فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تدوین الگوی سه‌سطحی راهبردی شهروندی شرکتی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
3 استاد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
چکیده
سازمان‌ها برای استمرار حیات در محیط پویای امروزی باید از ابزارها و روش‌ها برای ایجاد مزیت رقابتی و ارزش افزوده به‌منظور جذب و حفظ مشتری بهره گیرند. با پیچیده شدن روزافزون سازمان‌ها و افزایش کارهای غیراخلاقی و غیرقانونی در محیط‌های کسب‌وکار، اهمیت توجه به اخلاق در کسب‌وکار ضروری است. از این رو، یکی از ابزارهای اساسی، درک شهروندی شرکتی است. بنابراین، هدف این پژوهش دستیابی به الگوی پیامدهای سه سطحی برای شهروندی اشخاص، سازمان و جامعه است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه مدیران شرکت‌های فعال در صنعت مواد غذایی در استان قم بوده که با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس، 400 نمونه جمع‌آوری شد. ابزار اصلی جهت گردآوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه‌ است. برای بررسی و تأیید روایی پرسشنامه پژوهش حاضر روایی محتوا، روایی سازه و روایی همگرا بررسی شد. جهت بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شده است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای اس. ‌پی. ‌اس. ‌اس و لیزرل استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که شهروندی شرکتی در سطح فردی بر خوداثربخشی شغلی، تعهد عاطفی سازمانی، هویت سازمانی، وفاداری مشتریان، اعتماد به برند، تبلیغات توصیه‌ای و در سطح جامعه بر سرمایه اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارند؛ همچنین، در نهایت تأثیر غیرمستقیم خوداثربخشی شغلی و تعهد عاطفی سازمانی بر عملکرد تجاری مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Developing a three-level corporate citizenship strategy pattern

نویسندگان English

Morteza Soltani 1
Abdulhossein Ziyarati 2
Gholamreza Jandaghi 3
1 Associate Professor, College of Farabi of university of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2 MA graduated, College of Farabi of university of Tehran, Qom, Iran
3 Professor, College of Farabi of university of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: To survive in today’s dynamic environment, organizations should utilize all tools and methods to create competitive advantage and added value to attract and retain customers. Also, today, the increasing complexity of organizations and the increase of immoral and illegal activities in business environments have necessitated the importance of paying attention to business ethics. Therefore, one of the basic tools is to understand corporate citizenship dealing more with business ethics issues. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a three-level model (individual, organization, and society) of corporate citizenship consequences.
Methodology: This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of research method. The statistical population of the research includes senior managers of companies active in the food industry in Qom province. To determine the sample size, the model provided by Klein in 2005 was used. According to the number of research questions, which is 53 questions. To obtain a comprehensive sample of the statistical population, 400 questionnaires were collected in the form of face-to-face questionnaires using the available sampling method. To validate the content, several questionnaires were distributed among 10 university professors and experts, and the reasonableness, comprehensibility of the questions, and appropriateness of the variables were ensured. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to check the reliability of the questionnaire. This coefficient was calculated separately for each research variable. To check the research data and test the hypotheses, SPS and Lisrel statistical software have been used.
Results and Discussion: In this research, the model of three-level consequences (individual, organization, and society) of corporate citizenship was presented. The result of the first research hypothesis states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on job self-efficacy. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Chen and Lin and Lubers et al. The result of the second research hypothesis states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on organizational emotional commitment. This hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Magnan et al. Koska and Zarkada and Rigo et al. Corporate citizenship has a significant impact on organizational identity. This hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Evans and Davins and Tsai et al. The fourth hypothesis of the research states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on customer loyalty. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Magnan et al and Koska and Zarkada. The fifth hypothesis of the research states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on brand trust. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Tsai et al. The sixth hypothesis of the research states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on word-of-mouth advertising. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Dutton et al. and Magnan and Ferrell The result of the seventh hypothesis of the research states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on business performance, but this hypothesis was not confirmed. The result of this hypothesis is not consistent with the findings of Magnan et al. Wang and Mishra and Modi The eighth research hypothesis states that corporate citizenship has a significant effect on compensation. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Sweeney et al. and Park and Campbell. The ninth hypothesis of the research states that job self-efficacy has a significant effect on business performance. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Chen and Lin and Groza and Groza. The tenth research hypothesis states that organizational emotional commitment has a significant effect on business performance. The result of this hypothesis is consistent with the findings of Kim and Bremer, De Kopier and De Witte Wang, and Ziamtwick and Dink. The eleventh hypothesis of the research states that organizational identity has a significant effect on business performance, this hypothesis was not confirmed. The result of this hypothesis is not consistent with the findings of Slas and Ashfors, Khosravi et al. The twelfth hypothesis of the research states that customer loyalty has a significant effect on business performance, this hypothesis was not confirmed. The result of this hypothesis does not match the findings of Wang.  The 13th hypothesis of the research states that brand trust has a significant effect on business performance, this hypothesis was not confirmed. The result of this hypothesis is not consistent with the findings of Tsai et al. The fourteenth hypothesis of the research states that word-of-mouth advertising has a significant effect on business performance, this hypothesis was not confirmed. The result of this hypothesis is not consistent with the findings of Bash et al and Lee et al.
Conclusion: Current corporate citizenship is costly. On the other hand, one of the negative components of business performance is cost; Therefore, due to the non-alignment of this variable, the corresponding hypothesis is rejected. The consequences of corporate citizenship are word-of-mouth advertising, brand trust, emotional commitment, reciprocity, identity, job self-efficacy, and customer loyalty.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Corporate citizenship
Business Performance
Reciprocity
  1. Aazami, M., & Ahmadi, F. (2021). Designing and formulation Strategic action plan for development of corporate citizenship in producing unit in Iran. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 12(48). [in persian]. Doi: 1001.1.22286853.1400.12.48.6.6.
  2. Ablander, M. S., & Curbach, J. (2014). The corporation as citoyen? Towards a new understanding of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 541-554.‏ /doi: 1007/s10551-013-2004-8.
  3. Absar, M. M. N., Nimalathasan, B., & Jilani, M. M. A. K. (2010). Impact of HR practices on organizational performance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 3(2), 15-19. Doi: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/586
  4. Akpinar, E., Verlegh, P. W., & Smidts, A. (2018). Sharing product harm information: The effects of self-construal and self-relevance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(2), 319-335. ‏doi :1016/j.ijresmar.2018.01.001
  5. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  6. Asadullah, M. A., Akram, A., Imran, H., & Arain, G. A. (2017). When and which employees feel obliged: a personality perspective of how organizational identification develops. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(2), 125-135.‏ DOI:1016/j.rpto.2017.02.002
  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39. doi:5465/AMR.1989.4278999
  8. Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Sage.‏ doi:4135/9781483307961
  9. Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & management, 41(8), 1003-1020.‏ doi:1016/j.im.2003.10.004
  10. Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(5), 645-663.‏ doi:1002/job.372
  11. Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447-456.‏ doi: 10.1002/smj.743
  12. Bush, V. D., Bush, A. J., Clark, P., & Bush, R. P. (2005). Girl power and word‐of‐mouth behavior in the flourishing sports market. Journal of consumer Marketing. doi:1108/07363760510611680
  13. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.‏ doi:10.4324/9780203774762
  14. Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate citizenship and social responsibility policies in the United States of America. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. doi:1007/978-3-319-46849-5_6
  15. Carrigan, M., Moraes, C., & McEachern, M. (2013). From conspicuous to considered fashion: A harm-chain approach to the responsibilities of luxury-fashion businesses. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11-12), 1277-1307. doi:1080/0267257X.2013.798675
  16. Chahal, H., Jyoti, J., & Rani, A. (2016). The effect of perceived high-performance human resource practices on business performance: Role of organizational learning. Global Business Review, 17(3_suppl), 107S-132S.‏ doi:1177/0972150916631193
  17. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of marketing, 65(2), 81-93.‏ doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
  18. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2002). Product-class effects on brand commitment and brand outcomes: The role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of Brand Management. 10(1), 33-58.‏ doi :1057/palgrave.bm.2540100
  19. Chen, M. L., & Lin, C. P. (2014). Modelling perceived corporate citizenship and psychological contracts: A mediating mechanism of perceived job efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 231-247.‏ doi:1080/1359432X.2012.734455
  20. Chen, W., Wu, Y., Yue, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, W., Yang, X., & Han, L. (2015). Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science, 350(6263), 944-948.‏ doi: 10.1126/science. aad1015
  21. Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate governance-A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations. Critical perspectives on accounting, 21(8), 683-695.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.05.002
  22. Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert systems with applications, 40(1), 150-161.‏ doi:1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028
  23. De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2011). The management paradox: Self‐rated employability and organizational commitment and performance. Personnel Review.‏ doi :1108/00483481111106057
  24. Dinc, M. S., & Plakalovic, V. (2016). Impact of Caring Climate, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment on Employees Performance in the Banking Sector of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 9(18), 1-16.‏ doi:17015/ejbe.2016.018.01
  25. Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461-1485.‏ doi:1177/0149206309337896
  26. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263.‏ do:10.2307/2393235
  27. Elaine, E. G., Simone, S. R., & Kristel, K. P. A. (2023). Increasing the UX maturity level of clients: A study of best practices in an agile environment. Information and Software Technology,154, 107086. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107086
  28. Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. (2014). Corporate citizenship and the employee: An organizational identification perspective. Human Performance, 27(2), 129-146.‏ doi:1080/08959285.2014.882926
  29. Fan, K. K., & Chang, Y. T. (2023). Exploring the Key Elements of Sustainable Design from a Social Responsibility Perspective: A Case Study of Fast Fashion Consumers’ Evaluation of Green Projects. Sustainability, 15(2), 995. doi:3390/su15020995
  30. Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate citizenship in G ermany and the U nited S tates–differing perceptions and practices in transatlantic comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(4), 341-356.‏ doi:10.1111/beer.12027
  31. Gao, Y., & He, W. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and employee organizational citizenship behavior: the pivotal roles of ethical leadership and organizational justice. Management Decision.‏ doi:1108/MD-05-2016-0284
  32. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.‏ doi:1016/j.omega.2004.01.006
  33. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review, 161-178.‏ doi:10.2307/2092623
  34. Griffith, D. A., van Esch, P., & Trittenbach, M. (2018). Investigating the mediating effect of Uber's sexual harassment case on its brand: Does it matter?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 111-118.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.007
  35. Groza, M. D., & Groza, M. P. (2018). Salesperson regulatory knowledge and sales performance. Journal of Business Research, 89, 37-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.005
  36. Gunawan, I. (2022). CUSTOMER LOYALTY: The Effect Customer Satisfaction, Experiential Marketing and Product Quality. KINERJA: Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi dan Industri, 1(1), 35-50.
  37. Hadžiahmetović, N., & Dinç, M. S. (2017). The mediating role of affective commitment in the organizational rewards–organizational performance relationship. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 7(3), 105-130.‏ doi:5296/ijhrs. v7i3.11454
  38. Hamidizadeh, M.R. (2022). Strategic knowledge and wisdom.Adiban rooz pgs189-191. [in persian]
  39. Hamidizadeh, M.R. (2017). Managerial economics: Theories, strategies, tactics, capability and competitive intelligence.Adiban rooz. [in persian]
  40. Hsu, M. Y. T. (2018). RETRACTED: Cognitive systems research for neuromarketing assessment on evaluating consumer learning theory with fMRI: Comparing how two Word-Of-Mouth strategies affect the human brain differently after a product harm crisis.‏ doi:1016/j.cogsys.2017.11.004
  41. Ismail, A. R., & Spinelli, G. (2012). Effects of brand love, personality and image on word of mouth: The case of fashion brands among young consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal.‏ doi:1108/13612021211265791
  42. Jiang, Z., Hu, X., & Wang, Z. (2018). Career adaptability and plateaus: The moderating effects of tenure and job self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 59-71.‏ doi:1016/j.jvb.2017.10.006
  43. Jodi Demirchi, M., Asadi, A., & Alam Begi. (2022). Analyzing the features of B2B e-business portal among gardeners of Moghan plain. Village and Development, 25(2), 47-64. DOI: 10.30490/RVT.2021.343418.1236
  44. Kamboj, S., Sarmah, B., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 169-185.‏ doi:1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.001
  45. Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Ahmad, M. N. (2013). Does organizational identification lead to information system success?. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(3), 402-408.‏ doi:5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.3.2807
  46. Kim, W. G., & Brymer, R. A. (2011). The effects of ethical leadership on manager job satisfaction, commitment, behavioral outcomes, and firm performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 1020-1026.‏ doi:1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.008
  47. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences.
  48. Kordnaeij A, Nejat S. The Impact of corporate citizenship on employer brand attractiveness and employer brand loyalty. 2018; 8 (2) :114-133. [in Persian]
  49. Küskü, F., & Zarkada‐Fraser, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of corporate citizenship in Australia and Turkey. British Journal of Management, 15(1), 57-72.‏ doi:1111/j.1467-8551. 2004.t01-1-00400.x
  50. Lee, L. W., Tang, Y., Yip, L. S., & Sharma, P. (2018). Managing customer relationships in the emerging markets–guanxi as a driver of Chinese customer loyalty. Journal of business research, 86, 356-365.‏ doi:1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.017
  51. Lubbers, R., Loughlin, C., & Zweig, D. (2005). Young workers’ job self-efficacy and affect: Pathways to health and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 199-214. doi:1016/j.jvb.2004.03.002
  52. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6.‏ doi:10.12691/education-8-9-12
  53. Luo, M. M., & Chea, S. (2018). Cognitive appraisal of incident handling, affects, and post-adoption behaviors: A test of affective events theory. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 120-131.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.014
  54. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18.‏ doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001
  55. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 37-51.‏ doi:1016/S0148-2963(99)00042-9
  56. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of marketing science, 27(4), 455-469.‏ doi:1177/0092070399274005
  57. Maldonado-Guzman, G., Pinzon-Castro, S. Y., & Lopez-Torres, G. C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and business performance: The role of Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(10), 568-579.‏ doi:18488/journal.1/2016.6.10/1.10.568.579
  58. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management review, 30(1), 166-179.‏ doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281448
  59. McEachern, M. G. (2015). Corporate citizenship and its impact upon consumer moralisation, decision-making and choice. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(3-4), 430-452.‏ doi:1080/0267257X.2014.974658
  60. McKenna, S. (2005). Organisational commitment in the small entrepreneurial business in Singapore. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal.‏ doi:1108/13527600510797999
  61. Miller, N. J., & Kean, R. C. (1997). Reciprocal exchange in rural communities: Consumers' inducements to inshop. Psychology & Marketing, 14(7), 637-661.‏ doi: 10.1002/(sici)01520-6793
  62. Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2013). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of business ethics, 117(2), 431-448. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1526-9‏
  63. Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social psychology quarterly, 73(2), 119-131.‏ doi:1177/0190272510369079
  64. Moshabaki Esfahani, A., Nejat, S., Khalili Palandi, F. (2019). Corporate Citizenship and its Role in Creating Organizational Trust and Organizational Identification. Organizational Culture Management, 17(3), 399-419. (in persian). doi:22059/JOMC.2019.242265.1007338
  65. Molinillo, S., Japutra, A., & Ekinci, Y. (2022). Building brand credibility: The role of involvement, identification, reputation and attachment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,64, 102819. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102819
  66. Ogba, I. E., & Tan, Z. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Brand Image on Customer Loyalty. doi:1108/17468770910964993
  67. Pacheco, L. M., Alves, M. F. R., Krüger, C., de Arruda Lourenção, M. T., & Caldana, A. C. F. (2018). Are we all green? Understanding the microfoundations of corporate citizenship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 552-561.‏ doi:1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.134
  68. Park, J., & Campbell, J. M. (2017). US SMEs’ corporate citizenship: collectivism, market orientation, and reciprocity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 29(2), 120-139.‏ doi:1080/08276331.2016.1256930
  69. Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of business ethics, 67(3), 305-316.‏ doi:1007/s10551-006-9186-2
  70. Philip T. KotlerKevin Lane Keller. (2011). Marketing Management, 14th Edition.Doi:0132102927
  71. Popp, B., & Wilson, B. (2018). Investigating the role of identification for social networking Facebook brand pages. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 141-152.‏ doi:1016/j.chb.2018.01.033
  72. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American journal of sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350. doi:1086/230191
  73. Pratama, E. N., Suwarni, E., & Handayani, M. A. (2022). The effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on turnover intention with person organization fit as moderator variable. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 6(1), 74-82.‏ doi:10.33050/atm. v6i1.1722
  74. Rego, A., Leal, S., Cunha, M. P., Faria, J., & Pinho, C. (2010). How the perceptions of five dimensions of corporate citizenship and their inter-inconsistencies predict affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 107-127.‏ doi:1007/s10551-009-0252-4
  75. Rowley, J. (1997). Managing branding and corporate image for library and information services. Library Review.‏ doi:10.1177/034003529902500308
  76. Runyan, R. C., Huddleston, P., & Swinney, J. (2006). Entrepreneurial orientation and social capital as small firm strategies: A study of gender differences from a resource-based view. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 455-477.‏ doi:1007/s11365-006-0010-3
  77. Seeck, H., & Parzefall, M. R. (2008). Employee agency: Challenges and opportunities for psychological contract theory. Personnel Review.‏ doi:1108/00483480810891637
  78. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of management review, 32(1), 9-32.‏ doi2307/20159278
  79. Söderlund, M., & Mattsson, J. (2015). Merely asking the customer to recommend has an impact on word-of-mouth activity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 80-89.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.009
  80. Soenen, G., & Melkonian, T. (2017). Fairness and commitment to change in M&As: The mediating role of organizational identification. European Management Journal, 35(4), 486-492.‏ doi:1016/j.emj.2016.10.005
  81. Soltani M, nehat S. Analysis of the concept of corporate citizenship and it’s role in the development of customer loyalty. 2017; 7 (1) :45-64(in persian) doi: 20.1001.1.22286977.1396.7.1.3.8
  82. Soltani, Morteza; Esfidani, Mohammad Rahim (2016). The Impact of Corporate Citizenship on Customer Loyalty and Recommended Advertising, Business Management Perspectives, 15 (26), 196-179. [in Persian]
  83. Stolz, I. (2014). The role of OD practitioners in developing corporations’ capacity to practice corporate citizenship: A sociomaterial case study. European Journal of Training and Development.‏ doi:1108/EJTD-04-2013-0046
  84. Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. European journal of marketing.‏ doi:1108/03090560810852977
  85. Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Lin, C. P., Chiu, C. K., & Shen, K. T. (2015). Exploring corporate citizenship and purchase intention: mediating effects of brand trust and corporate identification. Business ethics: A European review, 24(4), 361-377.‏ doi:1111/beer.12073
  86. Uslu, A., Durmuş, B., & Taşdemir, S. (2013). Word of mouth, brand loyalty, acculturation and the Turkish ethnic minority group in Germany. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 455-464.‏ doi:1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.514
  87. Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and society review, 110(2), 191-212.‏ doi:1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x
  88. Van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Kerschreiter, R., Hertel, G., & Wieseke, J. (2008). Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 388-399.‏ doi:1016/j.jvb.2007.11.009
  89. Waddock, S. (2008). The development of corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship. Organization Management Journal, 5(1), 29-39.‏
  90. Walker, M., & Parent, M. M. (2010). Toward an integrated framework of corporate social responsibility, responsiveness, and citizenship in sport. Sport Management Review, 13(3), 198-213.‏ doi:1016/j.smr.2010.03.003
  91. Walters, G., & Chadwick, S. (2009). Corporate citizenship in football: Delivering strategic benefits through stakeholder engagement. Management Decision. DOI:1108/00251740910929696
  92. Wang, C. J. (2014). Do ethical and sustainable practices matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on business performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.‏ DOI:1108/IJCHM-01-2013-0001
  93. Wang, Y. J., Tsai, Y. H., & Lin, C. P. (2013). Modeling the relationship between perceived corporate citizenship and organizational commitment considering organizational trust as a moderator. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2), 218-233.‏ doi:1111/beer.12019
  94. Windsor, D. (2017). Corporate citizenship: Evolution and interpretation. In Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 39-52). Routledge.
  95. Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2016). The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR?. Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298-301.‏ doi:1080/13504851.2015.1071464
  96. Yasin, R., Huseynova, A., & Atif, M. (2023). Green human resource management, a gateway to employer branding: Mediating role of corporate environmental sustainability and corporate social sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,30(1), 369-383. doi:1002/csr.2360
  97. Ybañez, A., Ancheta, R., Evangelista, S. S., Aro, J. L., Maturan, F., Atibing, N. M., ... & Ocampo, L. (2023). How can we use machine learning for characterizing organizational identification-a study using clustering with picture fuzzy datasets. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights,3(1), 100157. doi:1016/j.jjimei.2023.100157
  98. Zehir, C., Şahin, A., Kitapçı, H., & Özşahin, M. (2011). The effects of brand communication and service quality in building brand loyalty through brand trust; the empirical research on global brands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1218-1231.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.142

  • تاریخ دریافت 06 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 مرداد 1403