تبیین الگوی ارزش‌گذاری دستگاه‌های اجرایی برای نیل به سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد کرمان.

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان.

چکیده

هدف این مقاله طراحی و تبیین الگوی ارزش‌گذاری دستگاه‌های اجرایی با مقیاس و تراز سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش است. در این تحقیق تبیین معیارهای ارزش‌گذاری مبتنی بر سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش در دستگاه‌های اجرایی استان خوزستان به منظور ارائه یک مدل بومی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. بر این اساس از دو پرسش­نامه یکی در خصوص معیارهای  ارزش‌گذاری با 51 سوال با آلفای کرونباخ ۰/۹۴ و دیگری در زمینه سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش با آلفای کرونباخ ۰/۹۳ با 98 سوال استفاده شده است. پرسش­نامه­ ها اساس روایی محتوایی و سازه تایید شد. جامعه پژوهش کارکنان سازمان­های اجرایی استان خوزستان می­ باشد که مطابق رابطه «کوکران» 382 نفر نمونه آماری انتخاب شده­ اند. برای بررسی و تحلیل داده­ ها از توصیف‌های آماری و استنباطی  استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که معیارهای ارزش‌گذاری 17 مولفه دارد. مولفه فنی آن بیشترین میانگین رتبه (۱۱/۰۹) و مولفه قابلیت نگهداری کمترین میانگین رتبه (۶/۷۶) را از مولفه­ ها داشته است. سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش با 13 مولفه در سطح بیشتر از میزان متوسط عملکرد دارد. البته بین معیارهای  ارزش‌گذاری و سطح بلوغ مدیریت دانش رابطه معناداری برقرار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the model of valuation in executive agencies to reach the level of maturity of knowledge management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Forough Farzan 1
  • Sanjar Salajegheh 2
  • Masoud PourKiani 1
  • Ayyub Sheikhi 1
1 Department of Management, Kerman University, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
2 Islamic Azad University, Kerman
چکیده [English]

In this research, the valuation criteria based on knowledge management maturity level in executing systems of Khuzestan province In order to provide a native model, it has been studied. Accordingly, one of the two questionnaires on evaluation criteria was used with 51 questions with Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 and the other about the level of knowledge management maturity with 0. 93 with alpha of 0.89 with 98 questions. Content validity and structure were used to assess the validity of the questionnaires. The statistical population of the study consisted of employees of executive organizations in Khuzestan province, using 389 people as the statistical sample using the Cochran formula. SPSS 22 and Amos 22 software were used to analyze the data. The results showed that the valuation criteria included 17 components, the technical component had the highest average rating (11.09), and the maintenance component with the lowest average rating (6.79) among other components in the statistical population Research has been done. The level of maturity of knowledge management consists of 13 components, which in general, it can be said that this variable is more than satisfactory. The results also showed that there is a meaningful relationship between the criteria of valuation and the level of maturity of knowledge management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Valuation Criteria
  • Knowledge Management
  • Knowledge Management Maturity Level

مراجع

  1.  

    1. Arling, P.A. (2011). Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 231-250.
    2. Akhavan Kharazian, M., Salehi Sedghiani, J., & Manafi, M. (2016). Assessment Model for Preparing for Establishment and Acceptance of Knowledge Management at the post office of the Islamic Republic of Iran Information Technology Center. Quarterly Journal of Information Technology Management Studies, Year 5, 17, 29-61, (In Persian).
    3. Azimi, N., & Aghaie Fishani, T. (2017). Explaining Intellectual Capital Strategy for Knowledge Creation and Transfer, Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, No. 31, 139-150, (In Persian).
    4. Arefinia, J. (2015). Review and compare knowledge management models and provide a compilation model for managing police knowledge. Journal of Police Science, 153-188, (In Persian).
    5. Bachtiar, H. (2015). The Impact of Request Tracker Application as Knowledge Management System on Employee Performance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 76, 222-229.
    6. Chen, Y. & Huang, H. (2012). Knowledge management fit and its implications for business performance: A profile deviation analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 27, 262-270.
    7. Dana'ifard, H., Azar, A., & Ebrahimi, S.A. (2013). Investigating the Strategies for Promoting Political, Social, Administrative and Technical Ability of Public Lines of the Country Using Evidence Based Linear Approach. Quarterly Journal of Management of Governmental Organizations, 3, 17-34, (In Persian).
    8. Dehghani, M., Yaghoobi, N.M., Mooghali, A., & Vazifeh Z. (2017). A Three-layer Pattern for Feasibility and Stablishment of Knowledge Management by Meta-Synthesis Method (Integral Approach), Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 5(2), 93-107, (In Persian).
    9. Ehms K. & Langen M. (2002). Holistic Development of Knowledge Management’, with KMMM Siemens AG / Corporate Technology Knowledge Management & Business Transformation; Online Accessible: http://www.knowledgeboard.com/doclibrary/knowledgeboard/kmmm_article_siemens_2002.pdf, 1-8.
    10. Elahi, Sh., & Hosseini Moghaddam, M.al-S. (2003). Feasibility study on the establishment of e-banking in the banking system of the country from the perspective of managers and experts in banking, the first international conference on information technology and knowledge, Tehran, Amirkabir University of Technology, (In Persian).
    11. Ghazi Nouri, S.S., Rajabzadeh Fatremi, A., & Modet, P. (2015). Designing a model for valuing technical knowledge for market players. Quarterly of Technology Development Management, 3, 45-80, (In Persian).
    12. Goonesekera, T., & Zyngier, S. (2011). Measuring Knowledge Management Maturity Levels in Organisation’s Production Area using Fuzzy Linguistic Variables Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 1-10.
    13. Hassangholipour, T., Abedi Jafari, H., & Khatibiyan, N. (2009). Measuring the level of maturity of knowledge management in organizations through the developed maturity model of knowledge management. Journal of Management Sciences of Iran, 14, 121-148, (In Persian).
    14. Hayat Davoodi, M. (2013). Framework for measuring knowledge management maturity level with emphasis on factors of information technology systems (Case Study Tarbiat Modares University Department of Engineering), Master thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, (In Persian).
    15. Hsieh, P.J., Lin, B., & Lin, C.H. (2009). The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNMTM): the evaluation of knowledge management maturity. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4087-4100.
    16. Hung, Y.H., & Chou, S.C.T. (2005). On constructing a knowledge management pyramid model. In Information Reuse and Integration, Conf, 2005. IRI-2005 IEEE International Conference on. 1-6.
    17. Jiankang, W., Jiuling, X., Qianwen, L., & Kun, L. (2011). Knowledge Management Maturity Models: A Systemic Comparison, International Conference on Information Management. Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering.
    18. Jiuling, X., Jiankang, W., & Hongjiang, Y. (2012). Study on Maturity Level Transition Mechanism of Knowledge Management, International Conference on Information Management. Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 325-328.
    19. Khalilnejad, Sh., & Daneshvar, M.R. (2012). The Effect of Knowledge-based Culture on Strategic Innovation, Knowledge Capacity and Strategic Flexibility, Journal of Strategic Studies, No. 30, 43-63, (In Persian).
    20. Khadivar, A., & Abbasi, F. (2016). Assessing the maturity of knowledge management in the top three Iranian companies. Journal of Modern Research in Decision Making. 3, 23-41, (In Persian).
    21. Kochikar, V.P. (2005). The Knowledge Management Maturity Model - A Staged Framework for Leveraging Knowledge’, with Principal Knowledge Manager Infosys Technologies Limited, India. Ehms K and Lange M.A. 2002. Holistic Development of Knowledge Management with KMMM. SIEMENS ag/Corporate Technology.
    22. Kuriakose, K.K., Baldev, R., Satya Murty, S.A.V., & Swaminathan, P. (2010). Knowledge Management Maturity Models – A Morphological Analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11, 1705-9232.
    23. Kuriakose, K.K., Raj, B., Satya Murty, S.A.V., & Swaminathan, P. (2011). Knowledge management maturity model: an engineering approach. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12, 1-17.
    24. Khatibian, N., Hasan Gholoipour, T., & Abedi Jafari, H. (2010). Measurement of knowledge management maturity level with in organizations. Business strategy series,11, 1751-5637.
    25. Kanapeckiene, L., Kaklauskas, A., & Zavadskas, E.K. (2010). Integrated Knowledge Management Model and System for Construction Projects. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,1200-1215.
    26. Kruger, C.J., & Johnson, R.D. (2010). Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: A South African perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 57–67.
    27. Moghadasi, A. (2006). Principles of Designing Information Systems Processes. Management publication, 107-108, 57-60, (In Persian).
    28. Mirza'i, M., Javanmard, H., & Hari, M.S. (2017). Identify the Pattern of Factors Related to Choosing a Knowledge Management Strategy (Case Study: Three Industrial Organizations). Journal of Strategic Management Research. 65,153-183, (In Persian).
    29. Mohammadzadeh, I., Keshtkar, M., & Mohammadi al-Muti, M. (2015). Assessing the readiness of strategy development organization organization knowledge management, Journal of Strategic Management Studies, No. 23, 61-79. (In Persian).
    30. Nazafati, N., Azimi, Gh., & Tavakoli, N. (2015). Explanation and Assessment of the Pattern of Knowledge Sharing Promotion in Knowledge Societies, Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, No. 21, 310-275, (In Persian).
    31. Oliva, F.L. (2014). Knowledge management barriers, practices and maturity model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 1053–1074.
    32. OECD. (2003). Conclusions from the Results of the Survey of Knowledge Management Practices for Ministries/Departments/Agencies of Central Government in OECD Member Countries”, February 3-4,2003, GOV/PUMA/HRM.2.
    33. Quinn, M.D. (2005). People Focused Knowledge Management: How Effective Decision Making Leads to Corporate Success. The Learning Organization, 12, 389-390.
    34. Qalich Lei, H., & Ebrahimi, Sh. (2016). Feasibility of knowledge management approach Asian Productivity Organization (APO). Management Prospects, 25, 95-114, (In Persian).
    35. Rodrigues, L.L., & Martis, M.S. (2004). System dynamics of human resource and knowledge management in engineering education. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Available in: http://www.tlainc. com/articl77.htm.
    36. Robinson, H.S., Anumba, C.J., Carrillo, P.M., & Al-Ghassani, A.M. (2006). STEPS: a knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12,793-808.
    37. Ranjbar Jamalabadi, H.R., Forghani AllahAbadi, M.A., & Jalili, J. (2016). Knowledge Management and t Maturity Models (in Organizations). Iranian Journal of Business and Economics, 3, 49-53, (In Persian).
    38. Ruiming, Y., & Yu Qingan, Y. (2013). Research on Knowledge Management Maturity Model: Based on the Life Cycle of the Industry, 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 259- 262.
    39. Suresh, J.K., & Mahesh, K. (2006). Ten Steps to Maturity in Knowledge management.
    40. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., & Hull, E. (2015). An application of the knowledge management maturity model: the case of credit unions. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-15.
    41. Teah, H.Y., Pee, L.G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Development and Application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model, The Tenth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 401-416.
    42. Wibowo, M.A., & Rudi Waluyo, R. (2015). Knowledge management maturity in construction companies, The 5th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-5), Procedia Engineering 125, 89-94.
    43. Zakeri, Sh.P. (2016). The Study of the Relationship between Organizational Learning Dimensions and the Organizational Maturation Rate of Managing Education Staff in Minab City. Quarterly Journal of Research in the Humanities, 7, 185-204, (In Persian).
    44. Zahedi, Sh.al-S. (2012). System Analysis and Design, Allameh Tabatabaei University Press, Second Edition, 11th Edition, (In Persian).
    45. Zahedi, Sh-al-S. (2006). Establishment and expansion of administrative information management systems. Journal of Management Studies, 51, (In Persian).
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 9، شماره 36
اسفند 1397
صفحه 191-216

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 شهریور 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 مرداد 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 30 دی 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار