فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تحلیل پویایی سیستم تامین منابع انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر روند تغییرات اقلیمی ایران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه ایوان‌‌کی، ایوان‌‌کی، ایران
2 استاد، دانشگاه ایوان‌‌کی، ایوان‌‌کی، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشگاه ایوان‌‌کی، ایوان‌‌کی، ایران
چکیده
صنعت برق که در امنیت انرژی کشورها نقش تعیین‌کننده‌‌ای دارد در جهان با چالش‌هایی نظیر افزایش تقاضا، انتشار گازهای گل‌خانه‌ای و تغییرات اقلیمی مواجه شده است. با توجه به روند افزایشی تقاضای انرژی الکتریکی و تغییرات اقلیمی، ضرورت سیاست‌گذاری در بهره‌وری انرژی و انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر، با نقش یکی از اولویت‌های استراتژیک دراسناد بالادستی کشور مطرح است. به علت پیچیدگی‌های بخش انرژی، پژوهش حاضر رویکرد پویایی سیستم را در نظر گرفته و به مدل‌سازی و شبیه‌سازی پویایی‌های سیستم تامین انرژی الکتریکی کشور با توجه به روند پیشران‌های تغییرات تقاضای انرژی الکتریکی ناشی از تغییر اقلیم، جمعیت و رشد اقتصادی در افق 30 ساله پرداخته است. در ادامه به شناسایی و ارزیابی سیاست‌های تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر سازگاری با تغییرات اقلیمی ایران پرداخته شده است. چهار راهبرد شامل: 1) تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر مدیریت عرضه انرژی الکتریکی از منابع تجدیدناپذیر؛ 2) تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر مدیریت عرضه انرژی الکتریکی از منابع تجدیدپذیر؛ 3) تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی مدیریت تقاضای انرژی الکتریکی و 4) تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر سازگاری با تغییرات اقلیمی شناسایی گردید. سپس با اعمال جداگانه و ترکیبی سیاست‌های هر یک از راهبردها؛ رفتار متغیرهای هدف مدل، مورد بررسی و مقایسه قرار گرفت. در نهایت سیاست‌های ترکیبی شامل: 1) کاهش تلفات عرضه از طریق بهره‌وری‌ عوامل تولید نیروگاه‌ها؛ 2) کاهش تلفات انتقال و توزیع انرژی؛ 3) کاهش سرانه مصرف انرژی الکتریکی؛ 4) توسعه نیروگاه‌های خورشیدی؛ 5) مدیریت تقاضای آب در بخش غذا؛ 6) توسعه سیستم‌های بازیافت حرارتی، 7) توسعه نیروگاه‌های بادی و 8) توسعه نیروگاه‌های بیوگاز به مثابۀ بهترین سیاست‌های تامین انرژی الکتریکی مبتنی بر سازگاری با روند تغییر اقلیم انتخاب گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Dynamic analysis of electric energy supply system based on climate change trends in Iran

نویسندگان English

Sona Razzaghy 1
Ali Mohammad Ahmadvand 2
Marzieh Samadi Foroushani 3
1 PhD student, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ivan k University, Ivan k, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ivan k University, Ivan k, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ivan k University, Ivan k, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The electricity industry, which plays a decisive role in the energy security of countries, has faced many challenges in the world such as increasing demand, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, reducing fossil fuel reserves and economic conditions. Forecasts have shown that this trend will continue. Considering the continued increase in the demand for electrical energy and climate change, the necessity of policy making in energy efficiency and renewable energies is always considered as one of the strategic priorities in the country's top level documents. In this regard, this research intends to identify the dynamics of the country's electric energy supply system from a macro perspective, paying attention to the trends of drivers of changes in electric energy demand due to climate change, population and economic growth, and based on these dynamics, obtain a correct estimate of the continuation of the existing situation.
Methodology
Considering the complexities governing the energy sector, the dynamic system approach is very suitable for investigating the issue. Therefore, in this research, the main goal is to present a dynamic model of electric energy supply for Iran and analyze the influencing factors of this relationship. Therefore, it has been tried to study the dimensions of electric energy supply under the influence of climate change in the country. Then, with a systemic approach, the behavior of the electrical energy supply system was simulated based on the climate change trend in the 30-year horizon (1400-1430) in the country.
 Results and Discussion
The obtained results showed that the simulated model can provide acceptable behavior and results compared to reality. With a pathological and systematic view, the effective factors have been examined in a regular and coordinated function to reveal the existing synergies and trade-offs to identify general strategies for providing electrical energy. In the following, according to the declining behavior of the security of electrical energy resources, the identification and evaluation of the policies of supplying electrical energy resources based on adaptation to the climate changes of Iran was discussed. According to the results of the sensitivity analysis of the dynamic model, four strategies include: (1) Electric energy supply based on the management of electric energy supply from non-renewable sources; (2) Electric energy supply based on the management of electric energy supply from renewable sources; (3) Electric energy supply based on electric energy demand management and (4) Electric energy supply based on adaptation to climate changes were identified. In the following, by applying separately and combined policies of each of the strategies; The behavior of target variables of the model was investigated and compared. Finally, combined policies include: (1) reducing supply losses through the productivity of power plant production factors; (2) reducing energy transmission and distribution losses; (3) Per capita reduction of electrical energy consumption; (4) Development of solar power plants and (5) Management of water demand in the food sector; (6) Development of heat recovery systems, (7) Development of wind power plants and (8) Development of biogas power plants were selected as the best policies for supplying electrical energy resources based on adaptation to the climate change process.
Conclusion
Finally, based on the implementation of selected combined policies in the model, in short, the following solutions will lead to the supply of electrical energy security under the influence of climate: (1) 16% development of nuclear power plants in order to manage the supply of electrical energy from non-renewable and low-carbon sources in order to reduce supply losses through the productivity of production factors. (2) 18% reduction in the ratio of production of gas power plants to the total production of non-renewable power plants and increasing the production of combined cycle power plants through conversion from gas to combined cycle in order to increase the productivity of production factors and manage the supply of non-renewable resources. (3) Consolidation of energy and development of heat recovery systems in industrial units in order to develop heat recovery power plants by 32%. (4) Development of biogas, wind and solar power plants according to the key potentials in the country in order to manage energy supply from renewable sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (5) 5% reduction in energy transmission and distribution losses in order to manage demand and maintain electrical energy security. (6) Reducing per capita energy consumption and reaching the global average due to the increasing demand due to population growth. (7) Management of water demand in the food sector by increasing the irrigation efficiency to about 85%, increasing the area of land under the irrigation network and reducing food losses. It is worth mentioning that in this study, the simulation was based on historical trends, so in the field of research proposals for future research, it is suggested to investigate the effects of climate change under climate change scenarios and climate forecasting models. In this review, technical and economic variables are not taken into consideration. More studies are needed on the technical and cost effects of the variability of renewable sources and the effects of extreme weather events on all elements of the energy system. The impact of severe weather changes compared to gradual changes (such as weather events with higher or lower than normal values) can be significant. prolonged periods of calm winds or drought, or reduced predictability of weather patterns, which may occur under more or more severe climate change; It could be problematic for energy systems with a high share of renewable energy in the future.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

System dynamics
Supply of electrical energy resources
Climate change
Sustainable development
  1. Abbasi, T., & Abbasi, S. (2010). Renewable energy sources: Their impact on global warming and pollution. PHI Learning.
  2. Amini Naghani, F., Mirabbasi Najafabadi, R., Zamani, R., & Nasr Esfahani, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of climate change on the amount of electrical energy production of Karun Dam 4. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 11th year, number 44, 236-251 [In Persian]
  3. Avraamidou, S., Beykal, B., Pistikopoulos, I., & Pistikopoulos, E. (2018). A hierarchical Food-Energy-Water Nexus (FEW-N) decision-making approach for Land Use Optimization. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 44, 1885-1890. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50309-8
  4. Bakhtiari, P., Ostadi Jafari, M., Karamroudi, M., & Habibian, M. (2009). The place of renewable energies in the theory of sustainable passenger transportation. Traffic Management Studies 4(12), 77-96, https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=104215 [In Persian]
  5. Borowski, P. (2020). Nexus between water, energy, food and climate change as challenges facing the modern global, European and Polish economy. AIMS Geosciences. Warsaw University of Life Sciences. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, 6(4), 397-421. doi:10.3934/geosci.2020022
  6. Chen, A., Stephens, A., Koon Koon, R., Ashtine, M., & Koon, K.-K. (2020). Pathways to climate change mitigation and stable energy by 100 % renewable for a small island: Jamaica as an example. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 121. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109671
  7. Cronin, J., Anandarajah, G., & Dessens, O. (2018, August 6). Climate change impacts on the energy system: a review of trends and gaps. Climatic Change, 151, 79-93. doi:10.1007%2Fs10584-018-2265-4
  8. Dayant, F. Spring 2021. Systemic modeling of planning the development of renewable electricity production in competition with fossil electricity. Scientific journal of energy planning and policy research, 7th year, number 22, pages 7-50. [In Persian]
  9. Ebrahimi Serin Dizj, A., & Zarghami, M. (2016). Comparing the impact of revitalization policies under the influence of climate change with the help of systems dynamics; A case study of Urmia lake ecosystem. Iran Water Resources Research, 13(4), 184-189. [In Persian]
  10. Elum, Z., & Momodu, A. (2017). Climate change mitigation and renewable energy for sustainable. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 72-80. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.040
  11. Gernaat, D., Boer, H., Daioglou, V., Yalew, S., Müller, C., & Vuuren , D. (2021). Climate change impacts on renewable energy supply. Nature Climate Change, 11, 119-125. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00949-9
  12. Ghasemi, M., Soltani Mohammadi, A., Naseri, A., & Moazd, H. (2019). Evaluation and application of the system dynamics model in the investigation and determination of nitrate leaching under different climatic scenarios in Amir Kabir sugarcane cultivation and industrial lands. Iran Irrigation and Drainage Journal,14(1), 217-229.
  13. Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050 (2018 edition). Retrieved from irena.org
  14. Global Trends 2040. (2021). A Publication Of The National Intelligence Council, ISBN 978-1-929667-33-8. Retrieved from www.dni.gov/nic/globaltrends
  15. Dale , V., A. Efroymson , R., & L. Kline, K. (2011). The land use–climate change–energy nexus. Landscape Ecol (2011) 26:755–773, 26, 755-773. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9606-2
  16. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2015). Global energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide stalled in 2014. http://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2015/march/global-energy-related-emissions-of-carbondioxide-stalled-in-2014.html. Accessed 15 2017
  17. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2014a). Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. IEA, Paris
  18. (2013) OECD/IEA Technology Roadmap. Wind Energy 63
  19. IEA (International Energy Agency) . World energy outlook: 2008. OECD/IEA; 2008.p.578
  20. IPCC (Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change)( (2014). Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. IPCC, New York.
  21. IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) (2015) Synergies between renewable energy and energy efficiency. IRENA/Copenhagen.
  22. IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) (2015). http://www.irena.org/document downloads/publications/irena_water_energy_food_nexus_2015.pdf.
  23. Kang , J.,& Wei , Y., & Liu , L., & Han , R., &Yu , B., & Wang , J. (2020). Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review. Applied Energy, 263. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114602
  24. Kaygusuz, k. (2012). Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1116-1126. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.013
  25. Kelly , P., & Adger , W. (2000). Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Facilitating Adaptation. Climatic Change , 47, 325-352. doi:10.1023/A:1005627828199
  26. Keyhanpour, M., Mousavi Jahormi, S., & Ebrahimi, H. (September 2021). Dynamic analysis of sustainable management of water resources based on correlation of water-food-energy resources. Iranian Irrigation and Drainage Journal, 15(3), 567-581.[In Persian]
  27. Liani, Q.,& Bakhshudeh, M. (2018).Water security in the Kowsar dam catchment under climate change conditions: application of the dynamic system method. Agricultural Economics, 13(1),47-72. [In Persian]
  28. Mei , H., & Li , Y., & Suo , C., & Ma , Y., & Lv , J. (2020). Analyzing the impact of climate change on energy-economy-carbon nexus system in China. Applied Energy, 262. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114568
  29. Nakhainejad, M., Abbasi, M., Zare Mehrjoui, Y., & Asadi Zarchi, A. (2003). Designing a model to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the electricity sector using the integrated approach of linear programming and system dynamics (case study: Iran's power plants)). Production and Operations Management, 13(1), 51-77. doi:10.22108/jpom.2022.129313.1382. (In Persian)
  30. Perera, A., Nik, V., Chen, D., Scartezzini, J.-L., & Hong, T. (2020, February 17). Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nature Energy, 5, 150-159. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0558-0
  31. R Albrecht, T., Crootof, A., & A Scott, C. (2018). The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environmental Research Letters, 13( 043002). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6/meta
  32. Rasul, G., & Sharma, B. (2016). The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Climate Policy, 16(6), 682-702. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1029865
  33. Ravestein, P., Schrier, G., Haarsma, R., Scheele, R., & Broek, M. (2018, December ). Vulnerability of European intermittent renewable energy supply to climate change and climate variability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 97, 497-508. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.057
  34. Renewables 2010: global status report. 2010.
  35. REN 21. Renewables 2014 global status report. Paris; 2014.
  36. REN 21. Renewables 2022: global-futures-report . https://www.ren21.net/2022-renewables / global-futures-report
  37. Report of the National Meteorological Organization (2022), report of the reference secretariat of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Risks of climate change and possible consequences for governments.[In Persian]
  38. Sayadi, M., Soltani, A., & Mohadi, S. (Autumn 2018). Presenting a conceptual model of water-energy-food nexus dynamics in Iran: a systemic approach. Environmental and Natural Resources Economics Quarterly, third year, number 6, pages 79-104.[In Persian]
  39. Solaun, K., & Cerda, E. (2019, December ). Climate change impacts on renewable energy generation. A review of quantitative projections. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116(109415), 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109415
  40. Soleimani Paytaq, M., & Arman Mehr, M. (2018). Examining the role of economic policies on the use of new energy in Iran's power plants (case study: subsidy, pricing and cost policies). Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 7(28), 35-59.[In Persian]
  41. Sterman, J. (2000): Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. The first volume. (Translator. Korosh, B. Banafsheh, R. Laleh, M. Parisa, A. Marzieh, & F. Hassan,) Tehran: Organization for the study and compilation of humanities books of universities (Samt).[In Persian]
  42. Streimikiene, D., Balezentis , T., Alisauskaite-Seskiene , I., Stankuniene, G., & Simanaviciene, Z. (2019). A Review of Willingness to Pay Studies for Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy Sector. energies, 12(8). doi:10.3390/en12081481
  43. World Bank (2012) Turn down the heat: why a 4°C warmer world must be avoided. World Bank, Washington.
  44. World Bank (2013) Turn down the heat: climate extremes, regional impacts, and the case for resilience. World Bank, Washington.
  45. World Meteorological Organisation (WMO)(2022). https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/climate
  46. Yalew, S., van Vliet, M., Gernaat , D., & Ludwig, F. (2020, August 3). Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios. nature energy, 5, 794-802. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0664-z

 

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 02 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 03 شهریور 1402