فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

واکاوی عوامل موثر بر حکمرانی سازمانی با رویکرد دوسوتوانی سازمانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، واحد ایذه، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، ایذه، ایران
چکیده
حکمرانی سازمانی ترکیبی از قوانین، فرایندها یا قواعدی است که بر اساس آنها یک سازمان، اداره، تنظیم یا کنترل می‌شود. حکمرانی سازمانی شامل عوامل داخلی و خارجی است که چارچوبی را برای دستیابی به اهداف شرکت فراهم می‌کند و بر منافع شرکت ازجمله سهام‌داران، مشتریان، تأمین‌کنندگان، قانون‌گذاران دولتی و مدیریت تأثیر می‌گذارد. هدف پژوهش حاضر واکاوی عوامل مؤثر بر حکمرانی سازمانی با رویکرد دوسوتوانی به روش آمیخته اکتشافی است. با بررسی پیشینه پژوهش تعداد 6 بُعد،17 مولفه و69 شاخص برای حکمرانی سازمانی و دوسوتوانی احصا گردید. برای تأیید آنها براساس نظر 20 خبره، ازروش دلفی فازی با پرسشنامه استاندارد استفاده شد و منجر به تأیید تعداد 3 بُعد برای حکمرانی سازمانی و 3 بُعد برای دوسوتوانی گردید. سپس با روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی براساس نظر 100 خبره، تعداد 6 بُعد استخراج شده تایید و روایی ابزار را خبرگان و پایایی با مقدار بالای 7/0 برای هر بُعد تأیید کردند. ابعاد نهایی برای حکمرانی سازمانی شامل، ساختارهای حکمرانی، راهبردهای حکمرانی وعمگرایی حکمرانی ازیکسو وابعاد دوسوتوانی نیزشامل ساختارهای دوسوتوانی، مدیریت دوسوتوانی و زمینه‌های دوسوتوانی ازسوی دیگرمورد تایید قرارگرفت. روابط میان ابعاد نهایی حکمرانی سازمانی و دوسوتوانی سازمانی با روش مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری تببین شدند و الگوی نهایی حاصل گردید. یافته‌های نشان می‌دهد که الگوی نهایی حکمرانی سازمانی مبتنی بر دوسوتوانی در شرکت‌های برق منطقه‌ای ایران مشتمل بر6 بُعد،12 مولفه و 48 شاخص بوده واز روایی و پایایی مطلوبی برخوردار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the factors affecting organizational governance with organizational ambidexterity

نویسندگان English

AbdolKarim Behzadi 1
Vahid Chenari 2
Ezzatullah Kayani 2
Fouad Makoundi 2
Mahmoud Daniali, Deh Hoz 3
1 PhD student, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Sho.C., Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Ize.C., Islamic Azad University, Izeh, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
the concept of corporate governance has been widely discussed in the past decade. this concept has been defined in two separate fields and has been defined as independent but related concepts. historically, the concept of governance in the field of plan policy has expanded and then has expanded to the economy and especially economic development. therefore, in contrast to itself, the concept of government government has found and has narrowed it. but gradually with the development of this concept to the scope of organizations in front of itself, it has found the concept of management and should also clarify its relation with it. the leaders of organized organizations and organizations in order to play role in the leadership and leadership of their societies. corporate governance consists of a set of relationships between company management, board, shareholders and other stakeholders. based on these relations, structures are created through which the company 's goals are the means to achieve those goals and how to monitor company performance. this system which is under guidance and supervision of ceo and with active participation of key officials in the company, periodically reviews the company 's internal control procedures and the accuracy of financial reporting and information and in addition to reporting to the board and other related references will prevent fraudulent activities in the company. in recent years, public administration researchers suggest that traditional management patterns are not suitable to maximize the value of firms in the long run. therefore, government agencies (including electricity companies in the region) are looking for corporate governance patterns in an integrated with new organizational concepts to use the results. one of the most important concepts of organizational ambidexterity is organizational ambidexterity. the mechanism of organizational governance in the electricity industry as one of the industries specialized in the power industry due to the ability of value creation and wealth through energy transfer can lead to the growth and development of community infrastructure and the effectiveness of government participation in the development of the country. in the event of increasing the capacity of the power generation capacity without considering the transmission and distribution infrastructure and also challenges of the field of leadership and corporate governance and existing social responsibility and challenges that will be added in the future, the importance and necessity of addressing the concepts and dimensions of organizational governance and organizational ambidexterity in relation to those concepts have increased.
Methodology
of the study is generally used in the mixed research (mixed) in the first stage. after selecting the stages of qualitative research, it comes to quantitative stages. in this stage, an initial pattern is drawn using exploratory models. finally, the final model is presented using confirmatory methods. accordingly, the present study with mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative) and exploratory design, in this process, was applied to experts in the field of electricity industry to increase accuracy of the final model. in order to compile this pattern, two main sources have been used. first, existing documents and documents that include previous researches related to organizational governance and ambidexterity s. second, the opinions and experiences of the experts that could contribute to the richness of the study pattern. one of the most widely used methods of meta - synthesis method is the first phase of the qualitative phase by using meta - synthesis method.
(b) the second phase of the qualitative section: the fuzzy delphi step was used to determine the sample size among experts and experts of the university professors, using purposive sampling method.
(c) the third stage of quantitative section: interpretive structural modeling (ism); at this stage, the statistical sample was purposefully and judgmental.
(d) the fourth step of quantitative sectio: modeling of structural equations was used in this stage of partial least squares.
 Results and Discussion
the analysis of research data as mentioned in theoretical framework, the pattern of organizational governance is the reference pattern for conducting research. on the basis of organizational governance dimensions, the organizational ambidexterity was executed according to the following tables and according to experts ' opinions, fuzzy delphi method was implemented. by using mathematical calculations for making fuzzy numbers, first the correct numbers of experts ' opinions have become fuzzy numbers. then, fuzzy average was taken from the points and then the fuzzy mean was converted to deterministic number or defuzzification. in delphi delphi fuzzy delphi was used to make a decision on the theoretical consensus among experts with respect to the views of experts.the finding of fuzzy interpretive structural modeling: the first step in this technique is the formation of paired comparisons of dimensions. in the present study, after dimensions, components and indicators of the proposed model, a survey was conducted about the effect and pattern of the model. the third step in fuzzy interpretive structural modeling is to form the primary accessibility matrix.the fifth step in fuzzy interpretive structural modeling is the formation of input, output, common and level of dimensions. structural equation modeling (sem): in the present study, the validity and reliability of the proposed model was evaluated by factor analysis. to determine the validity of the mentioned structures, the average index of variance extracted, the cross - load test criterion has been calculated.
Conclusion
corporate governance is critical to the appropriate performance and the reputation of an organization. because organizational governance is based on rules, regulations, policies and procedures to ensure the organization 's accountability, so once it is done properly, it creates a framework for achieving firm goals in all areas of management. the proper application of this concept ensures integration, overall orientation, risk management and enterprise success planning. this helps businesses remain financially stable and lead to strengthening bilateral relations of stakeholders. corporate governance is able to balance the interests of different stakeholders including shareholders, managers, customers, suppliers, creditors, government and finally society. in addition, due to providing a framework for achieving the macro goals of the organization, all the different managerial areas from internal control to performance evaluation, organizational structure and macro - organizational strategies are taken. today, organizations face a key challenge. on the one hand, they should be able to take advantage of the resources and their existing capabilities and the survival of the organization against the environmental changes is their adaptation and flexibility.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Governance
Ambidexterity
Structures and strategies
1- Abyar, M., Faghihi, A., & Chenari, V. (2020). Designing a governance model of National Iranian South Oil Company: A Study on Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability. Iranian journal of management sciences, 14(56), 1-24. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2159371 [In Persian]
2- Ahmadi, S. (2021). Investigating the theory of good governance based on public trust and social capital. Journal of Accounting and Management vision, 4(44), 1-12. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2314955 [In Persian]
3- Azizian, A., Nikpoor, A., Shokooh, Z., & Mohammadbagheri, M. (2022). Designing Pathology Pattern of Green Information Technology Implementation in Hospitals and Treatment Centers. Journal of Health Management, 13(1), 23-35. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2495745 [In Persian]
4- Bahmanshir, H. D., Omidi, F., Makvandi, F., & Basirat, M. (2023). Designing a Human Resources Model with Organizational Governance and Social Responsibility Approach Using the Hybrid Method and Fuzzy Delphi Technique (Case Study: Sugarcane and Ancillary Industries Development Company). Commercial Surveys, 20(115), 99-124. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2523737 10.22055/qjsd.2023.38758.2519 [In Persian]
5- Bazargan, A. (2008). Abbas Bazargan.Sociology of information society.
6- Ghaffari, R. (2019). Manager’s Competency, Axiomatic Instruments in Pursuit of Organizational Good Governance and Green Human Resources Management in Cooperative Agencies, Work and Social Welfare. Social Welfare Quarterly, 18(70), 241-270. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1963713  10.29252/refahj.18.70.241 [In Persian]
7- Ghandi Arani, M., & Najmi, M. (2014). Achieving organizational ambidexterity through designing the marketing and sales relationship. Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Management Sciences Association, 9(35), 1-24. http://journal.iams.ir/article_189_025e8075c6770df83b665aed7e2d8916.pdf  [In Persian]
8- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review, 26, 106-121.
9- Jamshidi, E., Seyed Ameri, M., & Abbasi, H. (2020). The effect of organizational governance on the innovative behavior of experts in the Ministry of Sports and Youth of Iran with the moderating role of organizational trust. Quarterly Journal of Applied Research in Sports Management, 9(2), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2020.7215 10.30473/ARSM.2020.7215 [In Persian]
10- Kaufmann, A. a. G., M.M. . (1988). Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. Elsevier Science Pub-lishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, N.Y. (A. a. G. Kaufmann, M.M. (1988) Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. Elsevier Science Pub-lishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, N.Y., Ed.).
11- Khosravi, M., Shahroodi, K., Amirteimoori, A., & Delafrooz, N. (2021). Presenting an integrated model of organizational ambidexterity and network data envelopment analysis in order to evaluate the efficiency of regional electricity companies in Iran. Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity, 10(3), 62-74. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2319701 10.22059/IMJ.2022.339078.1007925  [In Persian]
12- Mahmoodi, J., & Roozbahani, A. A. (2022). thematic clusters in the field of organizational governance science. Management Research in Iran, 26(2), 43-69. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2501533  20.1001.1.2322200.1401.26.2.3.2 [In Persian]
13- March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
14- Mirsepasi, N., Memarzadeh, G., & Pidaei, M. (2010). Designing a Human Resources Excellence Model in Iranian Government Organizations Using the Fuzzy Delphi Technique. Management Futures Studies, 87(0), 1-24. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1109845
15- Mombini, Y., Ebrahimpour, M., & Moradi, M. (2014). Examining the Ambiguities and Typology of Organizational Ambivalence in Technology-Based Organizations. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 12(23), 59-72. https://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_13350_e65cf98390fd2703bd4e44253237c796.pdf 20.1001.1.26765403.1393.12.23.5.7 [In Persian]
16- Mombini, Y., Moradi, M., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2015). The presentation of the conceptual framework of behavioral integration role of senior management teams (SMT) of technology-based organizations in establishing organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 13(25), 3-14. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1493888  [In Persian]
17- Moradi, M., Ebrahimpour, M., & Mombini, Y. (2015). Investigating the impact of behavioral integrity of the senior management team and organizational ambidexterity on performance. Studies of organizational behavior, 461-96(14-3). https://obs.sinaweb.net/article_15517_5982f0c24e22eaf4ab67f5a1d161724d.pdf  [In Persian]
18- Noblit, G. W. a. H., R.D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative studies. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
19- Hashemi, D. A., Zandieh, M., & Karimirad, E. (2021). Good organizational governance and its impact on the accountability of organizational employees. International Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies in Management and Engineering, 4(4), 353-372. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/2142704  ICOC04_031 [In Persian]
20- Salari, S., Rahimnia, F., Khorakian, A., Mortazavi, S., & Eslami, G. (2022). Discovering the Principles of Organizational governance in Iranian non-profit Organizations. Governance and Development Journal, 1(4), 37-71. https://www.magiran.com/paper/249501410.22111/JIPAA.2021.154559 [In Persian]
21- Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J.(2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
22- Vakili, Y., Hassanpour, A., & Saidi, L. (2018). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on organizational ambidexterity: Explaining the mediating role of behavioral ambidexterity and the moderating role of management support. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 1(1), 45-68. https://www.qjimdo.ir/article_81709_3a1cba39072be9e4f18b8d7ad3a21e52.pdf  [In Persian]
23- Vakili, Y., & Shahryari, S. (2018). The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Innovative Culture (Case Study: Electricity Industry in the Country). Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 11(2), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2018.262908.652672 10.22059/jed.2018.262908.652672[In Persian]
24- Warfield, J. D. i. m. i. s. m. I. T. o. S. M. a. C., 4(1), 81–67. (2005). Warfield, J. (2005). “Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems”. Man and Cybernetics, 4(1), 81–67. . https://arsmb.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_7215_9bcd721ddc32efd42eb86cf7892d4274.pdf
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 01 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 تیر 1404