., K.W., Whitten, D. (2011). Agile manufacturing: relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29 (4), 343-335.
  16. Jannati Mashkani, A., & khodadadit, M. (2016). The mediating role of organizational agility in the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance (Case Study: the subsidiaries of Isfahan city General Tax Office). International Business Management, 10(16), 3530-3535.
  17. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417.
  18. Juan, G, Cegarra, N., Pedro Soto, A., Anthony K.P. (2015). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 6.
  19. Kaplan, M., Ögut, A., Mehmet, D. & Kaplan, A. (2014). The Relationship between organizational learning and financial performance: A study of small-sized businesses in turkey. Journal of WEI Business and Economics-August, 3(2).
  20. Kirk, D., (2001). Technology; in Korea, broadband is part of the culture. The New York Times, October, 29.
  21. Kumar Potdar, P., Routroy, S., & Behera, A. (2017). A benchmarking approach for enhancing agility in manufacturing environment. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 20(4), 488-512.
  22. Kuo, S., Y. Lin, P., C. Lu, C., S. (2017). The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping, Transportation Research Part A, 95, 356-371.
  23. Lee, H.L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, October, 2-11.
  24. Lengnick-Hall, C.A. and Beck, T. E. (2009). Resilience capacity and strategic agility: Prerequisites for thriving in a dynamic environment, In C. Nemeth, E. Hollnagel, and S. Dekker (Eds.). Resilience engineering perspectives, 2, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  25. Li, X., Chung, C., Goldsby, T.J., Clyde, W. H., (2008). A unified model of supply chain agility: the work‐design perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3), 408-435.
  26. Luo, Y., Park, S.H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2), 141-155.
  27. Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2005). An exploratory study of manufacturing practice and performance interrelationships: Implications for capability progression. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9/10), 1013–1033.
  28. Nawanir, G., Kong Teong, L., & Norezam Othman, S. (2013). Impact of lean practices on operations performance and business performance: some evidence from Indonesian manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(7), 1019-1050.
  29. Okotoh, A., K. (2015).  Influence of organizational agility on operational performance of trademark east Africa. M.A. Project, University of Nairobi.
  30. Ploy, S., o. (2011) Impact of agile manufacturing on Thailand automotive performance and competitive advantage; Published in '25th Annual Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference Proceedings.
  31. Prajogo, D., Toy, J., Bhattacharya, A., Oke, A., Cheng, and T.C.E., (2018). The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts, International Journal of Production Economics doi: 10.1016/ j.ijpe.2018.02.019.
  32. Queiroz, Magno J; Tallon, Paul P; Sharma, Rajeev; Coltman, Tim (2018). The role of IT application orchestration capability in improving agility and performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 4-21.
  33. Ramasesh, R., Kulkarni, S., Jayakumar, M., (2001). Agility in manufacturing systems: an exploratory modeling framework and simulation. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12 (7), 534-548.
  34. Ranft, A.L., Lord, M.D., (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13 (4), 420-441.
  35. Rappaport, A. (1987). Stock market signals to managers. Harvard Business Review, 65(6), 63-76.
  36. Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. In Press.
  37. Roberts, N., Grover, V., (2012). Investigating firm’s customer agility and firm performance: the importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 65 (5), 579585.
  38. Saberrad, Lila. (2016). Investigating the impact of lean production practices on operational performance and business performance. Mater Desertation, Sahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. (In Persian) 
  39. Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J.K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 445–460.
  40. Shin, H., Nam, J., DaeSoo, L., Hosun Rhim, K. (2015). Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 181-196.
  41. Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S., Murthy, N., (2006)a. A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26 (2), 118-140.
  42. Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A., (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35 (2), 463-486.
  43. Torres, R., Sidorova, A., Jones, M.C. (2018) Enabling Firm Performance through Business Intelligence and Analytics: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Information and Management, Available online 3 April 2018.
  44. Vickery, S.K., Droge, C., Setia, P., Sambarmurthy, V., (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organizational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (23), 7025-7042.
  45. Whitten, G.D., Green Jr. K.W., Zelbst, P.J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32 (1), 28-48.
  46. Wu, S., J. Melnyk, S., J. & Flynn, B., B. (2010). Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 721-654.
  47. Yusuf, Y.Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., Dauda, M., El-Berishy, N.M., & Cang, S. (2014). A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 531–543.
  48. Zelbst, P. J., Green, K. W., Abshire, R. D., & Sower, V. E. (2010). Relationships among market orientation, JIT, TQM, and agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(5), 637-658.
  49. Zhang, Z. & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(4), 496–513.
  50. Zhang, C., S. T. Cavusgil, & A. S. Roath. (2003). Manufacturing Governance of Foreign Distributor Relationships: Do Relational Norms Enhance Competitiveness in the Export Market? Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (6), 550–566
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 9، شماره 36
اسفند 1397
صفحه 65-83

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 05 تیر 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 اردیبهشت 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 30 دی 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار