فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تبیین چگونگی پذیرش فناوری بلاکچین در بانکداری الکترونیک

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه کامپیوتر، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
در این مطالعه به بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش فناوری بلاکچین در بانکداری الکترونیک پرداخته شد. برای این منظور از توسعه مدل یکپارچه پذیرش و استفاده از فناوری با استفاده از دو عامل واسطه‌ای اعتماد اولیه و ریسک درک شده استفاده شد. بنابراین، قابلیت توسعه مدل یکپارچه پذیرش و استفاده از فناوری، از طریق دو عامل واسطه‌ای اعتماد اولیه و ریسک درک‌شده، مبنای طرح فرضیات تحقیق بوده که از طریق آزمون معناداری اثر اجزای مدل بر روی پذیرش فناوری بلاکچین در بانکداری الکترونیک و با نقش میانجی این عوامل مورد آزمون قرار گرفته است. برای اندازه‌گیری متغیرها از پرسشنامه استفاده شده و جامعه آماری تحقیق را مدیران ارشد و میانی بانک سامان در شهر تهران تشکیل دادند. تعداد 72 نفر از آن‌ها به‌شیوه غیراحتمالی در دسترس، نمونه آماری تحقیق انتخاب شدند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی انجام گرفت و نتایج نشان داد عوامل موثر بر پذیرش فناوری بلاکچین در بانکداری الکترونیک را می‌توان شامل پیشایندهای انتظارات عملکرد و شرایط تسهیل‌کننده و عامل واسطه‌ای اعتماد اولیه دانست. هر دوی این پیشایندها از طریق اعتماد اولیه نیز اثرات قابل توجهی بر پذیرش این فناوری در بانکداری الکترونیک داشته‌اند، اما نقش ریسک درک شده به‌عنوان یک عامل واسطه‌ای در این مدل قابل توجه نبود. نتایج نشان داد که از میان پیشایندهای مدل توسعه‌یافته یکپارچه پذیرش و استفاده از فناوری، تنها انتظارات عملکرد به‌طور‌‌‌مستقیم بر پذیرش این فناوری تأثیرگذار است و شرایط تسهیل‌کننده به‌خودی خود، تاثیر قابل توجهی بر پذیرش این فناوری ندارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Explaining how to adopt blockchain technology in electronic banking

نویسندگان English

Mehdi Dehbid 1
Ashraf Shah Mansouri 2
Seyyed Alireza Derakhshan 3
Mahnaz Rabiei 4
1 Ph. D student, Management Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Management Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Computer Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Economics Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Today, new technologies are emerging and changing all over the world. The general access to the Internet and the availability of Internet-connected devices such as cellphones, tablets, and personal computers have made a wide range of people aware of the rapid technological advances. The increased awareness and familiarity of consumers with new technologies has attracted the attention of many industries towards these technologies and the application of new technologies in the industry. Hence, the concept of Industry 4.0, which represents major modernizations in the economy and society through technology, has been explained and in this industry, the modification of internal and external application models for desirable interactions in the digital process has become the focus of attention.The fourth industrial revolution refers to the rapid changes in technology, industries, and social and operational patterns that have become widespread during the 21st century in order to increase interconnections and intelligent automation.
The banking industry is also one of the industries that, under the influence of technological progress, has tried to update the ways of communicating with customers and providing financial and credit services. Banks began their attention and movement towards information technology after the ease of access of society to independent personal computers and, subsequently, computer networks. The emergence and development of electronic banking technologies, which today are considered in their developed form as "electronic banking", has also been one of the consequences of technological development.
 Methodology:
This research is classified as applied research in terms of its purpose and is classified as correlational studies in terms of its analysis method. Therefore, performance expectations and facilitating conditions are considered antecedents of behavioral intentions. Because hope for effort and social impact cannot yet explain behavioral intentions to adopt this technology due to the significant lack of acceptance of blockchain technology in Iran. Instead of these demographic factors, in order to develop this model, important contextual mediators such as: initial trust and perceived risk were considered in the proposed model of the present study. Therefore, the research hypotheses in order to develop the integrated theory of technology acceptance and use model and determine the effect of each factor of this model on the adoption of blockchain technology in electronic banking are:
Hypothesis 1: Initial trust, the mediating factor in the developed model of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, has a significant effect on the adoption of blockchain technology in electronic banking.
Hypothesis 2: Perceived risk is a mediating factor in the developed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and has a significant effect on the adoption of blockchain technology in e-banking.
The conceptual model of the research to measure the impact of factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in e-banking has been developed under the integrated theory of technology acceptance and use model. In this model, facilitating conditions are the user's belief that institutional support and infrastructure are available to help use the targeted technology. From the perspective of the blockchain environment in the bank, facilitating conditions emphasize the availability of the technical structure for the adoption and use of technology, and all are influenced by the sufficient level of technical, organizational, infrastructural, and human support of users to use the technology. In addition, facilitating conditions help increase users' initial trust in using the technology.
Results and Discussion:
The results showed that the factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in digital banking can be considered as the antecedents of performance expectations and facilitating conditions and the mediating factor of initial trust. So that both of these antecedents have had significant effects on the adoption of this technology in digital banking through initial trust, but the role of perceived risk as a mediating factor in the adoption model of blockchain technology in digital banking was not significant. The results also showed that among the antecedents of the developed integrated theory of technology acceptance and use model, only performance expectations directly affect the adoption of this technology, and facilitating conditions by themselves do not have a significant impact on the adoption of this technology.
Conclusion:
This study formulated and empirically tested an extended The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)  model to explain the important predictors of Iranian bankers’ intention to use blockchain technology at an individual level. The research proposes a comprehensive strategy for future studies on the adoption of new technologies (e.g., blockchain) by emphasizing the utility of the UTAUT extension by integrating crucial contextual elements. The research provides practitioners with helpful insights that can be used to create and ensure the seamless deployment of blockchain technology within the banking sector. It seems that investing in the performance results of adopting blockchain technology as well as informing the responsible authorities and policymakers in the field of technology transfer in order to gain their trust in new technologies like blockchain can have favorable results in the adoption of this technology. Since the high security and low risk of this technology have been confirmed in many theoretical and experimental studies, and the structure of the definition of this technology is also based on reducing the risk of fraud, it seems that the use of factors such as perceived risk is in conflict with this technology. Based on this, it is suggested to policy makers in the field of technology transfer and creation, with the aim of reducing operational risk, disclosure and fraud in digital banking and on the other hand, increasing the level of information security, to pay more attention to the creation or transfer of blockchain technology from similar industries to the banking field.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Technology adoption
Blockchain
Digital banking
UTAUT Model
  1. Ahmadi, M., Rousta, A., Maleki, M. H., & Asayesh, F. (2023). Identifying and Prioritizing Drivers Affecting the Future of Smart Marketing in the Banking Industry with a Focus on Blockchain Technology Using Fuzzy Delphi and Codas. Journal of Advertising and Sales Management, 4(3). [In Persian] doi: JABM.3.2.15564.984128.
  2. Ahmed, S., Alshater, M. M., El Ammari, A., & Hammami, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101646. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101646.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  4. Akhtar, S., Irfan, M., Kanwal, S., & Pitafi, A. H. (2019). Analysing Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology with trust toward mobile banking adoption in China and Pakistan: Extending with the effect of power distance and uncertainty avoidance. International Journal of Financial Innovation in Banking, 2(3), 183-207. doi: 10.1504/IJFIB.2019.102307
  5. Badr, M.A.A. (2020). Industry 4.0 and its Implications for the Financial Sector. Procedia Computer Science, 177: 496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.10.068.
  6. Bunea, D., Karakitsos, P., Merriman, N., & Studener, W. (2016). Profit distribution and loss coverage rules for central banks. ECB Occasional Paper, (169), 1-56. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2770326
  7. Chang, V., Baudier, P., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, J., & Arami, M. (2020). How Blockchain can impact financial services–The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees. Technological forecasting and social change, 158, 120166. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166
  8. Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  9. Cheng, R. J. (2020). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology implementation of cryptocurrency-based Islamic financing instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9), 873-884. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7880
  10. Cucari, N., Lagasio, V., Lia, G., & Torriero, C. (2022). The impact of blockchain in banking processes: The Interbank Spunta case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(2), 138-150. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2021.1891217
  11. Davis, F. D. (1987). User acceptance of information systems: the technology acceptance model (TAM). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022
  12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Sarker, P., Jeyaraj, A., Jadil, Y., & Hughes, L. (2021). A meta-analytic structural equation model for understanding social commerce adoption. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10172-2
  13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric 10: 177–88. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237022
  14. Frame, W. S., Wall, L. D., & White, L. J. (2018). Technological change and financial innovation in banking: Some implications for fintech. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3261732. doi:10.29338/wp2018-11
  15. Gupta, A., & Gupta, S. (2018). Blockchain technology: Application in Indian banking sector. Delhi Business Review, 19(2), 75-84.
  16. Hashemi, M., Safdari Ranjbar, M., & Noorbakhsh, A. (2021). Identifying Block-chain Windows of Opportunity in Iran’s Banking Industry. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 11(2), 35-53. [In Persian] doi: 20.1001.1.24767220.1400.11.2.3.3
  17. Heidari, H., Mousakhani, M., Alborzi, M., Divandari, A., & Radfar, R. (2019). Explaining the Blockchain Acceptance Indices in Iran Financial Markets: A Fuzzy Delphi Study. Journal of Money and Economy, 14(3), 335-365. [In Persian] https://sid.ir/paper/672424/en
  18. Jena, R. K. (2022). Exploring Antecedents of Peoples' Intentions to Use Smart Services in a Smart City Environment: An Extended Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology Model. Journal of Information Systems, 36(1), 133-149. doi: 10.2308/ISYS-2020-050
  19. Jevsikova, T., Stupurienė, G., Stumbrienė, D., Juškevičienė, A., & Dagienė, V. (2021). Acceptance of distance learning technologies by teachers: Determining factors and emergency state influence. Informatica, 32(3), 517-542. doi: 10.15388/21-INFOR459
  20. Karim, S., Rabbani, M. R., & Bawazir, H. (2022). Applications of blockchain technology in the finance and banking industry beyond digital currencies. In Blockchain Technology and Computational Excellence for Society 5.0 (pp. 216-238). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8382-1.ch011
  21. Kawasmi, Z., Gyasi, E. A., & Dadd, D. (2020). Blockchain adoption model for the global banking industry. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 28(4), 112-154. doi: 10.58729/1941-6679.1436
  22. Khalil, M., Khawaja, K. F., & Sarfraz, M. (2021). The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model. Quality & Quantity, 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01229-0
  23. Khazaei, H., Faezy Razi, F., & Vakil Alroaia, Y. (2022). Acceptance model of new financial and banking technologies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(50), 289-306. [In Persian] doi: 10.22034/SMSJ.2022.119512
  24. Kim, K. K., & Prabhakar, B. (2004). Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e-commerce: The case of internet banking. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 50-64. doi: 10.1145/1007965.1007970
  25. Kumari, A., & Devi, N. C. (2022). Determinants of user's behavioural intention to use blockchain technology in the digital banking services. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 11(2), 159-174. doi: 10.1504/IJEF.2022.122181
  26. Kumari, A., & Devi, N. C. (2022). The impact of fintech and blockchain technologies on banking and financial services. Technology Innovation Management Review, 12(1/2). doi: 10.22215/timreview/1481
  27. Lee, I. (2018). Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1): 35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003
  28. MacDonald, T. J., Allen, D. W., & Potts, J. (2016). Blockchains and the boundaries of self-organized economies: Predictions for the future of banking (pp. 279-296). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42448-4_14
  29. Mekinji , B. (2019). The impact of Industry 4.0 on the Transformation of the Banking Sector. Journal of Contemporary Economics, 1: 8-17. doi: 10.7251/JOCE1901006M
  30. Moumivand, B., Gholami Jamkarani, R., Maleki, M. H., & Jahangirnia, H. (2022). A framework for identifying the drivers affecting the future of the banking industry with emphasis on the role of financial technology. Financial Economics, 16(61), 175-194. [In Persian] doi: 10.30495/FED.2023.698848
  31. Nazari, M., Vedadhir, A. A., Ezati, H., & Torkaman, A. (2022). The trend of digital transformation and strategy of the country's insurance industry. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(52), 158-141. [In Persian] doi: 10.22034/SMSJ.2022.163802
  32. Nazim, N. F., Razis, N. M., & Hatta, M. F. M. (2021). Behavioural intention to adopt blockchain technology among bankers in islamic financial system: perspectives in Malaysia. Romanian Journal of Information Technology & Automatic Control/Revista Română de Informatică și Automatică, 31(1). doi: 10.33436/v31i1y202101
  33. Nguyen, Q. K. (2016). Blockchain-a financial technology for future sustainable development. In 2016 3rd International conference on green technology and sustainable development (GTSD) (pp. 51-54). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/GTSD.2016.22
  34. Osmani, M., El-Haddadeh, R., Hindi, N., Janssen, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2021). Blockchain for next generation services in banking and finance: cost, benefit, risk and opportunity analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 884-899. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-02-2020-0044
  35. Patel, R., Migliavacca, M., & Oriani, M. E. (2022). Blockchain in banking and finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101718. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101718
  36. Patki, A., & Sople, V. (2020). Indian banking sector: Blockchain implementation, challenges and way forward. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 4(1), 65-73. doi: 10.1007/s42786-020-00019-w
  37. Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. doi: 10.1177/0735633120960421
  38. Saheb, T., & Mamaghani, F. H. (2021). Exploring the barriers and organizational values of blockchain adoption in the banking industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 32(2), 100417. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100417
  39. Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia manufacturing, 22, 960-967. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
  40. Taherdoost, H. (2022). A critical review of blockchain acceptance models—blockchain technology adoption frameworks and applications. Computers, 11(2), 24. doi: 10.3390/computers11020024
  41. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: A meta-analytic evaluation of Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology .Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 987-1005. doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10007-6
  42. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 222-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.008
  43. Thusi, P., & Maduku, D. K. (2020). South African millennials’ acceptance and use of retail mobile banking apps: An integrated perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106405. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106405
  44. Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in . Annals of Operations Research, 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9
  45. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
  46. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178. doi: 10.2307/41410412
  47. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800121
  48. Wijaya, D., Girsang, E., Ramadhani, S. L., Nasution, S. W., & Karo, U. K. (2022). Influence Of Organizing Functions, Direction Functions And Planning Functions On Nurse Performance At Hospital Royal Prima Medan. International Journal of Health and Pharmaceutical (IJHP), 2(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000204
  49. Yazdanirad, M., Keshtkar Haranaki, M., Ahmadi Sharif, M., & Asayesh, F. (2021). Designing a model for the application of blockchain technology in the Iranian banking industry based on Grounded theory. Journal of Advertising and Sales Management, 2(2), 195-211. [In Persian] doi: 10.52547/JABM.3.2.13418
  50. Yazdanirad, M., Keshtkar, M., Ahmadi, M., & Asayesh, F. (2023). Interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting the application of Blockchain technology in Banking industry of Iran. Journal of Business Management, 15(59), 231-250. [In Persian] available at: https://bmj.ctb.iau.ir/article_697400.html?lang=en
  51. Yulius, K., Ninuk, M., & Lena, E. (2019). Fintech in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. International Journal of Research Culture Society, 3(9): 53-56. Available at: http://repository.ukwms.ac.id/id/eprint/20320/
  52. Yusof, H., Munir, M. F. M. B., Zolkaply, Z., Jing, C. L., Hao, C. Y., Ying, D. S. & Leong, T. K. (2018). Behavioral intention to adopt blockchain technology: Viewpoint of the banking institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 3(10), 274-279. Available  at:https://www.academia.edu/37833584/Behavioral_Intention_to_Adopt_Blockchain_Technology_Viewpoint_of_the_Banking_Institutions_in_Malaysia

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 05 اسفند 1402