فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تحلیل سیاست‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی کشورها با افق‌های پیش‌روی آموزش عالی ایران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار، دانشکده حکمرانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل مبانی راهبردی سیاست‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی در کشورهای اسکاندیناوی است که  افق امیدبخشی برای ارتقای حکمرانی آموزش عالی در بستر ملی مورد واکاوی قرار گرفته است. این مطالعه با رویکرد تفسیر و تاویل‌گرایی(تفسیر و تاویل‌گرایی) و مبتنی بر پنج پرسش اساسی پژوهش است. جامعه آماری با تأکید بر معیار فرهنگی شامل پنج کشور سوئد، دانمارک، فنلاند، نروژ و ایران می‌باشد. سیاست‌های آموزشی- پژوهشی در چهار کشور مبتنی بر اجرای طرح بولونیا بر اساس بافتار آن جامعه بوده است. این بررسی پس از مطالعه مقالات این حوزه و نیز تفسیر آراء و اثرگذاری سیاست‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی صورت پذیرفته است. بررسی مورد نظر در کشور ایران نیز در پاسخ به افق‌های پیش‌روی آموزش عالی با توجه به نهادهای علم و فناوری و اسناد مرتبط بر اساس برداشت ضمنی از برنامه های منتخب به انجام رسیده است. نتایج بررسی در کشورهای منتخب نشان داد سه عامل جایگاه اجتماعی، مشروعیت، و وابستگی منابع اهمیت دارد. این عوامل یک‌دیگر را تقویت کرده و رابطه‌ای تنگاتنگ میان آنها وجود دارد. جریان افکار در میان کشورهای اسکاندیناوی، تغییرات مشابه سایر نقاط اروپا را در سطح سیاست‌گذاری رقم زده است. در ایران بیشترین تأثیر در جهت‌گیری برنامه‌ها وجود دارد. زیرا سیاستگذاری درون زمینه اتفاق می‌افتد. لذا ریشۀ سیاست‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی کاملاً وابسته به زمینه‌های فرهنگی، سیاسی و اجتماعی است. از‌این‌رو، به منظور افق‌های پیش‌روی آموزش عالی ایران، شبکه‌سازی فرهنگی، توسعه آگاهی عمومی، پویایی کنشگران و تقویت اجماع نخبگانی کشور پیشنهاد می‌گردد. 
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of educational and research policies in countries with horizons for higher education in Iran

نویسنده English

Fatemeh Ordoo
Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural-Social Governance, Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Governance refers to the mechanism of coordination of activities on how things are run. Governance is a complex system of interactions between structures, traditions, functions and practices, which is characterized by three key values: accountability, transparency and participation. In higher education, research on governance ends up in areas such as the balanced relationship between higher education institutions and the government (in terms of the degree of autonomy and accountability of the university versus the type and extent of government control) as well as the administrative structure and management mechanism within these institutions. University governance encompasses different dimensions such as supportive frameworks, academic freedom, independence, strategic vision, superior culture, etc. Governance is considered an important factor in the promotion of universities, which tries to establish a balance between the degree of autonomy and accountability.
The aim’s paper is to explore the foundations of educational and research policies in Eastern European countries, which are examined as a promising horizon for the governance of higher education in Iran. This research will seek to identify successful approaches and practices in alternative educational and research policies that can help the Iranian higher education system achieve its goals.
Methodology
This research is based on a hermeneutic approach that investigates the foundations of educational and research policies. The statistical population includes five countries: Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Iran. The educational research policies in the four Eastern European countries have been shaped by the Bologna Process, reflecting the culture of those societies. This study follows a review of relevant literature and an interpretation of the impact of educational and research policies. The analysis in Iran also responds to the future horizons of higher education, considering parallel institutions related to science and technology activities and various documents in this regard. Using document analysis and implicit interpretation aligned with the hermeneutic approach, it examines development programs from the First to the Seventh Development Plan of the country, the Vision Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran for 2025, and the science and technology policies issued by the Supreme Leader. The focal point of the investigation in each country is based on the element of local culture. Consequently, four main research questions are interpreted through a unified approach to the Bologna Process, and the findings are analyzed and interpreted based on a free interpretation of the aforementioned documents in Iran.
Results and Discussion
The analysis of findings in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway revealed that the development of evaluation schemes has largely been based on policy-making and supervised by national institutions and organizations, resulting in evaluation playing a central role in transforming higher education governance. This aligns more closely with market-oriented approaches, whereas the university is a unique organization. It emphasizes many characteristics such as self-governance, institutional independence, tolerance of diverse opinions, openness to dialogue, and the search for consensus. These processes facilitate concepts like good governance and are nurtured following an institutional approach. In Iran, however, there is generally a lack of coordination in the implementation of programs. In the academic sector, the degree of influence of policies is low. This may be attributed to the unmanageable nature of science and scholarly work, as well as the dominance of an individualistic culture. This issue highlights the existence of structural, historical, and cultural problems that have led to policies remaining on paper. Furthermore, documented programs and policies resemble ideals and ideological statements. These documents often lack precise targeting monitoring and evaluation systems, resulting in minimal enforcement. Typically, the relationships between sectors and cross-sectoral entities are not clearly defined, and both stewardship and budgetary allocations are only at a general level. Another point is that institutional synergy in scientific and research policies is weak. The level of interaction and information exchange among policymaking institutions—including the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, the Supreme Council of Science, Research and Technology, the Ministry of Science, the Ministry of Health, the Expediency Council, the Education and Research Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, the Vice Presidency for Science and Technology, the Management and Planning Organization of the country, the Higher Education Expansion Council, and the Supreme Planning Council of the Ministries of Science and Health—does not exist.
 
 
 
Conclusion
The results of the study in the selected countries indicated that three factors—social status, legitimacy, and resource dependency—are of great importance. These factors reinforce each other and are closely interconnected. It also became clear that the flow of ideas among Eastern European countries has led to similar policy changes as seen in other parts of Europe. In Iran, there is a significant impact on program orientation because policymaking occurs within a specific context. Therefore, it can be stated that the roots of educational and research policies are entirely dependent on cultural, political, and social contexts. In the four countries examined, it was evident that explicit and documented policies serve as a basis for action; however, in Iran, implicit and unwritten policies often have the greatest influence on program orientation because policymaking occurs within a cultural-historical framework. Additionally, it is necessary to gradually transform implicit policies into explicit and written ones. This way, on the one hand, government accountability will improve, and on the other hand, the enforcement of policies will increase. Thus, for the future horizons of higher education in Iran, it is suggested to focus on aspects such as cultural networking, public awareness development, dynamism among stakeholders, and strengthening elite consensus in the country.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Competent organizational culture
Educational policies
Higher education
Research Policies
University
  1. Amiri, S., Haghdoost, A., Mostafavi, E., Sharifi, H., Peykari, N., Raeisi, A., & Eybpoosh, S. (2021). Iran COVID-19 epidemiology committee: A review of missions, structures, achievements, and challenges. Journal of research in health sciences21(1), e00505. doi: 34172/jrhs.2021.45
  2. Asgari, H., & Moridian, A. (2023). Investigating the dynamic causality between Budget Deficit (BD) and Current Account Deficit (CAD) in the framework of the Mendel-Fleming model in IRAN: a Bootstrap Rolling Window Approach. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies12(1), 7-29. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2024.46891.1897 ]in Persian[
  3. Ashrafi, A. (2019). Comparative study of development patterns of higher education in Iran and norway. Studies in Comparative Education, (1). https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.1.2019.167319
  4. Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2015). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. Routledge.
  5. Azizi, M. (2021). Higher Education in Iran: evolution and challenges. In Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives(pp. 395-417). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  6. Darnell, A. J., & Kuperminc, G. P. (2006). Organizational Cultural Competence in Mental Health Service Delivery: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34(4), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2006.tb00039.
  7. Berg, A. E., Jungblut, J., & Jupskås, A. R. (2023). We don’t need no education? Education policies of Western European populist radical right parties. West European Politics46(7), 1312–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2177010
  8. Brossard Børhaug, F. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities in Norwegian Higher Education in the Anthropocene Epoch. In: Pedagogy of the Anthropocene Epoch for a Great Transition. Anthropocene – Humanities and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39366-2_14
  9. Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Euro-barometer(No. 64). Commission of the European Communities.
  10. Deen, J. J. A. N. (2007). Higher education in Sweden.
  11. Diogo, S. (2019). Looking back in anger? Putting in perspective the implementation of the Bologna process in Finnish and Portuguese higher education systems. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology7(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2019.1694420
  12. Dobbins, M., Martens, K., Niemann, D., Vögtle, E.M. (2023). The Bologna Process as a Multidimensional Architecture of Policy Diffusion in Western Europe. In: Jungblut, J., Maltais, M., Ness, E.C., Rexe, D. (eds) Comparative Higher Education Politics. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25867-1_18
  13. Ebrahimi, A., Hosseini, M. A., Mohammad Khani, K., & Reshadatjo, H. (2023). Explaining the Challenges and Obstacles of the Application of Land Use Planning in the Development of Scientific-Applied Higher Education: a Qualitative Study. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology6(1), 117-129. doi:61186/ijes.6.1.117 ]in Persian[
  14. European Commission. Directorate-General for Education, European Parliament, European Council, European Economic, Social Committee, & Committee of the Regions. (2011). Supporting Growth and Jobs: An Agenda for the Modernisation of Europe's Higher Education Systems. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  15. Farasatkhah, M., Ghazi, M., & Bazargan, A. Quality Challenge in Iran’s Higher Education: A Historical Review. Iranian Studies. 2008;41(2):115-137. doi:10.1080/00210860801913321 ]in Persian[
  16. Hallonsten, O. (2014). ERAWATCH Country Reports 2013: Sweden. JRC Science and Technology Reports.
  17. Haukland, L. H. (2020). The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy. Athens Journal of Education7(4), 365-383. doi:10.30958/aje.7-4-3
  18. Haukland, L. H. (2021). Higher education in three dimensions-A new theoretical frame of understanding. Orkana Forlag.
  19. Helskog, G. H., & Torgersen, G.-E. (2021). Towards A new pedagogy in higher education. International Journal on Philosophical Practice HASER, (12), 195–237. Retrieved from https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/HASER/article/view/15403
  20. Holm, T., Sammalisto, K., & Vuorisalo, T. (2011). Education for sustainable development and management systems in higher education in Finland and China: a comparative study. In 2nd Sino-Finland Forum on Higher Education, Tampere, Finland, September 19-20th, 2011. doi:10.1080/13538321003679515
  21. Jafari, H., Pourrezzat, A., Sadeghi, A. et al.Identifying contextual effective factors on total fertility rate decline in Iran: a qualitative framework-based study. Qual Quant 56, 3395–3412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01273-w
  22. Jamebozorg, N. (2024). Assessing the Suitability of Quality Education (SDG4) for Iran: An Analysis of Cultural Factors Impacting Implementation(Master's thesis, University of Agder). doi: http://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.3929
  23. Juhl, J. (2024). Educational Imaginaries: Reforming Danish Higher Education. In: Buch, A., Lindberg, Y., Cerratto Pargman, T. (eds) Framing Futures in Postdigital Education. Postdigital Science and Education . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58622-4_6
  24. Kärkkäinen, K., Jääskelä, P., & Tynjälä, P. (2023). How does university teachers’ pedagogical training meet topical challenges raised by educational research? A case study from Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104088
  25. Kazemi, S. H., Ahmadi, E., & Mortazavi, M. (2024). Obstacles and Opportunities for Effective Implementation: A Case Study of COVID-19 Crisis Policy in Kurdistan Province. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly)13(4), 528-545. doi:32598/DMKP.13.4.774.1 ]in Persian [
  26. Kehm, B., Michelsen, S. & Vabø, A. Towards the Two-cycle Degree Structure: Bologna, Reform and Path Dependency in German and Norwegian Universities. High Educ Policy23, 227–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.7
  27. Khanifar, H., & Muslimi, N. (2018). Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods: a new and practical approach (Volume 2). Tehran: Negah Danesh, second volume. ]in Persian[
  28. Korhonen, V., & Rautopuro, J. (2018). Identifying Problematic Study Progression and “At-Risk” Students in Higher Education in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research63(7), 1056–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1476407
  29. Krejsler, J. B., & Carney, S. (2009). University Academics at a Crossroads? Continuity and Transformation in Danish University Reform. European Education41(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934410204
  30. Kvilhaugsvik, H. (2022). Quality Assurance in Nordic Higher Education: Relevance and Quality for the Welfare State? High Educ Policy35, 909–928 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00239-9
  31. Kelstrup, J. D. (2024). Evidence-Based Policymaking and Public Administration in Denmark. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-73943-9
  32. (2022). The future of science and technology policy: Trends and perspectives
  33. Olsen, J. (2007). The Institutional Dynamics of the European University. In: Maassen, P., Olsen, J. (eds) University Dynamics and European Integration. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1_2
  34. Parvin, E., & Rigi, A. (2023). Critical review of the national monitoring and evaluation system in Iran's higher education: Providing favorable policy proposals. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 17(60), 94-108. doi: 10.22034/jiera.2023.383428.2908
  35. Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Foss Hansen, H., & Pulkkinen, K. (2019). Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education: A comparative account from the Nordic countries(p. 326). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-030-11738-2
  36. Rasmussen, P. (2019). Higher education system reform in Denmark in the Bologna era. In Higher Education System Reform(79-96). Brill. org/10.1163/9789004400115_006
  37. Rönnberg, L., Hult, A., & Lindgren, J. (2018). Ensuring quality assurance in Swedish higher education: A national trial evaluation. In NERA 2018, University of Oslo, Norway, March 8-10, 2018 (pp. 210-210). University of Oslo. https://doi.org/10.1234/exampledoi
  38. Slaughter, S., Cantwell, B. Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union. High Educ63, 583–606 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9460-9
  39. Nikkola, T., & Tervasmäki, T. (2021). Democracy in the Grip of Academic Capitalism: A Psychosocial Reading of the Logics of University Work in the Post-University Reform Era. Kasvatus ja aika, 15(3-4), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.33350/ka.109711
  40. Tange, H., & Jæger, K. (2021). From Bologna to welfare nationalism: International higher education in Denmark, 2000–2020. Language and Intercultural Communication21(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1865392
  41. Tittenbrun, J. (2016). Anti-capital: Human, social and cultural: The mesmerizing misnomers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315567327
  42. Ulriksen, L. (2023). Students’ choices and paths in the Bologna degree structure: An introduction to the special issue. European Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211022201
  43. Van den Beemt, A., Van de Watering, G., & Bots, M. (2022). Conceptualizing variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass. European Journal of Engineering Education48(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2078181
  44. World Bank. (2013). The world bank annual report 2013. The World Bank. Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2015). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. Routledge.
  45. Nazarzadeh Zare, M., PourKarimi, J., Abili, K., & Zakersalehi, G. (2014). The World-Class University as a Part of Higher Education New Paradigm. Rahyaft24(57), 79-92. doi:1001.1.10272690.1393.24.57.5.6 ]in Persian[
  46. Zaman, K. (2014). Quality guidelines for good governance in higher education across the globe. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.01.001

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 بهمن 1403