شناسایی و تبیین اثرگذارترین و اثرپذیرترین مولفه‌های مؤثر بر رهبری چابک در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

3 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تبیین اثرگذارترین و اثرپذیرترین مولفه‌های مؤثر بر سبک رهبری چابک انجام گرفت. این پژوهش از نوع پژوهش­های آمیخته با رویکرد کیفی و کمی در پارادایم استقرایی است که از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ ماهیت و روش، توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش مدیران شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در استان لرستان هستند که 30 نفر از خبرگان آنها بر اساس اصل کفایت نظری و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده­اند. در بخش کیفی برای گردآوری اطلاعات از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته استفاده شد که روایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از ضریب CVR و آزمون کاپای- کوهن تایید شد و داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم افزار Atlas.ti و روش کدگذاری تحلیل و عوامل مؤثر بر سبک رهبری چابک شناسایی شدند. در بخش کمی برای گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه مقایسه زوجی استفاده شد. روایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از روایی محتوا و آزمون مجدد تایید شد و با استفاده از روش دیمتل فازی اثرگذارترین و اثرپذیرترین مولفه‌های مؤثر بر سبک رهبری چابک شناسایی شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهنده آن است که مولفه‌های انعطاف‌پذیری بالا، مهارت­های ارتباطی بالا، ریسک­پذیر و آینده­نگر بودن اثرگذارترین و مولفه‌های خوش‌رو و گشاده­رو بودن، روابط اجتماعی قوی و تفکر خلاقانه اثرپذیرترین مولفه‌های مؤثر بر سبک رهبری چابک می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and explaining the Most Effective and Influential Components Affecting Agile Leadership in Knowledge-based Organizations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fariborz Fathi Chegeni 1
  • Amirhoshang Nazarpouri 2
  • Seyed Najmoddin Mousavi 2
  • Reza Sepahvand 3
1 PhD Candidateof Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Aim and Introduction. Organizations to get distance of environmental challenges and maintain competitiveness, past approaches and solutions lost need to use the capability and the current environment that requires new paradigms and perspectives. Therefore, agility is a strategic and new weapon to take advantage of potential opportunities as well as positively deal with environmental threats [20]. Agility almost rejects the old ways of doing things that fit the traditional operating conditions and emphasizes the approach that in a highly competitive environment, organizations need to be very flexible and very sensitive to change. [26]. On the other hand, research shows that 46% of the failures of organizations in making changes, organizational improvement and overall adaptation to environmental conditions, are due to incorrect leadership style [8]. Today, managing and leading advanced and complex organizations such as knowledge-based organizations in a highly dynamic and changing environment requires leaders who have the ability to adopt flexible and adaptable strategies based on external and internal dynamics, and from a broader perspective to Recognize and evaluate different conditions and respond quickly to these conditions. Leaders who have the adaptability and flexibility to lead in challenging and unpredictable situations [29]. In the management and leadership literature, these leaders known as agile leaders. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify and explain the most effective and efficient components affecting agile leadership style using Fuzzy Dematel method.
Methodology. This research is a type of research mixed with a qualitative and quantitative approach in the inductive paradigm, which applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of the research was the managers of knowledge-based companies in Lorestan Province, about thirty experts selected according to purposive sampling method. In the qualitative part, a semi-structured interview used to collect information, the validity and reliability of which confirmed using CVR coefficient and Kappa-Cohen test, and the data obtained from the interview were analyzed using Atlas.ti software and coding method. Factors affecting agile leadership style identified. In the quantitative part, a pairwise comparison questionnaire was used to collect information, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed by content validity and retesting , and the most effective and influential components affecting agile leadership style were identified using the Fuzzy Dematel method
Findings. Factors affecting agile leadership style in knowledge-based organizationsincluding high flexibility, high communication skills, risk-taking and foresight, intellectual curiosity, high emotional intelligence, insight and having Broad vision, criticism and strong will and perseverance are in the cause group, which shows the importance and great impact of these factors on other parameters affecting the formation of agile leadership in knowledge-based organizations. In addition, cheerfulness and openness, strong social relationships, creative thinking, a relationship with respect, striving for self-improvement and employees, a relationship with support, empathy and intimacy, self-motivation and injecting passion and enthusiasm into employees, resilience High and belief in the abilities of themselves and employees are among the most effective parameters in the formation of agile leadership. In fact, these parameters are much more influential than other factors.
Discussion and Conclusion. Leadership style is not only one of the key factors that determine the growth or failure of the organization, but also considered to determine the strategies that govern it [19]. In fact, leadership is the most important factor in the continuation of life and success in the organization and is a fulcrum around which all other variables interact [53]. One of the reasons for the vital importance of leadership in the organization is its strong influence on the behavior of followers, so that it is claimed that the role of leadership in the organization determines the difference between great success or complete failure [18]. Undoubtedly, the key to the success and growth of social organizations and enterprises is the result of the effectiveness and positive actions of their leaders (54). Therefore, the activity of knowledge-based companies in an environment full of change that requires rapid response and appropriate adaptation to these change, requires the presence of agile leaders with high flexibility and environmental awareness and the ability to make rational and effective decisions in complex, unstable and unstable environments. Rapidly changing knowledge-based organizations can bring these organizations to shore of success by undergoing dramatic changes and transformations. Agile leaders who have the necessary emotional intelligence and skills and can promote effective cooperation and teamwork in the organization by communicating effectively and understanding the feelings of employees to guide their organization well in difficult situations and uncertainties and high complexities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Leadership
  • Agility
  • Agile Leadership
  • Knowledge Based Organizations
  1. Ahmadi, M., Fekri, R., Babaeian, M., & Fathian, M. (2016). Agility of after-sales service chain of heavy vehicles in Iran. Journal of Management Improvement, 10(1), 101-122. (in Persian)
  2. Akkaya, B. (2020). Review of leadership styles in perspective of dynamic capabilities: An empirical research on managers in manufacturing firms. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(36), 389–407.
  3. Arad, O., Mohammad Davoodi, A. H., & Taghi Pourzahir, A. (2020). Identifying the dimensions and components of authentic leadership in Islamic Azad University. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration, 14(3), 43-61. (in Persian)
  4. Arteta, B.M., & Giachetti, R.E. (2004). A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system, Robotics and Computer‐Integrated Manufacturing 20(6), 495-503.
  5. Atashi, A., Rastgar, A., & Damghanian, H. (2019). A grounded theory approach: model of knowledge workers leadership in Iranian knowledge-based organizations. Majlis and Rahbord, 26(97), 251-287. (in Persian)
  6. Attar, M., & Abdul-Kareem, A. (2020). The role of agile leadership in organisational agility, Akkaya, B. (Ed.) Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0, Emerald Publishing Limited, 17- 191
  7. Bititci, U.S., Trevor, J.T., & Ball, P.D. (1999). The Viable Business Structure for Managing Agility, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(3), 190-202.
  8. Chamanifard, R., & Nikpour, A. (2019). New leadership styles in the organization, Tehran: University Jihad Organization Publications. (in Persian)
  9. Cho, H., Jung, M., & Kim, M. (1996). Enabling technologies of agile manufacturing and its related activities in Korea, Computers and Industrial Engineering (30:3), pp. 323-335
  10. Dohani, E., & Ghasemi Zad, A. (2017). New ideas of leadership in educational management, Iran & World New Researches In Management, Economics, Accounting and Humanities, 2017(1), 1-11. (in Persian)
  11. Drucker, P. F. (1997). Introduction: Toward the new organization. In Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., & Beckhard, R. (Eds.).The organization of the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 17-31.
  12. Ebrahimpour, H., Salarifar, M., & Asiaei, A. (2012). The relationship between agility capabilities and organizational performance: a case study among home appliance factories in Iran. European Journal of Business and Management. 4(17), 186-195.
  13. Entezarian, N. (2016). The impact of knowledge-based businesses on the country's economic growth. Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural Monthly of Work and Society, 180. (in Persian)
  14. Ezati Vand, A. (2018). Transformational leadership. National conference on new and creative thoughts in management, Accounting, Legal and Social Studies, 2018(1), 1-16. (in Persian)
  15. Fakhari, H. (2014). Review of knowledge-based firms definition consistent with the economic conditions of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(4), 69-88. (in Persian)
  16. Fernández, J. A. (2006). The agile leader: Conditions for succeeding in China. Advances in Global Leadership, 4, 255–275.
  17. Fillol, A., Lohmann, J., Tremblay, A., Andre Some, P., & Ridde, A (2019). The importance of leadership and organizational capacity in shaping health workers’ motivational reactions to performance-based financing: a multiple case study in Burkina Faso, Int J Health Policy Manag, 8(5), 272–279.
  18. Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2011). Organizational behavior. Nelson Education.
  19. Hakkak, M., Saedi, A., & Momenimofrad, M. (2020). Identify and prioritize the antecedents and implications visionary leadership style using fuzzy Delphi approach. Future study Management, 31(1), 69-84. (in Persian)
  20. Hamad, Z, M. M., & Yozgat, U. (2017). Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking. Management Science Letters, 7, 407–22
  21. Hayward, S. (2018). The agile leadership. How to create an agile business in the digital age? London: Kogan Page Limited.
  22. Henson, C. (2015). Agile leadership for a changing workplace. Learning Quest. Retrieved from https://www.learningquest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Agile-Leadership
  23. Heydari, M., Siadat, S. A., Hoveida, R., & Shahin, A. (2014). The Relationship between organizational excellence enablers and organizational agility capabilities in universities in Isfahan. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 5(17), 21-38. (in Persian)
  24. Holbeche, L. (2015). The agile organization: how to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. London: UK: Kogan Page Publishers.
  25. Horney, N., Pasmore, B., & O’Shea, T. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. People & Strategy, 33(4), 32–38.
  26. Jafar Zadeh Zarandi, M., Sharifian, E., & Ghahreman Tabrizi, K. (2019). Explaining organizational agility model based on information technology from the perspective of sports experts. Sport Management Studies, 10(52), 137-160. (in Persian)
  27. Jafarnejad, A., & Shehai, B. (2008). Introduction to organizational agility and agile production. First Edition, Tehran: Mehraban Publishing Institute. (in Persian)
  28. Joiner, B. (2009). Creating a culture of agile leaders: A developmental approach. People and Strategy, 32(4), 28–35.
  29. Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership Agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139–149.
  30. Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Leadership agility; five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  31. Kumar, A., & Motwani, J.A. (1995). Methodology for assessing time based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15(2), 36–53.
  32. Maskell, B. (2001). The age of agile manufacturing, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal; 6 (1), 5-11.
  33. Mates, G., Yakalan, J., & Bradish, P. (2005). Agile networking: Competing through internet and intranets. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  34. McPherson, B. (2016). Agile, adaptive leaders. Human Resource Management International Digest, 24(2), 1–3.
  35. Medinilla, Á. (2012). Agile management: Leadership in an agile environment. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  36. Mesri, M., Ghafarzadeh, M., & Panahi, B. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Human Resource Leadership Agility on Reducing the Phenomenon of Invisible Employees through Knowledge Sharing. Tose e Quarttely Development Management of the Human Resources and Logistics, 1400(59), 22-45. (in Persian)
  37. Moorhed, G., & Griffin, R.W. (2001). Organizational Behavior, 334.
  38. Nagel, R. N., & Dove, R. (1991). 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy-an Industry led View.
  39. Nazar Poori, A., Shariat Nejad, A., Saedi, A., & Haji Zadeh, A. (2018). Identifying the manager’s mental pattern in order to human capital agility in sports organizations using the Q Approach. Sport Management Studies, 10(50), 227-246. (in Persian)
  40. Nikpour, A. (2020). The impact of manager’s lean leadership skills on readiness for change in public sector with the mediating role of organizational trust. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 9(4), 69-94. (in Persian)
  41. Nkuda, M. (2017). Strategic agility and competitive advantage: Exploration of the ontological, epistemological and theoretical underpinnings. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 16(1), 1-13.
  42. Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Information Technology, European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
  43. Popper, W., Power, B., & Stanson, S. (2013). Make agility part of your process. Harvard Business Review.
  44. Ragh, M., Sepahvand, R., Nazarpoori, A., & Mousavi, S. (2020). Identification of factors influencing the formation of leadership capital in academic environments: application of fuzzy dematel. Management Researches, 13(48), 193-215. (in Persian)
  45. Rastegar, A., & Fotovat, B. (2020). A qualitative study of gamification based recruitment process in Start-Ups. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 29(96), 149-168. (in Persian)
  46. Rastegar, A., Khezri, R., & Karimi Yazdi, A. R. (2016). Investigating the method of leadership from the perspective of divine hadiths and books. 4th International Conference on Modem Research s in Management Economics & Accounting, 2016(4), 1-30. (in Persian)
  47. Roth, A. V. (1996). Achieving Strategic Agility through Economies of Knowledge, Strategy and Leadership Strategy and Leadership, formerly Planning ReviewPlanning Review, 24(2), 30-37.
  48. Sadeghi, Z., & Mohtashami, R. (2012). The role of distributed leadership in learning quality improvement. Iranian Quarterly of Education Strategies, 5(3), 207-214. (in Persian)
  49. Şahin, S., & Alp, F. (2020). Agile leadership model in health care: organizational and individual antecedents and outcomes, Akkaya, B. (Ed.) Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0, Emerald Publishing Limited, 47-68.
  50. Sanjaghi, M., daliri, S., Farahi, A., & amirahmadi, F. (2017). The effect of strategic leadership on innovation emphasizing on network communication approach. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 9(4), 181-205. (in Persian)
  51. Sepahvand, R., Arefnezhad, M., Fathi Chgni, F., & Sepahvand, M. (2020). Identifying and explaining the most effective and impressionable components of students' tendency to engage in vandalism using fuzzy dematel method (Case Study: High School Students in Khorramabad). Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 11(2), 181-208. (in Persian)
  52. Setia, P., Sambamurthy, V., & Closs, D.J. (2008). Realizing Business Value of Agile It Applications: Antecedents in the Supply Chain Networks, Information Technology and Management 9(1), 5-19.
  53. Shojaei, S., Sadeghi, M., Naimi, A., & Yousefi, P. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between ethical leadership and employee voice with the mediating role of organizational identity and the role of adjusting organizational trust. Ethics in science and Technology, 15(1), 130-135. (in Persian)
  54. Tewari, S., Gujarathi, R., & Maduletty, K. (2019). Leadership Styles and Productivity. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education, 15(4), 115-120.
  55. Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17-24.
  56. Yadegari, M., & Tarokh. M (2017). Using fuzzy dematel technique to ranking knowledge management strategies. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(6), 761-788. (in Persian)