فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

چگونگی دستیابی به تغییرات ترجیحات برپایه تغییر نیازها

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش، بررسی چگونگی تأثیر تغییرات نیازهای مصرف‌کنندگان بر ترجیحات برند است. با توجه به نقش محوری نیازها در شکل‌گیری ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان، مطالعه تغییرات این نیازها و تأثیر آن‌ها بر ترجیحات برند از اهمیتی ویژه برخوردار است. این تحقیق با رویکرد کیفی و مبتنی بر نظریه داده‌بنیاد نسل سوم انجام شده است. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های عمیق با 16 نفر از متخصصان حوزه برند در صنعت و اساتید دانشگاهی جمع‌آوری شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA 2024 استفاده شد که منجر به شناسایی 68 کدگذاری باز و 9 کدگذاری انتخابی گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل زیر در تغییر ترجیحات برند نقش کلیدی دارند: توجه به نیازهای نوظهور مصرف‌کنندگان و سازگاری با آن‌ها؛ تلفیق تنوع‌گرایی و کارکردگرایی برای پاسخ‌گویی به نیازهای پیچیده افراد؛ افزایش تقاضای مصرف‌کنندگان برای بهره‌گیری از فناوری‌های نوین؛ خلق نیازهای جدید در مصرف‌کنندگان برای محصولات نوآورانه؛  هوشمندسازی برند از طریق همسویی با روندهای نوظهور و تغییرات نیازها؛  تمرکز بر تحولات محصول متناسب با نیازهای مصرف‌کنندگان؛  توسعه برند با تأکید بر نوآوری‌ها و نیازهای بازار؛  اولویت‌بندی نیازهای اساسی در طراحی محصولات؛ ارتقای عملکرد برند از طریق خلق ارزش ویژه با توجه به نیازهای مصرف‌کنندگان. بر اساس این یافته‌ها، مدلی ارائه شده است که ارتباط میان تغییرات نیازهای مصرف‌کنندگان و چگونگی شکل‌گیری ترجیحات برند را تبیین می‌کند. این مدل می‌تواند به برندها در تدوین استراتژی‌های مؤثر برای انطباق با نیازهای پویای بازار و تقویت مزیت رقابتی یاری رساند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

How to achieve preference changes based on changing needs

نویسندگان English

Allahyar Ghasemi 1
Mehdi Mohammadsalehi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 MA graduated, Department of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University of Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The study emphasizes the critical importance of fulfilling human needs, particularly in consumer behavior and brand preferences. As consumer needs evolve, brands must adapt to maintain relevance. Research has shown that consumers derive psychological satisfaction from brands that meet their evolving needs, such as social status and a sense of control. Innovation facilitates better product performance, and brands must stay attuned to technological advancements and consumer preferences to build loyalty. A recent survey revealed that consumers today are more likely to consider a wider range of brands compared to a decade ago. Brands that successfully innovate and respond to consumer needs enhance customer commitment and satisfaction. Technology plays a key role in helping brands navigate these changes, particularly in a digital era where consumers are constantly online. Furthermore, brand development is crucial for leveraging existing brand equity and entering new product categories more cost-effectively. This study aims to investigate how to achieve brand preference changes based on changing consumer needs. By focusing on the integration of consumer needs into innovation, brands can achieve sustainable growth and customer loyalty. The findings suggest that brands that neglect these changes risk facing significant challenges in maintaining their market position.
Methodology
This research follows a qualitative approach and utilizes third-generation grounded theory. The paradigm is interpretive and subjective, with an inductive reasoning approach. Data collection involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews with experts in management and branding, and the gathered data was analyzed using MAXQDA software. This resulted in 189 open codes and 9 selective codes, which led to the development of the proposed model. Grounded theory, as a systematic approach, helps build theories directly from data through coding and constant comparison. The study applies the approach of Urquhart, who emphasizes that emerging phenomena should align with existing literature to enhance theoretical development. The research integrates three coding approaches (Gleser, Strauss, and Urquhart) to ensure a robust and comprehensive theory, avoiding the limitations of any one method. The final model emerged through the iterative process of open, selective, and theoretical coding, alongside the integration of visual diagrams to illustrate relationships between categories and concepts. This mixed approach offers greater flexibility and depth, helping address gaps in understanding while contributing to the theory of preference change based on changing needs. The research emphasizes the importance of adaptability in theory development and integrates literature to confirm, extend, or challenge existing knowledge.
Results and Discussion
The proposed preference change model, based on changing needs, is designed using Urquhart’s integrated approach. The model identifies "effective conditions," which are factors that influence or encourage changes in brand preferences due to evolving consumer needs. "Components" are the strategies and value-creating approaches recognized for guiding this process, while "outcomes" focus on the expected results of these strategies. The central element of the model is the "how to achieve preference changes based on changing needs," which serves as the core concept.
The findings indicate that brands play a significant role in fulfilling psychological and social needs, with consistent connections often leading to customer loyalty. Brands that address fundamental human needs tend to remain in consumers' minds, influencing their preferences. Innovation is highlighted as a key driver in maintaining customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Brands that align themselves with emerging trends and technological advancements are more successful in keeping customers engaged. Innovations that improve product quality, offer new experiences, and introduce new services help strengthen brand preference. Moreover, the increasing influence of technology in consumers' daily lives has significantly impacted brand preferences. Brands that effectively incorporate new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and virtual reality (VR), create engaging customer experiences and enhance brand loyalty. The model emphasizes the importance of responding to shifting consumer needs and adapting through innovation and technology for sustained brand success.
Conclusion
In today's rapidly changing world, consumer trends and preferences are constantly evolving due to shifts in their needs. The research indicates that in modern, competitive markets, brands must adopt dynamic strategies to respond to these fast-changing consumer needs. Key factors such as digitalization, the rise of new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), data mining, and the metaverse, and the increasing demand for diverse experiences have fundamentally altered brand preferences. Brands must innovate to maintain their competitive position while addressing consumers' complex needs.
Brands are advised to implement strategies like product and service personalization, improving consumer experiences through technological innovations, and delivering new values to meet changing consumer expectations. These proactive strategies help strengthen consumer trust and loyalty. Additionally, consumer diversity and emotional experiences now play a crucial role in brand preference, as consumers seek more than just functionality; they desire emotional connections with brands.
The research further reveals that brands that prioritize trust-building through quality enhancement and unique value propositions can foster long-term customer relationships. Addressing the evolving preferences of different generations is also crucial for brands to remain attractive and competitive. Brands that embrace innovation, integrate technology effectively, and personalize experiences will strengthen brand loyalty and preference. The proposed model outlines effective conditions, responsive strategies, and potential outcomes, guiding brands in adapting to consumers’ changing needs. Brands that can predict and address these changes will succeed in maintaining or increasing consumer loyalty and preference.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Brand extension, Brand innovation, Brand preference, Brand switching, Consumer needs
  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 34(3), 347-356, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304
  2. Assaad, A., Sanayei, A., & Shafiee, M. (2024). The effect of inbound marketing strategy and relationship marketing on brand loyalty with customer engagement and brand trust. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 15(59), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.393629.1832 [in Persian]
  3. Akram, U., Ansari, A. R., & Yan, C. (2023). Cosmetics makers have always sold ‘hope in a jar’! Understanding the cosmetics purchase intention in the Chinese mobile commerce environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103337
  4. Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1999). Strategies for building consumer brand preference. Journal of product & brand management, 8(2), 130-144. , https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429910266986
  5. Altan, O., & Dowman, I. (2021). The changing world under the corona virus threat—from human needs to SDGs and what next? Geo-spatial Information Science, 24(1), 50-57, https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2021.1886874
  6. Antonetti, P., Baines, P., & Walker, L. (2015). From elicitation to consumption: assessing the longitudinal effectiveness of negative emotional appeals in social marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(9-10), 940-969, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1031266
  7. Arta, P., & Qastharin, A. (2022). Factors Affecting Generation Z Attitudes and Purchase Behavior towards Buying Luxury Fashion Product. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Education Science, ICE-BEES 2021, 27-28 July 2021, Semarang, Indonesia, http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2021.2316913
  8. Bagozzi, R. P., Batra, R., & Ahuvia, A. (2017). Brand love: development and validation of a practical scale. Marketing letters, 28, 1-14, DOI:10.1007/s11002-016-9406-1
  9. Bakar, A. A., & Osman, M. M. (2021). Satisfaction with life and human needs fulfillment. Planning Malaysia, 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i18.1045
  10. Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of marketing, 76(2), 1-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0339
  11. Beck, J. T., Rahinel, R., & Bleier, A. (2020). Company worth keeping: Personal control and preferences for brand leaders. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 871-886, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz040
  12. Beverland, M., Napoli, J., & Yakimova, R. (2007). Branding the business marketing offer: exploring brand attributes in business markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22(6), 394-399, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620710780154
  13. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage, 69, 169-176, 336, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526436061
  14. Cai, Y., Wang, M., Huang, H., & Jiang, Q. (2023). Which brands do consumers become attached to? The roles of brand concepts and brand positioning in the context of COVID-19. Journal of product & brand management, https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-05-2022-3998
  15. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: sage, 62. DOI:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36
  16. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
  17. Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative research in psychology18(3), 305-327, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
  18. Cui, A. P., Wajda, T. A., & Walsh, M. F. (2015). Luxury brands in emerging markets: a case study on China. In Entrepreneurship in international marketing (pp. 287-305). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-797920140000025013
  19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  20. Dunn, L., & Hoegg, J. (2014). The impact of fear on emotional brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 152-168, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675377
  21. Fellner, W. J., & Goehmann, B. (2020). Human needs, consumerism and welfare. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(2), 303-318, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez046
  22. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209515
  23. Ganesan, P., & Sridhar, M. (2016). Service innovation and customer performance of telecommunication service provider: a study on mediation effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 19, 77-101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.29
  24. Ganesan, P., Sridhar, M., & Priyadharsani, S. (2016). Advertisement attitude, brand attitude and purchase intention-reciprocal and mediation effect study. International Journal of Business Excellence, 9(4), 488-510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.076781
  25. Getty, J. M., & Thompson, K. N. (1995). The relationship between quality, satisfaction, and recommending behavior in lodging decisions. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 2(3), 3-22, https://doi.org/10.1300/J150v02n03_02
  26. Ghasemi, Allahyar, RahChamani, Ahmad & Saeednia, Hamid Reza. (2022). Cognitive-emotional modeling of integrated advertising. Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, 14(54), 213-244. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2023.170069  [in Persian]
  27. Ghasemi, Allahyar; Rah Chamani, Ahmad and Saeednia, Hamid Reza (2022). Presenting a model of cognitive and emotional elements in environmental advertising,  Journal of Development and Transformation Management 51, 106-93 [in Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jdem/Article/949438/FullText
  28. Ghasemi, Allahyar, Rah Chamani, Ahmed, & Saidnia, Hamidreza. (2023). Presenting the model of the effectiveness of colors in marketing by applying consumer neuroscience (with a sequential exploratory mixed research approach). Business Management, 15(4), 747-777. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2023.354629.4537 [in Persian]
  29. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine, 110
  30. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 72
  31. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Glaser. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
  32. Glaser, B. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 37
  33. Green, K. M., Crawford, B. A., Williamson, K. A., & DeWan, A. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of social marketing campaigns to improve global conservation outcomes. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(1), 69-87, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500418824258
  34. Griffin, J. (2002). Customer loyalty: How to earn it, how to keep it. John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of marketing, 74(4), 15-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.4.15
  36. He, J., Wang, C. L., & Wu, Y. (2021). Building the connection between nation and commercial brand: an integrative review and future research directions. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 19-35, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2019-0268
  37. He, A.-Z., Cai, Y., Cai, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Conversation, storytelling, or consumer interaction and participation? The impact of brand-owned social media content marketing on consumers’ brand perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 419-440, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-08-2019-0128
  38. Japutra, A., Ekinci, Y., & Simkin, L. (2014). Exploring brand attachment, its determinants and outcomes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(7), 616-630, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.914062
  39. Joy, A., Zhu, Y., Peña, C., & Brouard, M. (2022). Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens. Strategic change, 31(3), 337-343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2502
  40. Katsifaraki, G. D., & Theodosiou, M. (2024). The Role of Service-Dominant Logic Strategic Orientations in Driving Customer Engagement in Online Retailing. Journal of interactive marketing, doi: 10.1177/10949968231180497.
  41. Kendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western journal of nursing research, 21 (6), 743-757, https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599902100603
  42. Kerr, N. M. (2011). Creating a protective picture: A grounded theory of how medical-surgical nurses decide to follow a charting-by-exception policy on a day-to-day, patient-by-patient basis. Rutgers the State University-of-NewJersey-Newark, https://www.proquest.com/openview/d52d50c752d11a71561664f585405487/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  43. Ki, C.-W. C., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133
  44. Kim, Y., & Srivastava, J. (2020). The “Achilles Heel” of Established Brands: the Effect of Brand Age on Consumers’ Brand Choices. ACR North American Advances. DOI:10.1177/00222437231178544
  45. Khajehfini, F., Hamidizadeh, M. R., Naami, A., & Alizadeh Mashkani, F. (2024). The impact of environmental noise in social media marketing. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 15(57), 157-179, https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.414694.1926 [in Persian]
  46. Kusek, K. (2016). The death of brand loyalty: Cultural shifts mean it's gone forever. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathleenkusek/2016/07/25/the-death-of-brand-loyalty-cultural-shifts-mean-its-gone-forever/
  47. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(3), 367, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367
  48. Le, C. X., & Wang, H. (2020). Integrative perceived values influencing consumers' attitude and behavioral responses toward mobile location-based advertising: an empirical study in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(1), 275-295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2019-0475
  49. Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
  50. Makanyeza, C. (2015). Consumer awareness, ethnocentrism and loyalty: An integrative model. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 27(2), 167-183, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2014.980927
  51. Makanyeza, C., & Chikazhe, L. (2017). Mediators of the relationship between service quality and customer loyalty: Evidence from the banking sector in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(3), 540-556, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2016-0164
  52. Manohar, S. (2018). Mediation effect of service quality between service innovation and customer word-of-mouth in Indian higher education system. International Journal of Business Excellence, 16(2), 127-148. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2018.094701
  53. Manohar, S., Kumar, R., Saha, R., & Mittal, A. (2023). Examining the effect of emotional branding in building brand equity of social marketing campaigns: a case on Swachh Bharat, India. Society and Business Review, 18(2), 197-218, https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0159
  54. Max-Neef, M. A., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. Apex Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=tHKzAAAAIAAJ
  55. Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The role of triangulation in qualitative research: Converging perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 98-129). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006
  56. Mogaji, E., Restuccia, M., Lee, Z., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). B2B brand positioning in emerging markets: Exploring positioning signals via websites and managerial tensions in top-performing African B2B service brands. Industrial Marketing Management, 108, 237-250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.12.003
  57. Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Anti-method: Logic and qualitative methodology design. Tehran. Logos Publications, 296-297 [in Persian] https://irlogos.com/products/allbooks/%D8%B6%D8%AF-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B4/
  58. Ndungu, N. (2023). The Evolution of Brand Innovation and its Impact on Consumer Loyalty in a Globalized Economy. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study, 4(4), 25-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v4i4.454
  59. Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan teknologi dan pola hidup manusia dalam perspektif sosial budaya. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(1). , http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v2i1.2616
  60. Panggati, I. E., Sasmoko, Simatupang, B., & Abdinagoro, S. B. (2023). Does digital influencer endorsement contribute to building consumers’ attitude toward digital advertising during COVID-19 pandemic? mediating role of brand attitude. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2220204, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2220204
  61. Peng L.S., Hoo W.C. (2024). Modelling factors influencing consumer behaviour towards the brand equity of coffee machines in Malaysia. Cases on Social Media and Entrepreneurship, pp. 1 – 17. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1781-5.ch001
  62. Ratnasari, R. T., Gunawan, S., Septiarini, D. F., Rusmita, S. A., & Kirana, K. C. (2020). Customer satisfaction between perceptions of environment destination brand and behavioural intention. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(12), 472-487.
  63. Robercht, L. C. (1995). Grounded theory: Evolving methods. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (2), 169-177, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500203
  64. Roy, S. K., Eshghi, A., & Sarkar, A. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of brand love. Journal of Brand Management, 20, 325-332, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.24
  65. Rungie, C., Uncles, M., & Laurent, G. (2013). Integrating consumer characteristics into the stochastic modelling of purchase loyalty. European Journal of marketing, 47(10), 1667-1690, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2010-0656
  66. Salehi, M., & Esfidani, M. R. (2023). Developing a model of brand judgment in service brands from the customers' perspective. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 14(56), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.180692 [in Persian]
  67. Sang, H., Xue, F., & Zhao, J. (2018). What happens when satisfied customers need variety?–Effects of purchase decision involvement and product category on Chinese consumers' brand-switching behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(3), 148-157. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1423662
  68. Sekar, S. B., Varki, S., & Elsantil, Y. (2024). Centrality of sensory attributes in brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 41(5), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-11-2021-5016
  69. Talay, M. B., Townsend, J. D., & Yeniyurt, S. (2015). Global brand architecture position and market-based performance: The moderating role of culture. Journal of International Marketing, 23(2), 55-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jim.13.0164
  70. Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66, https://doi.org/10.1086/321947
  71. Turja, T., Särkikoski, T., Koistinen, P., & Melin, H. (2022). Basic human needs and robotization: How to make deployment of robots worthwhile for everyone? Technology in Society, 68, 101917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101917
  72. Unger Unruh, G., & Canciglieri Junior, O. (2023). Correction to: Human Needs’ Analysis and Evaluation Model for Product Development. In Human Needs' Analysis and Evaluation Model for Product Development (pp. C1-C1). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12623-9_5
  73. Urquhart, C. (2022). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide, 25, 142-149, 217, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402196.n1
  74. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of public policy & marketing, 39(4), 444-460, https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359
  75. Williams, R. (2021). Gucci’s Robert Triefus on Testing Luxury’s Allure in the Metaverse. The Business of Fashion. https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/luxury/the-state-of-fashion-2022-bof-mckinsey-gucci-robert-triefus-metaverse-virtual-nft-gaming/
  76. Wong K.H., Chang H.H., Yeh C.H. (2019). The effects of consumption values and relational benefits on smartphone brand switching behavior. Information Technology and People, 32 (1), pp. 217 – 243. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-02-2018-0064
  77. Xu, J., Shen, H., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2012). Does the distance between us matter? Influences of physical proximity to others on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 418-423, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.006
  78. Xu, L., Mehta, R., & Herd, K. B. (2019). Look at me! Or don’t…: How mere social presence impacts innovation adoption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(3), 269-279, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/703565
  79. Yadav, R., Paul, J., & Mittal, A. (2023). Impact of nation brand experience on nation brand loyalty, and positive WOM in a changing environment: the role of nation brand love. International Marketing Review, 40(1), 28-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMR-05-2021-0173
  80. Yaghoubpour, Maryam, Khodadad Hosseini, Seyed Hamid, Janatifar, Hossein & Sanavi Fard, Rasool (2024). Designing a Digital Marketing Excellence Model (A Case Study of Commercial Banking). Journal of Business Management, 16(3), 596- 617. https://doi.org/10.22059/JIBM.2024.376605.4785 [in Persian]
  81. Yahya, M. A., & Dahanayake, A. (2021). Augmented Reality Data Analysis for Human Needs: Subsistence, Protection, and Leisure. International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96196-1_2
  82. Yang, K., Kim, H. M., & Zimmerman, J. (2020). Emotional branding on fashion brand websites: harnessing the Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) model. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 555-570. DOI:10.1108/JFMM-03-2019-0055
  83. Yu, M., & Smith, S. M. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for a new generation of researchers. International Journal of Doctoral Studies16, 553. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4836
  84. Zhang, J., & Kim, C.-Y. (2020). Research on the Influence of the Collaboration between Fashion Brands and Artists on Consumer Needs-Centered on the Collaboration Series between Uniqlo and KAWS. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, 23(8), 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2020.23.8.1108

 

 

 

دوره 16، شماره 63
پاییز 1404
صفحه 223-245

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 مرداد 1404