فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

برندسازی ملی ایران از دیدگاه حکمرانی اقتصادی و تجاری بین‌المللی: الزام‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهبردها

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار، دانشکده حکمرانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
شاخص ارزش برند ملی (NBI) دارای شش بعد است که سه بعد آن یعنی صادرات، گردشگری و سرمایه‌گذاری خارجی به طور مستقیم تحت تأثیر حکمرانی اقتصادی و تجاری بین‌المللی کشور قرار دارند. در این پژوهش برندسازی ملی ایران از منظر حکمرانی اقتصادی و تجاری بین‌المللی مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. پژوهش در چارچوب رویکرد تفسیری و از نوع اکتشافی است و با روش تحلیل مضمون انجام‌ شده است. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با خبرگان دانشگاهی- اجرایی گردآوری شده است. خبرگان به روش گلوله برفی نمونه‌گیری شدند و فرایند گردآوری داده‌ها پس از مصاحبه با دوازدهمین خبره به اشباع رسید. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار Maxqda انجام شد و 28 مضمون پایه استخراج شد. سپس این مضمون‌ها در قالب 3 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده یعنی «الزام‌ها»، «چالش‌ها» و «راهبردها» دسته‌بندی شدند و شبکه مضمون‌ها حول یک مضمون فراگیر یعنی «برندسازی ملی از دیدگاه حکمرانی اقتصادی و تجاری بین‌المللی» تشکیل شد. یافته‌های پژوهش، راهبردهای حکمرانی اقتصادی و تجاری بین‌المللی برای برندسازی ملی ایران را احصاء کرده است. همچنین الزام‌های برندسازی ملی از جمله بازسازی تصویر ایران در اقتصاد جهانی و نیاز مبرم به جذب سرمایه خارجی را شناسایی کرده است. علاوه بر این، چالش‌های فراروی برندسازی ملی ایران از جمله شناخت ناکافی حکمرانان کشور از مقوله­ برندسازی ملی و عدم وجود یک نهاد متولی برای برندسازی ملی ایران را مشخص کرده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Iran's nation branding from the perspective of international economic and trade governance: requirements, challenges, and strategies

نویسنده English

Hossein Jalilian
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Nation branding represents a strategic soft power tool for countries and has been discussed in academic literature for over two decades. Many nations have invested significant effort into enhancing their nation brand to project a positive and influential image on the global stage. The concept of nation branding spans various dimensions, including tourism, foreign direct investment, exports, culture and heritage, migration, governance, and people. It can be analyzed through political, economic, cultural, and media lenses. This study focuses on Iran's nation branding, particularly from the perspective of international economic and trade governance. International economic and trade governance involves policymaking and regulation in areas such as international trade agreements, trade governance models, reforms in economic governance, economic cooperation between countries, foreign direct investment, global finance and trade regimes, international business relations governance, international trade diplomacy, global economic and trade sustainability, global trade facilitation, and global trade policies.
Methodology
This study adopts a qualitative and exploratory approach to examine Iran's nation branding through the lens of international economic and trade governance. The research employs thematic analysis as its core method, operating within an interpretative paradigm to uncover underlying themes and patterns. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with twelve academic and executive experts in the fields of nation branding and economic governance. Participants were selected using the snowball sampling method, ensuring a diverse range of perspectives and expertise. Theoretical saturation was achieved after the twelfth interview, indicating that no new themes were emerging from the data. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using MAXQDA software, which facilitated the identification of 28 basic themes. These themes were then categorized into three organizing themes: "requirements," "challenges," and "strategies," forming a thematic network centered around the global theme of "nation branding from an international economic and trade governance perspective." To ensure the reliability and validity of the research, methods such as triangulation, researcher reflexivity, methodological consistency, and appropriate sampling were employed. Additionally, the findings were reviewed by some of the participants to confirm the accuracy of the interpretations.
Results and Discussion
Through thematic analysis, 28 basic themes related to Iran’s nation branding were identified. These themes were subsequently organized into three main categories: "requirements," "challenges," and "strategies." Together, these categories form a thematic network centered around the global theme of "Iran's nation branding from the perspective of international economic and trade governance”. The study identified several key requirements for Iran's nation branding. The most prominent was the need to rebuild Iran's image among global economic actors, emphasizing the importance of improving regional and global competitiveness. Other requirements included attracting foreign investment, leveraging Iran's geoeconomic position, and instilling hope among economic stakeholders. These elements are crucial for enhancing Iran's economic standing and fostering a positive global perception. The primary challenges facing Iran's nation branding include international sanctions, negative media portrayals, and a lack of awareness among high-level officials about the importance of nation branding. Additionally, the absence of a dedicated institution to manage the nation brand project and weak social capital between the government and economic actors were identified as significant obstacles. These challenges hinder Iran's ability to effectively project a cohesive and positive national image on the global stage. To address these challenges, the study proposed several strategies. Joining regional and global economic agreements was highlighted as a critical step to enhance Iran's economic integration and reduce isolation. Establishing a Nation Branding Council to oversee and coordinate branding efforts was also recommended. Other strategies included engaging in economic diplomacy, promoting products rooted in Iranian-Islamic heritage, and implementing an international marketing and communication plan for the nation brand. These strategies aim to create a unified and compelling national identity that can attract foreign investment, boost tourism, and enhance Iran's global competitiveness.
Conclusion
The findings of this study highlight significant requirements for Iran's nation branding from an economic and trade governance perspective, as well as the main challenges faced by the governance system. Achieving Iran's nation branding goals will require the formulation and implementation of the proposed strategies. Effective nation branding can inspire hope among the public, enhance the morale and self-esteem of economic actors, and promote domestic brands in international markets. Nation branding should be prioritized in strategic planning, with key ministries related to the economy and industry playing a central role. The stewardship of the nation brand project should be entrusted to a National Council, which would also involve the private sector and civil society. The study emphasizes the need for a coordinated effort involving key ministries, the private sector, and civil society to achieve Iran's nation branding goals. Future research could further explore the meta-governance of nation branding and mechanisms for private-sector partnerships in these efforts. In conclusion, Iran's nation branding requires a comprehensive and strategic approach that addresses both internal and external challenges. By implementing the proposed strategies, Iran can improve its global standing, attract foreign investment, and foster economic growth. Nation branding should be prioritized in Iran's strategic planning to ensure long-term benefits for the country's economy and international relations

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Nation Branding
Governance
Diplomacy
Economic Governance
International Trade Governance
  1. AbediJa’fari, H., Taslimi, M., Faghihi, A., &Sheikhzade, M. (2011). Thematic Analysis and Thematic Networks: A Simple and Efficient Method for Exploring Patterns Embedded in Qualitative Data. Strategic Management, 5(2), 151-198. [In Persian]
  2. Agarwal, M. (2008). China, India and Russia: Enhancing Cooperation for International Economic Governance. China Report, 44(4), 407–420. doi:10.1177/000944550804400
  3. Alaji, H., Hajipour, B., &Azizi, Sh. (2022). Identifying and Explaining the Components of Nation Rebranding of Syria in the Tourism Industry, Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(49), 1-17.https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2022.133677[In Persian]
  4. Anholt, S. (2000). The nation as brand. Across the board, 37(10), 22-28.
  5. Anholt, S. (2003). Brand New Justice: The upside of global branding. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  6. Anholt, S. (2006).Why brand? Some practical considerations for nation branding.Place Branding, 2(2), 97-107.https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.599004

7.        Ardekanifard, Z., &HosseiniPakdehi, A. (2022). The Image of the "National Brand" of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the IRIB World Service Channels: Press TV and Al-Alam. Journal of International Madia Research Letters, 6(2), 57-88. (In Persian)https://doi.org/10.22034/imrl.2022.150200

  1. Azar, A., zabihijamkhaneh, M., &Khanahmadloo, R. (2019). Ranking of Iranian Industries in Terms of their Importance in Nation Branding and their Roles in Promoting it. Quarterly Journal of Brand Management, 5(4), 7-40. [In Persian]
  2. Bidollahkhani, A. (2020). Nation branding and national image making: new interdisciplinary perspective for political Science and international relation. Journal of Politics Quarterley, 49(4), 9991020. [In Persian]https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2019.224197.1006992
  3. Brodie, R.J. and Benson-Rea, M. (2016). Country of origin branding: an integrative perspective, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(4), 322-336.https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2016-1138
  4. Browning, C. S. (2013). Nation Branding, National Self-esteem, and the Constitution of Subjectivity in Late Modernity. Foreign Policy Analysis, 11(2), 195–214. doi:10.1111/fpa.12028 
  5. Browning, C. S. (2014). Nation branding and development: Poverty panacea or business as usual? Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(1), 50–75. doi:10.1057/jird.2014.14 
  6. Cha, H., Rhee, Y., & Chung, C. J. (2017). Comparative nation-branding analysis of Big Data: Focusing on Korea and Japan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 20(4), 276–295. doi:10.1080/1097198x.2017.1388697 
  7. Cooke, A., Hamilton, T., & Werner, M. (2017). Trade governance at a crossroads: Continuity and change in uncertain times. Competition & Change, 21(5), 388-396.https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417729325
  8. DanaieFard, H., &Mozafari, Z. (2008). Enhancing validity and reliability in the qualitative research of management: the research auditing strategies. The Modares Journal of Management Researches in Iran, 1 (1), 131-162. [In Persian]
  9. DehdashtiShahrokh, Z., Mohammadian, M., &Sepahvand, A. (2021). The Multilevel Model of Nation Branding: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies. Journal of International Business Administration, 4(1), 1-19. [In Persian]
  10. Efstathopoulos, C. (2016). Reformist Multipolarity and Global Trade Governance in an Era of Systemic Power Redistribution. Global Journal of Emerging MarketEconomies, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910115613695
  11. Feiz, D., Mirmohammadi, S. M., Zarei, A., &Ezadkhah, M. (2017). An Intellectual and Religious Studying about position of "National Brand of Islamic Country. Resean and Religion, 9(16), 136-161. (In Persian).
  12. Frig, M., &Sorsa, V.-P. (2020). Nation Branding as Sustainability Governance: A Comparative Case Analysis. Business & Society, 59(6), 1151-1180.https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318758322
  13. Gudjonsson, H. (2005). Nation Branding. Place Branding, 1(3), 283-298.
  14. Hira, A. (2004). Paradigmatic Crisis in International Economic Governance: Explaining the Explosion of Protest. Policy and Society, 23(3), 1–16. doi:10.1016/s1449-4035(04)70035-1 
  15. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1994). Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment and International Economic Governance. Organization, 1(2), 277–303. doi:10.1177/135050849412003
  16. Homburg, C., Cannon, J. P., Krohmer, H., &Kiedaisch, I. (2009). Governance of International Business Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Study on Alternative Governance Modes. Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.17.3.1
  17. Kavoura, Androniki (2014). A Conceptual Communication Model for Nation Branding in the Greek Framework. Implications for Strategic Advertising Policy, Procedia.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32 – 39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.015
  18. Kangile, J. R., Mpenda, Z. T., Kadigi, R. M. J., &Mgeni, C. P. (2022). The Effects of Trade Governance on Sugar Trade and Its Landscape of Policy Practices in Tanzania. Sage Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221121603
  19. Khademzadeh, J., Izadi, J., &Soltani, A. (2019). The Position of National Brand in the Modern Public Diplomacy of Republic Slamic of Iran. Research Political Geography Quarterly, 3(3), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v3i9.78736 [In Persian]
  20. Khademzadeh, J., Izadi, J., &Soltani, A. (2020). Structural Pathology of Public Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Political Strategic Studies, 9(34), 107-141.22054/qpss.2020.41098.2284[In Persian]
  21. Kleber, D.M.S.; Juusola, K. (2021). Open Innovation—An Explorative Study on Value Co-Creation Tools for Nation Branding and Building a Competitive Identity. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 7(4), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7040206
  22. Kucharska, W., Flisikowski, K., &Confente, I. (2018). Do global brands contribute to the economy of their country of origin? A dynamic spatial approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 27(7), 768-780. doi:10.1108/jpbm-10-2017-1641
  23. Kumari, M., & Bharti, N. (2021). Linkages between Trade Facilitation and Governance: Relevance for Post-COVID-19 Trade Strategy. Millennial Asia, 12(2), 162-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399620972346
  24. Lee, R., & Lee, Y. (2019). The role of nation brand in attracting foreign direct investments: a case study of Korea. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 124–140. doi:10.1108/imr-01-2019-0024 
  25. Li, E.P.H.Min, H.J.and Lee, S. (2021). Soft power and nation rebranding: The transformation of Korean national identity through cosmetic surgery tourism. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2019-0053
  26. Masoomzadeh, A., Shamsi, J., &Ebrahimi, A. (2013). Nation Branding Strategies in Iran, Business Management Perspective, 12(17), 31-48. [In Persian]
  27. Mohammadifar, Y., Ahmadian, G., &Heshmati, A. (2019).The Concequence of National Branding for Iran with Emphasis on Political and Economic Dimensions. International Political Economy Studies (IPES), 2(1), 25-56.22126/ipes.2019.4452.1167[In Persian]
  28. Mohib, A.A., Carroll, C. (2024). Nation branding as a tool to attract foreign direct investments: a case study of Qatar. Place Brand Public Diplomacy,20, 363–377.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00326-9
  29. Mohsenian rad, M., &Abedi, H. (2020). Representation of the nation brand of Iran in the photos of the Associated Press. Journal of Cultural Studies & Communication, 16(59), 311-351. [In Persian]https://doi.org/10.22034/jcsc.2020.136092.2221
  30. Papadopoulos, N., Hamzaoui-Essoussi, L., & El Banna, A. (2016). Nation branding for foreign direct investment: an Integrative review and directions for research and strategy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(7), 615–628. doi:10.1108/jpbm-09-2016-1320 
  31. Paquin, S. (2013). Federalism and the governance of international trade negotiations in Canada: Comparing CUSFTA with CETA. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 68(4), 545–552. doi:10.1177/0020702013509318 
  32. J. E. (2006). Qatar and the World: Branding for a Micro-state. Middle East Journal, 60(4). 732-748.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330320
  33. Porter, M. E. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press.
  34. Rodrik, D. (2024). How to smooth US-China economic relations for the benefit of the global economy: A light model of global economic governance. Journal of Government and Economics, (13), 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2024.100097
  35. Sampson, M., & Wang, J. (2023). Status-quo enhancing versus status-quo challenging change in global economic governance: the case of China in finance and trade. International Relations, 37(4), 613-633.https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178221139997
  36. Schirm, S. A. (2016). Domestic ideas, institutions or interests? Explaining governmental preferences towards global economic governance. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114540190
  37. Schoeneman, J., Fullerton, J. (2023). Exploring relationships between nation branding and foreign direct investment. Place Brand Public Diplomacy,19, 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00264-4
  38. Shahabadi, A., Amjadian, S., Ghasemifar, S. et al. (2023). The effect of the national brand on high-tech exports in selected countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(54). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00318-8
  39. Sharei, Z., Ebrahimi, S.A., Damghanian, &Zare, A. (2020). Providing a Branding Model for Elite and top-Talented People with the Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Publc Management Researches, 12 (46), 171-198. (In Persian)https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.30447.4631
  40. Silvanto, S., & Ryan, J. (2014). Relocation branding: a strategic framework for attracting talent from abroad. Journal of Global Mobility, 2(1), 102–120. doi:10.1108/jgm-07-2013-0046
  41. Steenkamp, J.-B. (2019). Building strong nation brands. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 6–18. doi:10.1108/imr-10-2019-0253
  42. Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and differences. Haag: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael.
  43. Tecmen, A. (2017). Nation branding and right to brand/brand Turkey. Research and Policy on Turkey, 2(1), 76–89. doi:10.1080/23760818.2016.1272269 
  44. Yan, D., &Chunding, L. (2021). China and the Reform of International Trade Governance System. Social Sciences in China, 42(3), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2021.1971407
  45. Zabihi, M., Azar, A., Moazaz, H., &Moghimi, S.M. (2019). Islamic Republic of Iran Nation Branding. Islamic Revolution Studies, 16(57), 53-68. [In Persian]
  46. Zeineddine, C. (2017). Employing nation branding in the Middle East – United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Qatar. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 12(2), 208-221. DOI: 10.1515/mmcks-2017-0013
دوره 16، شماره 63
پاییز 1404
صفحه 1-16

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 05 اسفند 1403