فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

ارائه سکوی شکل‌گیری نوآوری باز در کسب‌وکارهای خانگی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، دانشکده علوم انسانی و هنر، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، ‌قم، ایران
3 فارغ التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، ‌قم، ایران
چکیده
کسب‌وکارهای خانگی در کنار روند جهانی‌شدن، رشد سریع فناوری‌های نوین و نفوذ بالای پدیده‌های نوظهوری مانند شبکه‌ها و رسانه‌های اجتماعی، ناگزیر به استفاده از ابزارهایی مانند نوآوری باز برای حفظ بقای خود و کسب مزیت رقابتی هستند. لذا، هدف پژوهش ارائه سکوی شکل‌گیری نوآوری باز در کسب‌وکارهای خانگی است. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر کیفی، از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نگاه ماهیت داده‌ها و روش توصیفی-تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق را متخصصان و خبرگان حوزه نوآوری باز و همچنین فعالان و صاحبان کسب‌وکارهای خانگی با حداقل سه سال سابقه کاری تشکیل می‌دهد. در این مطالعه با استفاده از روش گلوله برفی و مصاحبه با 14 نفر از مشارکت‌کنندگان اشباع نظری حاصل‌ و از روش تحلیل مضمون برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها استفاده‌ شده است. پس از تحلیل مضمون و کدگذاری مصاحبه‌ها، عوامل اثرگذار بر به‌کارگیری، اجرا و پیاده‌سازی نوآوری باز در کسب‌وکارهای خانگی در قالب 50 مضمون پایه، شش مضمون سازمان‌دهنده و سه مضمون فراگیر «بازآفرینی فراگیر»،‌ «ظرفیت‌سازی جریان دانشی» و «مزیت‌آفرینی فنی و دانشی» شناسایی و برچسب‌گذاری شد. مطابق یافته‌های این طرح در فرایند نوآوری باز مشارکت با بازیگران اصلی کسب‌وکارهای خانگی مانند کارآفرینان، مشتریان، رقبا، تأمین‌کنندگان و دانشگاه‌ها در کنار حمایت از صاحبان ایده و حفظ مالکیت فکری و معنوی بسیار مؤثر است. همچنین تأکید بر کار گروهی در کنار تمرکز بر تجربه مشتری، توسعه فرهنگ کارآفرینی و نوآوری، اشتراک‌گذاری دانش و میزان تداوم استفاده از ظرفیت‌های فضای مجازی می‌تواند ابزار مناسبی برای اجرای موفق نوآوری باز در کسب‌وکارهای خانگی باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a platform for implementing open innovation in family businesses

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Reza Fallah 1
Rasoul Abbasi 2
Zahra Shiri 3
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
3 MA graduated, Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Despite the great importance of family businesses in generating wealth and sustainable employment, however, these types of businesses need new approaches and tools to survive in the current business environment, which is associated with particular complexity and dynamics. This new approach is called "open innovation" as a new paradigm. Open innovation is also defined as the use of internal and external knowledge to accelerate the company's internal innovation. Nowadays, along with the trend of globalization, the rapid growth of new technologies and the high influence of emerging phenomena such as networks and social media, home businesses are forced to use new tools such as open innovation to maintain their survival and gain a competitive advantage. In this regard, the main goal of the current research is to provide a framework for the formation of open innovation in home businesses.
  Methodology
Despite the great importance of home-based businesses in generating wealth and sustainable employment, however, these types of businesses need new approaches and tools to survive in the current business environment, which is associated with particular complexity and dynamics. This new approach is called "open innovation" as a new paradigm. Open innovation is also defined as the use of internal and external knowledge to accelerate the company's internal innovation. Nowadays, along with the trend of globalization, the rapid growth of new technologies and the high influence of emerging phenomena such as networks and social media, home businesses are forced to use new tools such as open innovation to maintain their survival and gain a competitive advantage. In this regard, the main goal of the current research is to provide a framework for the formation of open innovation in home businesses.
Results and Discussion
After analyzing the themes and coding the interviews, the influencing factors on the implementation of open innovation in home businesses in the form of 50 basic themes, six organizing themes and three global themes "inclusive innovation", "knowledge flow capacity building" and "technical and knowledge advantage creation" were identified and tagged. Comprehensive re-creation is said to integrate and reconstruct the internal and external relations of a business unit in order to achieve cooperation and synergy. This theme has two dimensions "exogenous participation and coordination" and "endogenous cooperation and interactions" in the field of home businesses. The capacity building of the knowledge flow refers to the creation of individual capabilities and the cultural background needed for the development of knowledge, innovation and their application, which is made of two themes "development of individual capabilities" and "knowledge-oriented culture creation". In order to complete the comprehensive regeneration cycle, it is very important to pay attention to "creating technical and knowledge advantages". Technical and knowledge advantage creation refers to how knowledge and technology are managed with the aim of creating, sharing and applying knowledge and technology in the business complex. The creation of technical and knowledge advantage is the emphasis on "technological capability measurement" and "knowledge co-creation" that can empower home businesses in the formation of innovation.
Conclusion
According to the findings, in the process of open innovation, participation with the main actors of family businesses such as entrepreneurs, customers, competitors, suppliers, universities is very effective in supporting the owners of ideas and maintaining intellectual and intellectual property. In addition, emphasis on teamwork along with focusing on customer experience, development of entrepreneurial and innovation culture, knowledge sharing and continuous use of virtual space capacities can be a suitable tool for the successful implementation of open innovation in home businesses. Creating culture is defined as the rules and behavior that guide the behavior of employees and business owners; Therefore, it is very important to create a culture that fits the characteristics of each business because it affects the requirements for success. These requirements include customer service, efficiency, innovation, product reliability and quality. Another effective tool in the formation of open innovation in home businesses is paying attention to the category of knowledge-oriented culture. In this regard, the development of the culture of innovation and entrepreneurship along with the development of institutions that help produce innovation and creativity such as science and technology parks and incubators along with material and non-material support from the government can provide the main basis for the successful entry of home businesses into the field of open innovation. It is practically not possible to be present in emerging markets without paying attention to flexibility and innovative mentality along with risk acceptance. In this regard, home businesses can facilitate the process of attracting and supporting idea owners by developing factors that can increase risk acceptance and make the business environment suitable, and thus improve the capacity of forming open innovation in their businesses.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Open innovation
Family business
Inclusive re-creation
Knowledge flow capacity building
Technical and knowledge advantage creating
  1. Abouzeedan, A., & Hedner, T. (2012). Organization structure theories and open innovation paradigm. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(1): 6-27. DOI:10.1108/20425941211223598

    1. Adamides, E., & Karacapilidis, N. (2020). Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(1): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.07.001
    2. Aleksić, D., Rangus, K., & Slavec Gomezel, A. (2022). Microfoundations of SME open innovation: the role of help, knowledge sharing and hiding. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6): 178-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0411
    3. Asadollah, M., Sanavifard, R., & Hamidizadeh, A. (2021). Designing an Open Banking Model Based on the Emergence of Open Innovation. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 12(45): 245-268. (In Persian).
    4. Banu, G.S., Dumitrescu, A., Purcărea, A.A., & Isărescu, S.W. (2016). Defining open innovation concept using business process modeling. Procedia Technology, 22(1): 1020-1027. DOI:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.135
    5. Barba-Aragón, M.I., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Valle-Mestre, L. (2022). Effects of open climate on innovation radicality in SMEs: relevance of hidden innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). DOI:10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-104
    6. Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2017). Family firms and collaborative innovation: present debates and future research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(2), 334-358. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-05-2017-0054
    7. Bin Dahari, Z., Abu Bakar, A.R., & Al-Gosaibi, S. (2019). Key Success Factors of Home-Based Business among Female Entrepreneur in Saudi Arabia. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review. 3(2): 43-66.
    8. Bo, S., & Kexin, B. (2021). Open Innovation Mode of Green Innovation System for Manufacturing Industry. Mobile Information Systems, 2021(1): 9948683. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9948683
    9. Brinkerink, J., Gils, A.V., Bammens, Y., & Carree, M. (2017). Open Innovation: A Literature Review and Recommendations for Family Business Research. In book: Routledge Companion to Family Business (241-266) Publisher: Routledge.
    10. Burgess, S., & Paguio, R. (2016). Examining ICT application adoption in Australian home-based businesses: An innovation-decision process approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(2): 276-299.
    11. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press.
    12. Chesbrough, H.W., & Crowther, A.K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3): 229-236.
    13. Cillo, V., Rialti, R., Bertoldi, B., & Ciampi, F. (2019). Knowledge management and open innovation in agri-food crowdfunding. British Food Journal, 121(1): 242-258, DOI:10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0472
    14. Clark, D., & Douglas, H. (2015). Micro-enterprise growth: Lessons from home-based business in New Zealand. Small Enterprise Research, 21(1): 82-98.
    15. Daniel, E., Henley, A., & Anwar, M.N. (2019). Contemporary ethnic minority entrepreneurship in the UK: A quantitative exploration of break out and entrepreneurial quality. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 1(1): 1-44.
    16. Aro de, E.R., & Perez, G. (2021). Identification of dynamic capabilities in open innovation. Innovation & Management Review, 18(2): 118-128.
    17. De Vincenzi, T.B., & Cunha da, J.C. (2021). Open innovation and performance in the service sector. Innovation & Management Review, 18(4): 382-399.
    18. Zubielqui de, G.C., Fryges, H., & Jones, J. (2019). Social media, open innovation & HRM: Implications for performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144: 334-347.
    19. Fisher, G.J., & W.J. Qualls (2018). A framework of interfirm open innovation: relationship and knowledge based perspectives. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(2): 240-250.
    20. Flamini, G., Pellegrini, M.M., Fakhar Manesh, M., & Caputo, A. (2022). "Entrepreneurial approach for open innovation: opening new opportunities, mapping knowledge and highlighting gaps", International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(5): 1347-1368. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0079
    21. Formica, P., & Curley, M. (2018). In Search of the Origin of an ‘Open Innovation’ Culture. In Exploring the Culture of Open Innovation, Towards an Altruistic Model of Economy. Emerald Publishing Limited, 1-54. DOI:10.1108/978-1-78743-789-020181001
    22. García-Vidales, M.Y., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., & Pinzón-Castro, S.Y. (2019). The influence of open innovation practices on business performance in Mexican family and non-family SMEs. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(153): 370-378.
    23. Hashemi, S.H., & Yousefi, M. (2017). Clarifying the Concept Framework of Open Innovation and Strategic Leadership in High-tech Companies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 8(29): 117-141. (In Persian).
    24. Hastings, D., & Anwar, M.N. (2019). Home-based Businesses and the Factors Affecting their Collaborative Propensity, in Conference of Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship. UK. 1-21.
    25. Hsieh, C.T., Huang, H.C., & Lee, W.L. (2016). Using transaction cost economics to explain open innovation in start-ups. Management Decision, 54(9): 2133-2156.
    26. Huizingh, E.K.R.E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1): 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
    27. Hungund, S., & Mani, V. (2019). Benchmarking of factors influencing adoption of innovation in software product SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(5): 1451-1468.
    28. Jiao, H., Yang, J., & Cui, Y. (2021). Institutional pressure and open innovation: the moderating effect of digital knowledge and experience-based knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). DOI:10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0046
    29. Kamargianni, M., & Matyas, M. (2017). The Business Ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service. In Conference of Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 8-12.
    30. Kapasi, I., & Galloway, L. (2019). Home-based Business: An Exploration of Business Model Heterogeneity. Journal of Business Models, 6(3): 63-78.
    31. Karami, M., Rastgar, A.A., Azar, A., Feiz, D., & Esfidani, M.R. (2019). A Model for the Problem Identification of Entry into the B2B Online Markets. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 18(38): 87-108. DOI:10.29252/jbmp.18.38.87 (In Persian).
    32. Koh, A., Kong, E., & Timperio, G. (2019). An analysis of open innovation determinants: the case study of Singapore based family owned enterprises. European Journal of Family Business, 9(2): 85-101.
    33. Marín, G.S., Hernández, J.C., Valle del, I.D., & Sastre Castillo, M.A. (2016). Organizational culture and family business: A configurational approach. European Journal of Family Business, 6(2): 99-107.
    34. Nation, E. (2014). Home Business Report, in Enterprise Nation. Available at: https://static.guim.co.uk/ni/1414079504761/Home-Business-Survey-(1).pdf
    35. Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., & Möller, K. (2012). Strategic flexibility in open innovation – designing business models for open source software. European Journal of Marketing, 46(10): 1368-1388.
    36. Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6): 750-772.
    37. Reuschke, D. & Houston, D. (2016). The importance of housing and neighbourhood resources for urban microbusinesses. European Planning Studies, 24(6): 1216-1235.
    38. Reuschke, D., & Mason, C. (2020). The engagement of home-based businesses in the digital economy. Futures, 135, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102542
    39. Rostami, R., & Nasrollahi, M. (2021). The requirements of justice demand from the viewpoint of the Supreme Leader of Revolution. Basij Strategic Studies, 23(89): 5-30. (in Persian).
    40. Saberfard, A. (2019). The Effect of the Open Innovation Approach on the Technology Absorptive Capacity in Defense Industries: The Case of Space Industries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(4): 15-30.
    41. Sanchez-Henriquez, F., & Pavez, I. (2021). The Effect of Open Innovation on Eco-Innovation Performance: The Role of Market Knowledge Sources. Sustainability, 13(7): 3890.
    42. Siadati, H., & Afshari Mofrad, M. (2019). Policies for Promoting Open Innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2): 379-393.
    43. Taghizadeh, S.K., Nikbin, D., Didarul alam, M.M., & Rahman, S.A. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation and perceived operational performance in SMEs: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6): 1486-1507. DOI:10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0352
    44. Valdez-Juárez, L.E., Castillo-Vergara, M., & Ramos-Escobar, E.A. (2022). Innovative Business Strategies in the Face of COVID-19: An Approach to Open Innovation of SMEs in the Sonora Region of Mexico. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, & Complexity, 8(1): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010047
    45. Vieira, F.C., Bonfim, L.R.C., & Cruz, A.C.D. (2022). The process of opening innovation networks: open innovation at Embrapa Florestas. Innovation & Management Review, 19(2): 123-139.
    46. Wei, N., & Li, Z. (2021). Telepresence and Interactivity in Mobile Learning System: Its Relation with Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1): 78.
    47. Xiong, B., Kuam Lim, E.T., Tan, C.W., & Zhao, Z. (2022. Towards an evolutionary view of innovation diffusion in open innovation ecosystems. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(1). DOI:10.1108/IMDS-11-2021-0686
    48. Yun, J., Kim, D., & Yan, M.R. (2020). Open Innovation Engineering-Preliminary Study on New Entrance of Technology to Market. Electronics, 9(5): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050791
    49. Zanjirchi, S.M., Jalilian, N., & Shahmohamadi Mehrjardi, M. (2019). Open innovation: from technology exploitation to creation of superior performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(3): 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-02-2019-0005

  • تاریخ دریافت 30 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 مرداد 1402