مدل پذیرش فناوری‌های نوین مالی و بانکی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، گروه مدیریت، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران

2 استادیار ، گروه مدیریت، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران

3 استادیار و رئیس مرکز تحقیقات کارآفرینی، ایده پردازی و تجاری سازی، گروه مدیریت، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.

چکیده

امروزه فناوری نوین مالی بانکی یا فین تک با توجه به گستردگی استفاده از اینترنت و فناوری اطلاعات اهمیت زیادی در دنیا دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل پذیرش فناوری‌­های نوین مالی و بانکی انجام شده است. این مطالعه در دو بخش کیفی و کمی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی، 15 نفر از خبرگان توسط نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی و سطح اشباع برای نمونه آماری و انجام مصاحبه انتخاب شدند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل مصاحبه­‌‌ها توسط روش تحلیل محتوا انجام شد و مقوله­‌های مدل پذیرش فناوری­‌های نوین مالی و بانکی شناسایی شدند. بدین ترتیب تعداد 77 مقوله فرعی، 16 مقوله اصلی و تعداد 10 سند نهایی از تحلیل بخش کیفی حاصل شد. در بخش کمی، پرسشنامه‌­ای از مقوله­‌های شناسایی شده طراحی شد و در اختیار 384 نفر از مشتریان بانک‌­ها و مؤسسات مالی که توسط فرمول کوکران انتخاب شدند قرار گرفت. مقوله­‌های شناسایی شده توسط روش آنتروپی شانون، وزن­دهی و اولویت‌بندی شدند تا مهم­ترین مقوله‌ها برای پذیرش فناوری­های نوین مالی و بانکی مشخص گردند. نتایج نشان داد که زیرمقوله­‌های راهبردهای سازمانی با وزن 0231/0، ایجاد سرعت در پذیرش نوآوری با وزن 0222/0 و سرمایه‌گذاری و چالش‌­ها با وزن 0222/0 بالاترین اهمیت را در میان سایر زیرمقوله‌­های شناسایی شده دارا هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Acceptance model of new financial and banking technologies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Khazaei 1
  • Farshad Faezy Razi 2
  • Younos Vakil Alroaia 3
1 PhD student, Department of Business Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
2 Department of Industrial Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
3 Assistant Prof. and Chairman, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization Research Center, Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Aim and Introduction: The world economy has experienced a huge transformation during the last three decades, partly due to the advancement of information and communication technology. In particular, during the last two decades, the banking industry has invested significant resources in the use of information technologies. In response to privatization, the growth of global networks and the increase in income levels, the banking industry has used new technologies based on the provision of services, which is called electronic banking, and its purpose is to achieve and maintain strategic advantages. Electronic banking includes systems that enable financial institutions, customers, individuals or businesses to access accounts, transact business or obtain information about financial products and services from public or private electronic networks, including benefit from the Internet.. In this situation, with the emergence and development of Internet technologies, companies and banks are adopting e-commerce technologies to increase productivity and quality, reduce operational costs, and respond faster to the needs of customers and business partners. As a result, the adoption and efficient use of e-commerce technologies has become the main concern of managers .
Methodology: Financial technology (Fintech) or in simpler terms the innovative use of technology in providing financial services is one of the most important innovations of the financial industry that tries to bring innovation to the field of financial services by using modern technology and this is due Sharing economy is the desirable behavioral rules of information. With the presence of the new generation of customers and their changing taste in using financial services, Fintech promises to transform the financial industry of the 20th century by eliminating additional costs, increasing the quality of financial services and drawing diverse and sustainable perspectives. pay one The development of information technology and infrastructures, big data analysis, and mobile devices have led to the disintermediation of traditional financial companies by fintech startups, which is due to personalization, individualization, and positioning. Financial services are provided by fintechs. Fintech startups have distinguished themselves from traditional financial institutions by personalizing services and services, solutions derived from data, innovative culture and agility in providing customer service, lower rates and fees, and access to diverse services. have done that through mobile phone, cloud data and cloud computing and change in past work methods and restrictive structures can be achieved.
Findings: In our country, doing things quickly and not wasting time is considered as the most important element of success in the competition of banks, and customers as the main determinant of this competition, there is a great value for technology and speed, and in the next degree, the technical expertise of banks. it is necessary to explain bank services, especially electronic banking services, and customers have the right to know the services of banks through public media. Therefore, for efficiency, banks need to obtain sufficient information from the customer, understand their interests and desires, and develop relationships with them. In Iran, despite the importance of electronic banking services, a number of customers still prefer to spend time in long bank lines to pay for water, electricity, telephone, etc. or transfer from one account to another. Accordingly, accepting electronic banking in our country is a complex issue. Today, due to the advances in information technology and the impact of this technology on various aspects of life and the emergence of the digital age, change in various fields has become inevitable, and in case of incompatibility of organizations with these changes and innovations, the ineffectiveness of organizations is more than It will be evident . The application of new technologies in the field of financial services creates many opportunities, including many job opportunities for the generation of the third millennium. Fintech companies can take banks out of the traditional structure and speed up the development of the service and product process by improving the digital banking experience and help with the rapid changes in the field of technology, lending process, risk management, etc. Also, various types of technologies such as mobile sales terminals, tablet-based sales terminals, online commerce and companies that are transforming this space and making business easier and cheaper for all parties, double the growth in this field. And in the near future we will witness the complete replacement of wallets with cash and plastic cards. Based on this and considering the importance of accepting new banking financial services, the current research has been conducted with the aim of providing a model of acceptance of Fintech products and services by the customers of the country's banks.
Discussion and conclusion: Nowadays, the use of Fintech or innovative application of technology in providing financial services has become an integral part of the banking industry, and banks' cooperation with Fintech startups to transition to digital banking is no longer a choice, but a necessity. The model of acceptance of new financial technologies is presented. In the qualitative section, 77 sub-categories, 16 main categories and 10 final documents were obtained by interviewing theoretical and experimental experts by content analysis method. Then, the conceptual model of the research was designed to enter the quantitative and modeling part. In the quantitative part, using the categories identified in the conceptual model and based on the questionnaire, the model of acceptance of Finatech products and services by the customers of the country's banks was presented by structural equations (PLS). The statistical population in a small part includes the customers of banks and financial institutions that due to the unlimited statistical population, 384 people were selected as a statistical sample by Cochran's formula. The results of structural equation modeling showed that the independent variables of awareness, perceived security, efficiency, convenience and comparative advantage have a positive effect and a negative effect on attitudes toward finitech products and services. Age and experience in relation to independent variables have a positive moderating effect on attitudes toward Fintech products and services. It can be said that attitude has acted as a mediator in the relationship between independent and dependent variables.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "New Technologies"
  • " Financial"
  • "Banking"
  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Alsamydai, M. J., Yassen, S. G., ALnaimi, H. M., Dajani, D., & Al-Qirem, I. (2014). The factors influencing customer usage of mobile banking services in Jordan. International Journal of Business Management and Research, 4(2), 63-78.
  3. Alsheikh, L., & Bojei, J. (2014). Determinants affecting customer's intention to adopt mobile banking in Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. e Technol., 3(4), 210-219.
  4. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and RegTech in a Nutshell, and the Future in a Sandbox. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
  5. Arner, D. W., Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Barberis, J. N. (2019). The identity challenge in finance: from analogue identity to digitized identification to digital KYC utilities. European business organization law review, 20(1), 55-80.
  6. Ataran, A., & Nami, K. (2011, August). Examining acceptance of information technology: a longitudinal study of Iranian high school teachers. In 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering.
  7. Chen, C. (2013). Perceived risk, usage frequency of mobile banking services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal.
  8. Chen, L. (2016). From fintech to finlife: The case of fintech development in China. China Economic Journal, 9(3), 225-239.
  9. Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2020). ICT-related behavioral factors mediate the relationship between adolescents’ ICT interest and their ICT self-efficacy: Evidence from 30 countries. Computers & Education, 159, 104004.
  10. Tun-Pin, C., Keng-Soon, W. C., Yen-San, Y., Pui-Yee, C., Hong-Leong, J. T., & Shwu-Shing, N. (2019). An adoption of fintech service in Malaysia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, 18(5), 134-147.
  11. Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S., & Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7(5), 515-543.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.
  13. Cruz, P., Neto, L. B. F., Munoz-Gallego, P., & Laukkanen, T. (2010). Mobile banking rollout in emerging markets: evidence from Brazil. The International Journal of bank marketing, 28(5), 342-371.
  14. Danaeifard, H. (2005). Inductive approach to building theory: grounded theory strategy.
  15. Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  16. Denig, S. (2017). The global web in regional politics: the regulatory and political debate on digitalization and the internet of things. In Out-thinking Organizational Communications, 165-185. Springer, Cham.
  17. Dhaggara, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G. (2020). Impact of trust and privacy concerns on technology acceptance in healthcare: an Indian perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 104164.
  18. Fahami, R., & Zare, H. (2013). An investigation of factors affecting accepting new technologies in distance education drawing on technology acceptance model (a case study of Esfahan Payame Noor University).
  19. Fairooz, H. M. M., & Wickramasinghe, C. N. (2019). Innovation and development of digital finance: a review on digital transformation in banking & financial sector of Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 69-78.
  20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  21. Ghaemi, M., Dehghan, M., & Sadatmoradi, N. (2017). Investigating the situation of banking startups in the field of modern banking services (Case Study of the Iranian Banking System). Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 17(20), 119-139.
  22. Ghafari, P., Zanjirdar, M., & Shabani, R. (2012). Investigating the effect of trust and perceived risk on the acceptance of internet banking services among customers of banks in Arak. Journal of Marketing Management, 7(16), 40-61.
  23. Ghorbani, Z. V., Deljou, G. H., & Amiri, A. (2009). Effective factors on citizen’s acceptance toward Tehran urban management phone number, 137.
  24. Gitau, L., & Nzuki, D. (2014). Analysis of determinants of m-commerce adoption by online consumers. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4(3), 88-94.
  25. Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and finTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580.
  26. Gunawardene, N. (2017). Digital transformation in Sri Lanka: opportunities and challenges in pursuit of liberal policies. Colombo: Friedrich Naumann Foundation Sri Lanka.
  27. Gupta, A., & Arora, N. (2017). Consumer adoption of m-banking: a behavioral reasoning theory perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  28. Liu, X., Zhou, J., Xue, Y., & Qian, S. (2019). Analysis of property management ecological behavior in China based on the grounded theory: The influencing factors and the behavior model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 44-56.
  29. Heydariyeh, A., & Mostafapour, M. (2016). A Conceptual Model for Accepting SCRM Customer Relationship Management System in Social Networks. The First International Conference on Management Coherence and Economy in Urban Development.
  30. Hosseini, M., Hamidizadeh, M., Jokar, A., & Rezaei, M. (2016). Customer churn in the private banking industry in Iran. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 6(24), 131-144.
  31. Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), 340.
  32. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46.
  33. Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, Å. (2011). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile phones among the farmers in Bangladesh: Theories and practices. ICTer, 4(1).
  34. Islam, M. M., & Hossain, M. E. (2014). Consumers’ attitudes towards mobile banking in Bangladesh. In The Second International Conference on E-Technologies and Business on the Web (EBW2014) (pp. 31-45).
  35. Jin, C. C., Seong, L. C., & Khin, A. A. (2019). Factors affecting the consumer acceptance towards fintech products and services in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(1), 59-65.
  36. Karakara, A. A., & Osabuohien, E. S. (2019). Households' ICT access and bank patronage in West Africa: Empirical insights from Burkina Faso and Ghana. Technology in Society, 56, 116-125.
  37. Khan, M. N., & Allil, K. (2010). Determinants of mobile advertising adoption: a cross-country comparison of India and Syria. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 5(1).
  38. Klewes, J., Popp, D., & Rost-Hein, M. (2017). Digital transformation and the challenges for organizational communications: An introduction. In Out-thinking Organizational Communications (pp. 1-6). Springer, Cham.
  39. Kolodinsky, J. M., Hogarth, J. M., & Hilgert, M. A. (2004). The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  40. Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21-38.
  41. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46.
  42. Markey, K., Tilki, M., & Taylor, G. (2020). Practicalities in doctorate research of using grounded theory methodology in understanding nurses’ behaviors when caring for culturally diverse patients. Nurse Education in Practice, 102751.
  43. Masinge, K. (2011). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile banking services at the Bottom of the Pyramid in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
  44. Megdadi, Y. A., & Nusair, T. T. (2011). Shopping consumer attitudes toward mobile marketing: a case study among Jordanian user's. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(2), 53.
  45. Chen, M. C., Chen, S. S., Yeh, H. M., & Tsaur, W. G. (2016). The key factors influencing internet finances services satisfaction: an empirical study in Taiwan. american journal of industrial and business management, 6(6), 748-762.
  46. Mushtaq, R., & Bruneau, C. (2019). Microfinance, financial inclusion and ICT: Implications for poverty and inequality. Technology in Society, 59, 101154.
  47. Najafi, F., Irandoost, M., & Soltanpanah, H. (2019). A model for relationship management with fintech and financial startups in banking industry.
  48. Alqahtani, F. N. (2016). Identifying the critical factors that impact on the Development of Electronic Government using TOE Framework in Saudi E-Government Context: A Thematic Analysis.
  49. Ng, A. W., & Kwok, B. K. (2017). Emergence of fintech and cybersecurity in a global financial centre. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance.
  50. Omarini, A. (2017). The digital transformation in banking and the role of FinTechs in the new financial intermediation scenario.
  51. Ouhadi, F., & Naseri, M. (2015). A study of business models for implementing fintechs and startups in the financial and banking fields, National Conference on Management and Electronic Business with a Resistance Economy Approach.
  52. Arjunwadkar, P. Y. (2018). FinTech: The Technology Driving Disruption in the Financial Services Industry. CRC Press.
  53. Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of service research, 18(1), 59-74.
  54. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of service research, 2(4), 307-320.
  55. Rajagopal, P. (2002). An innovation—diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and development of a research model. Information & Management, 40(2), 87-114.
  56. Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Costa, C. J. (2016). Does ease-of-use contributes to the perception of enjoyment? A case of gamification in e-banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 114-126.
  57. Ruangkanjanases, A., & Sirikulprasert, N. (2018). Predicting consumer intention to adopt near field communication enabled mobile payment in Thailand. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(2-7), 147-152.
  58. Gebert-Persson, S., Gidhagen, M., Sallis, J. E., & Lundberg, H. (2019). Online insurance claims: when more than trust matters. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  59. Sarlak, M. Roustaei, , & Moghaddasian, M. (2012). An effective study on mobile banking acceptance in Iran. 4th International Conference on Banking Services Marketing, 13, 1-21.
  60. Scardovi, C. (2017). Digital transformation in financial services, 236. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  61. Shahriari, S., Jafari Nia, S., & Karbakhsh, A. (2020). Strategic model of e-business performance. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(40), 69-20.
  62. Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and informatics, 32(1), 129-142.
  63. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 17(1), 273-285.
  64. Xiao-e, S. U. N. (2011). Grounded theory: theory-development in in-depth interview research [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 6.
  65. Tchamyou, V. S., Erreygers, G., & Cassimon, D. (2019). Inequality, ICT and financial access in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 169-184.
  66. Vahidinia, E., Hosseinzadeh Shahri, M., Khodadad Hoseini, S. H., & Abdolvand, N. (2020). Identification and Conceptualization of Coopetition's Antecedents for Market Entry in the Iranian ICT Industry. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(40), 19-43.
  67. World Economic Forum. Digital transformation initiative maximizing the return on digital investments in collaboration with Accenture.
  68. World Economic Forum. Digital Transformation of Industries, (2016). 45.
  69. Yang, Y., Jia, F., Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Xiong, Y. (2020). Adoption timing of OHSAS 18001 and firm performance: An institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107870.
  70. Sekhon, H., Zhao, A. L., Koenig‐Lewis, N., Hanmer‐Lloyd, S., & Ward, P. (2010). Adoption of internet banking services in China: is it all about trust? International journal of bank marketing.