فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

شناسایی سیستماتیک عوامل مؤثر بر تنش در هم‌‌رقابتی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، پردیس بین‌المللی کیش، دانشگاه تهران، ایران
2 استاد، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هم‌رقابتی - همکاری و رقابت هم‌زمان میان شرکت‌ها - پدیده‌ای مهم در مدیریت راهبردی است. هم‌رقابتی می‌تواند به سطوح عملکردی بالاتر بینجامد. مشارکت در هم‌رقابتی اغلب باعث تنش، رفتار فرصت‌طلبانه و نشت دانش می‌شود و رابطه‌ای آسیب‌پذیر ایجاد می‌کند. هدف مقاله حاضر، مرور سیستماتیک پژوهش‌های قبلی در خصوص عوامل مؤثر بر تنش در هم‌رقابتی است. برای دستیابی به هدف مقاله حاضر، با استفاده از روش مرور سیستماتیک، پس از استخراج و بررسی پژوهش‌های متعدد، در نهایت 87 مقاله برای بررسی عمیق‌تر انتخاب گردید. پس از تعیین مسئله پژوهش به جست‌و‌جو پیرامون کلیدواژه‌ها پرداخته شد. جست‌وجو‌ی کلیدواژه‌ها در مقاله‌های نمایه شده مرحله اول طی سال‌های 2017 تا 2022 و در مرحله دوم طی سال‌های 1995 تا 2017 انجام شد. با بررسی پیشینه پژوهش این حوزه در ایران طی سال‌های اخیر مشخص شد که پژوهشگران بر توسعه مبانی هستی‌شناختی رقابت همکارانه، شرایط شکل‌گیری، فرآیندهای زیربنایی و نتایج آن تمرکز کرده‌اند. آن‌ها این امر را با استفاده از روش‌های مختلف پژوهش انجام داده‌اند. از یک سو، بسیاری از مطالعات ماهیت مفهومی یا اکتشافی داشته‌اند و غالباً موارد منفرد را برای ارائه یک مبنای مفهومی اولیه مورد بررسی قرار داده‌اند. از سوی دیگر، مطالعات کمی برای بررسی همبستگی بین متغیرهای رابطه متمایز مشارکتی، از جمله اثرات ویژگی‌های شریک بر کارایی، تأثیر تنش‌ها بر نتایج و ارزش انجام شده‌اند. شاکله اصلی مبانی نظری عوامل مؤثر بر تنش در هم‌رقابتی بر چهار عامل تمرکز دارد که عبارت‌اند از: پارادوکس، تعارض، ناسازگاری و روابط.  
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Identification systematic of factors affecting tension in coopetition

نویسندگان English

Golnaz Rostami 1
Mohammad Ali Shahhoseini 2
Mohsen Nazari 2
1 PhD student, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Coopetition - cooperation and simultaneous competition between companies - is important in strategic management. Coopetition can lead to higher performance levels. Coopetitive partnerships often cause tension, opportunistic behavior, and knowledge leakage, creating a vulnerable relationship. Due to its difficult and potentially harmful nature, coopetition is known as one of the most complex and demanding organizational phenomena. The purpose of this article is to systematically review previous research regarding factors affecting tension in coopetition. The CASP program was used to conduct this research and to check the quality of selected articles. In the next step, MAXQDA2020 software was used for data analysis, coding, and theme analysis. Through the Shannon entropy technique, the indicators obtained from the previous stage were weighted and selected based on priority. Finally, by using the identified codes and their classification, the factors affecting the tension in the coopetition have been identified.
Methodology
To achieve the goal of this article, using the systematic review method, after extracting and reviewing numerous studies, finally 87 articles were selected for deeper review. After determining the research problem, search for research keywords in the databases of international authoritative articles including Scopus, Web of Science and Elsevier, Emerald websites, the internal website of the articles including the website of the Journal of Business Management, Strategic Management Studies, and the Quarterly Journal of Iranian Management Sciences and many others. The search for these keywords was performed in the indexed articles of the first stage during the years 2017 to 2022 and in the second stage during the years 1995 to 2017. In the first stage of the search, during the years 2017 to 2022, a forward search was used to search for articles, and in the second stage of the search, during the years 1995 to 2017, a backward search was used to find all articles related to the research problem. 
 Results and Discussion
Due to the competitive aspect of the coopetitive relationship, there are many tensions in the coopetitive relationship. These tensions can harm the quality of cooperation between competitors. They can cause mistrust, mutual negative effects, and intractable conflicts between competitors. By examining the background of research in this field in Iran in recent years, it was found that researchers have focused on the development of the ontological foundations of cooperative competition, its formation conditions, underlying processes, and its results. They have done this using different research methods. On the one hand, many studies have been conceptual or exploratory in nature and have often examined individual cases to provide an initial conceptual basis. On the other hand, few studies have been conducted to examine the correlation between distinct partnership relationship variables, including, for example, the effects of partner characteristics on performance, the impact of tensions on outcomes, and value.
Conclusion
Considering the review of the background of both competitive and non-competitive research focusing on the topic of tension in Iran and observing little research in this field due to the novelty of this topic in the country's management literature, the results of the present research can contribute to knowledge enhancement and innovation in the field of coopetition in Iran's researches. After reviewing and analyzing the selected articles, it was found that the main structure of the literature on factors affecting tension in coopetition focuses on four factors: paradox, conflict, incompatibility, and relationships. In this research, the conceptual framework of the factors affecting the tension in coopetition has been determined based on the analysis and composition of the identified factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Coopetition
Tension
Cooperation
Competition
Conflict
Alliance
  1. Afuah, A. (2000). How much do your “co- opetitors’ ” capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management, 21(3), 387– 404. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<397::AID-SMJ88>3.0.CO;2-1
  2. Akpinar, M., & Vincze, Z. (2016). The dynamics of coopetition: A stakeholder view of the German automotive industry. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.006.
  3. Amata, R., Battista Dagnino, G., Min`a, A., & Massimo Picone, P. (2021). Managing coopetition in diversified firms: Insights from a qualitative case study. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102128
  4. An, D., Kreutzer, M., & Heidenreich, S. (2020). Always play against par? The effect of inter-team coopetition on individual team productivity. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.009.
  5. Anne- Sophie Fernandez, P. C. (2019). The routledge companion to coopetition strategies . New York: Routledge.110,214-256. doi: 4324/9781315185644-22
  6. Ansari, S. S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853. doi:10.1002/smj.2442
  7. Arranz, N., & Fdez. de Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28(1–2), 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.006
  8. Bouncken, R., & Fredrich, V. (2015). Learning in coopetition: Alliance orientation, network size, and firm types. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.050
  9. Bouncken, R., Fredrich, V., Kraus, S., & Ritala, P. (2019). Innovation alliances: Balancing value creation dynamics, competitive intensity and market overlap. Journal of Business Research. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.004.
  10. Bouncken, R., M. Laudien, S., Fredrich, V., & Görmar, L. (2017). Coopetition in coworking‑spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space. Springer. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7.
  11. Bacon, E., D. Williams, M., & Davies, G. (2019). Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.005
  12. Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155–1168. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.008
  13. Basterretxea, I. C. (2019). Coopetition and innovation. Lessons from worker cooperatives in the Spanish machine tool industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-01-2018-0015
  14. Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., & Wincent, J. (2010). Co‐opetition dynamics – an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review Journal, 20(2), 194–214. doi:10.1108/10595421011029893
  15. Bengtsson, M. &. (2000). Coopetition” in business networks— to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 411– 426. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00067-x
  16. Bengtsson, M. &. (2014). Coopetition— quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180– 188. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.015
  17. Bengtsson, M. E. (2010). Coopetition dynamics – an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 20(2), 194– 214. doi:10.1108/10595421011029893
  18. Bengtsson, M. R.-U. (2016). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 19– 30. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.008
  19. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003
  20. Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T., & Vanyushyn, V. (2016). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Diva. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.008
  21. Bloomberg Law. (2020). Pharma collaborations in the Covid-19 era come with legal risks. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/pharma-and-life-sciences/pharma-collaborations-in-the-covid-19-era-come-with-legal-risks.
  22. Bouncken, R. B. (2013). Innovation in knowledge- intensive industries: The double- edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060– 2070. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.032
  23. Bouncken, R. B., & Ritala, P. (2017). In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0237-0
  24. Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577–601. doi:10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6
  25. Branden B. (1996). Co-opetitionCo-opetition By BrandenburgerAdam M. and NalebuftBarry J., New York: Doubleday Currency. 1996. 290 pages, hard cover. $24.95. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(4), 118–119. doi:10.5465/ame.1996.3145330
  26. Brown, J., Gianiodis, P., & D. Santoro, M. (2017). Managing Co-opetition for Shared Stakeholder Utility in Dynamic Environments. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617705868
  27. Chai, L., Li, J., Clauss, T., & Tangpong, C. (2019). The influences of interdependence, opportunism and technology uncertainty on interfirm coopetition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(5), 948–964. doi:10.1108/jbim-07-2018-0208
  28. Chai, L., Li, J., Tangpong, C., & Clauss, T. (2020). The interplays of coopetition, conflicts, trust, and efficiency process innovation in vertical B2B relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 269–280. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.004
  29. Chen, H., Yao, Y., Zan, A., & Carayannis, E. G. (2021). How does coopetition affect radical innovation? The roles of internal knowledge structure and external knowledge integration. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(11), 1975–1987. doi:10.1108/jbim-05-2019-0257
  30. Chen, M.-J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition— cooperation relationship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288–304. doi:10.1177/1056492607312577
  31. Chen, M.-J., Su, K.-H., & Tsai, W. (2007). Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 101–118. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24162081
  32. Chen, M., (Ya) Tang, T., Wu, S., & Wang, F. (2020). The double-edged sword of coopetition: differential effects of cross-functional coopetition on product and service innovations. Emerald. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-06-2019-0313
  33. Cheng, Y., & Fan, T. (2020). Production coopetition strategies for an FV automaker and a competitive NEV automaker under the dual-credit policy. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102391
  34. Chiambaretto, P., & Fernandez, A.-S. (2016). The evolution of coopetitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: The Air France case. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.005
  35. Chiambaretto, P., & Fernandez, A.-S. (2016). The evolution of coopetitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: The Air France case. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.009
  36. Chiambaretto, P., Gurău, C., & Le Roy, F. (2016). Coopetitive branding: Definition, typology, benefits and risks. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.009
  37. Chiambaretto, P., Massé, D., & Mirc, N. (2018). “All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case. Hal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00676-3
  38. Chou, H.-H., & Zolkiewski, J. (2018). Coopetition and value creation and appropriation: The role of interdependencies, tensions and harmony. Industrial Marketing Management, 70, 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.014
  39. Clarke-Hill, C., Li, H., & Davies, B. (2003). The paradox of co‐operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi‐paradigm approach. Management Research News, 26(1), 1–20. doi:10.1108/01409170310783376
  40. Cozzolino, A., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2018). Discontinuities, competition, and cooperation: Coopetitive dynamics between incumbents and entrants. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3053–3085. doi:10.1002/smj.2776
  41. Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2021). Coopetition and sales performance: evidence from non-mainstream sporting clubs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 27(1), 123–147. doi:10.1108/ijebr-05-2020-0273
  42. Crick, M. (2020). The dark side of coopetition: When collaborating with competitors is harmful for company performance. Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(2),318–337. doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2019-0057
  43. Czakon, W. F.-S. (2014). From paradox to practice: the rise of coopetition strategies. International Journal of Business Environment, 6(1), 1– 10. doi:10.1504/ijbe.2014.058040
  44. Czakon, W., & Czernek, K. (2016). The role of trust-building mechanisms in entering into network coopetition: The case of tourism networks in Poland. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.010
  45. Czakon, W., Klimas, P., & Mariani, M. (2019). Behavioral antecedents of coopetition: A synthesis and measurement scale. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.03.001
  46. Dagnino, G. B. (2016). Evolutionary lineage of the dominant paradigms in strategic management. New York: Routledge.Pages 96-177
  47. Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho, G., Alisson Westarb Cruz, J., Gomes de Carvalho, H., Carlos Duclós, L., & Oliveira Corrêa, R. (2020). Innovativeness and coopetition in tourism SMEs: comparing two coopetitive networks in Brazil. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 3(4), 469–488. doi:10.1108/jhti-12-2019-0134
  48. Resende, L. M. M. de, Volski, I., Betim, L. M., Carvalho, G. D. G. de, Barros, R. de, & Senger, F. P. (2018). Critical success factors in coopetition: Evidence on a business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 177–187. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.013
  49. De Rond, M., & Bouchikhi, H. (2004). On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 15(1), 56–69. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0037
  50. Depeyre, C., Rigaud, E., & Seraidarian, F. (2018). Coopetition in the French luxury industry: five cases of brandbuilding by suppliers of luxury brands. Springer. doi: 10.1057/s41262-018-0088-2
  51. Devece, C., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2019). Coopetition as the new trend in inter-firm alliances: literature review and research patterns. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 207–226. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0245-0
  52. Dorn, S. S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 34(5), 484– 500. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.009
  53. Dowling, M. J. (1996). Multifaceted relationships under coopetition description and theory. Management Inquiry, 5(2), 155–167. doi:10.1177/105649269652008
  54. Dowling, M. J. (1996). Multifaceted relationships under coopetition:Description and theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 155– 167. doi:10.1177/105649269652008
  55. Estrada, I. F. (2016). Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56– 65. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013
  56. Estrada, I., & Qi Dong, J. (2019). Learning from experience? Technological investments and the impact of coopetition experience on firm profitability. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.01.003
  57. Chim-Mikia, A., & M. Batista-Canino, R. (2017). Tourism coopetition: An introduction to the subject and a research agenda. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.05.003
  58. Durach, C. F., Wiengarten, F., & Choi, T. Y. (2020). Supplier–supplier coopetition and supply chain disruption: first-tier supplier resilience in the tetradic context. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1041–1065. doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2019-0224
  59. Fernandez, A. S. (2014). Sources and management of tension in co- opetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 222– 235. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.004
  60. Fredrich, V., B. Bouncken, R., & Kraus, S. (2018). The race is on: Configurations of absorptive capacity, interdependence and slack resources for interorganizational learning in coopetition alliances. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.038
  61. Galkina, T., & Lundgren-Henriksson, E.-L. (2017). Coopetition as an entrepreneurial process: Interplay of causation and effectuation. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.004
  62. Galloway, T. K.-C. (2019). Competitors as advisors: Peer assistance among small business entrepreneurs. Long Range Planning 54(2),. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101929
  63. Garri, D. (2020). Coopetition, Value Co-Creation,and Knowledge-Enhancement in the UK Alpaca Industry: A multi-level mechanism. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.11.001
  64. Gernsheimer, O., K. Kanbach, D., & Gast, J. (2021). Coopetition research - A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.05.001
  65. Gnyawali, D. R. (2001). Networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431– 445. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845820
  66. Gnyawali, D. R. (2006). Impact of co- opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32, 507– 530. doi:10.1177/0149206305284550
  67. Gnyawali, D. R. (2009). Co- opetition and technological innovation in small and medium- sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 308– 330. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2009.00273.x
  68. Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). Co- opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40, 650– 663. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009
  69. Gnyawali, D. R. (2016). Pursuit of rigor in research: Illustration from coopetition literature. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 12– 22. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.004
  70. Gnyawali, D. R. (2016). The competition– cooperation paradox in inter- firm relationships: A conceptual framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 7– 18. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.014
  71. Gnyawali, D. R, Park, B.-J (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003
  72. Gnyawali, D. R., & Ryan Charleton, T. (2018). Nuances in the interplay of competition and cooperation: Towards a theory of coopetition. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2511–2534. doi:10.1177/0149206318788945
  73. Golnam, A., Sanchez, R., Ritala, P., & Wegmann, A. (2014). The why and the how of coopetition: Modeling the incentives and design of coopetitive value networks. In Research in Competence-Based Management. A Focused Issue onBuilding New Competences in Dynamic Environments (pp. 29–60). doi:10.1108/s1744-211720140000007002
  74. Granata, J., Lasch, F., Le Roy, F., & Dana, L.-P. (2018). How do micro-firms manage coopetition? A study of the wine sector in France. International Small Business Journal, 36(3), 331–355. doi:10.1177/0266242617740412
  75. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter- partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 1, 83– 103. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120908
  76. Hani, M., & Dagnino, G.-B. (2021). Global network coopetition, firm innovation and value creation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(11), 1962–1974. doi:10.1108/jbim-05-2019-0268
  77. Helfat, C. E. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management, 36(6), 831– 850. doi:10.1002/smj.2247
  78. Herzog, T. (2010) .Strategic management of coopetitive relationships in CoPS- related industries. Coopetition: winning strategies for the 21st century, Yami, S., Castaldo, S., Dagnino, G. B., Le Roy, F. (Eds). doi:10.4337/9781849807241.00020
  79. Hoffmann, W., Lavie, D., Reuer, J. J., & Shipilov, A. (2018). The interplay of competition and cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3033–3052. doi:10.1002/smj.2965
  80. Hora, W., Gast, J., Kailer, N., Rey-Marti, A., & Mas-Tur, A. (2018). David and Goliath: causes and effects of coopetition between start-ups and corporates. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 411–439. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0273-9
  81. Hurmelinna- Laukkanen, P. &. (2014). Coping with rivals’ absorptive capacity in innovation activities. Technovation, 34(1), 3– 11. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.005
  82. Jakobsen, S. (2020). Managing tension in coopetition through mutual dependence and asymmetries: A longitudinal study of a Norwegian R&D alliance. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 251–260. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.006
  83. Khanna, T. G. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation,and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193– 210. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199803)19:3<193::aid-smj949>3.0.co;2-c
  84. Klimas, P., & Czakon, W. (2018). Organizational innovativeness and coopetition: a study of video game developers. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 469–497. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0269-5
  85. Knein, E., Greven, A., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2020). Culture and cross-functional coopetition: The interplay of organizational and national culture. Journal of International Management, 26(2), 100731. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2019.100731
  86. Kraus, S., Klimas, P., Gast, J., & Stephan, T. (2019). Sleeping with competitors. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 25(1), 50–66. doi:10.1108/ijebr-09-2017-0356
  87. Kraus, S., Meier, F., Niemand, T., Bouncken, R. B., & Ritala, P. (2017). In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0237-0
  88. Kurdanaij, A (2021). Presenting a model of factors affecting the formation and consequences of coopetitiveness: mixed research. Perspectives of Business Management. (In Persian)
  89. Christ, K. L., Burritt, R. L., & Varsei, M. (2017). Coopetition as a Potential Strategy for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 1029–1040. doi:10.1002/bse.1967
  90. Lado, A. A. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22, 110– 141. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180261
  91. Lascaux, A. (2020). Coopetition and trust: What we know, where to go next. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 2–18. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.015
  92. Le Roy, F. &. (2015). Managing coopetitive tensions at the working- group Level: The rise of the coopetitive project team. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 671– 688. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12095
  93. Le Roy, F., & Czakon, W. (2016). Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 3–6. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.005
  94. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707712
  95. Li, W., & Zhao, X. (2022). Competition or coopetition? Equilibrium analysis in the presence of process improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(1), 180–202. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.031
  96. Lindström, T. &. (2016). Coopetition close to the customer – A case study of a small business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 207– 215.
  97. Lundgren-Henriksson, E.-L., & Tidström, A. (2021). Temporal distancing and integrating: Exploring coopetition tensions through managerial sensemaking dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(3), 101168. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101168
  98. Luo, X. S. (2006). Cross- functional “coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 67– 80. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.2.67
  99. Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. World Business, 42(2), 129– 144. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.007
  100. Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2021). The dark-side of coopetition: Influences on the paradoxical forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness across product-market strategies. Journal of Business Research, 122, 226–240. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.065
  101. Makarevich, A. (2018). Performance feedback as a cooperation ‘switch’: a behavioral perspective on the success of venture capital syndicates among competitors. doi: 10.1002/smj.2722.
  102. Mateen, M. e (2019). Competitive advantage (cooperation and competition) in government organizations: human and process cooperation. Journal of Perspectives of Public Administration. (In Persian)
  103. Mention, A. L. (2011). Co- operation and co- opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty? Technovation, 31(1), 44– 53. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.08.002
  104. Morris, M. H., Kocak, A., & Ozer, A. (2007). Coopetition as a Small Business Strategy: Implications for Performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 18(1), 35–56. Retrieved from https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/77
  105. Munten, P., Vanhamme, J., Maon, F., Swaen, V., & Lindgreen, A. (2021). Addressing tensions in coopetition for sustainable innovation: Insights from the automotive industry. Journal of Business Research, 136, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.020
  106. Nazari, M., Broujerdi, M., & Aghazadeh, H (2019). Competitive partners in the engineering services industry: development of a conceptual model. Iranian Management Sciences Quarterly. (In Persian)
  107. Nazari, M., Kamrei, M., Heydari, A., & Qadri Abed, A (2018). Presenting a conceptual model of cooperative competition strategy in Iran's fixed and mobile communications sector: a multi-case study. Business Management. (In Persian).
  108. Navío-Marco, J., Bujidos-Casado, M., & Rodrigo-Moya, B. (2019). Coopetition as an innovation strategy in the European Union: Analysis of the German case. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 9–14. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.014
  109. Öberg, C., Dahlin, P., & Pesämaa, O. (2020). Tension in networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 311–322. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.001
  110. Oshri, I. &. (2006). Cooperation and competition standards- setting activities in the digitization era: The case of wireless information devices. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(2),265– 283 doi:10.1080/09537320600624196
  111. Padula, G. &. (2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 32– 52. doi:10.2753/imo0020-8825370202
  112. Park, B.-J. (robert), Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003
  113. Pattinson, S., Nicholson, J., & Lindgreen, A. (2018). Emergent coopetition from a sensemaking perspective: A multi-level analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.005
  114. Peng, T. J. (2009). The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: Implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 377– 400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00565.x
  115. Peng, T. J.-H. (2012). Is Cooperation with competitors a good Idea? An example in practice. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 532– 560. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00781.x
  116. Peng, T.-J., Yen, M.-H., & Bourne, M. (2018). How rival partners compete based on cooperation? Long Range Planning, 51(2), 351–383. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.10.003
  117. Poole, M. S. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562– 578. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308389
  118. Quintana- García, C. &.-V. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability:A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24, 927– 938. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00060-9
  119. Rajala, A., & Tidström, A. (2021). Unmasking conflict in vertical coopetition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(13), 78–90. doi:10.1108/jbim-08-2019-0381
  120. Raza- Ullah, T (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189– 198. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.001
  121. Raza-Ullah, T. (2020). Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension–performance relationship. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101863. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.003
  122. Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M. (2016). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 19–30. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.008
  123. Raza-Ullah, T., & Kostis, A. (2020). Do trust and distrust in coopetition matter to performance? European Management Journal, 38(3), 367–376. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.10.004
  124. Ricciardi, F., Zardini, A., Czakon, W., Rossignoli, C., & Kraus, S. (2022). Revisiting the cooperation–competition paradox: A configurational approach to short- and long-term coopetition performance in business networks. European Management Journal, 40(3), 320–331. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.002
  125. Ritala, P. &. (2014). Untangling the value- creation and value- appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels. Scandinavian Journal of Management,, 30(4), 498– 515. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2014.05.002
  126. Ritala, P. &.-L. (2009). What is in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation- related coopetition. Technovation, 29, 819– 882. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.002
  127. Ritala, P., Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V. (2018). Coopetition in new product development alliances: Advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(3), 391–410. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12213
  128. Ritala, P. &.-L. (2013). Incremental and radical innovation in Coopetition— The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management,, 30(1), 154– 169. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00956.x
  129. Ritala, P. (2001). Coopetition Strategy - When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance. British Journal of Management. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
  130. Roig-Tierno, N., Kraus, S., & Cruz, S. (2018). The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 379–383. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0266-8
  131. Roth, S., Leydesdorff, L., Kaivo-Oja, J., & Sales, A. (2019). Open coopetition: when multiple players and rivals team up. The Journal of Business Strategy, 41(6), 31–38. doi:10.1108/jbs-11-2018-0192
  132. Rusko, R. (2019). Is coopetitive decision-making a black box? Technology and digitisation as decision-makers and drivers of coopetition. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 31(8), 888–901. doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1573981
  133. Schiffling, S., Hannibal, C., Fan, Y., & Tickle, M. (2020). Coopetition in temporary contexts: examining swift trust and swift distrust in humanitarian operations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(9), 1449–1473. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2019-0800
  134. Seepana, C., Paulraj, A., & Huq, F. A. (2020). The architecture of coopetition: Strategic intent, ambidextrous managers, and knowledge sharing. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.012
  135. Séran, T. P.-B. (2016). The management of coopetitive tensions within multiunit organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 31– 41. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.009
  136. Smith, K. G. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management , 38(1), 7– 23. doi:10.2307/256726
  137. Smith, W. K. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381– 403. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
  138. Tidström, A., & Rajala, A. (2016). Coopetition strategy as interrelated praxis and practices on multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.013
  139. Tidström, A. (2014). Managing tensions in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 261–271. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.001
  140. Soltani, M., Jafari, S., & Binandeh, R(2018). Improving the performance of economic enterprises through a coopetitive strategy. Strategic management studies.(In Persian)
  141. Soltani, M., Shahbazi, M., Hamidizadeh, A., & Ahmadian, A.(2018). An analytical and systematic review of theories related to coopetitive strategy as a conflict in strategic management literature. Iranian Management Sciences.(In Persian)
  142. Talari, A. b(2020). Examining the course of competitive development and providing a comprehensive model of coopetitive strategy under sanctions. Improve management. Vol. 14,No 47: 95-126, (In Persian).
  143. Tidström, A. (2014). Managing tensions in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 261– 271. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.001
  144. Times, F. (2020, October 28). H&M opens sustainable supply chain up to rivals. https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2020/03/hm-opens-sustainable-supply-chain-up-to-third-parties/.
  145. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
  146. Vaaland, T. &. (2003). Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 127– 138. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(02)00227-4
  147. van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2018). Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study on coopetition in healthcare. European Management Journal, 36(1), 135–144. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.012
  148. Wilhelm, M. (2011). Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 29(8), 663– 676. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.03.003
  149. Wu, J. (2014). Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 199– 209. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.002
  150. Wulhelm, M. M. (2011). Book review: Saïd Yami, Sandro Castaldo, Giovanni Battista dagnino and Frédéric Le Roy (eds.) Coopetition: Winning strategies for the 21st century Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010. 288pp. ISBN: 978-1-84844-321-1. £75.00. Organization Studies, 32(4), 573–576. doi:10.1177/01708406110320040602
  151. Zhu, Y., Lynette Wang, V., Wang, Y. J., & Nastos, J. (2020). Business-to-business referral as digital coopetition strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 54(6), 1181–1203. doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2019-0011

  • تاریخ دریافت 09 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 05 شهریور 1402