فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

رهبری اخلاقی و عملکرد شرکت با میانجی مسئولیت اجتماعی و شهرت شرکت

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکده اقتصاد،مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه آموزش معارف اسلامی دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
4 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
چکیده
سبک رهبری اخلاقی نقشی برجسته در ارتقاء مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت نسبت به کارکنان، مشتریان و جامعه ایفا می‌کند. این ارتقاء می‌تواند به‌طور مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر شهرت و عملکرد شرکت تأثیرگذار باشد. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر رهبری اخلاقی بر عملکرد شرکت با توجه به نقش میانجی مسئولیت اجتماعی و شهرت شرکت است. وش پژوهش توصیفی-پیمایشی و از نوع کاربردی بوده و جامعه آماری شامل کارکنان بخش مالی شرکت‌های خصوصی واقع در شهرک صنعتی استان یزد می‌باشد. بر اساس جدول کوکران-مورگان، ۲۷۸ نفر، نمونه نهایی انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه گردآوری شده و برای تحلیل داده‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Smart PLS بهره گرفته شده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد رهبری اخلاقی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر عملکرد شرکت دارد. همچنین، رهبری اخلاقی به‌طور معنادار موجب افزایش مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت شده و این مسئولیت اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر شهرت شرکت دارد. افزون بر این، یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که شهرت و مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت به‌طور معناداری بر عملکرد شرکت اثرگذار هستند. با این حال، نقش میانجی شهرت شرکت در رابطه بین مسئولیت اجتماعی و عملکرد شرکت و همچنین نقش میانجی مسئولیت اجتماعی در رابطه بین رهبری اخلاقی و عملکرد شرکت تأیید نشده است. در نهایت، مسئولیت اجتماعی  یکی از پیش‌شرط‌های موفقیت کسب‌وکار شناخته می‌شود که می‌تواند رشد و توسعه همه‌جانبه و بهبود عملکرد شرکت را به‌دنبال داشته باشد. بر این اساس، پیشنهاد می‌شود رهبران سازمانی به پیاده‌سازی جدی و منسجم مسئولیت اجتماعی توجه نموده و آن را در اولویت راهبردی شرکت قرار دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Ethical leadership and firm performance by corporate social responsibility and firm reputation

نویسندگان English

Abdolsattar Torshabi 1
Zohreh Arefmanesh 2
MohammadMahdi Dehghani Ashkezari 3
MohammadMahdi Bozorg 4
1 MA. graduated, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
4 PhD student, Faculty of Economics, management and Accounting, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: One of the factors that can influence a company's performance is its leadership style. An appropriate leadership style can enhance customer satisfaction by fostering strong morale and motivation among employees, improving their job satisfaction, and ultimately boosting the company's performance. Among various leadership styles, ethical leadership is increasingly recognized as a key tool through which leaders can positively impact company performance. The purpose of this research is to determine whether ethical leadership affects company performance through the mediating roles of social responsibility and company reputation.
Methodology: This research follows a descriptive survey approach of an applied nature. The statistical population consists of employees from the financial departments of companies located in the industrial town of Yazd province. Out of the 1,000 employees in the financial departments, 278 individuals were selected as the final sample using the Cochran-Morgan table. Data was collected using a questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale. To examine the causal relationships between variables, structural equation modeling was employed using Smart PLS software. The reliability of the data was confirmed with an average Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.82, and the KMO index was 72.20%, indicating that the validity and reliability of the research were well-established.
Results and Discussion: The results of the first hypothesis suggest that ethical leadership significantly and positively impacts company performance. Many experts believe that leadership is the most critical factor in sustaining the success of a company. By recognizing the importance of ethical leadership, organizations can improve their efficiency and effectiveness, ultimately enhancing company performance. The second hypothesis indicates that ethical leadership has a significant positive impact on the company's social responsibility. Ethical leadership is essential for the successful implementation of social responsibility. In this context, it is believed that ethical leaders possess a strong sense of accountability and a desire to implement social responsibility, thereby leading to high-quality social responsibility initiatives. The third hypothesis demonstrates that social responsibility has a significant positive effect on the company’s reputation. Companies that effectively implement social responsibility initiatives often see an improvement in their reputation. According to the fourth hypothesis, the company’s reputation has a significant positive effect on its performance. Corporate reputation is defined as the overall evaluation of a company by stakeholders over time. A strong reputation can influence customer preferences by enhancing the company’s social standing, thereby impacting company performance. Conversely, high performance within business units can lead to the creation of a positive image in the minds of stakeholders, which, in turn, affects the company’s reputation. The fifth hypothesis suggests that social responsibility has a significant positive effect on company performance. One of the primary motivations for companies to engage in social responsibility is the belief that they should act ethically and consider the interests of all stakeholders. The sixth hypothesis reveals that the company’s reputation does not play a significant mediating role in the relationship between social responsibility and company performance. Previous research suggests that an increase in corporate reputation allows the social responsibility of a company to directly affect its performance. The seventh hypothesis indicates that corporate social responsibility does not have a significant mediating role in the relationship between ethical leadership and company performance. The results of this research contradict the theoretical framework and findings of Nguyen et al. (2021). One possible reason for this discrepancy is that ethical leadership holds a distinct and important position within the company. The way ethical leadership is practiced has a direct and measurable impact on company performance. While social responsibility has a positive effect on performance, it does not significantly mediate the relationship between ethical leadership and company performance. This ultimately highlights the prioritization of ethical leadership over corporate social responsibility in influencing company performance.
 Conclusion: This research aims to investigate the impact of Ethical Leadership on company performance, considering the mediating roles of Social Responsibility and company Reputation. Leaders should regard social responsibility as a cornerstone of corporate integrity and work to remove barriers to its adoption and implementation in the workplace. Since social responsibility incurs costs for businesses, many companies in Iran tend to avoid its implementation. However, given its positive impact on both the company’s reputation and performance, it is crucial for leadership to prioritize its implementation and incorporate it into the company’s agenda.Moreover, considering the significant positive effects of ethical leadership across various dimensions of company operations, including reputation and performance, it is recommended to implement a system of rewards and penalties to encourage ethical behavior and eliminate unethical practices. Additionally, promoting accountability among employees for their actions is essential. This approach not only enhances the company’s reputation but also leads to improved overall performance.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ethical Leadership, Performance, Social Responsibility, Reputation
1.      Aghaei, M. A., & Kazempour, M. (2016). The effect of corporate social responsibility and product diversification on performance evaluation. Journal  of Value and Behavioral Accounting. 1 (1), 99-121 (In Persian). URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-50-fa.html
2.      Ahmadzadeh, S., Salehzadeh, R., & Sadeghzadeh, M. M. (2022). Examining the effect of ethical leadership on company performance: the mediating role of social responsibility, company reputation and organizational citizen behavior (case study: Water and Sewerage Company of Isfahan Province). 9th National Conference of Modern Studies and Research in Human Sciences, Management and Entrepreneurship of Iran, Tehran, (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1562473
3.      Amoushahi, M., & Karimi, F. (2018). The Relationship between Ethical Leadership and Job Performance. Ethics in Science and Technology, 13(1),177-181 (In Persian). URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-1006-fa.html
4.      Awang, Z.H., & Jusoff, K. (2009). The effects of corporate reputation on the competitiveness of Malaysian telecommunication service providers,‌.‌ Int. J. Bus. Manag, 4(5), 173–178.
5.      Bakshizadeh, N., Nourbakhsh, P., & Khodayari, A. (2020). The role of the perception of ethical leadership in predicting political skills and organizational innovation from the perspective of employees. Sports Sciences Quarterly, online publication (In Persian).
6.      Barati Marnani, A., Sajjadi, H. Sadat & Kivanara, M. (2011). Social Responsibility in Isfahan Hospitals, Journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5(1), 10-23 (In Persian).
7.      Beheshtifar, M., & Korouki, A. (2013).‌‌‌ Reputation: an important component of corporations' value. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci, 3(7), 15–16.
8.      Black, E.L., Carnes, T.A., & Richardson, V.J. (2000). The market valuation of corporate reputation. Corp. Reput. Rev, 3(1), 31–42.
9.      Brown, M.E., Trevi~no, L.K., & Harrison, D.A. (2005). Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing,‌‌‌ Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 97(2), 117–134.
10.   Brown, ME. & Trevino, LK. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions.‌‌‌ The Leadership Quarterly, (17), 595-616.
11.   Butt, S., Mubeen, I., & Ahmed, A. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: Moderating role of Ethical Leadership and Social Capital. JISR management and social sciences & economics, 20(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2022.20.1.9
12.   Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012).‌‌‌ Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32.
13.   Chong, M. (2009).‌‌‌ Employee participation in CSR and corporate identity: insights from a disaster-response program in the Asia-Pacific. Corp. Reput. Rev, 12(2), 106–119.
14.   D’Amato, A. & Roome, N. (2009). Toward an Integrated Model of Leadership for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Development: a Process Model of Corporate Responsibility Beyond Management Innovation.‌Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 421-434.
15.   Davies, G., R. Chun, & M.A. Kamins. (2010). Reputation gaps and
the performance of service organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 530–546.
16.   De Roeck, K., Marique, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Swaen, V. (2014). Understanding employees, responses to corporate social responsibility: mediating roles of overall justice an organisational identification. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag,‌‌‌ 25(1), 91–112.
17.   Dey., M. Bhattacharjee, S. Mahmoodc, M. Uddin, M. & Ranjan, Sh. (2022). Ethical leadership for better sustainable performance: Role of employee values, behavior and ethical climate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130527.
18.   Faal Golshani, T., & Atai, M. (2021). Designing a model of ethical leadership styles. Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 5(83), 1123-1141 (In Persian).
19.   Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004).‌ Fame and Fortune, How succesful companies build winning reputations, Pearson Education. Inc. Prentise Hall.
20.   Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience, J. Market, 56(1), 6–21.
21.   González-Rodríguez, M.R. Díaz-Fernández, M.C. Shi, F. & Okumus., F. (2021). Exploring the links among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and performance from a multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, October 2021, 103079.
22.   Gullifor, D.P., Petrenko, O.V., Chandler, J.A., Quade, M.J., & Rouba, Y. (2023). Employee reactions to perceived CSR: The influence of the ethical environment on OCB engagement and individual performance, Journal of Business Research, 161, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113835
23.   Haqitian, M, Hashemianfar, S. A., & Moradi, G.  M. (2012). Investigating the effect of organizational socialization on employees' social responsibility (case study of Kermanshah Oil Company), Applied Sociology Quarterly, 24(3), 71-96 (In Persian).
24.   Hassani, M., najjari, M., & roshani ali benasi, H. (2020). Modeling the relationship of ethical leadership with responsibility and accountability with an emphasis on ethical atmosphere. Career and Organizational Counseling, 12(44), 209-220 (In Persian). doi:10.52547/jcoc.12.3.209
25.   Hazrati, M., Rostami, V., & Ghorbani, B. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Reputation. Management and Accounting Studies, 4(2), 233-223 (In Persian).
26.   Jorge, M.L., Madue~no, J.H., Martinez-Martinez, D., & Sancho, M.P.L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium nterprises: is there a direct link? J. Clean. Prod,‌‌‌ 101, 26–37.
27.   Karami, M. R., Mirkamali, S. M., & Pourkarimi, J. (2015). Examining and explaining ethical leadership and its dimensions (case study: University of Tehran employees). Public Policy Making in Management (Government Management Mission), 7(22), 17-34 (In Persian). SID. https://sid.ir/paper/199057/fa
28.   Khanahmadi, M., Ahmadi, S A., & Dastgir, M.  (2021). An Investigation of the Relationship between Profitability and Company Reputations on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Iran. Financial Economics, 15(55), 269-296 (In Persian).
29.   Khosravipour, E. (2022). The effect of ethical leadership dimensions on job commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors, the first national conference on mental health psychology studies (In Persian).
30.   Kim, G. W., & Brymer, R. A. (2011). The effects of ethical leadership on manager job satisfaction, commitment, behavioral outcomes, and firm performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.008
31.   Knippenberg, L., & de Jong, E.B.P. (2010). Moralising the market by moralising the firm. J. Bus. Ethics,‌‌‌ 91(1), 17–31.
32.   Le, Q. Vafaei, A. Ahmad, K. &‌‌‌ Kutubi., Sh. (2022). Independent directors' reputation incentives and firm performance – an Australian perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 72, April 2022, 101709.
33.   Lim, J.S., & Greenwood, C.A. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR):stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals. Publ, Relat. Rev, 43(4), 768–776.
34.   Lin, W.L., Yip, N., Ho, J.A., & Sambasivan, M. (2020). The adoption of technological innovations in a B2B context and its impact on firm performance: An ethical leadership perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.12.009
35.   Lourenço, I.C., Callen, J.L., Branco, M.C., & Curto, J.D. (2014). The
value relevance of reputation for sustainability leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1): 17–28.
36.   Mahmoudzadeh, M. (2023). Investigating the relationship between social responsibility on environmental quality management and the company's financial performance. Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Researches in Management and Accounting Sciences, 5(16), 94-106 (In Persian).
37.   McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001).‌‌‌ Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev, 26(1), 117–127.
38.   Mehtap, O., & Kokalan, O. (2012). The relationship between corporate reputation and organizational citizenship behavior: a comparative study on TV companies and banks.‌‌ Published online: Springer Science Business Media B.V, 3609-3619.
39.   Moghaddam, K., Weber, T., Seifzadeh, P., & Azarpanah, S. (2021). Internal Reputation of the Firm: CEO Retention and Firm Market Performance. Corp Reputation Rev 24, 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00104-2
40.   Morgan, D. R., Meier, K. J., Kearney, R. C., Hays, S. W., & Birch, H. B. (1981). Reputation and Productivity among U. S. Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 666-673.
41.   Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006).‌‌‌ Corporate social responsibility communication:stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev, 15(4), 323–338.
42.   Moura-Leite, R.C., & Padgett, R. (2014). The effect of corporate social
actions on organizational reputation. Management Research
Review, 37 (2), 167–185.
43.   Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001).‌‌‌ Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers' retention decisions in services.‌‌‌ J. Retailing Consum. Serv, 8(4), 227–236.
44.   Nguyen, N., Nguyen., N., & Hoai., Th. (2021). Ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: A serial mediation model, Heliyon, journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon.
45.   Nouchmani, H. (2019). The effect of ethical leadership and social responsibility on the organizational reputation of sports and youth departments of Golestan province, Central Library of Shahrood University of Technology, Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Master's degree (In Persian).
46.   Pham, H.S.T.,  & Tran, H.T. (2020).‌‌‌ CSR disclosure and firm performance: the mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. J. Bus. Res. 120 , 127–136.
47.   Rahmani, H., & Rajabdoory, H. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Professional Ethics on Organizational Performance in Industrial Managers of Fars province. Journal  of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 1 (1), 53-75 (In Persian). URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-48-fa.html
48.   Ramezannia H, & Rezaei, F. (2018). Investigating the effect of corporate social responsibility on systemic risk and idiosyncratic risk: Using data envelopment analysis model. Journal  of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2 (4), 189-214 (In Persian). URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-341-fa.html
49.   Rastegar, S., & Enayati, T. (2020). Relationship between Ethical Leadership and Job Performance of Faculty Members of Universities. Ethics in Science and Technology, 15 (1), 99-107 (In Persian).
URL: 
http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-1766-fa.html
50.   Rettab, B., Brik, A.B., & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: the case of Dubai. J. Bus. Ethics, 89(3), 371–390.
51.   Rehman, Z. U., Khan, A., & Rahman, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility's influence on firm risk and firm performance: the mediating role of firm reputation. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag,  115. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2018
52.   Rehman, Z.U., Khan, A., & Rahman, A. (2020).‌‌‌ Corporate social responsibility's influence on firm risk and firm performance: the mediating role of firm reputation. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag,‌‌ 27(6), 2991–3005.
53.   Ruiz-Palomino, P., Martínez-Canas, ˜ R., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Ethical culture and
employee outcomes: The mediating role of person-organization fit. Journal of
Business Ethics
, 116, 173–188.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1453-9
54.   Saeidi, P. Adalid, L. Robles., A. Saeidi, P. & Vera., M. (2021). How does organizational leadership contribute to the firm performance through social responsibility strategies?, Heliyon, 7(7).
55.   Saha, R, Shashi, Cerchione R, Singh R., & Dahiya R. (2019). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma.1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1824
56.   Sanobar, N., & Heydayrian, B. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing factors affecting corporate social responsibility in Iran. Journal of Economic & Developmental Sociology, 1(1), 71-89 (In Persian).
57.   Shafei, R., & Azizi, N. (2012). A study of organizational social responsibility in universities and higher education centers in the west of the country (designing an evaluation model). Organizational Behavior Quarterly in Education, 1(2), 5-22 (In Persian).
58.   Shapiro, C. (1983), Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Q. J. Econ,‌‌‌ 98(4), 659–679.
59.   Stawiski, B.S., Ph, D., & Deal, J.J. (2010).‌‌‌ Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility the implications for your organization. J. Marriage Fam, 73(1), 18–22.
60.   Surroca, J., Trib_o, J.A., & Waddock, S. (2010).‌‌‌ Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strat. Manag. J, 31, 463–490.
61.   Tahmasebi, S., Eivani, F., & Ardeshiri, M.J. (2021). An investigation of the interaction relationship between Corporate Reputationand Financial Performance by the simultaneous equation method (3SLS). Management Research in Iran, 22(1), 119-141 (In Persian).
62.   Trotta, A., Iannuzzi, A., Cavallaro, G., & Atti’Dell. S. (2011). Banking reputation and‌‌‌ CSR‌: a‌‌‌ stakeholder value approach.
63.   Withanage, E. (2023). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Firm Performance. Edition Rainer Hampp in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Edition, 2, 1-262. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783957104175
64.   Worcester, R. (2009), Reflections on corporate reputations. Manag. Decis, 47(4), 573–589.
65.   Wu, L.Z., Kwan, H.K., Yim, F.H.K., Chiu, R.K., & He, X. (2015). CEO ethical leadership andcorporate social responsibility: a moderated mediation model. J. Bus. Ethics, 130(4), 819–831.
66.   Wu, LZ. Kwan, HK. Yim, FH. Chiu, RK. & He, X. (2014). CEO Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Moderated Mediation Mode,‌‌‌ Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 1-13.
67.   Zamani, R., Lari Dashtbayaz, M., & Hesarzadeh, R. (2022). The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Coordination, Cohesion and Conflict Among Audit Team Members. Journal  of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 7 (13), 76-116 (In Persian). URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1109-fa.html
68.   Zhang., Q. Oo., B. &  Teck HengLim, B. (2022). Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and organizational performance in the construction industry: A resource collaboration network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,‌‌‌ 179, April 2022, 106113.
69.   Zhou, M.(2016),‌‌‌ Review of accounting and finance article information. Rev. Account, Finance,‌‌‌ 15(1) 65–84.
70.   Zhu, Q., Hang, Y., Liu, J., & Lai, K.H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corp. Soc. Responsib, Environ. Manag, 21(1), 28–40.
71.   Zhu, Y., Sun, LY. & Leung, A.S.M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pac J Manag 31, 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9369-1
دوره 16، شماره 63
پاییز 1404
صفحه 201-222

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 بهمن 1403