فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

شناسایی و تحلیل ابعاد و شاخص‌های توسعه شهر هوشمند

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
استادیار، گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
چکیده
محققان در سراسر جهان در حال بررسی چگونگی استفاده از فناوری‌های نوین برای توسعه خدمات جدید به ساکنان شهرهای جهان هستند. این تحقیق با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، یافته‌‌های مطالعات حوزه شهر هوشمند را به صورت نظام‌مند بررسی می‌کند و بر اساس کدهای شناسایی‌شده، ابعاد و شاخص‌های شهر هوشمند را معرفی می‌کند. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین و دسته‌بندی ابعاد و شاخص‌های توسعه شهر هوشمند است. روش پژوهش در دسته مطالعات توصیفی گردآوری اطلاعات به روش مرور سیستماتیک می‌باشد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه مقالات پژوهشی مرتبط در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی منتخب در بازه زمانی سال 2000 تا 2021 است. نمونه‌گیری پس از غربال مقالات، صورت گرفت و 106 مقاله انتخاب شد. با مطالعه متن کامل مقالات، کدگذاری انجام و مقوله‌ها دسته بندی شدند. به جهت ارزیابی اعتبار مقالات از معیار CASP استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل در 8 بعد اقتصاد، محیط‌زیست، حاکمیت، پویایی، انرژی، زندگی، فناوری و مردم هوشمند و 75 شاخص دسته‌بندی شدند. یافته‌های این مطالعه در جهت‌دهی مطالعات آتی کشور ایران، به سمت برنامه‌های توسعه پایدار برای پیاده‌سازی شهرهای هوشمند با تمرکز بر عوامل حیاتی موفقیت که کشورهای در حال توسعه را قادر به دستیابی به پیشرفت و توسعه می‌نماید، کمک می‌کند. پژوهش انجام شده با معرفی شاخص‌های مؤثر بر روند توسعه شهر هوشمند، به ویژه در شاخص‌هایی که عموماً عوامل اصلی تصمیم‌گیری در مورد توسعه شهر هستند، می‌تواند مورد توجه سیاست‌گذاران قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Identify and analyze the dimensions and indicators of smart city development

نویسندگان English

Sanaz Shafiee
Masarat Ayat
Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: To create a smart city in the first step, we need to identify the dimensions and relevant indicators of a smart city. Considering the importance of smart city development in Iran and the necessity of formulating appropriate policies for its development, identifying the components and dimensions of this field is crucial. Therefore, one of the knowledge gaps in this area is the lack of identification of suitable dimensions and indicators for a smart city. This research aims to address this gap by examining the concepts, indicators, relationships, and dimensions of this system in the best possible way. Identifying suitable dimensions can lead to the establishment of a systematic vision and facilitate appropriate development of smart cities in Iran. The innovation of this research lies in systematically identifying and explaining the indicators of smart city development as a step towards achieving the vision of smart cities. Given the lack of comprehensive research in the field of smart cities in the country, the findings of this research can serve as an effective initial step for future research in this area.
Methodology: Since the concept of a smart city is relatively new, most articles in this field are qualitative studies without quantitative data. Therefore, it seems that the meta-synthesis approach is a suitable method for data collection in this research area. The target population for extracting indicators of sustainable smart cities is all articles published in reputable journals and conferences from 2000 to 2021. The review and selection of documents and articles have been done systematically and purposefully. There are various methods for systematic review. Different authors have described this process to some extent differently. In this research, the Sandowlski and Barossa (2006) model has been used for the systematic review of research. The first stage of the meta-synthesis method is formulating the research question. Considering the objective of this research, appropriate answers to the "what, who, when, how" questions should be provided to validate the meta-synthesis method and complete the study. Texts and articles reviewed in this method include all articles related to the research questions. The second stage involves identifying articles using selected keywords. The information sources used in this research are English articles available in selected scientific databases such as Emerald, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Springer, and Google Scholar. After determining the information sources, the next step is article selection. The selection of articles is based on the keywords used in this research, namely "key factors" or "success factors" or "development factors" and "smart city." Based on the 106 final selected articles, the process of extracting information from these articles was performed. First, all extracted factors from the literature study were considered as codes, and then, considering the concept and content of each of these codes, they were categorized into similar concepts so that the research concepts and themes could be formed by combining similar codes.
Results and Discussion: After analyzing the identified indicators in the dimensions of smart economy, smart environment, smart governance, smart living, smart mobility, smart people, smart technology, and smart energy, they were classified. Overall, these indicators or factors that constitute the contributions of this study can be used to help cities in setting their goals and monitoring their performance in smart city development over time. As a result, cities regularly use indicators to determine their quantitative goals and systematically monitor progress towards those goals. The development of smart cities contributes to improving the quality of life for citizens, providing public services, and achieving sustainable development goals, among others. The development of various indicators of a smart city, including mobile network coverage, Internet of Things, cloud computing, big data, and next-generation mobile networks, has played a role in creating sustainable smart urban strategies. Many of these tools are employed globally and accelerate the next technological and industrial revolution that combines intelligent and sustainable characteristics. However, as the design and implementation of smart city strategies continue to evolve, the development of robust indicators that enable better monitoring, measurement, and understanding of the technical requirements as well as the social and environmental implications of using information and communication technologies in urban environments is crucial. In order to enhance further understanding of the components that can make cities smarter and to support decision-makers, practitioners, and citizens equally in the development of new approaches to urban development, it is necessary to examine a set of key performance indicators for smart city development by policymakers.
Conclusion: The aim of this research is to introduce dimensions and key indicators related to the development of smart cities. The results of conducted studies indicate that smart cities are built on several pillars. Based on the results and analyses, a set of performance indicators for smart cities were extracted using systematic literature review. All the indicators were classified into eight categories. This research introduces indicators that are of interest to global, national, and regional stakeholders involved in urban development. The innovation of this research lies in considering different dimensions and indicators towards the success of smart cities. The content and additional information available in this research indicate: Although the categorization among indicators may vary, common themes include economy, environment, and to some extent governance. These are the areas that have been recognized as the core strategies of smart cities. The social sustainability aspect is addressed through various sets of indicators in different ways. Some articles have a main categorization for social aspects and add subcategories, while others do not include a single social category but use multiple categories related to social aspects. Despite specific approaches and occasional variations in measuring the role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in smart city contexts, attention to infrastructure and technology dimensions remains crucial.


کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart city
Sustainable city
Systematic review
Meta-synthesis
Sustainable development 
  1. Aghimien, D. O., Aigbavboa, C., Edwards, D. J., Mahamadu, A.-M., Olomolaiye, P., Nash, H., & Onyia, M. (2020). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of the challenges of smart city development in developing countries. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2020-0092
  2. Ahlers, D., Wienhofen, L. W., Petersen, S. A., & Anvaari, M. (2019). A Smart City ecosystem enabling open innovation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Innovations for Community Services.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22482-0_9
  3. Al-Alwani, M. K. (2018). A development framework for smart cities assessment. Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences, 26(3), 340-349. doi: https://doi.org/10.29196/jub.v26i3.674
  4. Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N., & Al-Jaroodi, J. (2015). Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5
  5. Al Sharif, R., & Pokharel, S. (2022). Smart city dimensions and associated risks: Review of literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103542
  6. Alami, T., & Tahmasebi Aria, T. (2016). Sustainable and smart destination management: Opportunities for the DMO to act as an intelligent agent among destination stakeholders. (Master thesis), Umeå university, School of Business and Economics. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-122391
  7. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of urban technology, 22(1), 3-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
  8. Allen, B., Tamindael, L. E., Bickerton, S. H., & Cho, W. (2020). Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412
  9. Anand, P. B. (2021). Assessing smart city projects and their implications for public policy in the Global South. Contemporary Social Science, 16(2), 199-212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2020.1720794
  10. Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, S3-S11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
  11. Arasti, M., Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N., & Jafarpanah, I. (2022). Networking capability: a systematic review of literature and future research agenda. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(1), 160-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2020-0273
  12. Arroub, A., Zahi, B., Sabir, E., & Sadik, M. (2016). A literature review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems. Paper presented at the 2016 International conference on wireless networks and mobile communications (WINCOM).doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WINCOM.2016.7777211
  13. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4, 135-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
  14. Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E., Miskon, S., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 154-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03708
  15. Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, S. (2020). Smart city. Four approaches to the concept of understanding. Urban Research & Practice, 1-24. doi: . https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1818817
  16. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Perspectives: qualitative computing and NVivo. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo(1526478498), 1-46.
  17. Benevolo, C., Dameri, R. P., & D’auria, B. (2016). Smart mobility in smart city Empowering organizations (pp. 13-28): Springer.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_2
  18. Beretta, I. (2018). The social effects of eco-innovations in Italian smart cities. Cities, 72, 115-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.010
  19. Berg, B. L. (2004). Methods for the social sciences. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Pearson Education, 191, 10.
  20. Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C., & D'Auria, A. (2016). ICT and sustainability in smart cities management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 132-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132
  21. Bjørner, T. (2021). The advantages of and barriers to being smart in a smart city: The perceptions of project managers within a smart city cluster project in Greater Copenhagen. Cities, 114, 103187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103187
  22. Blanck, M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2021). Smart cities financing system: An empirical modelling from the European context. Cities, 116, 103268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103268
  23. Boes, K., Buhalis, D., & Inversini, A. (2015). Conceptualising smart tourism destination dimensions. Paper presented at the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015: Proceedings of the International Conference in Lugano, Switzerland, February 3-6, 2015.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_29
  24. Borsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., & Vitálišová, K. (2018). Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications. Cities, 78, 17-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010
  25. Braga, I. F. B., Ferreira, F. A. F., Ferreira, J. J. M., Correia, R. J. C., Pereira, L. F., & Falcão, P. F. (2021). A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants. Technology in Society, 66, 101687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101687
  26. Breslow, H. (2021). The smart city and the containment of informality: The case of Dubai. Urban Studies, 58(3), 471-486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020903233
  27. Buhalis, D., & Amaranggana, A. (2013). Smart tourism destinations Information and communication technologies in tourism 2014 (pp. 553-564): Springer, Cham.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03973-2_40
  28. Cacho, A., Figueredo, M., Cassio, A., Araujo, M. V., Mendes, L., Lucas, J., . . . Prolo, C. (2016). Social smart destination: a platform to analyze user generated content in smart tourism destinations New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 817-826): Springerr, Cham.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_77
  29. Caird, S. (2018). City approaches to smart city evaluation and reporting: case studies in the United Kingdom. Urban Research & Practice, 11(2), 159-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1317828
  30. Caird, S. P., & Hallett, S. H. (2019). Towards evaluation design for smart city development. Journal of Urban Design, 24(2), 188-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1469402
  31. Camero, A., & Alba, E. (2019). Smart City and information technology: A review. Cities, 93, 84-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014
  32. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe, series research memoranda 0048. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics, 48, 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  33. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 65-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  34. Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. F. (2019). Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 373-383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.022
  35. Chenail, R. J., & Weiss, A. D. (2007). Utilizing qualitative meta synthesis to conduct systematic reviews of primary healthcare research. 21st Annual Primary Care Research Methods & Statistics. San Antonio.
  36. Chong, M., Habib, A., Evangelopoulos, N., & Park, H. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 682-692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.005
  37. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., . . . Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on.doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
  38. Confente, I. (2015). Twenty‐five years of word‐of‐mouth studies: A critical review of tourism research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(6), 613-624. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2029
  39. de Wijs, L., Witte, P., & Geertman, S. (2016). How smart is smart? Theoretical and empirical considerations on implementing smart city objectives – a case study of Dutch railway station areas. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 424-441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1201758
  40. El Messeidy, R. (2016). Potable Streets: Smart Urban Solution. Paper presented at the REAL CORP 2016–SMART ME UP! How to become and how to stay a Smart City, and does this improve quality of life? Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society.
  41. Falconer, G., & Mitchell, S. (2012). Smart city framework. Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG), 12(9), 2-10.
  42. Fallah Tafti, H., Heydari Kooshaknoo, M., & Almasi Sarvestani, R. (2019). Understanding of Smart Citizen Components in Urban Environment with Technological Learning Approach (Case: Yazd City). Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 7(25), 51-62. doi: https://doi.org/1020.1001.1.23452870.1397.7.25.4.6
  43. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. J. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final Report.
  44. Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: architecture, city and environment (Vol. 4, pp. 7-26).
  45. Greco, I., & Cresta, A. (2015). A smart planning for smart city: the concept of smart city as an opportunity to re-think the planning models of the contemporary city. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications.doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21407-8_40
  46. Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 179-188.
  47. Gretzel, U., Zhong, L., Koo, C., Morrison, A., & Morrison, A. (2016). Application of smart tourism to cities. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 2(2), 216–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-04-2016-0007
  48. Hall, R. E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., & Von Wimmersperg, U. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Upton, New York: Brookhaven National Lab.(BNL), Upton, NY (United States).
  49. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303-320. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
  50. Israilidis, J., Odusanya, K., & Mazhar, M. U. (2021). Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 101989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.015
  51. Jamshidzehi, M. A., Karimian Bostani, M., & Hafez Rezazadeh, M. (2022). Analysis of smart city indicators in Zahedan City. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 17(2). doi: http://doi.org/20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.2.8.0
  52. Jiang, M., Gao, Y., Jin, M., & Liu, S. (2021). Sustainable development of the business environment in smart cities: a hierarchical framework. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1426-1448. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2020-0148
  53. Joia, L. A., & Kuhl, A. (2019). Smart city for development: A conceptual model for developing countries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_17
  54. Joshi, M., Vaidya, A., & Deshmukh, M. (2018). Sustainable transport solutions for the concept of smart city Sustainable Energy and Transportation . Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. (pp. 21-42): Springer.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7509-4_3
  55. Jucevičius, R., Patašienė, I., & Patašius, M. (2014). Digital Dimension of Smart City: Critical Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 146-150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.137
  56. Koca, G., Egilmez, O., & Akcakaya, O. (2021). Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique. Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101625
  57. Komninos, N. (2011). Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 172-188. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.579339
  58. Kozłowski, W., & Suwar, K. (2021). Smart city: definitions, dimensions, and initiatives. European Research Studies Journal, 3(116), 509-520. doi: http://doi.org/35808/ersj/2442
  59. Kumar, V., & Dahiya, B. (2017). Smart economy in smart cities. In T. M. V. Kumar (Ed.), Smart economy in smart cities (pp. 3-76). Hong Kong: Springer.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3
  60. Lacinák, M., & Ristvej, J. (2017). Smart city, safety and security. Procedia engineering, 192, 522-527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.090
  61. Lai, C. S., Jia, Y., Dong, Z., Wang, D., Tao, Y., Lai, Q. H., . . . Lai, L. L. (2020). A review of technical standards for smart cities. Clean Technologies, 2(3), 290-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol2030019
  62. Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science, 9(1), 181-212. doi: https://doi.org/10.28945/479
  63. Lim, C., Kim, K.-J., & Maglio, P. P. (2018). Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities, 82, 86-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.011
  64. Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2019). Identifying the results of smart city development: Findings from systematic literature review. Cities, 95, 102397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102397
  65. Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Azeroual, O., Ukpabi, D., Valtenbergs, V., & Machova, R. (2022). Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82(1), 103906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103906
  66. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Wael, Y. (2011). An analytic network model for Smart cities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on the AHP, June, Hilton Sorrento Palace.
  67. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
  68. Lopes, N. V. (2017). Smart governance: A key factor for smart cities implementation. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), Singapore.doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGSC.2017.8038591
  69. Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Jonathan, C., Millard, J., Pederson, J. K., Thaarup, R. K., . . . WiK, M. W. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU Strategy & Policy Analysis (pp. 1-200): European Parliament ; Directorate General for Internal Policies. Policy Department Economic and Scientific policy A, Brussel.
  70. Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L., Colomer-Llinàs, J., & Meléndez-Frigola, J. (2015). Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 611-622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012
  71. McCartney, G., Butler, R., & Bennett, M. (2008). A strategic use of the communication mix in the destination image-formation process. Journal of Travel Research, 47(2), 183-196. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508321201
  72. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. international review of administrative sciences, 82(2), 392-408. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  73. Meline, T. (2006). Selecting studies for systemic review: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contemporary issues in communication science and disorders, 33(Spring), 21-27. doi: http://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_33_S_21
  74. Minghetti, V., & Buhalis, D. (2010). Digital divide in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 49(3), 267-281. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0047287509346843
  75. Mohammadi, J., Mohammadi, A., Ghafari, A., & Yazdani, M. H. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of the city from. Human Geography Research, 53(2), 521-543. doi: 10.22059/JHGR.2020.287972.1008000
  76. Moradi, S. (2019). The Thematic study of Research in the Smart City Scope. Journal of Scientometrics, 5(9), 139-160. doi: http://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2018.759
  77. Moustaka, V., Vakali, A., & Anthopoulos, L. G. (2018). A systematic review for smart city data analytics. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 1-41. doi: http://doi.org/10.1145/3239566
  78. Myeong, S., Park, J., & Lee, M. (2022). Research models and methodologies on the smart city: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1687. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031687
  79. Neves, F. T., de Castro Neto, M., & Aparicio, M. (2020). The impacts of open data initiatives on smart cities: A framework for evaluation and monitoring. Cities, 106, 102860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102860
  80. Ninčević Pašalić, I., Ćukušić, M., & Jadrić, M. (2021). Smart city research advances in Southeast Europe. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102127
  81. Noori, N., & De Jong, M. (2018). Towards Credible City Branding Practices: How Do Iran’s Largest Cities Face Ecological Modernization? Sustainability, 10(5), 1354. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051354
  82. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., . . . Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  83. Pan, G., Qi, G., Zhang, W., Li, S., Wu, Z., & Yang, L. T. (2013). Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: issues, methods, and applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6), 120-126. doi: http:/doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525604
  84. Patrão, C., Moura, P., & Almeida, A. T. d. (2020). Review of Smart City Assessment Tools. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1117-1132. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040055
  85. Purnomo, F., & Prabowo, H. (2016). Smart city indicators: A systematic literature review. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(3), 161-164.
  86. Rahnama, M. R., Hosseini, S. M., & Mohammadi Hamidi, S. (2020). Measuring and assessment of smart city criteria in Metropolis Ahvaz. Human Geography Research, 52(2), 589-611. doi: 10.22059/JHGR.2018.201090.1007182
  87. Ristvej, J., & Lacinák, M. (2018). Enhancing Resilience by Understanding Smart City and Safe City Concepts and Their Common Systems. Paper presented at the EAI International Conference on Smart Cities within SmartCity360° Summit.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_13
  88. Riva Sanseverino, E., Riva Sanseverino, R., & Anello, E. (2018). A cross-reading approach to smart city: A european perspective of chinese smart cities. Smart Cities, 1(1), 26-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010003
  89. Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
  90. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the schools: a nationally refereed journal sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama, 13(1), 29.
  91. Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2021). Towards a hybrid model for the management of smart city initiatives. Cities, 116, 103278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103278
  92. Shafiee, S., Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A., Hasanzadeh, A., & Jahanyan, S. (2021). Smart tourism destinations: a systematic review. Tourism Review, 76(3), 505-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-06-2019-0235
  93. Shamsuzzoha, A., Nieminen, J., Piya, S., & Rutledge, K. (2021). Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities, 114, 103194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194
  94. Singh, A., & Singla, A. R. (2021). Constructing definition of smart cities from systems thinking view. Kybernetes, 50(6), 1919-1950. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2020-0276
  95. Siokas, G., Tsakanikas, A., & Siokas, E. (2021). Implementing smart city strategies in Greece: Appetite for success. Cities, 108, 102938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102938
  96. Stoltz, D., Arrias, J., & Lundqvist, P. (2015). Categorization Framework for Systems Innovation in Eco Cities. Energy procedia, 75, 2466-2471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.221
  97. Stübinger, J., & Schneider, L. (2020). Understanding smart city—A data-driven literature review. Sustainability, 12(20), 8460. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208460
  98. Sylvester, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1199-1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
  99. Tahir, Z., & Malek, J. A. (2016). Main criteria in the development of smart cities determined using analytical method. Planning Malaysia, 14(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.179
  100. Thornbush, M., & Golubchikov, O. (2021). Smart energy cities: The evolution of the city-energy-sustainability nexus. Environmental Development, 39, 100626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100626
  101. Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative health research, 14(10), 1342-1365. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269888
  102. Tok, E., McSparren, J. J., Al Merekhi, M., Elghaish, H., & Ali, F. M. (2015). Crafting smart cities in the Gulf region: A comparison of Masdar and Lusail Handbook of Research on Digital Media and Creative Technologies (pp. 448-460): IGI Global.
  103. Tran Thi Hoang, G., Dupont, L., & Camargo, M. (2019). Application of decision-making methods in smart city projects: a systematic literature review. Smart Cities, 2(3), 433-452. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2030027
  104. van Twist, A., Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2023). Smart cities & citizen discontent: A systematic review of the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 101799. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101799
  105. Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 526-553. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
  106. Vicini, S., Bellini, S., & Sanna, A. (2012). How to co-create Internet of things-enabled services for smarter cities. Paper presented at the SMART 2012: The first international conference on smart systems, devices and technologies, May 27–June 1.
  107. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Paper presented at the ECIS.
  108. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N., & Nelson, L. E. (2009). Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Growth, 17(2), 1-17.
  109. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E. M., & Yun, J. J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145-160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
  110. Yigitcanlar, T., Kankanamge, N., & Vella, K. (2021). How Are Smart City Concepts and Technologies Perceived and Utilized? A Systematic Geo-Twitter Analysis of Smart Cities in Australia. Journal of urban technology, 28(1-2), 135-154. doi: http:doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1753483
  111. Zhu, H., Shen, L., & Ren, Y. (2022). How can smart city shape a happier life? The mechanism for developing a Happiness Driven Smart City. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80, 103791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103791
  112. Zhu, W., Zhang, L., & Li, N. (2014). Challenges, function changing of government and enterprises in Chinese smart tourism. Information and communication technologies in tourism, 10, 553-564.
  113. Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x
  114. Zygiaris, S. (2013). Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4(2), 217-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 07 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 مرداد 1402