Extended Abstract


Introduction:
In recent years, the concept of "scientific and technological leadership" has become a prominent feature in the leadership discourse, upstream documents, and national development plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Positioned as an overarching goal of its scientific and civilizational policy, this reflects a fundamental shift in national science policy—from positioning the country as a consumer of knowledge to becoming a producer and reference point in global knowledge production.
Methodology:
The primary objective of this research is to develop a framework for a national division of labor aimed at achieving scientific and technological leadership in Iran. This study employs a systematic analysis of upstream documents, expert opinions, and institutional mapping to identify responsibilities among relevant institutions. Guided by the theoretical framework of science, technology, and innovation (STI) governance—particularly the concept of "functional coherence levels"—the research addresses the following key question:
How can scientific and technological leadership be achieved within the framework of Iran’s Islamic-Iranian identity through a well-defined national division of labor and inter-institutional coordination?
This main objective is pursued through four specific sub-objectives:
1. Extraction and classification of macro-level and operational strategies related to scientific leadership from upstream documents.
2. Analysis and alignment of these strategies with international innovation governance concepts, particularly "functional coherence levels."
3. Design of a conceptual model for the national division of labor among governing, executive, intermediary, and knowledge-producing institutions.
4. Proposal of actionable policy recommendations for implementing, coordinating, and monitoring the designed framework.
The methodological approach is a qualitative, interpretive, and systematic document analysis conducted in three stages:
1. Extraction of strategies and policies from key documents.
2. Categorization of these elements across thematic domains and functional levels.
3. Systematic analysis and alignment with the theoretical framework.
The Delphi method, engaging 16 experts from academia, senior scientific management, policymaking, and the private sector, was used to validate the identified strategies and the proposed division-of-labor model.
Results and Discussion:
Coding was organized into eight thematic axes, each encompassing key actions assigned to relevant institutions:
Production of beneficial and indigenous science
Intelligent engagement with the global community
Training and retention of elite human capital
Transformation of the education, research, and innovation system
Linkage between university, industry, and society
Enhancement of infrastructure and support systems
Development of a culture of scientism and scientific ethics
International and civilizational engagement
Through institutional mapping, four categories of institutions were identified, each responsible for a distinct dimension of the system:
Governing Institutions: High-level policymakers and regulators positioned at the governance level. They define "what should be done and why" by formulating the national vision, setting strategic priorities, allocating resources, and monitoring implementation.
Government Ministries and Agencies: Primary actors at the executive level of STI governance, responsible for translating macro-level policies into concrete operational actions.
Research and Innovation Institutions: The main pillars of knowledge and technology production, operating at the production level to generate foundational, applied, and technological knowledge.
Intermediary Institutions: These institutions act as the "glue" within the innovation system. Situated between academia, industry, and government, they bridge the gap between knowledge creation and socio-economic application by fostering networks, facilitating knowledge exchange, enabling commercialization, and supporting financing.
Conclusion:
Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that integrating strategic management principles into STI governance is essential for achieving scientific and technological leadership. This requires a shift from operational management to integrated strategic management, wherein:
Each institution operates based on its specific mission;
Processes are guided by strategic tools;
The overall system evolves through collaboration, knowledge integration, and innovation-driven accountability.
This approach enables an intelligent national division of labor. Institutions understand not only what to do but also why and how their tasks fit within a coordinated national system. Consequently, achieving scientific leadership cannot be realized through publishing papers or registering patents alone; it demands the deep integration of strategic management into the governance of STI systems. In today’s complex environment, scientific organizations and governance bodies must adopt strategic frameworks to guide their activities through a combination of innovation models, knowledge management, networking, and strategic flexibility. The framework developed in this study provides a roadmap for coordination among various institutions—including governance bodies, policymakers, implementers, funding agencies, knowledge producers, and market actors—to collectively advance Iran's scientific and technological leadership.