فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تأثیر برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک بنگاه نگهدار بر نوآوری استراتژیک و بقای استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه با تحلیل نقش انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
پریناز عربزاده 1
حامد رحمانی 2
علی محتشمی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
10.22034/smsj.2023.364882.1738
چکیده
هدف از این مطالعه بررسی تأثیر برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک بنگاه  نگهدار بر نوآوری استراتژیک و بقای استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه و تحلیل نقش انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک در بنگاه نگهدار تاپیکو است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش 482 نفر از مدیران ارشد و میانی 42 شرکت تابعه از پنج گروه مختلف صنعتی و مدیریتی هستند که تحت نظارت شرکت نگهدار تاپیکو فعالیت دارند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از روش توان آزمون و به‌کارگیری نرم‌افزار G-Power به تعداد 222 نفر تعیین شد و به‌منظور اطمینان بیشتر 280 پرسشنامه توزیع شد و با نرخ برگشت‌پذیری 5/82 درصد، نهایتاً 225 پرسشنامه مبنای تحلیل قرار گرفت. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار Smart PLS انجام شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک بنگاه‌های نگهدار تأثیر مثبتی بر انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک، نوآوری استراتژیک و بقای استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه دارد. علاوه بر این، انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه تأثیر مثبتی بر نوآوری استراتژیک و بقای استراتژیک آن‌ها دارد. همچنین نوآوری استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه تأثیر مثبتی بر بقای استراتژیک دارد. از طرفی تحلیل متغیرهای میانجی نشان می‌دهد که انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک و نوآوری استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه میانجی‌کننده تأثیر برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک بر بقای استراتژیک است. ضمن آنکه انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک شرکت‌های تابعه میانجی‌کننده تأثیر برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک بر نوآوری استراتژیک و نوآوری استراتژیک نیز میانجی‌کننده تأثیر انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک بر بقای استراتژیک است. پژوهش حاضر مبانی نظری مدیریت استراتژیک را با پر کردن شکاف پژوهشی گسترش داد و نقش متغیرهای مؤثر بر بقای استراتژیک در کسب‌وکارها را برجسته کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
"برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک"
"نوآوری استراتژیک"
"بقای استراتژیک"
" انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک"
" هولدینگ"

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The impact of strategic planning of parent company on strategic innovation and strategic survival of subsidiaries by analyzing the role of strategic flexibility

نویسندگان English

Parinaz Arabzadeh 1
Hamed Rahmani 2
Ali Mohtashami 3
1 PhD student, Management group, Islamic Azad university, Qazvin branch, Qazvin. Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Management group, Islamic Azad university, Qazvin branch, Qazvin. Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Nowadays, with changes and instability, the business environment has become more complicated, and organizations need to change their past strategies to understand and meet customer needs faster and more competitively than competitors. Accordingly, the business survival is an important functional feature that is heavily dependent on the strategic Planning of the parent companies. The decisions that parent companies make to choose maternal practices determine the business survival level. Therefore, strategic planning is used as one of the methods of controlling parent companies for the long -term business survival of subsidiary. However, parent companies cannot compete with their main competitors regardless of strategic innovation. Prommarat et al. (2015) considers strategic flexibility to be important for adaptation, value creation and business survival; But Armstrong (2013) points out that flexibility-based strategies, has a negative impact on business survival. Given that there are different and sometimes contradictory results on the impact of strategic planning on innovation and strategic survival, and the mediating role of strategic flexibility in the relationship between strategic planning and strategic survival in earlier studies has not been clarified; Therefore, this study, in order to address this research gap, develops a conceptual framework for the relationship between strategic planning, strategic flexibility, strategic innovation and strategic survival, analyzing and describing the role of these structures in both parent companies and subsidiary business. This study examines the impact of strategic planning of parent companies on strategic innovation and strategic survival of subsidiaries by analyzing the role of strategic flexibility in TAPICO Holding. Answering the questions of how strategic planning for parent companies can be useful for strategic innovation and strategic survival of subsidiary businesses? And what is the role of the strategic flexibility of subsidiary units in the relationship between strategic planning, strategic innovation and strategic survival?
Methodology
This research is applied in purpose and is a descriptive nature of the survey. The statistical population of the study is 482 senior and middle managers of 42 subsidiaries from five different industrial and management groups operating under the supervision of TAPICO Holding. Due to the problems of the fingerprint rules, the sample size of this study was determined by 222 people using the power test and G-Power software, and 280 questionnaires were distributed and at 82.5 %, Finally 225 questionnaires were based on analysis. Standard questions were used to measure variables. Strategic planning in parent companies is based on 5 questions focused on long-term programs based on strategic goals, corporate strategies, future resources, reform processes, and continuous analysis and interpretation of environmental by AlQershi (2021) research questionnaire. Strategic flexibility based on 6 questions by research of Rosovich (2018) focusing on ease of regeneration of procedures, reform and rapid reaction, strategies control, timing of alternative resource use, implementation and active development of new projects and reset is a resource chain. Strategic Innovation with 7 research questions based on Karasneh (2019) and focusing on new production or improving current products, creating new supply products, new problem-solving methods, allocation of resources for research and development, searching and discovering new market opportunities, using high-level technologies, improving product quality and reducing costs have been measured. The strategic survival includes 8 closed questions by Barbosa (2016) and focused on cash accessibility, stored cash, account turnover, geographical market extent, market segmentation, sales estimation and risk tolerance adapted. Data analysis was done using structural equation and Smart PLS software. In this study based on the viewpoint of Hair et al. (2018) after the validity of the measurement model (convergence and divergent validity) and its reliability (Cronbach's Alfa and composite Reliability), structural model quality indices to ensure the coefficient of determination, The effect size and the predicting quality were calculated. To measure mediators, the Variance Accounted for test method was developed in accordance with Hair et al. (2018) is used. Finally, for the prediction power of the variables, the Importance-Performance Map Analyzed and interpreted based on the output of the structural model is used.
Results and Discussion
 However, strategic innovation is considered as a sustainable competitive advantage of companies; but in some cases, companies have not been able to achieve favorable economic returns through this way. Previous studies have shown that strategic flexibility is a prelude to strategic innovation and has a significant relationship with product innovation and corporate survival. However, previous studies have sometimes identified contradictory results from the impact of strategic flexibility and strategic planning for business survival. The present study expanded the literature of strategic management by filling out the research gap and highlighting the role of variables affecting strategic survival in businesses. Considering that the strategic innovation of businesses can be leapfrogging or gradual; It is suggested that businesses focus on the development of research and development activities for breakthrough innovations with a long-term view, and also on improving existing products and processes in the short term. Because strategic innovation is an important key for business survival. Taking into account the scope of activities and various industrial fields, Tapiko Holding Company endangers the survival and longevity of its subsidiaries, regardless of innovation in products. In this regard, the continuous support of senior managers and the creation of an innovative culture is a fundamental principle for laying the foundations and facilitating the innovative actions of businesses; Therefore, subsidiary businesses should continuously seek to create new methods of production and supply of products, and for this purpose, they should benefit from the support of allocating sufficient resources for research and development and new methods of problem solving. In addition, businesses should always update their production processes in view of the continuous changes in technologies, and by searching and discovering new market opportunities and using high-level technologies while improving the quality of their products, by reducing intangible costs, ensure their long-term survival.
Conclusion
The results of hypotheses testing with direct effect show that strategic planning by 0.547 coefficient effects on strategic flexibility, and by 0.223 coefficient effects on strategic innovation and by 0.363 coefficient effects on strategic survival. In addition, strategic flexibility by 0.686 coefficient effects on strategic innovation and by 0.411 coefficient effects on strategic survival. Strategic innovation also effects on strategic survival by 0.788 coefficient. The intensity result of mediation based on the Variance Accounted for test shows that strategic planning with the role of strategic flexibility by 0.255 coefficient and the role of strategic innovation by 0.173 coefficient effects on strategic survival of subsidiary. In addition, strategic planning with a mediating role of strategic innovation by 0.375 coefficient, effects on strategic survival and ultimately, strategic flexibility with the mediating role of strategic innovation and 0.534 coefficient effects on strategic survival. This study shows important managerial consequences for TAPICO Holding subsidiaries as well as and macro industry policymakers. Therefore, applications are offered for industrial managers and strategic planners. Intensive communication of business executives with external factors to gain environmental information and knowledge and continuous scouting of changes increases the likelihood of business survival; thus, industrial managers and planners should focus on resource flexibility and coordinate between internal factors and external resources while modifying source -based production processes, integrating long -term goals in different holding groups.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategic planning
Strategic innovation
Strategic survival
Strategic flexibility
Holding
  1. Adam, N. A., & Alarifi, G. (2021). Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: the role of external support. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6
  2. Alnazer, N. N., Alnuaimi, M. A., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2017). Analysing the appropriate cognitive styles and its effect on strategic innovation in Jordanian universities. International journal of business excellence, 13(1), 127-140. DOI:1504/IJBEX.2017.085799
  3. AlQershi, N. (2021). Strategic thinking, strategic planning, strategic innovation and the performance of SMEs: The mediating role of human capital. Management Science Letters, 11(3), 1003-1012. DOI:5267/j.msl.2020.9.042
  4. Armstrong, C. E. (2013). Competence or flexibility? Survival and growth implications of competitive strategy preferences among small US businesses. Journal of Strategy and Management, 6(4), 377–398. DOI:10.1108/JSMA-06-2012-0034
  5. Barbosa, E. (2016). Determinants of small business survival: The case of very small enterprises of the traditional manufacturing sectors in Brazil. SSRN, 3(1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2802706
  6. Belda, P. R., & Cabrer-Borrás, B. (2018). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs: Survival factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 249-264. DOI:10.1007/s11365-018-0504-9
  7. Beraha, A., Bingol, D., Ozkan-Canbolat, E., & Szczygiel, N. (2018). The effect of strategic flexibility configurations on product innovation. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 27(2), 129-140. DOI:10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0028
  8. Bouhalleb, A., & Smida, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and strategic flexibility and complexity. European Journal of International Management, 14(3), 476-493. DOI:10.1504/EJIM.2020.107033
  9. Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12111
  10. Chang, S., & Kim, S. (2018). The Influence of Corporate Strategy for Multi-Channel Network on Firm Performance: Make, Buy, or Ally? 22nd Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): Seoul, Korea, 24th-27th June. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/190395
  11. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1960144
  12. David, M. E, David, F. R & David, F. R (2017). The quantitative strategic planning matrix: a new marketing tool. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(4), 342-352, DOI:10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148763
  13. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 81(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008
  14. Dubkhti, M. Mashali, B. (2019). Designing the management strategy of Rasta Economic Development Group Holding (Special Shares), Master's Thesis in Business Management-Strategy Orientation, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture. https://file.pide.org.pk
  15. Ebrahimi Nejad, M., & jabarzadeh carbasi, B. (2019). The Impact of Participative Strategic Planning, Strategic Flexibility and Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Strategy Implementation. Strategic Management Researches, 25(72), 73-97. (In Persian). https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/smr/Article/666716?jid=666716
  16. Ebrahimpour, M., Nopasand asil, S. M., & Ahmadi saravani, M. (2015). The impact of strategic flexibility on companies' market performance: The Mediating Role of open innovation. Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 13(26), 5-16. (In Persian),DOI: 1001.1.26765403.1394.13.26.1.6
  17. Faghih, N., Dastourian, B., Sajadi, S. M., Henten, A., & Foroudi, P. (2018). A framework for business model with strategic innovation in ICT firms: The importance of information. The Bottom Line,31(1), 16-41. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-01-2018-0002
  18. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  19. Feng, J., & Luo, X. (2019). Median Role of Technology Innovation Strategic Information Acquisition Capacity in the Relationship between Board Capital and Technology Innovation Strategy Decision-Making Quality. International Conference on Social Science and Education Research, 1-7. http://proceedings-online.com › SSER07401
  20. Ghorban-bakhsh, R., & Gholipour-kanani, Y. (2018). Investigating the Impact of Strategic Flexibility on Organizational Innovation. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(3), 1–5. (In Persian). https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/6440
  21. Gray, S., O’Mahony, C., Hills, J., O’Dwyer, B., Devoy, R., & Gault, J. (2020). Strengthening coastal adaptation planning through scenario analysis: A beneficial but incomplete solution. Marine Policy, 111(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.031
  22. Hair J., Hollingsworth C. L., Randolph A. B., and Chong A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 113(3), 442-458. DOI:10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  23. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_A%20Primer%20on%20Partial%20Least%20Squares%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling_Hair.pdf
  24. Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. DOI:10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
  25. Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2297757
  26. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2756330
  27. Han, C., & Zhang, S. (2021). Multiple strategic orientations and strategic flexibility in product innovation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100-136. DOI:10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100136
  28. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
  29. Hernández, Y. G., Galvis, J. F. R., & Capacho, J. W. V. (2020). Business survival, a literary review of internal and external determinants. Criterio Libre, 18(32), 261-279. DOI:10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2020v18n32.7122
  30. Hosseinpour, M., Jamshidi, M. J., Mohamadifar, Y., & Behvar, S. (2021). Investigating the effect of strategic innovation on innovative performance with the role of the moderator of the business environment (Case study: small and medium companies in Kermanshah). Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal, 17(Special Issue), 189-208. (In Persian) ,DOI:10.48301/kssa.2021.128450
  31. Iravo, M. A. (2020). Strategic innovation, a contemporary management practice on performance of telecommunication companies in Rwanda. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 1-25. https://www.ijssit.com › main › uploads › 2021/02
  32. Karasneh, A. A. F. (2019). Reinforcing innovation through knowledge management: mediating role of organizational learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 14(1), 235-253. DOI:10.28945/4427
  33. Kidelo, P. (2019). Strategic planning as a tool for business survival. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 8(3), 11-26. https://garph.co.uk › IJARMSS › Mar2019
  34. Ko, W. W. J., Liu, G., Ngugi, I. K., & Chapleo, C. (2018). External supply chain flexibility and product innovation performance: A study of small-and medium-sized UK-based manufacturers. European Journal of Marketing, 52(10), 1981-2004. DOI:10.1108/EJM-07-2017-0466
  35. Kornelius, H., Bernarto, I., & Widjaja, A. W. (2020). Crafting Strategic Maneuverability to Boost Business Performance. In Conference Series, 3(1), 754-768. https://adi-journal.org/index.php/conferenceseries/article/view/409
  36. Kornelius, H., Bernarto, I., Widjaja, A. W., & Purwanto, A. (2020). Competitive Strategic Maneuverability: The Missing Link between Strategic Planning and Firm’s Performance,International Journal Of Advanced Sience And Technology, 29(3), 7413-7422. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/7612
  37. Kornelius, H., Supratikno, H., Bernarto, I., & Widjaja, A. W. (2021). Strategic planning and firm performance: The mediating role of strategic maneuverability. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 479-486. DOI:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.479
  38. Li, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., & Tian, F. (2018). Technological configuration capability, strategic flexibility, and organizational performance in Chinese high-tech organizations. Sustainability, 10(5), 1-17. DOI:10.20944/preprints201803.0182.v1
  39. Liao, S., Liu, Z., Fu, L., & Ye, P. (2018). Investigate the role of distributed leadership and strategic flexibility in fostering business model innovation. Chinese Management Studies, 13(1), 93-112. DOI:10.1108/CMS-02-2018-0420
  40. Majid, A., Yasir, M., Yousaf, Z., & Qudratullah, H. (2019). Role of network capability, structural flexibility and management commitment in defining strategic performance in hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(8), 3077–3096. DOI:10.1108/IJCHM-04-2018-0277
  41. Malekakhlagh, E., Safari, M., Beigi, S., & Rokhideh, M. R. (2022). Scenario planning and strategic innovation: The mediating effects of strategic thinking and strategic flexibility. Journal of International Marketing Modeling, 3(1), 1-13. (In Persian),DOI:10.22080/jimm.2022.23060.1026
  42. Marfou, M., & Shakeri, R. (2018). Business Strategies and Corporate Financial Performance. Empirical Research in Accounting, 8(3), 157-184. DOI: 22051/jera.2017.12670.1507
  43. Meng, M., Lei, J., Jiao, J., & Tao, Q. (2020). How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence? Plos one, 15(8), 1-18. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0238030
  44. Miroshnychenko, I., Strobl, A., Matzler, K., & De Massis, A. (2021). Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 130(1), 670-682. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.015
  45. Palmer, D., & Kaplan, S. (2016). A Framework for Strategic Innovation. Los Angeles: Innovation Point. https://www.innovation-point.com/Strategic%20Innovation%20White%20Paper.pdf
  46. Prommarat, P., Pratoom, K., & Muenthaisong, K. (2015). A conceptual model of strategic organizational flexibility capability and business survival. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Strategic Management. 14(2), 77–93. https://www.proquest.com/openview/7c2de3952d52039e2309c541f7368b7a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=38771
  47. Prommarat, P., Pratoom, K., & Muenthaisong, K. (2016). Strategic organizational flexibility capability and business survival: An empirical investigation of tour businesses in Thailand, AU-GSB e-JOURNAL, 9(1), 61-61. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu
  48. Rahman, N. A., Yaacob, Z., & Radzi, R. M. (2016). An Overview of Technological Innovation on SME Survival : A Conceptual Paper. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(1), 508–515. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.427
  49. Raji, A. U., & Gomez, C. P. (2017). Mediating effect of benefits realization management on contractor’s team competency and post-contract transaction costs in design-build projects. FUTY Journal of the Environment, 11(1), 17-31. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/fje/article/view/175897
  50. Rayisie, E., ABEDI, S., & ehteshamrasi, R. (2022). Design of a fuzzy artificial intelligence system in selection parent strategies in business management. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(51), 1-25. (In Persian). 22034/smsj.2022.121003
  51. Rezaei, R., Zandhessami, H., & Mohtashami, A. (2021). Modeling the Effect of Collaborative Open Foresight on Strategic Innovation in Aviation Industry; the Mediating Role of Strategic Learning and Strategic Flexibility. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, Journal Of Innovation Management in Defensive Organization, 4(4), 1-32. (In Persian),DOI: 22034/qjimdo.2022.303710.1447
  52. Rialti, R., Marzi, G., Caputo, A., & Mayah, K. A. (2020). Achieving strategic flexibility in the era of big data: The importance of knowledge management and ambidexterity. Management Decision, 58(8), 1585-1600. DOI:10.1108/MD-09-2019-1237
  53. Rofiq, A., & Pramono, S. (2019). The role of strategic planning and flexibility in shaping SMEs market orientation in turbulence business environment. European Research Studies, 22(1), 221-236. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1420
  54. Seifzadeh, P., & Rowe, W. G. (2019). The role of corporate controls and business-level strategy in business unit performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(3), 364-381 ,DOI:10.1108/JSMA-10-2018-0114.
  55. Shokry, A., ghazizadeh, S. Z., piroozfar, S., & tohidi, H. (2021). Design of an intelligent model to choose the parenting strategy of subsidiary businesses in mineral holding (Case study: Shahab- sang holding). Journal of Strategic Management Studies, Published online on July 28. (In Persian),DOI: 10.22044/jme.2020.9983.1931
  56. Stelmaszczyk, M., & Pierscieniak, A. (2020). Strategic Flexibility as a Mediator in Relationship between Managerial Decisions and Organizational Learning: Ambidexterity Perspective. European Research Studies Journal, 23(4), 612-622. 35808/ersj/1704
  57. Sukmanegara, W., Irawanto, D. W., & Prabandari, S. P. (2022). The effect of strategic flexibility on survivability with innovation as mediator in cooperatives. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 4(1), 138-154. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.6324779
  58. Suraya, E., Azis, N., & Majid, M. S. A. (2020). Does Performance Matter for Business Survival Based on the Enhancement of Locus of Control and Business Competence? The Case of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises. Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, 3(8), 98-106. https://sumerianz.com/pdf-files/sjbmm3(8)98-106.pdf
  59. Tayebi Abolhasani, A., daneshvar deylami, M., & Asadi Khanghah, S. (2020). The Effect of Knowledge Capacity on Strategic Innovation, Considering the Moderating Role of Competitiveness and Strategic Flexibility (Case Study of INOTEX Companies). Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 11(42), 189-212. (In Persian),DOI: 20.1001.1.22286853.1399.11.42.12.3
  60. Umam, R., & Sommanawat, K. (2019). Strategic flexibility, manufacturing flexibility, and firm performance under the presence of an agile supply chain: A case of strategic management in fashion industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 407-418. DOI:10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.35
  61. Authors:Wang, X., Qi, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Individual unlearning, organizational unlearning and strategic flexibility: The down-up change perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 14(1), 2-18. DOI:10.1108/BJM-10-2017-0324
  62. Xiu, L., Liang, X., Chen, Z., & Xu, W. (2017). Strategic flexibility, innovative HR practices, and firm performance a moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1335-1357. DOI:10.1108/PR-09-2016-0252
  63. Zhao, C., & Burt, R. S. (2018). A note on business survival and social network. Management and Organization Review, 14(2), 377-394. DOI:10.1017/mor.201
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 15، شماره 58
تابستان 1403
صفحه 295-316

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 مهر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 آذر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 فروردین 1402