فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تحلیل ساختاری امکان بهبود عملکرد شغلی در فضای دورکاری در دوران همه‌گیری کرونا (صنعت مورد مطالعه: لوازم خانگی)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
امیرحسین کاظم الماسی 1
محمدعلی شاه حسینی 2
حنان عموزاد مهدیرجی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت، پردیس کیش، دانشگاه تهران، کیش، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
10.22034/smsj.2022.340300.1663
چکیده
صنعت لوازم خانگی به دلیل ارتباط تنگاتنگ با مردم و استفاده از محصولات آن به‌طور روزمره، از جامعه بسیار تأثیرپذیر می‌باشد. بر این اساس هدف اصلی این پژوهش، تعیین مدلی ساختاری برای بهبود عملکرد شغلی در فضای دورکاری در صنعت لوازم خانگی در زمان همه‌گیری کووید-19 می‌باشد. تحقیق حاضر از نظر گردآوری و تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی_ پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش مدیران صنعت لوازم خانگی به تعداد 160 نفر می-باشد که طبق فرمول کوکران 112 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. روش نمونه‌گیری در این تحقیق، از نظر نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای استفاده و از هر طبقه نیز نمونه‌ها به صورت تصادفی ساده انتخاب شده‌اند. به منظور سنجش متغیرهای عملکرد شغلی، دورکاری، اضطراب فناوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد استفاده شده است. برای آزمون فرضیه‌ها از روش مدل معادلات ساختاری و در بستر نرم افزارهای آماری اس.پی.اس.اس 20 و اسمارت پی.ال.اس 2 بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌ها از تاثیر مثبت و معنادار اضطراب فنآوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر وقفه کاری حکایت دارد. همچنین اثر اضطراب فنآوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر عملکرد شغلی مثبت و معنادار شد. همینطور اثر وقفه کاری بر کارایی شغلی مثبت و معنادار گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عملکردشغلی
دورکاری
اضطراب فناوری اطلاعات وارتباطات

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Structural analysis of the possibility of improving job performance in telecommuting during the Covid-19 epidemic (Study industry: home appliances)

نویسندگان English

Amirhosein Kazem Almasi 1
Mohammad ali Shah Hoseini 2
Hanan Amoozad Mahdiraji 3
1 PhD student, Faculty of Management, Kish Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The home appliance industry is very influential in society due to its close relationship with people and the use of its products on a daily basis. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study is to determine a structural model for improving job performance in telecommuting in the home appliance industry during the Covid-19 epidemic. The present study is a descriptive-survey type in terms of data collection and analysis. The statistical population of the research is the managers of the home appliance industry to 160 people, of which 112 people were selected as a sample according to the Cochran's formula. Sampling method In this research, in terms of stratified sampling and samples from each stratum were selected by simple random sampling. Standard questionnaires were used to measure the variables of job performance, telework, and IT anxiety. To test the hypotheses, the structural equation model method was used in the context of SPSS 20 and Smart PLS 2 statistical software. Findings indicate a positive and significant effect of information and communication technology anxiety on work interruption. Also, the effect of information and communication technology anxiety on job performance was positive and significant. Also, the effect of work stoppage on job efficiency was positive and significant.

The home appliance industry is very influential in society due to its close relationship with people and the use of its products on a daily basis. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study is to determine a structural model for improving job performance in telecommuting in the home appliance industry during the Covid-19 epidemic. The present study is a descriptive-survey type in terms of data collection and analysis. The statistical population of the research is the managers of the home appliance industry to 160 people, of which 112 people were selected as a sample according to the Cochran's formula. Sampling method In this research, in terms of stratified sampling and samples from each stratum were selected by simple random sampling. Standard questionnaires were used to measure the variables of job performance, telework, and IT anxiety. To test the hypotheses, the structural equation model method was used in the context of SPSS 20 and Smart PLS 2 statistical software. Findings indicate a positive and significant effect of information and communication technology anxiety on work interruption. Also, the effect of information and communication technology anxiety on job performance was positive and significant. Also, the effect of work stoppage on job efficiency was positive and significant.

The home appliance industry is very influential in society due to its close relationship with people and the use of its products on a daily basis. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study is to determine a structural model for improving job performance in telecommuting in the home appliance industry during the Covid-19 epidemic. The present study is a descriptive-survey type in terms of data collection and analysis. The statistical population of the research is the managers of the home appliance industry to 160 people, of which 112 people were selected as a sample according to the Cochran's formula. Sampling method In this research, in terms of stratified sampling and samples from each stratum were selected by simple random sampling. Standard questionnaires were used to measure the variables of job performance, telework, and IT anxiety. To test the hypotheses, the structural equation model method was used in the context of SPSS 20 and Smart PLS 2 statistical software. Findings indicate a positive and significant effect of information and communication technology anxiety on work interruption. Also, the effect of information and communication technology anxiety on job performance was positive and significant. Also, the effect of work stoppage on job efficiency was positive and significant.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Job Performance
Telework
IT Anxiety
  1. Aghaz, A., & Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 62, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.077
  2. Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. ‌‌‌Current Addiction Reports‌‌‌, 2, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
  3. Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. ‌‌‌British Journal of Educational Technology‌‌‌, 48, 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437
  4. Bai, B., Wang, J., & Chai, C.-S. (2019). Understanding Hong Kong primary school English teachers’ continuance intention to teach with ICT. ‌‌‌Computers & Education‌‌‌, 133, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
  5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. ‌‌‌Journal of Occupational Health Psychology‌‌‌, 22, 273. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), ‌‌‌Handbook of well-being‌‌‌ (pp. 1–13). Noba Scholar.
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. ‌‌‌Psychological Review‌‌‌, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). ‌‌‌Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory‌‌‌. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). ‌‌‌Self-efficacy: The exercise of control‌‌‌. New York: Freeman.
  10. Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 20, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.07.002
  11. Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. ‌‌‌Sustainability‌‌‌, 12, 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093662
  12. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 24, 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.014
  13. Brem, A., Viardot, E., & Nylund, P. A. (2021). Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives? ‌‌‌Technological Forecasting and Social Change‌‌‌, 163, 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451
  14. Brown, M., Kraimer, M. L., & Bratton, V. K. (2019). The influence of employee performance appraisal cynicism on intent to quit and sportsmanship. ‌‌‌Personnel Review‌‌‌, 49(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2018-0212
  15. Carbonell, X., Oberst, U., & Beranuy, M. (2013). The cell phone in the twenty-first century: A risk for addiction or a necessary tool? ‌‌‌Principles of Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders‌‌‌, 1, 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398336-7.00091-1
  16. Charlton, J. P., & Danforth, I. D. W. (2007). Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 23(3), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002
  17. Chen, C., Xu, X., Adams, J., Brannon, J., Li, F., & Walzem, A. (2020). When East meets West: Understanding residents’ home energy management system adoption intention and willingness to pay in Japan and the United States. ‌‌‌Energy Research & Social Science‌‌‌, 69, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101616
  18. Chhabra, V., Rajan, P., & Chopra, S. (2020). User acceptance of new technology in mandatory adoption scenario for food distribution in India. ‌‌‌International Journal of Food System Dynamics‌‌‌, 11, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v11i2.01
  19. Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. ‌‌‌MIS Quarterly‌‌‌, 22(1), vii–xvi.
  20. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. ‌‌‌Psychometrika‌‌‌, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  21. Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. University Jihad Publications. (In Persian)
  22. Dolce, V., Vayre, E., Molino, M., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Far away, so close? The role of destructive leadership in the job demands–resources and recovery model in emergency telework. ‌‌‌Social Sciences‌‌‌, 9, 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110196
  23. Elhai, J. D., Yang, H., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020). COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults. ‌‌‌Journal of Affective Disorders‌‌‌, 274, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.080
  24. Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., Pallud, J., & Kalika, M. (2011). The influence of individual, contextual, and social factors on perceived behavioral control of information technology: A field theory approach. ‌‌‌Journal of Management Information Systems‌‌‌, 28(3), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280307
  25. Enez, Ö., & Yalçinkaya-Alkar, Ö. (2021). Assessing mobile phone attachment: Validation of the mobile attachment questionnaire in Turkish university students and examination of related variables. ‌‌‌Psychological Reports‌‌‌, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294121990503
  26. de O. Malaquias, F. de O., & da Silva Júnior, R. J. (2020). Smartphone users’ satisfaction and regional aspects: Factors that emerge from online reviews. ‌‌‌Journal of Technology Management & Innovation‌‌‌, 15, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000100003
  27. Farooq, A., Laato, S., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Isoaho, J. (2021). Understanding the impact of information sources on COVID-19 related preventive measures in Finland. ‌‌‌Technology in Society‌‌‌, 65, 101573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101573
  28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. ‌‌‌Journal of Marketing Research‌‌‌, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  29. Gerards, R., Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement? ‌‌‌Personnel Review‌‌‌, 47(2), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
  30. Ghanbari, S., & Karimi, E. (2018). Investigating the effect of ICT training on the effective acceptance of information technology. University Jihad Publications. (In Persian)
  31. Golden, T. D., & Gajendran, R. S. (2019). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter's job in their performance: Examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. ‌‌‌Journal of Business and Psychology‌‌‌, 34(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9530-4
  32. Guler, D., & Demir, H. (2022). Investigating the relationships between technostress and the dark triad personality traits in the context of work-from-home practices. ‌‌‌Journal of Managerial Psychology‌‌‌, 37(6), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2021-0292
  33. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). ‌‌‌A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)‌‌‌. SAGE Publications.
  34. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. ‌‌‌European Business Review‌‌‌, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  35. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. ‌‌‌European Business Review‌‌‌, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  36. Harris, R. B. H., Harris, K. J., Carlson, J. R., & Carlson, D. S. (2015). Resource loss from technology overload and its impact on work-life balance. ‌‌‌Technology in Society‌‌‌, 42, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.04.007
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2017). ‌‌‌Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach‌‌‌ (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
  38. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. ‌‌‌Communication Monographs‌‌‌, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
  39. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. ‌‌‌Industrial Management & Data Systems‌‌‌, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  40. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. ‌‌‌Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science‌‌‌, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  41. Herath, T., Chen, R., Wang, J., Banjara, K., Wilbur, J., & Rao, H. R. (2014). Security services as coping mechanisms: An investigation into user intention to adopt an email authentication service. ‌‌‌Information Systems Journal‌‌‌, 24, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12002
  42. Hung, W.-H., Chang, L.-M., & Lin, C.-H. (2011). Managing the risk of overusing mobile phones in the working environment: A study of ubiquitous technostress. ‌‌‌Telematics and Informatics‌‌‌, 28, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2010.07.001
  43. Kalliath, T., & Brough, P. (2008). Work-life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. ‌‌‌Journal of Management & Organization‌‌‌, 14(3), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.323
  44. Klein, H. J., & Kim, J. Y. (1998). A field study of the influence of situational constraints, leader–member exchange, and goal commitment on performance. ‌‌‌Academy of Management Journal‌‌‌, 41, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/256900
  45. Koay, K. Y., Soh, P. C. H., & Chew, K. W. (2017). Social networking addiction: An investigation of the relationships among social media features, negative consequences, and habitual use. ‌‌‌Journal of Technology Management & Innovation‌‌‌, 12(3), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242017000300009
  46. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. ‌‌‌International Journal of e-Collaboration‌‌‌, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  47. Kock, N. (2020). WarpPLS user manual: Version 7.0. ScriptWarp Systems. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20261.70885
  48. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. ‌‌‌Educational and Psychological Measurement‌‌‌, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  49. Li, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers' work performance in higher education. ‌‌‌Cognition, Technology & Work‌‌‌, 23, 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0
  50. Li, X., Zhang, W., & Shi, Y. (2018). The influence of the dark triad on exploitative manipulative behavior in a conflict situation: The role of moral disengagement. ‌‌‌Personality and Individual Differences‌‌‌, 126, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.022
  51. Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology. ‌‌‌Human Relations‌‌‌, 64(8), 1001–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711405552
  52. Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Gardner, A. (2009). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. ‌‌‌Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy‌‌‌, 52(7), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.7.6
  53. Moody, G. D., Galletta, D. F., & Lowry, P. B. (2017). Unifying conflicting models of information systems success: A normative framework and its empirical test. ‌‌‌European Journal of Information Systems‌‌‌, 27, 156–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2017.1305410
  54. Moreno, J. D., & Costa, J. (2016). The impact of ICT in SMEs: An empirical study of 5-Portuguese districts. ‌‌‌Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development‌‌‌, 23(3), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-06-2015-0072
  55. Nelson, K., & Quick, J. (2012). ‌‌‌Organizational behavior: Science, the real world, and you‌‌‌ (8th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  56. Pallant, J. (2020). ‌‌‌SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS‌‌‌ (7th ed.). Open University Press.
  57. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. ‌‌‌Annual Review of Psychology‌‌‌, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  58. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. ‌‌‌Journal of Applied Psychology‌‌‌, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  59. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. ‌‌‌Information Systems Research ‌‌‌, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
  60. Reinke, K., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). When email use gets out of control: Understanding the relationship between personality and email overload and their impact on burnout and work engagement. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 36, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.075
  61. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in "MIS Quarterly". ‌‌‌MIS Quarterly‌‌‌, 36(1), iii–xiv. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402
  62. Rossi, A. M., Meurs, J. A., & Perrewé, P. L. (2013). ‌‌‌Stress and quality of working life: Interpersonal and occupation-based stress‌‌‌ (3rd ed.). IAP.
  63. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. ‌‌‌International Journal of Psychology‌‌‌, 48(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
  64. Scott, E. (2021). The correlation between technostress and job satisfaction: A review of the literature. ‌‌‌Journal of Organizational Psychology‌‌‌, 21(4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v21i4.4589
  65. Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. ‌‌‌Information Systems Journal‌‌‌, 25, 355–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12067
  66. Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J.-F. (2019). The technostress trifecta: Techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. ‌‌‌Information Systems Journal‌‌‌, 29, 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
  67. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. ‌‌‌Information Systems Journal‌‌‌, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
  68. Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. ‌‌‌Omega‌‌‌, 27(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
  69. Tu, Q., Wang, K., & Shu, Q. (2005). Computer-related technostress in China. ‌‌‌Communications of the ACM‌‌‌, 48(4), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/1053291.1053323
  70. Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011). Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction users. ‌‌‌MIS Quarterly‌‌‌, 35(4), 1043–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971
  71. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. ‌‌‌MIS Quarterly‌‌‌, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  72. Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 24(6), 3002–3013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
  73. Weibel, D., Stricker, D., & Wissmath, B. (2011). The use of 3D in movies and video games: Motion sickness, visual fatigue, and disorientation. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 27(2), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.015
  74. World Health Organization. (2020). Mental health and COVID-19. https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/mental-health-and-covid-19
  75. Xu, X., Fang, M., Luo, J., Wang, T., & Li, Y. (2015). The role of emotional exhaustion in the relationship between chronic work stress and sleep quality. ‌‌‌International Journal of Stress Management‌‌‌, 22(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039860
  76. Yener, M. I., & Şimşek, Ö. F. (2016). The effects of technostress and switching behavior on work outcomes among university employees: The role of information and communication technology (ICT) self-efficacy. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 64, 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.039
  77. Yu, C. S., & Song, H. (2021). Exploring the impact of technostress on productivity: Theoretical development, empirical validation, and moderation effects of self-efficacy. ‌‌‌Journal of Organizational and End User Computing‌‌‌, 33(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2021070101
  78. Zhang, S., Zhao, L., Lu, Y., & Yang, J. (2016). Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behavior in social network services. ‌‌‌Information & Management‌‌‌, 53(7), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.03.006
  79. Zheng, X., & Lee, M. K. O. (2020). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites: Negative consequences on individuals. ‌‌‌Computers in Human Behavior‌‌‌, 110, 106384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106384
  80. Zhou, Z., Fang, Y., Vogel, D., Jin, X., & Zhang, X. (2012). Attracted to or locked in? Predicting continuance intention in social virtual world services. ‌‌‌Journal of Management Information Systems‌‌‌, 29(1), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290108
  81. Zuboff, S. (2019). ‌‌‌The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power‌‌‌. PublicAffairs.
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 14، شماره 56
زمستان 1402
صفحه 273-292

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 مهر 1401