ارتقای اعتماد به مواد غذایی ارگانیک با الگوسازی بسته‌بندی

نوع مقاله : مستخرج از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه علم و صنعت

2 کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی و مدل‌سازی راهبردهای طراحی بسته‌بندی موثر بر اعتماد مواد غذایی ارگانیک است. این پژوهش در پنج مرحله صورت پذیرفته است. پس از جستجو در مبانی نظری پژوهش در مورد مفاهیم مورد نظر پژوهش برای کشف راهبردهای مناسب طراحی با استفاده از رویکرد کفایت نظری هفده راهبرد مورد شناسایی قرار گرفته و پس از انجام تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و مدل‌سازی اکتشافی با استفاده از داده‌های حاصل از 505 پرسشنامه دریافتی از مصرف‌کنندگان غذاهای ارگانیک، این راهبردها مورد رتبه‌بندی به کمک روش فریدمن قرار گرفتند. نتایج این تحقیق  17 راهبرد را مورد اکتشاف قرار داد که این راهبردها در چهار دسته کلی ظاهر مناسب، مواد اولیه مناسب، اطلاعات مورد نیاز و ضمانتنامه‌های کیفی دسته‌بندی شدند. نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند موجب بهبود وضعیت اعتماد به مواد غذایی ارگانیک شود. از نظر ارزش و کمک پژوهش تاکنون هیچ پژوهشی در مورد اینکه چگونه می‌توان اعتماد به مواد غذایی ارگانیک را از طریق بسته‌بندی آنها بهبود داد صورت نگرفته است و پژوهش حاضر برای اولین بار به دنبال شناسایی عواملی از طراحی بسته‌بندی است که می‌تواند موجب بهبود اعتماد مصرف‌کنندگان نسب به مواد غذایی ارگانیک شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Promoting trust in organic food by packaging modeling

نویسندگان [English]

  • yaser sobhanifad 1
  • Mohammad Aliannegadi 2
1 assistant
2 Iran University of Science & Technomogy
چکیده [English]

Aim and Introduction: Rapid population growth and subsequent increase in demand for food in recent years have led to a dramatic change in traditional agriculture. In this regard, the use of fertilizers and chemical pesticides and planting high-yielding cultivars of agricultural and horticultural species has increased agricultural production. However, this increase in production has been associated with several environmental problems, such as pollution of soil and water resources, the emergence of new plant pests and diseases, and the emergence of malnutrition and disease in humans. (Sumner, 2008). In response to these problems, and with increasing public awareness of health-related issues, the demand for organic products has grown exponentially in the last two decades. Its annual growth rate is much higher than in the conventional food market.
  (Cushman & Wakefield, 2017; Sebastian et al., 2020; Lang et al., 2014). In this regard, the problems of industrial foods are being reported in such a way that many people now believe that organic foods are superior and healthier than modern industrial foods.
(Bezawada & Pauwels, 2013; Thøgersen, 2015; Olson et al., 2017). However, studies show that despite such profitable growth, the organic food market can expand much further. These studies show that the main obstacle in this regard is the scepticism of consumers about the claims made in organic food (Bray et al. 2011; D'Souza et al. 2007; MacKenzie, 1991; Peattie, 1995; Schlegelmilch et al. 1996). The reason for this lack of trust is that organic food and its production process are not known to the people and are still new and unknown products to many people. On the other hand, people have been using conventional food, which is industrial, for many years, and that is why they trust it, and changing their consumption orientation towards other types of food products requires gaining new trust. This fact shows that trust plays an essential role in the success of organic food in the market (Sobhanifard & Eshtiaghi, 2020).
Therefore, increasing trust in organic foods in any way possible can improve the consumption of these foods. This trust can benefit both related industries and improve people's health more than before. In this regard, one of the things that can strengthen trust in a product, including organic food, is how these products are packaged. The packaging is the customer's first direct contact with the product and is the first thing the customer sees of the product. In a way, the packaging is responsible for most of the desired or undesirable mental image of the product. The role of packaging design is instrumental in advertising marketing and sales. For each product, including food, it is a certificate to introduce the product. Food packaging focuses mainly on product safety. However, if the packaging itself is not reliable, food safety is a concern (Abreu, Cruz, & Losada, 2012). Therefore, packaging has an undeniable effect on any product, including products. It is organic. In general, considering the growth of organic foods on the one hand and the need to build trust in these products and the effectiveness of packaging on product trust on the other hand, it is necessary to answer the question of how to increase consumer trust through packaging.
This important as a review of the relevant research literature shows that although much research has been done on organic food trust so far (Vega et al., 2018; Thorsoe, 2015; Anisimova, 2016; Ayyub et al., 2018; Khare & Pandey, 2017). Although there has been much research on packaging (Coles et al., 2019; Favier et al., 2019; Thomas & Capelli, 2018; Holmes & Paswan, 2012; Kenneth & McMillin, 2017) so far no research has been done on how to improve trust in organic foods through their packaging. Therefore, for the first time, the present study seeks to identify factors in the design of organic food packaging that can improve consumer trust in organic food.
From a practical point of view, the results of this research can improve the situation of trust in organic food. These results can show what manufacturers of organic food products should do to design the packaging of these products, despite all their efforts, to strengthen trust in these products. The results can lead to the development of their bases and bring them good profits.
Socially, the results of the research increase the peace and trust in food consumption, and as a result, increasing the consumption of these foods, which are healthier than industrial foods, causes the general public and society to benefit from the results of this research.
 Methodology: This research has been done in five stages. As mentioned before, in the first stage, using research literature, an attempt was made to search for research concepts. As a result of this step, although information was found on packaging and trust in organic food, research has shown that no study has been done on the effects of design indicators on strengthening consumer trust in organic food. This shortcoming led the research to identify indicators using field research. For this purpose, in the second step, the theoretical saturation approach was used. In this approach, potential and actual consumers of organic food were randomly selected and asked the question, What factors in the packaging make you more trust in organic food?. Respondents, up to 35 people, we can introduce 17 of these factors. Then from 35 to 70, which was twice as useful as the sample, no one could add anything to the 17. Therefore, after 70 people, the announcement was saturated theoretically. The selection of new samples can no longer lead to the discovery of a new factor. Table 1 shows these 17 factors. Then, in the third step, the goal was to determine whether all consumers approve of these 17 factors of organic food. Using a random selection approach, 505 of these people now live in Iran were selected. They asked, To what extent does each of these packaging indicators boost your trust in organic food?. The respondents give their response with a number between 1 and 5. The demographic characteristics of these 505 people are shown in Table 2. In the fourth step of the research, using exploratory factor analysis, we sought to confirm these 17 factors and explore a model using these factors, which the data analysis section has addressed. Finally, in the fifth step, the question was raised that if these 17 factors, which have also been approved for modelling, are to strengthen the trust of consumers of organic foods, which factor should start? For this purpose, using the Friedman test, these 17 factors were ranked according to their importance in building trust in organic food.
Finding: The explored model includes four factors of packaging that have a positive effect on trust in organic foods. These are suitable materials, perfect appearance, information and qualitative credit. Results from the use of the Friedman test indicate that the main variables in packaging design that affect the trust of organic food are: comparative information, nutritional information and health certificate.
Discussion and Conclusion: While most research on building trust for organic food has focused on providing knowledge and information (Samia et al., 2018, Sobhanifard & Eshtiaghi, 2020, Daugbjerg et al. 2014; Vieira et al., 2013; Yin et al., 2010), This research also emphasizes the issue of information and knowledge with a unique packaging case. It considers it as one of the main concepts needed to build trust through packaging. This central concept in this research consists of four variables as four solutions.
Also, Sobhanifard and Eshtiaghi in one of the closest studies to the present study concluded that to build trust in organic food in social networks; it should focus on useful six concepts. They are: experiences, generation of useful content, valid guarantees and certificates, valid information on product benefits, emphasis on naturalness, communication with previous buyers (Sobhanifard & Eshtiaghi, 2020), The present study also concludes that to build trust in organic food through packaging should be focused on suitable material, perfect appearance, information, qualitative credit.
A comparison between the two conclusions shows that both studies share a common emphasis on concepts such as credibility, information delivery, and assurance. This subscription is because packaging, in many cases, plays the same role as messages on social networks. The difference between the results of these two studies is due to the difference in the physical space related to packaging and the virtual and non-physical space of social networks. Comparing this study with other related studies, it is clear that this research has been able to introduce cases specific to packaging and physical space about the factors that create a trust for organic food. Therefore, from this point of view, this research can be valuable. Uniquely known.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • strategy
  • organic food
  • Trust
  • packaging design
  1. Abreu, D. A. P. de, Cruz, J. M., & Losada, P. P. (2012). Active and intelligent packaging for the food industry. Food Reviews International, 28(2), 146–187. https://doi.org/10. 1080/87559129.2011.595022.
  2. Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111, 1140–1167.
  3. Ahmad Aziz, A., & Naser Salman, A. (2005). Critical issues packaged food business, British Food Journal, 107.
  4. Alerstam T., Bovin J.-O., Jönson, G., & Lundaforskare föreläser (1995). 27 (Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden)
  5. Allen, G.J., & Albala, K. (2007). the business of food: encyclopaedia of the food and drink industries, 288, ABC-CLIO, Westport, Connecticut.
  6. Al-Swide, A., Huque, S.M.R., Hafeez, M.H., & Shariff, M.N.M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption, British Food Journal, 116 (10), 1561-1580.
  7. Anisimova, T. (2016). Integrating multiple factors affecting consumer behavior toward organic foods: the role of healthism, hedonism, and trust in consumer purchase intentions of organic foods, Journal of Food Products Marketing, DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2015.1121429
  8. Ayyub, S., Wang, X., Asif, M., & Muhammad Ayyub, R. (2018). Antecedents of trust in organic foods: the mediating role of food related personality traits, sustainability. 10, 3597; DOI:10.3390/su10103597
  9. Bech-Larsen, T., & Grunert, K. G. (2001). Konsumentscheidungen bei Vertrauenseigenschaften: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Kaufes von o¨kologischen Lebensmitteln in Deutschland und Da¨nemark. Marketing ZFP, 23, 188–197
  10. Bezawada, R., & Pauwels, K. (2013). What is special about marketing organic products?, J. Mark. 77 (1), 31–51.
  11. Biji, K. B., Ravishankar, C. N., Mohan, C. O., & Srinivasa Gopal, T. K. (2015). Smart packaging systems for food applications: A review. Journal of Food Science & Technology, 52(10), 6125–6135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1766-7
  12. Bildtgard, T. (2008). Trust in food in modern and late-modern societies. Soc. Sci. Inf. 47, 99–128.
  13. Boudreaux, C., & Palmer, S. (2007). A charming little Cabernet: Effects of wine label design on purchase intent and brand personality. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 19(3), 170–186.
  14. Cavassilas, M. (2007). Clés et codes du packaging - sémiotique appliquée. Hermès Sci. Edited by Lavoisier. Paris
  15. Chekima, B., Oswald, A., Wafa, S.A., Wafa, S.K., & Chekima, K. (2017). Narrowing the gap: factors driving organic food consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 166 (November), 1438e1447
  16. Coles, R., & Kirwan, M. (2011). Food and beverage packaging technology (2nd ed.). https:// org/10.1002/9781444392180.
  17. CRIOC (2010). Consumer Behavior Monitor, http://genie-alimentaire.com/IMG/pdf/CRIOC- 2010.pdf
  18. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.
  19. Daugbjerg, C., Smed, S., Andersen, L.M., & Schvartzman, Y. (2014). Improving ecolabelling as an environmental policy instrument: knowledge, trust and organic consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16(4), 559–575.
  20. Durham, C.A. (2007). The impact of environmental and health motivations on the organic share of purchases. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 36(2), 304–320.
  21. Favier, M., Celhay, F., & Pantin-Sohier, G. (2019) Is less more or a bore? Package design simplicity and brand perception: an application to Champagne, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 46, 11–20
  22. Giannakas, K. (2002). Information asymmetries and consumption decisions in organic food product markets. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'agroeconomie, 50(1), 35–50.
  23. Grobbel, J. P., Dikeman, M. E., Hunt, M. C., & Milliken, G. A. (2008). Effects of packaging atmospheres on beef instrumental tenderness, fresh color stability, and internal cooked color. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 1191–1199
  24. Hamlin, R.P. (2016). The consumer testing of food package graphic design. Br. Food J. 118 (2), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2015-0105
  25. Hoefkens, C., Campo, J.V., Verbeke, W., Aertsens, J., & Mondelaers, K. (2009). The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables: Consumer perception versus scientific evidence. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1062–1077.
  26. Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25, 9–22.
  27. Kalpana, S. Priyadarshini, S.R.,  Maria Leena, M., Moses, J.A., & Anandharamakrishnan, C. (2019). Intelligent packaging: Trends and applications in food systems, Trends in Food Science & Technology 93 (2019) 145–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.008
  28. Kenneth W. McMillin (2017). Advancements in meat packaging, Meat Science 132, 153–162.
  29. Khare, A., & Pandey, S. (2017). Role of green self-identity and peer influence in fostering trust towards organic food retailers, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 45(9), 969-990.
  30. Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing Management, 14th edition. Pearson, France
  31. Lang, M., Stanton, J., & Qu, Y. (2014). Consumers' evolving definition and expectations for local foods. British Food Journal, 116, 1808–1820. DOI:10.1108/BFJ-03-2014-0117
  32. Lau, H., K. Shum, P., Nakandala, D., Fan, Y., & Lee, C. (2020). A game-theoretic decision model for organic food supplier evaluation in the global supply chains, Journal of Cleaner Production 242, 118536
  33. Laureti, T., & Benedetti, I. (2018). Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing behavior: an empirical analysis of Italian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (January), 3367e3378.
  34. Lewicki R. J., & Bunker B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: a model of Trust development and decline. In conflict, cooperation, and Justice, ed. B. B. Bunker, J. Z. Rubin. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  35. Lyons, K., Lockie, S., & Lawrence, G. (2001). Consuming green: The symbolic construction of organic foods. Rural Society, 11, 197–210. DOI:10.5172/rsj.11.3.197
  36. Magistris, T., & Gracia, A. (2016). Consumers' willingness-to-pay for sustainable food products: the case of organically and locally grown almonds in Spain. J. Clean. Prod. 118 (April), 97e104
  37. Marsh, K., & Bugusu, B. (2007). Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. Journal of Food Science, 72(3), R39–R55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750 3841.2007.00301.x.
  38. Nandi, R., Bokelmann, W., Gowdru, N.V., & Dias, G. (2016). Consumer motives and purchase preferences for organic food products: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey in Bangalore, South India. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 28(1), 74-99.
  39. Naspetti, S., & Zanoli, R. (2009). Organic food quality and safety perception throughout Europe. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 15, 249–266.
  40. Noblet, C. L., & Teisl, M. F. (2015). Eco-labelling as sustainable consumption policy. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption, 300–312. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
  41. Olga, A., & Natalia, V. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. journal of consumer management, ISSN 0736-3761: 100-102.
  42. Olson, E. (2017). The rationalization and persistence of organic food beliefs in the face of contrary evidence, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1007–1013.
  43. Opara, U. L., & Pathare, P. B. (2014). Bruise damage measurement and analysis of fresh horticultural produced a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 91, 9e24
  44. Orth, U.R., Campana, D., & Malkewitz, K. (2010). Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: attractive and quality routes. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180102
  45. Orth, U.R., & Crouch, R.C. (2014). Is beauty in the aisles of the retailer? Package processing in visually complex contexts? J. Retail. New Y. Univ. 90(4), 524–537. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.05.004
  46. Orth, U.R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impression. J. Mark. 72 (3), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.64
  47. Pal, M., Devrani, M., & Hadush, A. (2019). Recent developments in food packaging Food and Beverage World, 46(1), 21–25.
  48. Peattie, K. (1995). Environmental marketing management: Meeting the green challenge. London: Pitman Publishing
  49. Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. J. Mark. 74(5), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg. 74.5.48
  50. Pracejus, J.W., Olsen, G.D., & O'Guinn, T.C., (2006). How nothing became something: white space, rhetoric, history, and meaning. J. Consum. Res. 33(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/1086/504138
  51. Rettie, R., & Brewer, C. (2000). The verbal and visual components of package design. J. Brand Manag. 9(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010316339. Richard, L., 2012. Comprendre le Bauhaus. Infolio ed
  52. Rong-Da Liang, (2016). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the moderating effects of organic food prices, British Food Journal, 118(1), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0215
  53. Rooter J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust, Journal of personality, 35.
  54. Rundh Bo (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging (Marketing logistic or marketing tools), British Food Journal: 107, 670-681.
  55. Salem, M.Z. (2018). Effects of perfume packaging on Basque female consumers purchase decision in Spain. Manag. Decis. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0363
  56. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30, 35–55
  57. Schneider, F., Stolze, M., Kriege-Steffen, A., Lohscheidt, J., & Boland, H. (2009). How can consumer trust in organic products be enhanced? Paper presented at the Ethical futures: Bioscience and food horizon, EurSafe 2009, 2–4 July 2009, Nottingham, UK
  58. Shepherd, R., Magnusson, M., & Sj ¨od' en, P-O. (2005). Determinants of consumer behavior related to organic foods. Ambio, 34(4/5), 352–359.
  59. Silayoi P, & Speece (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: an exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal 2004; 106(8): 607–628, DOI: 10.1108/00070700410553602.
  60. Sobhanifard, Y., & Sadatfarizani, S. (2019). Consumer-based modeling and ranking of the consumption factors of cryptocurrencies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 528, 187–196.
  61. Sobhanifard, Y., & Eshtiaghi, K. (2020). Exploratory modeling and ranking of the trust factors of messages about organic foods in social networks. British Food Journal © Emerald Publishing Limited 0007-070X, DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2020-0302
  62. Sohail, M., Sun, D.-W., & Zhu, Z. (2018). Recent developments in intelligent packaging for enhancing food quality and safety. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 8398, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1449731
  63. Sonneveld, K.(2000). What drives (food) packaging innovation?, Packaging Technology and Science, 13(1), 29-35.
  64. Tajzadehnamin, A. (2016). A strategic approach to the role of the country of origin and nationalism to trust and attitude Iranian consumer in the home appliance industry , Strategic Management Studies, 12, 43.
  65. Thøgersen, J., Dutra de Barcellos, M., Perin, M.G., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets, International Marketing Review, 32(3), 389–413.
  66. Thomas, F., Capelli, S. (2018). The effect of the number of ingredient images on package evaluation and product choice. Rech. Et. Appl. En. Mark. 1–25. https://doi.org/10. 1177/2051570718769201
  67. Underwood, R.L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 11(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2003.11501933.
  68. Vega-Zamora, M., Torres-Ruiz, F., & Parras-Rosa, M. (2019). Towards sustainable consumption: Keys to communication for improving trust in organic foods, Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.129
  69. Verbeke, W., De Smet, S., Vackier, I., Van Oeckel, M. J., Warnats, N., & Van Kenhove, P. (2005). Role of intrinsic search cues in the formation of consumer preferences and choice for pork chops. Meat Science, 69(2), 343–354
  70. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer attitude–behavioral intentional. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 169–194
  71. Vieira, L. M., De Barcellos, M. D., Hoppe, A., & da Silva, S. B. (2013). An analysis of value in an organic food supply chain. British Food Journal, 115, 1454–1472
  72. Vukaspvič, T. (2016). Consumers' perceptions and behaviors regarding organic fruits and vegetables: Marketing trends for organic food in the twenty-first century. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 28(1), 59-73.
  73. Wang, E. (2013). The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(10), 805–816
  74. Yam, K. L., Takhistov, P. T., & Miltz, J. (2005). Intelligent packaging: concepts and applications. Journal of Food Science, 70-1, R1eR10
  75. Yin, S., Wu, L., Du, L., & Chen, M. (2010). Consumers' purchase intention of organic food in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90, 1361–1367.