فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تاثیر استراتژی‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌های تحقیق و توسعه بر نوآوری باز با تاکید بر قابلیت‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌های پویای کسب و کار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
چکیده
در دوران کنونی، باتوجه ‌به محدودیت‌های موجود در دانش، منابع، قابلیت‌ها و نیروی انسانی شرکت‌ها می‌توان گفت که سطح رقابت‌پذیری یک شرکت فارغ از فعالیت در درون یا بیرون از مرزهای سازمانی، زمانی حفظ شده و ارتقا می‌یابد که هم از دانش و توانمندی‌های داخلی (تحقیق و توسعه، قابلیت‌های پویای سازمان) بهره برد و هم منابع و ظرفیت‌های منحصربه‌فرد بیرونی (نوآوری باز) را به کار گیرد. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر استراتژی‌های تحقیق و توسعه بر نوآوری باز با تأکید بر نقش میانجی قابلیت‌های پویای کسب‌وکار در شرکت شاهسوند پرداخته است. پژوهش از منظر هدف کاربردی و از حیث جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، توصیفی علّی و از نوع پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش کارکنان و مدیران واحدهای تحقیق و توسعه، تولید، بازاریابی، بازرگانی، فروش، طرح و برنامه و سایر واحدهای مرتبط شرکت شاهسوند می‌باشند. باتوجه‌به آنکه تعداد کارمندان در این شرکت 150 نفر است، بر همین اساس حجم نمونه آماری از طریق فرمول کوکران 109 نفر در نظر گرفته شد. روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده است. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته استفاده شده است. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از رویکرد اصلی حداقل مربعات جزئی و به‌وسیله نرم‌افزار SPSS و Smart Pls انجام شده است. نتایج حاکی از آن بود که استراتژی‌های تحقیق و توسعه بر نوآوری باز تأثیر معناداری دارد. از بین ابعاد استراتژی‌های تحقیق و توسعه، بعد ادغام فناورانه بیشترین تأثیر را بر نوآوری باز داشته است. همچنین استراتژی‌های تحقیق و توسعه بر قابلیت‌های پویای کسب‌وکار تأثیر معناداری دارد. قابلیت‌های پویای کسب‌وکار نیز بر نوآوری باز تأثیر معناداری دارد. در انتها، استراتژی‌های تحقیق و توسعه بر نوآوری باز با میانجیگری قابلیتهای پویای کسب‌وکار تأثیر معناداری دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The impact of R&D strategies on open innovation by the dynamic business capabilities

نویسندگان English

Abbas ali Rastgar 1
Mohsen Shafie Nikabadi 1
Elham Moayyeri kashani 2
Fatemehzahra Tabrizian 3
1 Professor, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 MA graduated, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Iran
3 Ph.D. students, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The business environment is characterized by constant changes and fluctuations in customer demands, driven by various factors such as technological advancements, socio-economic changes, cultural shifts, and global events like pandemics. These changes have had a significant impact on the business market, forcing companies to adapt their strategies to remain competitive. Adapting to market shifts is crucial because markets are inherently fluid, influenced by a multitude of factors including technological advancements, regulatory changes, economic conditions, and shifts in consumer preferences. Companies that remain static in such a volatile environment risk losing their competitive edge. Innovation is critical in responding to market shifts. This might involve developing new products or services that meet emerging customer needs or improving existing offerings to stay competitive. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many restaurants innovated by offering takeaway and delivery services to adapt to changing consumer behaviors. This kind of innovation not only helps in meeting current demands but also positions the business for long-term success. Agility and flexibility are essential for responding to market shifts. Businesses must be able to quickly adapt to changes in the market environment, which might involve reconfiguring supply chains, adjusting business models, or reallocating resources. Dynamic business capabilities enable companies to respond rapidly to changing conditions, seize new opportunities, and maintain relevance to customers. This includes having a clear and rapid decision-making process, empowering teams to take accountability for decisions, and using data-driven insights to guide new initiatives. In conclusion, the dynamic interaction between R&D strategies and open innovation, mediated by dynamic business capabilities, is crucial for businesses to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of customer demands and market conditions. By understanding customer needs, leveraging customer data, innovating products and services, enhancing customer experience, embracing digital transformation, and integrating open innovation with R&D strategies, businesses can maintain their competitive edge and thrive in a volatile market environment. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of research and development strategies on open innovation with the mediating role of dynamic business capabilities.
Methodology
The research is considered descriptive-causal from the point of view of practical purpose and in terms of data collection, and it is a survey type in which the research and development strategy variable is the independent variable, open innovation is the dependent variable, and dynamic business capabilities are the mediating variable. The statistical population of the research is the employees and managers of the research and development, production, marketing, commercial, sales, design and program and other related units of shahsavand company, whose number is estimated to be 150 people based on the conducted surveys. The statistical sample size was considered to be 109 people through Cochran's formula, and the sampling method used in this research is simple random samplingThe data was collected using a researcher-made questionnaire containing 48 items, whose reliability was determined through Cronbach's alpha and its construct validity through analytical factor analysis and its validity from the point of view of experts and experts in the field under investigation.
Results and Discussion
To operate effectively in a dynamic, competitive and innovative environment, businesses need to exploit internal and external ideas. Open innovation as a strategy facilitates this process by encouraging the targeted use of external knowledge and innovations to accelerate internal innovation and expand market opportunities. This approach allows companies to access knowledge and resources that are beyond their organizational boundaries; This can be achieved through cooperation, partnerships and alliances with other companies, research institutions or individual innovators. Dynamic capabilities are essential for the successful implementation of open innovation strategies. The combination of open innovation and dynamic capabilities allows companies to secure and maintain their competitive advantage in a dynamic, competitive and innovative environment. Based on the obtained results, research and development strategies have a significant impact on open innovation. Also, these strategies greatly influence the dynamic capabilities of the business, and finally, the dynamic capabilities also influence open innovation.
Conclusion
In the turbulent world of business, it is very important to identify the needs and existing capacities for use in business.companies need to use open innovation to tap into external knowledge, collaborate with other entities, and adapt to changing environments. Dynamic capabilities are essential for managing these open innovation strategies effectively, allowing firms to sense opportunities, seize knowledge, transform resources, and continuously reconfigure their competences to stay competitive in a turbulent business environment. The results of this research are of great importance for managers and owners of businesses and companies, because it emphasizes the necessity of exploiting existing ideas and opportunities in order to maximize competitive advantage.
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

R&‌‌D Strategies
Open Innovation
Dynamic Business Capabilities
1.      Abou Kamar, M., Albadry, O. M., Sheikhelsouk, S., Ali Al-Abyadh, M. H., & Alsetoohy, O. (2023). Dynamic Capabilities Influence on the Operational Performance of Hotel Food Supply Chains: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Sustainability15(18), 13562. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813562
2.      Aghdam, S. G., Nikabadi, M. S., & Ebrahimi, S. A. (2019). The impact of R&D strategies on the performance of new product development with emphasis on the role of R&D team performance (case study: Hooshmand Sazeh Arvin Ara Corporation). International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development18(3), 189-204. DOI:10.1504/IJMED.2019.10021372
3.      Ahlfänger, M., & Leker, J. (2021). Resolving the Open Innovation Paradox: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. In ISPIM Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-31). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
4.      Beirami, M. H., Khashei, V., Ebrahimi, M., & Haghighi, M. (2024). Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Growth: A framework-based systematic literature review. Journal of Business Management. [in Persian[
5.     Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic management of open innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. California Management Review62(1), 77-94. DOI:10.1177/0008125619885150
6.      Brunswicker, S., & Ehrenmann, F. (2013). Managing open innovation in SMEs: A good practice example of a German software firm. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management4(1), 33-41. DOI:10.24867/IJIEM-2013-1-105
7.      Chabbouh, H., & Boujelbene, Y. (2023). Open innovation, dynamic organizational capacities and innovation performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence in the Tunisian manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation24(3), 178-190. DOI: 10.1177/14657503211066014
8.      Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press google schola2, 15-25.
9.      Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Mei, L. (2021). Open innovation with Chinese characteristics: a dynamic capabilities perspective. R&D Management51(3), 247-259. DOI:10.1111/radm.12438
10.   Cruz-Cazares, C., Bayona-Saez, C., & Garcia-Marco, T. (2013). Make, buy or both? R&D strategy selection. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management30(3), 227-245. DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.05.001
11.   Fainshtein, E., Chkoniya, V., Fiore, M. et al. An innovation potential and organizational performance: an integrative role of company’s dynamic capabilities. Agric Econ 12, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00334-6
12.   Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME's performance in Portugal: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science12(3), 255-286.doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0108
13.   Frankort, H. T. (2016). When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition. Research Policy45(1), 291-302. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.007
14.   Garcia Martinez, M., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Sánchez García, M. (2014). Open innovation strategies in the food and drink industry: determinants and impact on innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management 2366(2-3), 212-242. DOI:10.1504/IJTM.2014.064588
15.   Gruchmann, T., Timmer, V., Gold, S., & Geßner, C. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for sustainable change in the food processing industry: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production311, 127534.
16.   H. Karimifard, "Strategic alliances; A way to strengthen small and medium enterprises," Tadbir, vol. 213, p. 2010, 16-22. [in Persian[
17.   Hakaki, A., Nikabadi, M. S., & Heidarloo, M. A. (2021). An optimized model for open innovation success in manufacturing SMES. RAIRO-Operations Research55(6), 3339-3357. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021161
18.  Hakaki, A., Shafiei Nikabadi, M., & Bidkham, M. (2021). Provide a multilevel structural model for the successful implementation of open innovation. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations4(1), 79-106. [in Persian[
19.   Hutton, S., Demir, R., & Eldridge, S. (2021). How does open innovation contribute to the firm's dynamic capabilities?. Technovation106, 102288. doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102288
20.   Iglesias-Sánchez, P. P., López-Delgado, P., Correia, M. B., & Jambrino-Maldonado, C. (2020). How do external openness and R&D activity influence open innovation management and the potential contribution of social media in the tourism and hospitality industry?. Information Technology & Tourism22(2), 297-323. DOI:10.1007/s40558-019-00165-y
21.  Jia, H. J., Zhuang, Z. Y., Xie, Y. X., Wang, Y. X., & Wu, S. Y. (2023). Research on dynamic capability and enterprise open innovation. Sustainability15(2), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021234
22.   Latifian, M., Keramati, M. A., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2022). Assessing Research and development strategies with customer satisfaction (A case study on automotive battery industries). Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 9 (1), 182-206. [in Persian[
23.   Lin, C., & Tsai, H. L. (2016). Achieving a firm’s competitive advantage through dynamic capability. Baltic Journal of Management11(3), 260-285. DOI:10.1108/BJM-11-2015-0224
24.   Mazzucchelli, A., Chierici, R., Abbate, T., & Fontana, S. (2019). Exploring the microfoundations of innovation capabilities. Evidence from a cross-border R&D partnership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change146, 242-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.003
25.   Mohammad Shafiee, M., & Arman, A. (2024). Identifying and Prioritizing Open Innovation Factors in Gaining a Competitive Advantage in the Home Appliance Industry. Journal of Business Management. doi:10.22059/jibm.2024.371228.4741 [in Persian[
26.   Mostafiz, M. I., Ahmed, F. U., & Hughes, P. (2022). Open innovation pathway to firm performance: the role of dynamic marketing capability in Malaysian entrepreneurial firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0206
27.   Naghizadeh, M., Seydnaghavi, M. A., & Ehsani, R. (2013). The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities on Product Innovation Capability in Iranian Pharmaceutical Firms. Innovation Management Journal2(3), 27-51. [in Persian[
28.   Neely, A., & Hii, J. (1998). Innovation and business performance: a literature review. The Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, 1, 57.
29.   Nurani Kutenaee, M., Rezaei Dolatabadi, H., & Mohammad Shafiee, M. (2021). Modeling the Competitiveness of a Store Brand based on the pattern of Environmental Estimuli in Chain Stores: A mixed approach. Management Research in Iran, 25(2), 151-182 [in Persian[
30.   Paiva, T., Ribeiro, M., & Coutinho, P. (2020). R&D collaboration, competitiveness development, and open innovation in R&D. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity6(4), 116. DOI:10.3390/joitmc6040116
31.  Park, J. H. (2018). Open innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises and innovation efficiency. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation26(2), 115-145. DOI:10.1080/19761597.2018.1496796
32.   Pihlajamaa, M. (2023). What does it mean to be open? A typology of inbound open innovation strategies and their dynamic capability requirements. Innovation25(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1907192
33.   Pilav-Velić, A., & Marjanovic, O. (2016). Integrating open innovation and business process innovation: Insights from a large-scale study on a transition economy. Information & Management53(3), 398-408. doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.12.004
34.   Porter, M. E., Ketels, C., & Delgado, M. (2007). The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: findings from the business competitiveness index. The global competitiveness report2008, 51-81.
35.   Priyono A, Hidayat A. Dynamic Capabilities for Open Innovation: A Typology of Pathways toward Aligning Resources, Strategies and Capabilities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022; 8(4):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040206
36.   Pundziene, A., Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2022). The nexus between dynamic capabilities and competitive firm performance: the mediating role of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management25(6), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2020-
37.   Schroll, A., & Mild, A. (2012). A critical review of empirical research on open innovation adoption. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft62, 85-118. DOI:10.1007/s11301-012-0084-7
38.   Segarra-Ciprés, M., Roca-Puig, V., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2014). External knowledge acquisition and innovation output: an analysis of the moderating effect of internal knowledge transfer. Knowledge Management Research & Practice12(2), 203-214. DOI:10.1057/kmrp.2012.55
39.   Seifollahi, N., Shafiei Nikabadi, M., Mohajer, S., Beigi Firoozi, A., & Karim, M. H. (2019). The impact of open innovation on new product development performance with emphasis on knowledge acquisition capacity. Public Management Researches12(44), 55-78. [in Persian[
40.   Seyed Kalali, N., & Heydari, E. (2021). Identifying the Factors that Affect Innovation Adopting the Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspectives. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge5(17), 227-256. [in Persian[
41.   Shafiei Nikabadi, M., & Roohi, S. (2019). The Impact of Learning Orientation on New Product Development Performance with the Mediating Role of Open Innovation. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development17(37), 59-76. [in Persian[
42.   Shakeri, A., & Eyvazzadeh, E. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Open Innovation on Economic and Sustainability Innovation Performance in MAPNA Group Research and Development Units. [in Persian[
43.  Stanko, M. A., Fisher, G. J., & Bogers, M. (2017). Virtual issue editorial: Under the wide umbrella of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management34(4), 543-558. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12392
44.   Suh, Y., & Kim, M. S. (2012). Effects of SME collaboration on R&D in the service sector in open innovation. Innovation14(3), 349-362. DOI:10.5172/impp.2012.1124
45.   Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of management perspectives28(4), 328-352. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
46.   Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2013). Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in knowledge‐intensive business services. R&D Management43(1), 37-51.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00701.x
47.   VU, Hieu Minh. 2020. 'A review of dynamic capabilities, innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial capabilities and their consequences', The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7: 485-94.
48.   West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of product innovation management31(4), 814-831. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
49.   Zhou, X., Shan, M., & Li, J. (2018). R&D strategy and innovation performance: the role of standardization. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management30(7), 778-792. doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1378319
 
 
دوره 16، شماره 63
پاییز 1404
صفحه 179-200

  • تاریخ دریافت 04 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 اسفند 1403