تعیین الگوی تأثیرگذاری توانمندسازی ساختاری بر رفتار آوای کارکنان

نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین الگوی تاثیرگذاری توانمندسازی ساختاری بر رفتار آوای کارکنان است که در این راستا نقش میانجی‌گری قلدری در محیط کار و بهروزی روان‌شناختی کارکنان هم مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. طرح پژوهش توصیفی- پیمایشی است که به روش میدانی اقدام به جمع‌آوری اطلاعات شده است. جامعه آماری شامل پرستاران بیمارستان طالقانی تهران با تعداد 280 پرستار است که به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده، تعداد 162 پرستار به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب‌ شده‌اند. ابزار مورداستفاده برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه است که پایایی آن با آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه ‌شده است. تجزیه­وتحلیل داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از تکنیک مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی ال اس انجام‌ شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که توانمندسازی ساختاری از طریق تأثیر منفی بر رفتارهای قلدرمآبانه در سازمان و تأثیر مثبت بر بهروزی روان‌شناختی کارکنان موجب افزایش آوای رفتار در سازمان شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Pattern of Impact of Structural Empowerment on Employees' Voice Behavior

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akram Hadizadeh
  • Seyyed Soheil Azimi
  • Maryam Tehrani
Shahid Beheshti University.
چکیده [English]

This study determined the effect pattern of structural empowerment on employees' voice of behavior in the organization, according to the mediating role of bullying in the workplace and psychological well-being. The current research is a kind of descriptive field of study to collect information A total of 280 nurses in Tehran Taleghani's Hospital were aimed as the reaearch statistical society, and based on the simple random sampling method a collection of 162 nurses were selected as the research statistical sample. Reaeach data collection was implemented by using questionnaires, that thier reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha. Also Data was analyzed by using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques in the PLS sofwere. The results showed that structural empowerment through a negative impact on voice of behavior in the organization and employees' psychological well-being has positive impact on increasing the voice of behavior in the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Voice Behavior
  • psychological wellbeing
  • Structural Empowerment
  • Workplace Bullying

1. Ashford SJ, Sutcliffe K, Christianson MK. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: the leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. See Greenberg & Edwards: 175–202.

2. Beer, M. and Eisenstat, R. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning, Sloan Management Review41: 29-40.

3. Bolino, M. C. Turnley, W. H. & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review14: 229–246.

4. Bowen, David E. and Edward E. Lawler. (1992). Th e Empowerment of Service Workers: What, Why, How, and When. Sloan Management Review33(3): 31–39.

5. Budd, J. W. Arvey, R. D. & Lawless, P. (1996). Correlates and consequences of workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1: 197–210.

6. Burris ER. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial responses to employee voice. Acad. Manag.J. 55: 851–75.

7. Cho, J. Laschinger, H.K.S. & Wong, C. (2006). Workplace empowerment, work engagement and organizational commitment of new graduate nurses. Nursing Leadership.

8. Conger, Jay A. and Rabindra N. Kanungo. (1988). Th e Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review13(3): 471–82.

9. Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31: 874–900.

10. Diener, E. & Ryan, K. (2011). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology39(4): 391–406.

11. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin95(3): 542–575.

12. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist55(1): 34–43.

13. Dundon T, Wilkinson A, Marchington M, et al. (2004). The meaning and purpose of employee voice. International Journal of Human Resource Management15(6): 1149–1170.

14. Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower20(1/2): 16–27.

15. Einarsen, S. (2002). The nature and causes of bullying at work. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bullying at Work 23–24 September. Birkbeck University of London: 6–8.

16. Einarsen, S. B. I. Raknes and S. B. Matthiesen (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: an exploratory study’, European Work and Organizational Psychologist4: 381–401.

17. Einarsen, S. H. Hoel, D. Zapf and C. L. Cooper (2003). Bullying and Emotional Abuse: International Perspectives in Research and Practice. London: Taylor and Francis.

18. Einarsen, S. Raknes, B.I. & Matthiesen, S.B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychologist4(4): 381-401.

19. Frese, M. Teng, E. & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 1139–1155.

20. Fuller J, Marler L, Hester K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J. Organ. Behav27: 1089–120.

21. Gao, L, Zheng, X. & Yan, B. B. (2010). The differences of well-being between the East and the West: From the view of selfconstrual. Advances in Psychological Science18(7): 1041–1045 (in Chinese).

22. Helge Hoel, Lars Glas, J.rn Hetland, Cary L. Cooper, and Stale Einarsen. (2010). Leadership Styles as Predictors of Self-reported and Observed Workplace Bullying. British Journal of Management21: 453–468.

23. Hirshchman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states.cambridge.MA.

24. Hoel, H. and C. L. Cooper (2000). Destructive conflict andbbullying at work’. Unpublished report, Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.

25. Hoel, H. and D. Salin (2003). Organisational antecedents of workplace bullying’. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf and C.

26. Hoel, H. C. Rayner and C. L. Cooper (1999). Workplace bullying. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 195–230. Chichester: Wiley.

27. In Lutgen-Sandvik, P. & Sypher, B.D. (2009) Destructive Organizational Communication. New York: Routledge Press.

28. Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, July/August: 65-75.

29. Komla Tsey, Desley Harvey, Teresa Gibson and Liz Pearson. (2009). The role of empowerment in setting a foundation for social and emotional wellbeing. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health.

30. Laschinger, H. K. Almost, J. Purdy, N. & Kim J. (2004). Predictors of nurse managers’ health in Canadian restructured healthcare settings. Nurse Leadership, 17(4): 88-105.

31. Laschinger, H.K.S. Finegan, J. Shamian, J. & Wilk, P. (2001). Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: Expanding Kanter’s model. Journal of Nursing Administration31(5): 260- 272.

32. Lee