فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

پویایی محیط و شبکه‌سازی دانش حکمرانی شهری

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
شبکه‌سازی دانش حکمرانی شهری در محیط پویا، زیربنای پیشرفت دانش‌بنیان شهرها است. ضرورت آمادگی مدیریت پیچیده‌ی شهری را برای همگامی با تحولات و جذب آن‌ها به چالش می‌کشاند. لذا درک و شناخت نحوه شبکه‌سازی دانش حکمران شهری و تأثیر آن بر نحوه‌ی عملکرد و تصمیم‌گیری مدیران امری حیاتی است؛ هدف از این پژوهش ارائه الگویی از شبکه‌سازی دانش و عوامل تأثیرگذار بر شبکه دانش حکمرانان شهری است. پژوهش حاضر کیفی و مبتنی بر پارادایم تفسیری و روش تحلیل تم است. تحقیق از نظر هدف، بنیادین و از منظر جمع‌آوری و ماهیت داده‌ها، اکتشافی - استقرایی است. جامعه هدف تحقیق، شهرداران نواحی شهر تهران است و از میان 123 شهردار ناحیه‌ی تهران 18 نفر از افراد خبره انتخاب شدند. این افراد بر اساس سوابق کاری و با نظر معاونت برنامه‌ریزی مناطق 22 گانه تهران انتخاب شدند و پس از اشباع نظری و اشباع داده، مصاحبه‌ها به اتمام رسیدند. ابزار اصلی تحقیق گروه کانونی اکتشافی با مصاحبه عمیق است؛ لذا برای تحلیل داده‌های متن مصاحبه‌ها، بر اساس دانش‌های در دسترس، از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA 2020 استفاده شده است. در این تحقیق، دو دسته اصلی از تم‌های تأثیرگذار و تأثیرپذیر بر شکل‌گیری شبکه دانش حکمرانان شهری شناسایی شدند. تم‌های تأثیرگذار: عوامل زمینه‌ای فردی، محیطی و اجتماعی، دانش حکمرانی و دانش شهری می‌باشند. تم تأثیرپذیر: الگوی شبکه دانش حکمرانی است لذا، سه الگوی حکمرانی شهری رایج، مطلوب و نامطلوب ایجاد می‌شود. تأثیرات و پویایی محیط می‌تواند در فرآیند شکل‌گیری شبکه دانش حکمرانی تأثیرگذار باشد و این شبکه‌ها، الگوهای گوناگون حکمرانی ایجاد کنند. کم توجهی به ایجاد شبکه‌های دانش در نهادها و سازمان‌های دولتی، فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری را کند کرده و مدیریت بحران در دنیای امروز را با چالش‌هایی مواجه می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Environmental dynamics and urban governance knowledge networking

نویسندگان English

Mahyar Hassani 1
Mohammadreza Hamidizadeh 2
Ataollah Rafie atani 3
Mahdi Abdolhamid 3
1 Ph.D student, Economics and progressengineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Economics and progressengineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Increasing population growth, especially in developing countries, has made the importance of city management a key issue. The complexities of social, economic and cultural issues, as well as the migration of people from the countryside to the city and the excessive expansion of cities are important issues for governments. With the passage of time and the increasing complexity of the urban system and the importance of citizens' participation as well as the management of each citizen's issues, the necessity of examining the patterns of urban governance and how to make policies in the city councils has drawn more and more attention to the researchers of government organizations, economists and sociologists. The discussion of social justice and providing welfare facilities for the residents of the cities in the shadow of the decisions of the government, responding to the needs of the citizens and creating satisfaction and the efficiency and effectiveness of the decisions in order to improve the process of urban development are among the issues that should be given the attention of policy makers and statesmen more than in the past. The knowledge networking of urban rulers in a dynamic environment is the foundation of the knowledge-based progress of cities. Since decision-making is one of the important elements of management in accordance with the mission and strategies of inner and outer city environments that are rapidly changing and growing, they influence the way of urban planning. Therefore, it challenges the necessity of preparation of complex urban management to keep pace with developments and attract them, so understanding and knowing how to network the knowledge of urban rulers and its effect on the performance and decision-making of managers is a vital matter; The purpose of this research is to present a model of knowledge networking and the influencing factors on the knowledge network of urban rulers..
Methodology
The current research is qualitative and based on interpretive paradigm and theme analysis method. The research is basic in terms of its purpose and exploratory-inductive in terms of data collection and nature. The target community of the research is the municipal managers of Tehran districts. Among the 123 mayors of Tehran districts, 18 experts were selected. The main research tool is exploratory focus group with deep interview; therefore, based on available knowledge, MAXQDA 2020 software was used to analyze the interview text data. The aim of the research is to design the knowledge network model of urban rulers. For this reason, in this research,through a qualitative and interpretive approach, the managers and experts in Tehran municipality were interviewed using the method of theme analysis, and by posing appropriate questions, we seek to discover the pattern of action of city rulers. The main tool in this research is an in-depth interview. The effort in designing the qualitative interview letter was to propose questions whose answers from the respected interviewees would provide data for the research questions. In other words, in this process, we seek to discover the most important elements and causes of the formation of the common pattern of the knowledge network of these people in the design of the model of the knowledge network of urban rulers, and based on the available knowledge create a better model after interpreting the data obtained from the text of the interviews.
Results and Discussion
In this research, an attempt was made to examine the main and sub-themes correctly and accurately so that the knowledge network of urban rulers could be conceptualized; therefore, we considered some main themes as background conditions and some themes as consequences. The knowledge of urban governance is formed in a VUCA and dynamic environment. Our model in this research includes background factors, which are divided into three factors: individual background, social background and environmental background. Background conditions are related to conditions that can directly affect the type of decision making of people; also these background factors have mutual effects on each other and can have intensity and weakness as a result of these effects. Contextual factors can have direct and indirect effects on the formation of ruling knowledge and urban knowledge, and each of these two factors are effective in forming the knowledge network of urban rulers. In general, as a result of the creation of the knowledge network of urban rulers, different patterns are created according to all the considered conditions. Undesirable pattern, desirable pattern and common pattern.
Conclusion
In this research, two groups of influential main themes were discovered. The influencing themes on the formation of the knowledge network of urban rulers include personal background factors, environmental background factors, social background factors, knowledge of governance, urban knowledge. The influencing theme includes the model of the knowledge network of governance, and as a result of these effects,  3 different models, i.e. undesirable pattern, desirable pattern and common pattern of governance is created. The findings of the research show that the effects and dynamics of the environment can be effective in the process of formation of the governance knowledge network and these networks in turn can create different patterns of governance. Failure to pay attention to the creation of knowledge networks in government institutions and organizations can slow down the decision-making process and make crisis management difficult in today's world.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban governance
Environment dynamics
Knowledge network
Theme analysis
Networking
  1. Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and society18(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269292
  2. Bader, B., Schuster, T., Bader, A.K., & Shaffer, M. (2019). The dark side of expatriation: dysfunctional relationships, expatriate crises, prejudice, and a VUCA world, Journal of Global Mobility, 7(2), 126-136.
  3. Bagheri, A. (2006). Sustainable development: implementation in urban water systems. Lund University. https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/546536
  4. Batty, M. (2009). Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling, Interaction, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/15183/1/15183.pdf
  5. Bedford, D., & Sanchez, T. W. (2021). Designing and Operationalizing the Knowledge Network Analysis, NewYork, Emerald Publishing Limited: 131-141.
  6. Bell, S. (2017). Urban water sustainability: Constructing infrastructure for cities and nature.Routledge.https://books.google.de/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KCtEDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT12&dq=Urban+Water+Sustainability+Bell&ots=WAf4Dr-6O6&sig=HMasqTe_EE95hulUUxNNOjSBs2I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Urban%20Water%20Sustainability%20Bell&f=false
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  8. Cheng, L. I. (2010). System dynamics model of Suzhou water resources carrying capacity and its application. Water Science and Engineering3(2), 144-155.
  9. Coaffee, J. (2010). Protecting vulnerable cities: the UK's resilience response to defending everyday urban infrastructure. International affairs86(4), 939-954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00921.x
  10. Dai, L., Derudder, B., Cao, Z., & Ji, Y. (2023). Examining the evolving structures of intercity knowledge networks: the case of scientific collaboration in China. International Journal of Urban Sciences27(3), 371-389.
  11. Dehghani, M., Haghighat Naeini, G., & Zebardast, E. (2021). Knowledge-based urban development stakeholder analysis (Case Study: Isfahan City). Human Geography Research, 53(1), 323-341. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2020.280961.1007921. (In Persian)
  12. DiGaetano, A., & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative urban governance: An integrated approach. Urban affairs review, 38(3), 356-395.
  13. Ebrahimi, J., Azizi, M., & Pourmehdi, K. (2020). The impact of dynamic capabilities on corporate entrepreneurship in the communications industry. Business Intelligence Management Studies8(32), 211-238. doi: 10.22054/IMS.2020.46451.1589. (In Persian)
  14. Flamaki, M. M. (2018). Farabi and the course of citizenship thought in Iran, Noghreh Publishing, Tehran. (In Persian)
  15. Ghasemi, A., Alavian, M., Lotfi, S., & Rahmani, M. (2021). Thematic analysis of good urban governance in the development programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Research on Social Problems in Iran10(3), 117-141. doi: 10.22108/srspi.2021.130845.1736. (In Persian)
  16. Ghodoosi, M. R., Mahmudi, J., Musakhani, M., & Jafari, M. (2019). Proposing knowledge governance framework in social networks. Iranian Journal of Information Management5(1), 15-39. doi: 10.22034/aimj.2019.96045. (In Persian)
  17. Hamidizadeh, R. (2015). National Knowledge Development based on Domestic Patterns. Journal of Strategic Management Studies6(21), 211-249. (In Persian)
  18. Hamidizadeh, M. R. (2023). Strategic and long-term planning. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian)
  19. Harahap, M. A. K., Kraugusteeliana, K., Pramono, S. A., Jian, O. Z., & Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). The Role of Information Technology in Improving Urban Governance. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 371-379.
  20. Heidari, A., & Talafidaryani, M. (2021). Identifying the knowledge structure and research trend of the field of dynamic capabilities by topic modeling. Journal of Strategic Management Studies12(45), 161-180. Doi: 1001.1.22286853.1400.12.45.9.3 . (In Persian)
  21. Hosseini, S. (2021). Measuring the Level of Citizen Participation in Urban Management Based on Urban Governance Model (Case study; District 5 of Tehran Municipality). Urban Management Studies13(46), 35-49. doi: 10.30495/ums.2021.19262. (In Persian)
  22. Jafari Titkanloo, S., Zolfaghari, N., Behboodi, O., & Mohseni, M. Z. (2020). Impact of environment dynamics and competitiveness on business performance; Analyzing the role of product innovation strategies and processes. Future study Management30(4). (In Persian)
  23. Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: an alternative to technocratic “smartness.” GeoJournal, 87(3), 1639–1655. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w.
  24. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of management review22(4), 911-945. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109
  25. Kazemian, G., & Mirabedini, Z. (2011). Pathology of integrated urban management for Tehran in view of policy and decision making. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning3(46), 27-38. (In Persian)
  26. Keykha, A., & Abbaspour, A. (2019). The relationship between organizational intelligence and organizational performance with the mediation of creativity (Case Study: University of Tehran). Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science8(4), 1-32. https: //journals.iau.ir/article_665730.html. (In Persian)
  27. Li, G., Kou, C., Wang, Y., & Yang, H. (2020). System dynamics modelling for improving urban resilience in Beijing, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling161, 104954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
  28. McIver, D., &Lepisto, D.A. (2017). Effects of knowledge management on unit performance: examining the moderating role of tacitness and learnability, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 796-816. https: //doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0347.
  29. Meyer, N., & Auriacombe, C. (2019). Good urban governance and City resilience: An afrocentric approach to sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(19), 5514. https: //doi.org/10.3390/su11195514.
  30. Naim, M.F., &Lenka, U. (2017). Linking knowledge sharing, competency development, and affective commitment: evidence from Indian Gen Y employees, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 885-906. https: //doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0334.
  31. Obeng-Odoom, F. (2012). On the origin, meaning, and evaluation of urban governance. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 66(4), 204-212.
  32. Pluchinotta, I., Pagano, A., Vilcan, T., Ahilan, S., Kapetas, L., Maskrey, S., & O’Donnell, E. (2021). A participatory system dynamics model to investigate sustainable urban water management in Ebbsfleet Garden City. Sustainable Cities and Society67, 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102709
  33. Rahmani, H. (2019). Urban Governance: Identifying measures for Urban Management of Tehran Municipality. Urban Management Studies10(36), 1-15. (In Persian)
  34. Saeedi, F., Safai Namin, R., Safai Namin, R., & Shahabi, S. M. R. (2021). Presenting the differences between urban governments with urban narrative judgment in the last two decades, 7th National Conference on Management Studies in Humanities, Tehran, https:/ /civilica.com/doc/1474948. (In Persian)
  35. Schindler, S., Mitlin, D., & Marvin, S. (2018). National urban policy making and its potential for sustainable urbanism. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 34, 48-53.
  36. Seow, P. S., Pan, G., & Koh, G. (2019). Examining an experiential learning approach to prepare students for the volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) work environment. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 62-76.
  37. Shoja, A., Sadegh Vaziri, F., & Ebrahimi, E. (2020). Developing a framework of causes and consequences of hatred for Iranian product brands. Journal of Business Management12(1), 3-23. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2019.273225.3388. (In Persian)
  38. Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance.Administrative theory and Praxis, 693-720. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25611617
  39. Suh, A., & Wagner, C.(2017). How gamification of an enterprise collaboration system increases knowledge contribution: an affordance approach, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 416-431. https: //doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0429.
  40. Sušnik, J., Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S., Savić, D. A., & Kapelan, Z. (2012). Integrated system dynamics modelling for water scarcity assessment: Case study of the Kairouan region. Science of the Total Environment, 440, 290-306.
  41. Tang, H., Ma, Z., Xiao, J., & Xiao, L. (2020). Toward a more efficient knowledge network in innovation ecosystems: A simulated study on knowledge management. Sustainability, 12(16), 6328.
  42. Taskan, B., Junça-Silva, A., & Caetano, A. (2022). Clarifying the conceptual map of VUCA: A systematic review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 196-217.
  43. Ungureanu, P., Bertolotti, F., & Macri, D. (2018). Brokers or platforms? A longitudinal study of how hybrid interorganizational partnerships for regional innovation deal with VUCA environments, European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 636-671.
دوره 15، شماره 58
تابستان 1403
صفحه 43-63

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 02 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 فروردین 1403