فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

طراحی مدل راهبردهای چابکی بقای کسب‌وکار با رویکرد قابلیت بازاریابی دوسویه و مدیریت آشفتگی محیطی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
هدف: در پژوهش حاضر به طراحی الگوی راهبردهای چابک بر بقای کسب و کارها با رویکرد قابلیت بازاریابی دوسویه و مدیریت آشفتگی محیطی پرداخته شده است. همچنین، به شناسایی و تائید مواردی که مربوط به استراتژی چابکی و مدیریت آشفتگی محیطی و قابلیت بازاریابی دوسویه می‌باشد‌، پرداخته شده است و ارتباط بین متغیرهای پژوهش نیز تبیین شده است.
روش: در پژوهش حاضر برای شناسایی شاخص‌ها از روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شده است. همچنین جهت تاثیرگذاری و تاثیر پذیری متغیرها از نرم افزار میک مک استفاده گردید. جامعه آماری مدیران ارشد و اجرایی شرکت‌های عضو اتاق بازرگانی شیراز بودند. روش نمونه‌گیری این پژوهش، از روش نمونه-گیری گلوله برفی استفاده شد و به کمک این روش 13نفر انتخاب شدند. در این پژوهش از ابزار مصاحبه برای جمع‌آوری نظر افراد استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: بر اساس یافته‌ها، عوامل مربوط به راهبردهای چابک بر بقای کسب و کارها شناسایی و دسته‌بندی شدند. ابعاد مربوط به مدیریت آشفتگی محیطی و قابلیت بازاریابی دوسویه نیز شناسایی و تایید شد. از طریق نرم افزار میک مک تاثیرپذیری و تاثیرگذاری متغیرها نیز مشخص گردید.
نتیجه‌گیری: باتوجه به اطلاعات بدست آمده می‌توان از انعطاف پذیری عملیاتی، آینده‌نگاری استراتژیک، سرعت نوآوری و هوشمندی رقابتی بعنوان استراتژی‌های چابک نام برد که همراه با قابلیت بازاریابی دوسویه بعنوان متغیرهای کلیدی و راهکار حیاتی برای بقای کسب‌وکارها در دوران آشفتگی و تغییرپذیری محیطی نام برد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Designing a model of agile strategies for business survival with an ambidexterity marketing capability approach and environmental turbulence management

نویسندگان English

Pari Shojaeian 1
َAzarnoush Ansari 2
Majid Mohammad Shafiee 2
1 PhD student, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Survival is the ultimate goal of business. The survival of businesses is very important because the social and economic well-being of any nation depends on the survival of business. Business survival creates economic and employment opportunities, increases wealth generation potential and improves the chances of poverty reduction. In the reviewed studies, many variables such as (industry, macro and environmental factors, finance, company size and age, innovation, skill, knowledge and experience, quality, advertising cost, transportation, communication, research and development, adaptability, social media agility, dynamic capability, manpower, innovation) had an effect on survival and were studied. But the variables of ambidexterity marketing capability, agile strategies and environmental disturbance management did not work with each other in relation to business survival. The studies reviewed in relation to these variables have discussed more about performance and relationships with customers than the survival and sustainability of businesses. Therefore, this research aims to fill this gap by examining these variables as a catalyst for the survival and growth of businesses in the field of commerce and industry that have problems and challenges in the field of production. The current research seeks to provide a model that can explain the role of agile strategies, ambidexterity marketing capability and environmental disturbance management on the survival of businesses. Investigate the relationship between variables and as a result provide a framework through which businesses that face a chaotic environment can achieve continuity and development
Methodology
The current research has a qualitative nature and an exploratory approach, and in terms of its purpose, It was considered a type of applied research. The method used for sampling was snowball. The number of people participating in semi-structured interviews (13 people) is select in such a way that theoretical saturation is achieve regarding the subject under study. No new information was found from persons 11 to 13. The sample people for the interview are the senior and executive managers of Shiraz Chamber of Commerce member companies. The research data has been analyzed using thematic analysis method. The research data has been analyzed using thematic analysis method. In order to check the effectiveness and dependence of each of the factors identified in the previous step The mutual effects analysis matrix was formed and sent to the experts. In the following, the opinions of the experts are analyzed using the Mic-Mac software, and the scores of effectiveness and effectiveness of each of the factors are extracted, and the most effective factors are selected as key drivers.
Results and Discussion
This research addressed the gap that two-way marketing capability, agile strategy was investigated in various cases, but it was not seen especially in the survival of businesses In the current research, it was tried to identify and categorize the factors affecting the survival of businesses in the form of agile strategies, ambidexterity marketing capability, environmental disturbance management. Likewise, the dimensions of agile identification strategies and their role were investigated with regard to ambidexterity marketing capability and environmental disturbance management on business survival. A model has been designed that includes agile strategies (competitive intelligence, strategic foresight, operational flexibility and speed of innovation) and ambidexterity marketing capability (internal marketing capability and external marketing capability), environmental turbulence management (marketing turbulence, technological turbulence and intensity competition) has been observed in it. From a theoretical point of view, the current research tried to present a model to cover these cases and complement the studies.
Conclusion
Using the analysis of the findings in this research, competitive intelligence, strategic foresight, external marketing capability are independent variables and are considered key indicators for the survival of businesses. Variables of innovation speed, operational flexibility are among the linking factors that have both high influence and interdependence. Technology confusion, marketing confusion and intensity of competition is a dependent variable that has low influence but high dependence.  The variable of internal marketing capability has little dependence and influence. Marketing confusion is the most dependent variable and strategic foresight is the most influential variable. According to the literature review and study, it can be argued that strategic agility and ambidexterity marketing capability with cooperation and interaction enable the organization to simultaneously react to market changes and customer needs, identify new opportunities and at the same time Maintain and strengthen the current position, exploit innovative opportunities. The relationship between strategic agility and ambidexterity marketing capability creates a balance between establishment and innovation in the organization. Ambidexterity marketing capability can affect the management of environmental turbulence, including technology turbulence, marketing turbulence, and competition intensity. Considering the confusion of technology and confusion of marketing in the environment, external marketing capability enables the organization to obtain comprehensive information about the market changes and customer needs by analyzing the market, knowing customers and competitors. On the other hand, internal marketing capability describes the organization's ability to design and implement marketing strategies. Therefore, the agile strategy is able to influence ambidexterity marketing capability and frustration management, and thus strengthen the survival of businesses and have more survival with strong growth and competition in the market.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Business survival
Agile strategies
Ambidexterity marketing capability
Environmental disturbance management
  1. Acharya, P. K., & Patro, S. K. (2023). Evaluation of environmental disturbance indicator using functional performance and life cycle assessment of ferrochrome waste concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105788.
  2. Aghajani, H., Valipour, K. M., & Rahimi, N. H. (2015). Evaluation of Factors affecting the survival of companies based on business characteristics, empirical evidence: selected food industry companies of Mazandaran province, Master's thesis, Mazandaran University. (In Persian).
  3. Akbari, M., & Ismailzadeh, M. (2012). The role of dynamic capabilities in creating competitive advantage. Business Management Perspective Quarterly, (15), 127-144. (In Persian). DOI :10.29252/JBMP.12.16.107
  4. Akhtar, P., Khan, Z., Tarba, S., & Jayawickrama, U. (2018). The Internet of Things, dynamic data and information processing capabilities, and operational agility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(60), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.023.
  5. Alghamdi, O., & Agag, G. (2024). Competitive advantage: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of data-driven innovation capabilities, marketing agility, and market turbulence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103547. org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103547.
  6. Alshurideh, M., Al-Hadrami, A., Alquqa, E., Alzoubi, H., Hamadneh, S., & Kurdi, B. (2023). The effect of lean and agile operations strategy on improving order-winners: Empirical evidence from the UAE food service industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 87-94.‏ DOI: 5267/j.uscm.2022.11.007
  7. Ansari, A; Shojaeian, P., & Arwaneh, M. (2023). The role of social media in altruistic and selfish motives on green cosmetics consumers' purchase intention. Business Strategies,19­(20). (In Persian). DOI:  22070/CS.2023.17164.1272
  8. Ansari, S., Garud, R. & Kumaraswamy, A. (2015), “The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem”, Strategic Management Journal, 51) 2(. 315-334.
  9. Arab, N.A. M. (2009). Exit and factors affecting Iran's manufacturing industry: comparison of private and public sectors. Yazd University, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting. (In Persian).
  10. Arabzadeh, P., Rahmani, H., & Mohtashmi, A. (2023). The effect of strategic planning of the parent company on strategic innovation and strategic survival of subsidiaries by analyzing the role of strategic flexibility (case study: Topico Holding). Strategic Management Quarterly, (In Persian). 10.22034/SMSJ.2023.364882.1738
  11. Asare-Ankomah, E. (2024). Digital Innovation Sense: Towards Synthesis of Empirical and Business Survival. ADRRI Journal of Finance, Economics and Sustainable Development2(1), 1-14.‏
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77-101.
  13. Chadwick, I. C., & Raver, J. L. (2020). Psychological resilience and its downstream effects for business survival in nascent entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice44(2), 233-255. org/10.1177/1042258718801597
  14. Chen, J., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). New product development speed: too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 288-303.‏
  15. Chuang, S. H.­ (2020). Co-creating social media agility to build strong customer-firm relationships. Industrial Marketing Management,84, 202-211.
  16. Dadzie, K. Q., Amponsah, D. K., Dadzie, C. A., & Winston, E. M. (2017). How firms implement marketing strategies in emerging markets: An empirical assessment of the 4A marketing mix framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,25(3), 234-256.‏
  17. Elazhary, M., Popovič, A., Henrique de Souza Bermejo, P., & Oliveira, T. (2023). How information technology governance influences organizational agility: the role of market turbulence. Information Systems Management40(2), 148-168.‏
  18. Hayaeian, S., & Hesarzadeh, R. (2024). Knowledge management strategies, intellectual capital, and ambidextrous innovation capability in SMEs: are they relevant? Journal of the Knowledge Economy15(2), 6832-6859 /doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0056
  19. Heirati, N., O’Cass, A., Schoefer, K. & Siahtiri, V. (2016). Do professional service firms benefit from customer and supplier collaborations in competitive, turbulent environments?”,­ Industrial Marketing Management. 55­(4), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.011
  20. Hernández, Y. G., Galvis, J. F. R., & Capacho, J. W. V. (2020). Business survival, a literary review of internal and external determinants. Criterio Libre, 18(32), 261-279.‏ org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2020v18n32.7122
  21. IqbalMajd, M; Safari, A., & Shaemi­i, A. (2017). The impact of strategic entrepreneurship on organization performance: the role of dynamic organization capabilities and business environment turbulence in knowledge-based companies. Entrepreneurship Development,11(1),­1-19. (­In Persian).
  22. Jaworski, B. & Kohli, A. (1993), “Market orientation: antecedents and consequences”, The Journal of Marketing, 57) 3(. 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304.
  23. Kahramanpour, P., Zanouzi, J., & AbulFazli, A. (2019). Investigating the effect of flexibility capacity and organizational learning on marketing performance: Investigating the mediating effects of product innovation and environmental disturbance modifier. Business Management, 12 (1), 183-197. (­In Persian).
  24. Kerdpitak, C., Kerdpitak, N., Heuer, K., Li, L., & Chantranon, S. (2024). The effect of social media agility to strengthen the business relationship: Evidence from pharmaceutical firms in Thailand. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 45-52. DOI: 5267/j.ijdns.2023.10.019
  25. Kori, B. W., Muathe, S. M., & Maina, S. M. (2021). Strategic Intelligence and Firm Performance: An Analysis of the Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities from Commercial Banks in Kenya. Journal of Business, 9(1), 1-11. DOI:10.12691/jbms-9-1-1
  26. Lee, C. H., Venkatraman, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Iyer, B. (2010). Complementarity‐based hypercompetition in the software industry: Theory and empirical test, 1990–2002. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1431-1456.‏
  27. Liu, G., Chen, Y., & Ko, W. W. (2024). The influence of marketing exploitation and exploration on business-to-business small and medium-sized enterprises' pioneering orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 117­(20), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.12.012
  28. Mohammad Shafiee, M., Rahmatabadi, Y., & Soleymanzadeh, O. (2019). The impact of social networks marketing communication on brand equity, relationship equity and customer responses. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 6(1), 105-124. (In Persian). DOI:34785/J018.2019.420
  29. Mohammad Shafiei, M; Syfi; M., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). The effect of customer relationship management on improving internal processes, customer satisfaction and profitability (case study: Isfahan Social Security Organization branches). Business Strategies, 15(12), 31-48. (In Persian).
  30. Mohammed, N. I., Norshahrizan, B. N., & Wan-Ahmad, B. W. (2017). Innovation capability and firm performance relationship: A study of partial least square-structural equation modelling. International Journal of Organisation and Business Excellence, 2(1), 1–12.
  31. Nikoeh, Mi; Ghasemi, H., & Shiroiyepour, Sh. (2021). The effects of strategic foresight on organizational performance considering the role of organizational learning and value creation, Strategic Management Studies, 12 (48), 64-49. (In Persian). DOI: 1001.1.22286853.1400.12.48.7.7
  32. Niyi Anifowose, O., Ghasemi, M., & Olaleye, B. R. (2022). Total quality management and small and medium-sized enterprises’(SMEs) performance: Mediating role of innovation speed. Sustainability,14(14), 8719.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148719
  33. Nwachukwu, D., &­ Affen, M. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence marketing practices: The way forward to better customer experience management in Africa (Systematic Literature Review). International Academy Journal of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurial Studies, 9(2), 44-62 DOI: 27214256637924
  34. Ojha, D., Struckell, E., Acharya, C., & Patel, P. C. (2021). Managing environmental turbulence through innovation speed and operational flexibility in B2B service organizations. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,36(9), 1627-1645. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM- 01-2020-0026
  35. Onamusi, A. B. (2021). Adaptive Capability, Social Media Agility, Ambidextrous Marketing Capability, and Business Survival: A Mediation Analysis. Marketing and Branding Research8(1), 31.
  36. Quach, S., Thaichon, P., Lee, J. Y., Weaven, S., & Palmatier, R. W. (2020). Toward a theory of outside-in marketing: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.10.016
  37. Rahman, N. A., Yaacob, Z., & Radzi, R. M. (2016). An overview of technological innovation on SME survival: a conceptual paper. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(17), 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.427
  38. Rawashdeh, A., Abdallah, A. B., Alfawaeer, M., Al Dweiri, M., & Al-Jaghbeer, F. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on environmental sustainability: the mediating role of digital  Sustainability16(3), 1338.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031338.
  39. Sani, M. B. (2022). Business Survival Model for Sustained Socioeconomic Wellbeing: A Proposed Approach. Baze University Journal of Entrepreneurship and Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 2971-7124.
  40. Saranghi, T. F.; Zahmasbi, D., & Abedini, A. (2019). Analysis of the role of managerial and operational capabilities of digital strategy and digital culture on productivity. Strategic Management Studies Quarterly, 11 (44), 77-59. ­(In Persian).
  41. Shahriari, S. A., & Jahanshahi, F. (2021). Explaining the role of two-way marketing about market development and intellectual capital with the performance of knowledge-based companies. Modern Marketing Research, 11­(4)­, 126-107. (­In Persian).
  42. Shao, B.B. & Lin, W.T. (2016). Assessing output performance of information technology service industries: productivity, innovation and catch-up”, International Journal of Production Economics. 172. 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.026
  43. Sudarmiatin, S. (2022). The Analysis of Survival Strategies in Small Medium Enterprises during Coronavirus Pandemic. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(2), 094-105. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr32.3122022
  44. Sun, J., Tekleab, A., Cheung, M., & Wu, W. P. (2023). The contingent roles of market turbulence and organizational innovativeness on the relationships among interfirm trust, formal contracts, interfirm knowledge sharing and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(5), 1436-1457.‏ org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103547
  45. Tsai, K. H., & Yang, S. Y. (2014). The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 343-366.
  46. Vorhies, D. W., Orr, L. M., & Bush, V. D. (2011).­ Improving customer-focused marketing capabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 736-756.
  47. Wang, L., Kong, X., Wang, W., & Gong, Y. (2024). Pursuing supply chain ecosystem health under environmental turbulence: a supply chain learning approach. International Journal of Production Research62(8), 2792-2811.‏
  48. Wu, Q., Yan, D., & Umair, M. (2023). Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 60(2), 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024.
  49. Zargar, T., & Nazari, R. (2015). The role of skills the communication gaps of transformational and structural leadership styles and the effectiveness of sports organizations, Journal of Strategic Studies of Sports and Youth, 47, 200-90. (In Persian).
  50. Zhou, J., Mavondo, F. T., & Saunders, S. G. (2019). The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.008
  51. Zimuto, C., Sandada, M., Chuchu, T., & Ndoro, T. (2018). The Impact of Environmental Turbulence on Product Innovation in Small to Medium Enterprises in Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(6), 56-63.‏‏ DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i6A.2661

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 11 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 بهمن 1403