فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

ارائه چارچوب مفهومی هم‌تکاملی در زیست بوم کسب‌وکار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هم­‌تکاملی یکی از مفاهیم علمی در حوزه سازمانی به اقتباس از زیست ­بوم‌­های زیستی است و از جمله روابطی بوده که در سال‌­های اخیر بسیار در زیست ­بوم­‌ها مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. روش پژوهش اسنادی- مرور نظام­‌مند و در مرحله بعدی تحلیل محتوای متون مقالات انتخابی است. این پژوهش در نظر دارد بر اساس گزاره‌­های تعاریف هم‌­تکاملی در پیشینه، مفهومی یکپارچه از آن در زیست بوم­‌ها ارائه نماید. بدین منظور با مراجعه به پایگاه داده اسکوپوس، مقالات با کلیدواژه‌­های منتخب استخراج و تحلیل شد. در گام نخست 881 مقاله شناسایی شد که پس از پردازش مقالات با شاخص‌­های متفاوت، تعداد مقالات قابل تحلیل به 25 مقاله تقلیل یافت. متن 25 مقاله منتخب کلیدی، وارد مرحله تحلیل محتوا شد. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش، 5 تم اصلی هم‌­تکاملی شامل مکانیزم‌­ها، ماهیت، ویژگی­‌های کنش­گران زیست بوم و ۲۷ مقوله فرعی استخراج شد. از میان مقوله­‌های فرعی، 12 مقوله با تکرار بالا شناسایی و بر این اساس، تعریف جامعی از ماهیت و مفهوم هم‌­تکاملی در زیست ­بوم­های کسب و کار ارائه شد. مبتنی بر این تعریف، مفهوم هم­‌تکاملی در زیست ­بوم کسب‌و­کار بر اساس 4 بعد اصلی«تغییر، تعامل، یادگیری و چندسطحی» به صورت « تغییر و توسعه همزمان، پایدار و دائمی بین کنشگران متنوع یک زیست بوم کسب‌وکار که در چند سطح و مبتنی بر یادگیری و تعامل بین آنهاست» تعریف می‌­‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Providing a co-evolutionary conceptual framework in business ecosystems

نویسندگان English

Farzaneh Bayattork 1
Ali Mobini Dehkordi 2
Abolghasem Arabiun 3
Kamal Sakhdari 3
1 PhD student, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Co-evolution is one of the scientific concepts that is adapted from biological ecosystems in the field of organization and as one of the relationships that has received much attention in recent years in ecosystems. Ecosystems as an evolutionary system consist of several parties, including actors, technologies, and institutions, which are trying to interact and survive through competition and cooperation. This research aims to, by relying on the research literature of business ecosystem and co-evolution in organizational populations, various components and dimensions of the concept of co-evolution in business ecosystems, which in many researches It has been dealt with in a scattered way in an overview and to answer the following main question: What are the dimensions of co-evolution in the business ecosystem? And what factors are involved in the emergence of this phenomenon in the business ecosystem?
Methodology
This research is fundamental in terms of its purpose, and in terms of data collection, it is systematic review-documentary research. In order to identify the components of the concept of co-evolution in ecosystems, this research has used the systematic review method along with the content analysis of key articles in this field. 
 Results and Discussion
By referring to Scopus and Google Scholar database, articles related to selected keywords were extracted and analyzed. In the first step, 881 articles were identified, and after filtering articles with different indexes, the number of articles that could be analyzed was reduced to 25 articles. The texts of 25 selected key articles entered the content analysis phase. Based on the results of this research, 5 main themes of the concept of co-evolution including mechanisms, nature, characteristics of ecosystem actors and 27 subcategories were extracted. Co-evolutionary mechanisms that actually express how this phenomenon is formed in ecosystems is "learning based on positive feedback and intelligence".
Among the 27 sub-categories, 12 categories with high repetition were identified and based on this, a comprehensive definition of the nature and concept of co-evolution in business ecosystems was presented. Based on this definition, the concept of co-evolution in the business ecosystem based on the 4 main dimensions of "change, interaction, learning and multi-level" as "simultaneous, stable and permanent change and development between diverse actors of a business ecosystem that It is defined on several levels and based on learning and interaction between them. Based on the dimension of change, the main components that can be called co-evolutionary changes between different actors are "simultaneity and stability of changes" in which both actors must change simultaneously and mutually and the changes created in both entities must be stable (reproducible) and permanent. In the characteristics of ecosystem actors, the internal characteristics of each actor including "having intelligent, learning and interactive strategies" can have an effect on co-evolution, and the characteristics of the focal company of the ecosystem include intelligence, planning, and value. Development along with the laws and norms that are included in the governance structure of the ecosystem can have an effect on the formation of co-evolution at this level.
Conclusion
In this research, the study and analysis of co-evolutionary studies in the business ecosystem has been done using systematic review methods and content analysis of selected researches in this field. The review of the literature shows how over the years, the studies related to co-evolution in terms of conceptual and applied researches have adopted the analytical orientations of heterogeneity and still there is no unified understanding of this concept. Not in studies. The multiplicity of features and requirements mentioned in different sources and the observation that different studies have only considered some of these requirements have made the researchers in this field confused in obtaining a unified understanding of this approach and how it works. On the other hand, specific analyzes about where this point of view is now and where it can move to, are still not visible in the literature of organization and management. The aim of this research is to get an image of the past research process and future research streams and to know what and how the concept of co-evolution in the business ecosystem is, which is done through a systematic review and analysis of the content of highly cited articles. This field has answered two research questions. Each of the identified dimensions of this research can be used in companies that interact in cooperation networks and business ecosystems. The boundaries of the industry are gradually disappearing and different types of symbiosis, including ecosystems, replace the industry, the issue of co-evolution especially between the leaders and other members of the ecosystems. , co-evolution in technological entrepreneurship ecosystems in dynamic environments, the way of network formation in institutional ecosystems and the co-evolutionary leadership model in entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems can be among future theoretical researches.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Co-evolution
Ecosystem
Business
Systematic review
  1. Abatecola, G., Belussi, F., Breslin, D., & Filatotchev, I. (2016). Darwinism, organizational evolution and survival: key challenges for future research. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 1-17.‏ doi: 1007/s10997-015-9310-8
  2. Abatecola, G., Breslin, D., & Kask, J. (2020). Do organizations really co-evolve? Problematizing co-evolutionary change in management and organization studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119964.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119964
  3. Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.016
  4. Breslin, D., Romano, D., & Percival, J. (2016). Conceptualizing and modeling multi-level organizational co-evolution. Agent-Based Simulation of Organizational Behavior: Agent-Based Simulation of Organizational Behavior: New Frontiers of Social Science Research,(pp.137-157).‏ doi:1007/978-3-319-18153-0_7
  5. Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138-164.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
  6. Daymond, J., Knight, E., Rumyantseva, M., & Maguire, S. (2023). Managing ecosystem emergence and evolution: Strategies for ecosystem architects. Strategic Management Journal, 44(4), 1-27.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3449
  7. Dijksterhuis, M. S., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organization Science, 10(5), 569-582. doi:1287/orsc.10.5.569
  8. Geels, F. W. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework. Research policy, 43(2), 261-277.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006
  9. Gross, T., & Blasius, B. (2008). Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5(20), 259-271.‏ https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.1229
  10. Grandinetti, R. (2018). Is organizational evolution Darwinian and/or Lamarckian?. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 6(26), 858-874.doi:10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1367.‏
  11. Hearn, G., & Pace, C. (2006). Value‐creating ecologies: understanding next generation business systems. Foresight.‏8(1),55-65. doi:1108/14636680610647147
  12. Hou, H., & Shi, Y. (2021). Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: constructive examination. Technovation, 100(3), 102-193.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193
  13. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  14. Lewin, A. Y., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization science, 10(5), 519-534.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.519
  15. Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization science, 10(5), 535-550.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
  16. Mäkinen, S. J., & Dedehayir, O. (2012). Business ecosystem evolution and strategic considerations: A literature review. In 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation,(pp.1-10). doi:1109/ICE.2012.6297653
  17. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.‏ https://hbr.org/1993/05
  18. Pagie, L., & Mitchell, M. (2002). A comparison of evolutionary and coevolutionary search. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2(01), 53-69.‏ https:// doi.org/10.1142/S1469026802000427
  19. Peltoniemi, M. (2006). Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 8(1),10-19. doi: 10.emerg/10.17357 .8bb81e60d0fa815f83002ae1f418068c
  20. Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Frontiers of e-Business Research 2004 Conference Proceedings, (pp.267-281). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228985086
  21. Porter, T. B. (2006). Coevolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment. Organization & Environment, 19(4), 479-504.‏ doi:10.1177/1086026606294958
  22. Riasanow, T., Flötgen, R. J., Greineder, M., Möslein, D., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Co-evolution in business ecosystems: Findings from literature40th GI EMISA2019 (pp.77-89). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333186124
  23. Rodrigues, S., & Child, J. (2003). Co‐evolution in an institutionalized environment. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2137-2162. doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00415.x
  24. Thomas, L. D., & Ritala, P. (2022). Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: A collective action view. Journal of Management, 48(3), 515-541.‏ doi:1177/0149206320986617
  25. Ter Wal, A. L., & Boschma, R, Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional studies, 45(7), (2011), 919-933.‏ doi:1080/00343400802662658
  26. Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co‐evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co‐evolution. Journal of management studies, 40(8), 2111-2136.‏ doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00414.x
  27. Wilson, J., & Hynes, N. (2009). Co-evolution of firms and strategic alliances: Theory and empirical evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 620-628.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.005
  28. Zhang, M., Chen, H., Lyytinen, K., & Li, X. (2019). A co-evolutionary perspective on business and IT alignment: A review and research agenda. 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Conference.(pp.7-10). doi:24251/HICSS.2019.749
  29. Zollo, M., winter, S.G. (2002). deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities ,organization science, 13 (3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 شهریور 1402