فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی توسعه مشارکت اقتصادی در مدیریت شهری کلان‌شهر اهواز

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش با هدف برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی توسعه مشارکت اقتصادی در مدیریت شهری کلان‌شهر اهواز تدوین ‌شده است. این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی- توسعه‌ای و به لحاظ نوع، توصیفی- تحلیلی و پیمایشی است. داده‌های موردنیاز تحقیق با روش اسنادی، پیمایشی و مصاحبه با مردم و کارشناسان گردآوری‌ شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، 30 نفر از کارشناسان و خبرگان حوزه سرمایه‌گذاری و مشارکت است که با توجه به تعداد محدود، همه افراد جزء نمونه انتخاب شدند. جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره دیمتل فازی و با تلفیق آن در مدل SWOT استفاده ‌شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که راهبردهای: مطالعه آسیب‌شناسی در حوزه سرمایه‌گذاری شهرداری اهواز؛ طراحی و ارائه بسته‌های سرمایه‌گذاری؛ افزایش تعامل مثبت با دستگاه‌های اجرایی و بسترسازی لازم با مشارکت سایر دستگاه‌های ذی‌صلاح جهت ارتقاء خدمات و انجام وظایفی که بر اساس قوانین، مقررات و دستورالعمل‌ها به شهرداری واگذار شده است؛ پیش‌بینی نظام تشویقی برای کاهش ریسک پروژه‌ها؛ تهیه کاداستر و GIS؛ طراحی بانک اطلاعات سرمایه‌گذاران و پروژه‌های شهری؛ تشکیل کارگروه تسهیل سرمایه‌گذاری با مشارکت دستگاه‌های مرتبط با دبیری شهرداری؛ و شناسایی ظرفیت‌های سرمایه‌گذاری مرتبط با وظایف ذاتی شهرداری به ترتیب جزء اولویت‌دار‌ترین راهبردها در توسعه مشارکت‌های اقتصادی در مدیریت شهری کلان‌شهر اهواز هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Strategic planning for the development of economic participation in the urban management of Ahvaz metropolis

نویسنده English

Majid Goodarzi
Associate Professor, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Nowadays, the physical growth and expansion of cities with rational standards and principles are among the sustainable urban development principles. Sustainable urban development is based on real needs and rational decisions considering diverse economic, social and environmental aspects. Among the factors affecting urban physical development is sustainable income via which the level of profitability and access to sustainable income can determine the type and amount of urban development with a plan. Providing financial resources is one of the most critical duties of public institutions such as municipalities. Financial resources of municipalities can be obtained in different ways, but not all of them have the characteristics of stable incomes. The stability of the incomes requires that, firstly, they have relative continuity and secondly, they do not expose the quality conditions of the city to threat and destruction.
One of the ways to accepleate economic development, development and job creation is to attract capital and invest in cities. Besides, attracting investment can lead to the reform of the city's management system and the exchange of economic experiences and the use of new technologies. In the face of problems and problems in cities such as population explosion, the bad condition of vehicles on the streets and roads, pollution and environment, the flood of rural migrants, and the growing wave of marginalization, cooperative programs and private investments have a special place among city managers because the municipalities are facing budget limitations in the implementation of urban projects. The present study aimed at compiling and prioritizing strategies for economic participation development in the urban management of Ahvaz metropolis.
  Methodology:
The study employed an applied-developmental research design, descriptive-analytical research method. The data were through documentary-library and survey research, and interviewing with citizens and experts. The statistical population consisted of 30 investment and partnership experts, all of whom were selected as samples due to the limited number of population. To analyze the data, Fuzzy DEMATEL multi-criteria decision making technique (FDEMATEL) was employed and integrated with the SWOT model. In this research, to present strategies for economic participation development in urban management, using a strategic planning and strategic management technique, SWOT strategic analysis, an effort was made to find the most important efficient strategies and policies, and finally to present the best strategy for the development of economic participation in the urban management of Ahvaz metropolis.
  Results and Discussion:
In the analysis of offensive strategy (SO), dimensions SO1, SO2 and SO4 are considered the cause due to their positive situation. As a result, these dimensions have a high effect on the effectiveness of other dimensions. In other words, SO3 and SO5 dimensions are considered disabled due to their negative position and have more influence. The SO4 dimension has a longer length from the origin than other dimensions-- SO4 is more important than other indicators in influencing and being influenced by indicators. Also, among the dimensions of survival strategies (SO), ST1, ST4, and ST2 are considered the cause due to their positive situation. As a result, these dimensions have a high effect on the effectiveness of other dimensions. In other words, ST3 and ST5 dimensions are considered disabled due to their negative situation and have more influence. As can be seen in the table, the ST1 dimension has a longer length from the origin than other dimensions, this means that ST1 is more important than other indicators in influencing and being influenced by indicators. In the analysis of reorienting strategies (WO), dimensions WO1, WO2, WO4, and WO5 are considered causes due to their positive status. As a result, these dimensions have a high effect on the effectiveness of other dimensions. In other words, dimensions WO3 and WO6 are considered disabled due to their negative position and have more influence. As can be seen in the table, WO2 dimension has a longer length from the origin than other
 

Strateg. Manag. Stud., Vol. 16, No. 61, Spring 2025

Web: http://smsjournal.ir
Doi: 10.22034/smsj.2024.414811.1927
dimensions, this means that WO2 is more important than other indicators in influencing and being influenced by indicators. Also, among the dimensions of defensive strategies (WT), WT1, WT2 and WT3 are considered the cause due to their positive situation. As a result, these dimensions have a high effect on the effectiveness of other dimensions. In other words, WT4, WT5 and WT6 dimensions are considered disabled due to their negative situation and have more influence. As can be seen in the table, WT2 dimension has a longer length from the origin than other dimensions, this means that WT2 is more important than other indicators in influencing and being influenced by indicators.
Conclusion:
Strategies such as doing pathological study in Ahvaz municipality investment; designing and providing investment packages; increasing the positive interaction with the executive and necessary devices with the participation of other interested organizations for the promotion of services and performing tasks based on laws, regulations and guidelines delegated to the municipality; forecasting the incentive system to reduce the risk of projects; providing Cadastre and GIS; designing a database of investors and urban projects; setting up an investment facilitation team with the participation of departments related to the municipality; and identifying regular investment capacities related to inherent duties of the municipality are among the most important strategies in developing economic participation in Ahwaz Metropolis.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategic planning
Economic participation
Urban management
Ahvaz City
  1. Albalate, D., Bel, G., & Geddes, R.R. (2014). The determinents of contractual choice for private involvement in infrastructur projects in the united states, IREA Working Papers 201220, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2012.
  2. Angel, Sh., Jason, P., & Daniel, I.C (2012). Atlas of Urban Expansion, Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  3. Arns, C. (2012). California: One state, two economies, Journal of Sacramento Business, 20 September.
  4. Asgharpour, M. J. (2010).Group decision making and game theory with an operations research perspective, second edition, Tehran, Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  5. Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A metaregression analysis of solid waste and water services, Journal of policy analysis and management, 29(3), 553-557.
  6. Besada, H. (2013). Doing business in fragile states: The private sector, natural resources and conflict in Africa, London: James Currency Publishers.
  7. Blacher, Y. (2005). Changing The way Government works, public Administration today, OCT-Dec.
  8. Chan, A., Lam, P., Chan, D., Cheung, E., & Ke, Y. (2010). Potential Obstacles to Successful Implementation of Public-Private Partnerships in Beijing and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(1): 30 - 40. DOI: 1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2010)26:1(30)
  9. Danaeifard, H., Delkhah, J., & Kiaei, P. (2017).Identifying and prioritizing obstacles to the development of public private sector participation, Journal of Business Management Perspective, 16(29), 33-49. https://www.sid.ir/paper/523396/fa [In Persian]
  10. Ezekia, M., & Ghaffari, Gh. (2002).Investigating the relationship between trust and participation in the rural areas of Kashan city, Social Science Journal, 17, Tehran.[In Persian]
  11. Fontela, E. (2000). Bridging the gap between scenarios and models, Foresight, 2 (1).ttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14636680010802447/full/html
  12. Heybati, F., & Ahmadi, M. (2009).Public-private partnership: the new system of financial provision in handing over the infrastructure projects of the central and local governments to the private sector, the first international conference on the development of the financial provision system in Iran, 1(1), https://www.sid.ir/paper/807692/fa. [In Persian]
  13. Hosseini Shahparian, N. (2014).An analysis of spatial justice with an emphasis on urban public services in Ahvaz metropolis, Master's thesis of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. [In Persian]
  14. Jamshidzadeh, I. (2003).Investigation and analysis of the expenses and credits of the country's municipalities during the years 50-56 and 79-71, the research quarterly of the country's management and planning, 4(13), 28-37. [In Persian]
  15. Jeng, D. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Social influence on the use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62, 819–828.
  16. Lane, M. (2005). public participation in planning: an intellectual history, Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283-299.
  17. Willoughby, Ch. (2013). How much can public private partnership really do for urban transport in developing countries?, Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, 40(1), 34-55.
  18. Martin, P. (1997). Third Millennium Management, Bathos Press, University of South Australia.
  19. Mir Bagheri Heer, M., & Selahvarzi, M. (2015).Obstacles to attracting investment in the urban area (case study: Lorestan province), Scientific-Research Quarterly of Economics and Urban Management, 5(1), 101-114. [In Persian] 
  20. Moldan, B., & Bilharz, S. (1998).Sustainable Development Indicators, translated by Haddad Tehrani and Moharram Nejad (2012), Tehran: Environmental Protection Organization Publications. [In Persian]
  21. Morrissey, O., & Udomkerdmongkol, M. (2012). Governance, private investment and foreign direct investment in developing countries, World development, 40(3), 437-445.
  22. Motuf, Sh. (2009).The role of people's participation in the country's development planning, Research Quarterly, Jihad University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Institute, 3(1), pp. 10-16. [In Persian]
  23. Nascio, L. (2006). Trend and Perspective of Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries, ICFAI Journal of Urban Policy, 3(1), 211-226 https://www.sid.ir/paper/593650/en
  24. Pazhouyan, J., Mohammadpour Zarandi, H., & Danesh Jafari, D. (2011).Reforming the revenue and financial system of metropolises, City Economy Quarterly, No. 10, summer 2018, 9-23. [In Persian]
  25. Ziyari, K., Mehdi, A., & Mahdian Behnmiri, M. (2011).Studying and understanding financial resources and providing solutions to improve the sustainability of municipalities' income (case study: Mahabad Municipality), Urban Management Quarterly, 11(31), 107-124. https://www.sid.ir/paper/92082/fa [In Persian]
  26. Qadri, J. (2015).Evaluating the financial and revenue system of municipalities in Iran, Quarterly Economic Surveys, third period, 3. [In Persian]
  27. Quan, Z., HuangWeila, I., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying Critical Success Factors in Emergency Management Using a Fuzzy DEMATEL Method, Safety Science, 49(2), 243–252. DOI: 1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005
  28. Rabiei, S., & Shahandeh, A. (2011).An extension of the balanced scorecard, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management, 1(22), 41-50. http://www.iust.ac.ir/ijiefa/article-1-594-en.html [In Persian]
  29. Rahmani, F., & Mazhari, M. (2018).Examining the problems, effects and methods of privatization in the deputy city services of Mashhad Municipality, the first urban economy conference. [In Persian]
  30. Rahnama, M.R., & Hijazi Joshkhani, M. (2016).The effect of trust in the municipality on the willingness of the private sector to invest in collaborative projects of the Mashhad municipality, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 15(1), 1-24. [In Persian]
  31. Reyes, F., Cerpa, N., Candia-Véjar, A., & Bardeen, M. (2011). The optimization of Success Probability for Software Projects Using Genetic Algorithms, The Journal of Systems and Software, 84(5), 775–785. DOI: 1016/j.jss.2010.12.036
  32. Sadeghi, S.K., Mohammadzadeh, P., & Sobh Khaiz Zenozi, Sh. (2013).Factors affecting the participation of the private sector, as an approach in providing sustainable financial resources for municipal projects, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Economics and Urban Management, 3 (11), 153-167. URL: http://iueam.ir/article-1-202-fa.html [In Persian]
  33. Schaeffer, M. (2008). Access to Fiscal Information and Audit: Challenges and Strategies, in Péteri, G(Ed.) Finding the money, Public Accountability and Service Efficiency Fiscal Transparency, Budapest: Open Society Institute, 88-
  34. Shahidul, M., & Swapan, H. (2016). Who participate and who doesn't? Adapting community participation model for developing countries, Journal of Cities, (53), 70-77. DOI:1016/j.cities.2016.01.013
  35. Sharezai, G.A. (2007). recognition and analysis of the sustainability of the income items of the municipalities of the country, Urban Management Quarterly, 1(1), 23-37. https://www.sid.ir/paper/489313/fa [In Persian]
  36. Sharezai, G.A., & Majed, V. (2010).Sustainable financing of the city: How to finance the sustainable development of the city of Mashhad, the first conference on urban economics in Iran, Mashhad, Ferdowsi University. [In Persian]
  37. Taghvaei, M., & Goodarzi, M. (2015).Compilation and prioritization of medical tourism development strategies (case study: Shiraz metropolis), Research and Urban Planning Journal, 7(24), 1-22. 1001.1.22285229.1395.7.24.3.0 [In Persian]
  38. Tzeng, G. H., Chen, W. H., Yu, R., & Shih, M. L. (2010). Fuzzy decision maps: a generalization of the DEMATEL methods, Soft Computing, 14(11), 1141–1150. DOI: 1007/s00500-009-0507-0
  39. Varol,C., Ercoskun,O., & Gurer. Y. (2010). Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey, Habitat International.xxx. Article in Press.
  40. Yang, Y.P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications, International Journal Operational Research, 5(3), 160-168.

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 اسفند 1402