نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In this article, we first consider parenting styles and their relationships with corporate parent sense of subsidiaries, which is one of the remarkable issues in Goold and associates’ studies referred to in this article as parenting feel for brevity, then having identified and classified environmental factors and exploiting concepts and related literatures of competitive intelligence, we develop and enrich parenting feel and subsequently propose novel concept of Parenting Intelligence. Finally the goal is to examine the relationship of Parenting Intelligence and its triple dimensions on the parenting-subsidiaries interaction styles. The population of this study includes managers and experts of Iranian pure holding companies. To analyze the questionnaires Pierson correlation coefficient and partial correlation coefficient are employed. The results of the tests reveal that in the population of focus holdings, parenting intelligence and its dimensions are significantly correlated with parenting styles in which the intensity of the relationship is maximum for the dimension of “awareness of subsidiaries” and is minimum for the dimension of “awareness of parent exclusive environment”, furthermore the effect of industry type on the relationship of intelligence and parenting style was not accepted.
کلیدواژهها [English]
|
.
|
|
14. Bonbright, J.C. & Means, G.C. (1932). The Holding Company, Its Public Significance and Its Regulation. New York: McGraw Hill.
|
|
15. Dishman, P., & Pearson, T. (2003). Assessing intelligence as learning within an industrial marking group: a pilot study. industrial marketing management, 32, 615-620.
|
|
16. Fuld, L. M. (1998). Monitoring the Competition: Finding out what is Really Going over there. New York: John wiley.
|
|
17. Gilad, B. (1999). Competitive Intelligence: The real knowledge management. Knowledge Management, 12(33).
|
|
18. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate level strategy: Creating Value in the Multi Business Company. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
|
19. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1995). Corporate Strategy: The Quest for Parenting Advantage, Harvard Business Review,73(2), 120-132.
|
|
20. Goold, M., & Quinn, J. J. (1988). Strategic control: a survey of current practice. Working Paper, Ashridge Strategic Management Centre, London.
|
|
21. Goold, M., & Quinn, J. J. (1993). Strategic Control: Establishing Milestones for Long-Term Performance. London: Pitman Publishing.
|
|
22. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1998). Corporate Strategy and Parenting Theory-Briefcase. Long Range Planning, 31(2) ,308-314.
|
|
23. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
|
|
24. Lonnqvist, A., & Pirttimäki, V. (2006). The measurement of business intelligence. Information Systems Management, 23(1), 32 - 40.
|
|
25. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Smith, A. (2010). Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New York: Wiley.
|
|
26. Peyrot, M., Childs, N., Van Doren, D., & Allen, K. (2002). An empirically based model of competitor intelligence use. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 747-758.
|
|
27. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press.
|
|
28. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
|
|
29. Porter, M. E. (1987). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43-59.
|
|
30. Prescott, J. E. & Gibbons P. T. (1992). The Parallel Process of Competitive Intelligence: Why it Exists and what we can do about it? Competitive Intelligence Review, 3(2), 11-13.
|
|
31. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
|
)
