فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تاثیر تعهد سازمانی بر کارآفرینی فرهنگی با رویکرد سرمایه اجتماعی در کسب وکارهای نوپای فرهنگی- هنری

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
2 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
3 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
4 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
چکیده
  هدف  پژوهش، تبیین تاثیر تعهد سازمانی بر کارآفرینی فرهنگی در کسب‌وکارهای نوپای فرهنگی- هنری و بررسی اثرات متغیر تعدیل گر سرمایه اجتماعی بر تعهد سازمانی می‌یاشد. کارآفرینی فرهنگی فرآیندی است که از رهگذر خلاقیت، ایجاد معنا، و بازتعریف نمادهای فرهنگی، به خلق ارزش‌های اقتصادی و اجتماعی می‌انجامد. به این منظور روش اجرای تحقیق از نوع توصیفی-همبستگی است و جامعه آماری پژوهش تمامی کارکنان کسب و کارهای نوپای فرهنگی- هنری تهران است. نمونه آماری تعداد 356 نفر است به صورت تصادفی انتخاب شده‌اند و با استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه، داده‌های مورد نیاز جمع‌آوری شده است. پایایی پرسشنامه استاندارد تعهد سازمانی آلن و مایر با آلفای کرونباخ 71/0 و پایایی پرسشنامه استاندارد لامپکین و دس با آلفای کرونباخ 8/0 و پایایی پرسشنامه استاندارد سرمایه اجتماعی ناهاپیت و گوشال با آلفای کرونباخ 9/0 محاسبه شده است که از اعتبار بالایی برخوردارند. روش تحلیل آماری به کار رفته در این پژوهش smart pls می‌باشد. نتایج نشان می‌دهند ارتباط مثبت و معناداری بین تعهد سازمانی با ابعاد کارآفرینی فرهنگی وجود دارد، همچنین نتایج حاکی از آن است که متغیر سرمایه اجتماعی شدت اثر تعهد سازمانی بر کارآفرینی فرهنگی را افزایش می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The impact of organizational commitment on cultural entrepreneurship with a social capital approach in cultural–artistic startups

نویسندگان English

Saniye Darabiyan 1
Abbas Ali Rastgar 2
Davood Feiz 3
Azim Zarei 4
1 Ph.D student, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
3 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
4 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: In recent decades, new approaches in the field of cultural economics and human resource management have turned cultural entrepreneurship into one of the fundamental strategies for social development and identity formation in contemporary societies. Cultural entrepreneurship is a process that, through creativity, meaning creation, and the redefinition of cultural symbols, leads to the creation of economic and social values. In addition to generating value, this process functions as an engine for cultural continuity and adaptive transformation, allowing societies to reinterpret their cultural heritage in ways that align with current technological, economic, and communicative realities. As global cultural industries expand, the strategic importance of cultural entrepreneurship has increased, highlighting the need for organizations—especially cultural and artistic startups—to cultivate internal capacities that support sustained innovation. Organizational commitment, as one of the fundamental constructs of organizational behavior, plays a decisive role in strengthening motivation, creativity, and the sustainability of cultural entrepreneurship. Research has shown that increasing organizational commitment, especially of the affective type, is associated with the growth of job satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and cultural innovation. Social capital acts as a complementary and reinforcing construct in this relationship. The presence of shared norms, trust, and strong interpersonal relationships within an organization can dramatically enhance the willingness of employees to contribute their cultural knowledge, creative insights, and innovative practices to collective projects. These interactions also support the formation of a shared cultural identity, which is a crucial precondition for effective cultural entrepreneurship. The combination of organizational commitment and social capital, in fact, creates a pattern of psychological and social synergy that leads to the enhancement of cultural entrepreneurship. Committed employees, with belief in the organization’s cultural mission, in an atmosphere full of trust and constructive communication, are able to develop new ideas, fresh cultural narratives, and creative actions that strengthen innovation, risk taking, and a proactive cultural orientation. This synergy also promotes a climate where individuals feel empowered to experiment with new cultural forms, collaborate across disciplines, and take calculated risks in the creation of artistic content, digital products, and culturally relevant services. As a result, the organization as a whole gains greater adaptive capacity and a higher degree of resilience in the face of environmental changes. Considering the research gap regarding the explanation of the effect of organizational commitment on the components of cultural entrepreneurship with a social capital approach, the present study has sought to examine the mechanisms of this relationship and to show how social capital can, in the context of cultural organizations, strengthen the effect of organizational commitment on innovation and the sustainability of cultural entrepreneurship. This study contributes to the existing literature by integrating perspectives from organizational behavior, cultural economics, and entrepreneurship, and by focusing on cultural-artistic startups as a unique and rapidly growing domain that has received relatively limited empirical attention.
Methodology: The present study is applied in terms of its objective and falls under descriptive-correlational research regarding the method of data collection. The statistical population of this study includes cultural-artistic startups in Iran, which encompass artistic startups, digital content production companies, and cultural video game production companies, with a total estimated number of 356 individuals. In this research, simple random sampling is employed, and the sample size is calculated to be 185 individuals using Cochran’s formula. The main measurement tool for this study is a questionnaire, utilizing a Likert scale for measurement. Additionally, Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis are used to determine the type of relationship between the two variables. The statistical analysis method employed in this research is Smart PLS. This methodological approach enables the identification of latent relationships, reliability of constructs, and structural pathways that clarify how organizational commitment interacts with social capital to affect cultural entrepreneurship.
Results and Discussion: The results obtained from structural equations indicate that organizational commitment has a significant impact on cultural entrepreneurship. Therefore, there is a positive and meaningful relationship between organizational commitment and cultural entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the results show that: There is a positive and significant relationship between organizational commitment and innovation. There are also positive and significant relationships between organizational commitment and both aggressive approaches and risk-taking. In addition, the statistical analysis results indicate that social capital, as a moderating variable, has been able to moderate the relationship between organizational commitment and cultural entrepreneurship. This result implies that in conditions where social capital is at a high level, the relationship between organizational commitment and cultural entrepreneurship will be stronger and more positive. These findings underscore the importance of interpersonal networks, shared cultural values, and collaborative environments in driving entrepreneurial momentum within cultural industries.
Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that organizational commitment exerts a significant and positive impact on cultural entrepreneurship, particularly when reinforced by high levels of social capital. The findings confirm that affective organizational commitment is positively associated with innovation, proactive approaches, and risk taking behaviors, all of which are critical for sustaining cultural entrepreneurship in cultural–artistic startups. Moreover, social capital serves as a powerful moderating factor, amplifying the relationship between organizational commitment and cultural entrepreneurship under conditions of strong interpersonal trust and collaborative networks. These results offer clear implications for managers and policymakers: fostering an organizational culture that builds trust, strengthens collective identity, and aligns employees with the organization’s cultural mission can substantially enhance entrepreneurial performance in the cultural sector. Future research should extend this work by examining longitudinal effects, exploring commercialization processes, and assessing the interplay of additional sociopsychological variables such as resilience within the organizational commitment–cultural entrepreneurship nexus. Additionally, investigating cross-cultural differences and digital transformation trends may provide deeper insights into how cultural entrepreneurship evolves in emerging creative economies.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Affective commitment
Innovation
Proaciveness
Risk-taking
The social capital approach
1.      Akomea, S. Y., Agyapong, A., Aidoo, S. O., & Kyei, S. M. (2023). The roles of social capital, entrepreneurial orientation and competitive intensity in managerial capability and performance relationship: Evidence from an emerging market economy. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-04-2022-0073
2.      Álvarez-Castañón, L. d. C., Montiel Méndez, O. J., & Alvarado, A. A. (2022). Innovation in Latin America: An eternal recurrence? In O. J. Montiel Méndez & A. A. Alvarado (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of entrepreneurship in Latin America (pp. 105–109). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-955-220221008
3.      AlMazrouei, H. (2023). Empowerment leadership as a predictor of expatriates’ job performance and creative work involvement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(3), 837–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2021-2769
4.      Ametepe, P. K., Otuaga, E. U., Nnaji, C. F., & Arilesere, M. S. (2023). The moderating role of workplace ostracism between employee training, employee participation and organizational commitment among bank employees. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-11-2022-0249
5.      Amin, A., Ali, R., Ur Rehman, R., & Ntim, C. G. (2023). CEO personal characteristics and firms’ risk-taking behaviour: The moderating role of family ownership. Gender in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2022-0034
6.      Arora, T. S., & Gill, S. (2022). Impact of executive compensation on corporate tax aggressiveness: Evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 48(6), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2021-0306
7.      Bashir, M., & Pradhan, S. (2023). The influence of knowledge-oriented leadership on business model innovation and open innovation: Mediating role of absorptive capacity. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2022-1481
8.      Benhayoun, L., Le-Dain, M.-A., Saikouk, T., Schiele, H., & Calvi, R. (2023). Supplier involvement in NPD projects: The buyer’s perspective on the complementary roles of social capital and social exchange for project performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2022-0222
9.      Bonyadi, E., & Sarreshtehdari, L. (2021). The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI): A critical review. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 11, 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-021-00302-0
10.   Boohene, R., Gyimah, R. A., & Osei, M. B. (2020). Social capital and SME performance: The moderating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2018-0103
11.   Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press
12.   Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Jia, R. (2022). Entrepreneurship as cultural theme in neoliberal society. In R. N. Eberhart, M. Lounsbury, & H. E. Aldrich (Eds.), Entrepreneurialism and society: New theoretical perspectives, 81,55–75. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000081004
13.   Castro-Abancéns, I., Casanueva, C., & Gallego, Á. (2023). The spectrum of inter-organizational relationships and social capital mobilization of MNEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-03-2023-0043
14.   Chetty, R., Jackson, M. O., Kuchler, T., Stroebel, J., Hendren, N., et al. (2022). Social capital I: Measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature, 608(7921), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4
15.   Clarke, J., & Healey, M. P. (2022). Giving voice to persuasion: Embodiment, the voice and cultural entrepreneurship. In C. Lockwood & J.-F. Soublière (Eds.), Advances in cultural entrepreneurship (Vol. 80, pp. 37–56). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000080003
16.   Dencik, J., Fisher, L.-G., Higgins, L., Lipp, A., Marshall, A., & Palmer, K. (2023). Factors that make open innovation more successful than traditional approaches. Strategy & Leadership, 51(5), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-05-2023-0057
17.   Dunger, S. (2023). Culture meets commitment: How organizational culture influences affective commitment. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 26(1/2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-09-2022-0173
18.   Gehman, J., & Wry, T. (2022). Cultural entrepreneurship: Theorizing the dark sides. In C. Lockwood & J.-F. Soublière (Eds.), Advances in cultural entrepreneurship (Vol. 80, pp. 97–110). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000080007
19.   Hsu, Y. H., et al. (2025). Social capital and job performance: A moderated mediation model. Behavioural Sciences, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030041
20.   Hjorth, D. (2022). Toward a more cultural understanding of entrepreneurship. In C. Lockwood & J.-F. Soublière (Eds.), Advances in cultural entrepreneurship (Vol. 80, pp. 81–96). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000080006
21.   Ilyas, S., Abid, G., & Ashfaq, F. (2023). The impact of perceived organizational support on professional commitment. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(7/8), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2022-0170
22.   Jha, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2023). Entrepreneurial satisfaction for women micro-entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-023-00351-7
23.   Jin, D., Shen, H., Wang, H., & Yin, D. (2023). Do state tax changes affect corporate tax aggressiveness? Pacific Accounting Review, 35(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-09-2021-0156
24.   Junça-Silva, A., Duarte, H., & Santos, S. C. (2023). Personal initiative, risk-taking, creativity and opportunity discovery among students. Journal of Enterprising Communities. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2022-0150
25.   Jouber, H. (2023). Boardroom gender diversity and risk-taking in the insurance industry. Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2023-0002
26.   Khan, S. H., Majid, A., Yasir, M., Javed, A., & Shah, H. A. (2021). The role of social capital in augmenting strategic renewal of SMEs. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-04-2020-0029
27.   Lambert, E., Liu, J., & Jiang, S. (2023). Research note – organizational justice and commitment in Chinese police. Policing: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2022-0156
28.   Loan, L. (2020). The influence of organizational commitment on employees’ job performance. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3307–3312. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.025
29.   Lockwood, C., & Soublière, J.-F. (2022). Two advances in cultural entrepreneurship research. Advances in cultural entrepreneurship 80, 3–14. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000080001
30.   Lyu, J., Shepherd, D. M., & Lee, K. (2021). Teaching entrepreneurship in China: Culture matters. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(5), 1285–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2020-0653
31.   Marchalina, L., Ahmad, H., & Gelaidan, H. M. (2021). Employees’ commitment to change. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 37(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-11-2018-0131
32.   Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2004). TCM employee commitment survey academic users guide 2004. University of Western Ontario. (No DOI)
33.   Minja, J. J., Charles, G., & Mbura, O. K. (2023). Co-production of entrepreneurship training programmes. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 13, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-023-00349-1
34.   Nguyen Quoc, A., Nguyen Van, D., & Nguyen, N. N. A. (2023). Entrepreneurship, family and migration. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 17(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2020-0042
35.   Qin, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). Impact of multiple commitments on open innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1992–2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2022-0454
36.   Rahayu, M. J., Mukaromah, H., & Mulyanto, M. (2023). Social capital-based strategy of sustainable BUMDes development. International Journal of Social Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2022-0700
37.   Ranaei Kordshouli, H. A., & Maleki, B. (2023). Entrepreneurship motivation and institutions: System dynamics and scenario planning. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 13, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-023-00348-2
38.   Serhan, C., Nehmeh, N., & Sioufi, I. (2022). Organizational commitment and turnover intentions among Islamic bank employees. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0008
39.   Shamil, M. M., Gooneratne, D. W., Gunathilaka, D., & Shaikh, J. M. (2023). Board characteristics and tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2022-0224
40.   Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
41.   Soomro, B. A., Zehri, A. W., Anwar, S., Abdelwahed, N. A. A., & Shah, N. (2023). Corporate cultural factors and employees’ organizational commitment. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-12-2021-0459
42.   Than, S. T., Le, P. B., & Le, T. T. (2023). High-commitment HRM practices and innovation: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(3), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2020-0196
43.   Tseng, H.-T., Jia, S. (J)., Nisar, T. M., & Hajli, N. (2023). Big data analytics and innovation performance. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2022-0237
44.   Truong, B. T. T., Nguyen, P. V., Vrontis, D., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2023). Intellectual capital, knowledge management and environmental compliance. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0389
45.   Tran, Q. H. N. (2023). Work–family interfaces, organizational commitment, organizational justice and occupational stress in Vietnamese state organizations. Industrial and Commercial Training, 55(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-01-2022-0006
46.   Wiers, J., & Chabaud, D. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 12, 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-022-00335-z
47.   Zubair, A. K. I., & Olaolu, E. O. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and government policy: The catalysts for SME performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, Environmental Studies & Technology, 6(1), 77–96. (No DOI)

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 22 آذر 1404