فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تجربه زیسته مدیران از تعالی سازمانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری تخصصی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، کرمانشاه، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، کرمانشاه، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی تجربه زیسته مدیران دانشگاه فرهنگیان از تعالی سازمانی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان کرمانشاه،کردستان و همدان انجام شده است. این پژوهش به روش ترکیبی از نوع اکتشافی به دنبال پاسخ به این سوال است که مولفه‌های تعالی سازمانی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان کدامند و تعالی سازمانی در این دانشگاه اساساً از چه الگویی متاثر است. روش این پژوهش کیفی از نوع اکتشافی بوده که با تکنیک گراندد تئوری انجام شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل مدیران دانشگاه فرهنگیان هستند که از تعداد 177 نفر آنها 15 نفر به صورت هدفمند به عنوان نمونه مورد مطالعه انتخاب شده و از آنها مصاحبه عمیق گرفته شده است. روش تحلیل مصاحبه سه مرحله کدگذاری بوده که پس از بررسی دقیق‌تر و پیوند بین مفاهیم خرده مقولات، 11 مقوله محوری به دست آمد که این مقولات عبارت از: دانش‌گرایی، جانشین پروری، پایدارسازی نتایج مطلوب، شبکه‌ها و مهارت‌های ارتباطی، کارایی سازمانی، منابع انسانی، خلق مشترک ارزش، قابلیت رقابت پذیری سازمان، توانمندسازی، رهبران نخبه و سرآمد و شناسایی نقاط قابل بهبود هستند که با انتزاع بیشتر این مقولات در مرحلۀ کدگذاری گزینشی، مقوله هسته‌ای به شرح « تعالی سازمانی در الگوی توانمندسازی سازمان به وسیله مدیرانی نخبه و سرآمد، همراه با شناسایی نقاط قابل بهبود و کارا به خلق مشترک ارزش‌های پایدار و توسعه جانشین‌پروری منجر می‌شود.» لذا می‌تواند تمامی مقولات دیگر را تحت پوشش قرار بدهد. نظر به این که دانشگاه فرهنگیان و دیگر موسسات آموزش عالی از عمده‌ترین نهادهای علمی در تولید دانش و فناوری و تربیت دانشجویان هستند، همواره باید در مسیر تعالی بوده و در زمره سازمان‌‌های سرآمد، پیشاپیش محیط رقابتی در حرکت باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The lived experience managers on organizational excellence

نویسندگان English

Masoud Nouri 1
Marzban Adib Manesh 2
Amir Moradi 2
Yaser Sayadi 2
1 PhD graduated, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Today, every organization needs processes according to its long-term and short-term goals so that it can be on the right path of goals and excellence. Organizational excellence models provide appropriate frameworks for identifying areas that can be improved and identifying weak and strong points, and organizational pathology using excellence models is a way to gain a sustainable competitive advantage. be paid Using organizational excellence models to evaluate the current situation, planning for any fundamental changes, innovation, organizational learning, raising the level of service quality, using information technology and customer satisfaction will be effective. Therefore, the question arises, what is the status of service quality in the path of excellence based on the organizational excellence model in the studied statistical population? And how can one take an effective step in improving the quality and efficiency of Farhangian University by presenting the organizational excellence promotion model and achieve the excellence and excellence of the university? This research was conducted with the aim of identifying the lived experience of Farhangian University managers of organizational excellence in Farhangian University of Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Hamedan. This research, using a combined exploratory method, seeks to answer the question of what are the components of organizational excellence in Farhangian University and what model is the organizational excellence in this university basically affected by.
Methodology
The data collection of this research is done in the qualitative part using in-depth semi-structured interviews and this research is done in a qualitative way. The statistical community of this research includes the managers of Farhangian University of Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Hamedan, which according to the statistics of these universities are about 177 people. are selected as statistical population. The method of this qualitative research is exploratory type, which was done with grounded theory technique. The statistical population of the research includes the directors of Farhangian University, 15 people were purposefully selected as the study sample and in-depth interviews were taken from them.
Results and Discussion
The method of interview analysis was three stages of coding, and after a more detailed examination and the link between sub-category concepts, 11 core categories were obtained, which are: knowledge orientation, succession planning, stabilization of desirable results, networks and communication skills, organizational efficiency. , human resources, joint creation of value, competitiveness of the organization, empowerment, elite leaders and the identification of points that can be improved. The means of elite and excellent managers, together with the identification of points that can be improved and efficient, leads to the joint creation of sustainable values and the development of succession." It appeared that it can cover all other categories. Therefore, considering the fact that universities, especially Farhangian University and higher education institutions, are among the most important scientific institutions in the production of knowledge and technology and the education of students, they should always be on the path of excellence and be among the top organizations, moving in advance of the competitive environment.
Conclusion
The results of the modeling of this research show the fact that the effect of all variables on the dependent variable of organizational excellence in Farhangian University of Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Hamedan was significant. In a general conclusion, it can be said that all the results in structural equation modeling overlap with the results of hypothesis testing in Spss software. Therefore, the locally developed model for the basis of organizational excellence in Farhangian University of Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Hamadan has high credibility and is acceptable for implementation in other universities and scientific centers of the country. The advantages and consequences of this model include creating loyal and satisfied customers, successful leaders, creating a clear understanding of the organizational goal, managing changes, creating more motivation in the organization's stakeholders, effective and better use of organizational information, making organizational operations more efficient, creating He pointed out the opportunities for improvement in the organization, minimizing redundancies, and innovation and creativity and added value in the organization. By using the research excellence model, the university can evaluate its success in implementing improvement programs at different times and will have the possibility to compare its performance with other universities, especially with the best ones. Considering the fact that universities, especially Farhangian University and higher education institutions, are among the major scientific institutions responsible for the training of committed human resources and experts in the education system, as leaders of the country's human resources cycle, it should always be on the path of excellence and among the organizations Sarmad, the competitive environment of scientific universities should be on the move. Therefore, the continuous improvement of quality resulting from the implementation of the organizational excellence model is the basis for improving the competitive advantage of educational institutions and higher education institutions. Therefore, Farhangian University, as a mission-oriented university in the education of the country's education system specialists, can achieve excellence and improve quality among the country's universities and institutions of higher education. And as a qualitative university, it should play a role in the dynamism and effectiveness of human resources of society and increase the quality of social services, excellence and excellence of society.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Lived experience
Managers
Organizational excellence
Dynamism and effectiveness of human resources
  1. Arasteh, H., Jafari, P., & Gurchiyan, N. (2008). Encyclopedia of higher education, ministry of science research and technology. Persian Encyclopaedia Foundation .(In Persian)
  2. Abdulahi, B., & Ansari Jabri, M. (2012). Evaluation of technical and professional training and research center (ITC) based on the fundamental model of quality management (EFQM), Educational Skills, 1(3), 53-66. https://sid.ir/paper/255967/fa. (In Persian)
  3. Asadi, Samaneh. (2014). Identifying the components of the relationship between industry and university with the commercialization approach of research results among the studies conducted in Iran. Master's thesis, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  4. Ali Asgharzadeh, A., Maidani, Z., Gilasi, H. R., Maliki, M. R., & Nazadi Niaser, M. (2013). Evaluation of service quality based on EFQM European quality management foundation model of excellence in Paramedical Faculty of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Ahvaz Jundishapour Education Development Journal, 5(1), 1-11. (In Persian)
  5. Atafar, A., & Forozan, B. (2012). Organizational excellence review of ghaem sepahan engineering company of Isfahan based on Peters and Waterman Codel. Journal of Production and Operations Management, 4 (6), 85-102. (In Persian)
  6. Bazargan, A. (2003). Educational evaluation. Tehran, Samit Publications. (In Persian)
  7. Bernice, Br. (2012). Analyzing Service Quality: The Case of Post Graduate Chinese Students. Total Quall Manage Bus Excel, 18(3-4), 13-31. doi:1080/14783360601152558.
  8. Bounazef, D., & Van Caillie, D. (2017). Leadership and organizational values in university hospital centres: An analysis based on EFQM model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320043905.
  9. Bouranta, N., Psomas, E. L., & Pantouvakis, A. (2017). Identifying the critical determinants of TQM and their impact on company performance: Evidence from the hotel industry of Greece. The TQM Journal, 29(1), 147-166. doi:1108/TQM-11-2015-0142.
  10. Calumora, D. (2010). EFQM organizational excellence model in a university. Spanish
  11. Est, M. (2006). Implementation organizational excellence models self-assessment in the UK higher education sector-lessons learned from other sectors. TQM magazine, 16(3), 194-201. doi:1108/09544780410532936.
  12. Ezgoli, M. (2013). The introduction of typology and the definition of organizational excellence in some humanistic schools. Journal of Human Resource Management Researches, 5(2). (In Persian)
  13. Faraj Pahlo, A. H., Akshik, S. S., & Rajabali Baglo, R. (2014). Adaptation of organizational excellence model for public libraries of Iran (Case Study of Public Libraries of Khuzestan). Public Library Research and Information, 21(4), 529- doi: 20.1001.1.26455730.1394.21.4.8.8. (In Persian)
  14. Garami, M. R., & Noor Alizadeh, H. R. (2017). Excellence in organizations, fundamental European excellence model of quality management (EQM). Sarmad Publications. (In Persian)
  15. Shams Morkani, Gh., Ghahrani, M., Ma'rifovand, Z., & Zanganeh, F. (2013). Performance evaluation of Shahid Beheshti University based on EFQM organizational excellence model. Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 7(1), 39-67 (In Persian)
  16. Ghorbani, Z., Pardachi, M. H., & Imam Juma, M. (2013). Evaluating the performance of Tarbiat Debir Shahid Rajaei University based on the EFQM excellence model in the areas of leadership and human resources. Leadership and Educational Management Quarterly. Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, 2(3), 123-144 (In Persian)
  17. Ghorchian, N. A., Jafari, P., & Rahgozar, H. R. (2009). Designing a performance evaluation system for open universities based on organizational excellence indicators using data coverage analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Management, 2(5), 101-116 (In Persian)
  18. Imani Gole-Pardsari, M. R., Nazim, F., & Karimzadeh, S. (2017). Identifying dimensions of organizational excellence with emphasis on EFQM model in Islamic Azad University. Educational Management Research, 9(36), 177-205 (In Persian)
  19. Javednia, R., & Kamali, M. (2017). Investigating the status of knowledge management in Urmia University of Technology using the EFQM approach. Management of Information Resources and Services, 4(2), 11-26 (In Persian)
  20. Jose, T., & Juana, H. (2016). An EFQM model of self-assessment exercises at Spanish university. Journal of Education Administration, 4(2), 170-188. doi:1108/09578230610652051.
  21. Jose Tari, J. (2007). EFQM model self-assessment using a questionnaire approach in university administrative services. TQM Magazine, 19(6), 604-615.
  22. Kafash, M., & Zamani, F. (2017). Presenting a model to explain the impact of spiritual leadership and resilience on organizational excellence based on the viewpoint of faculty members of Khorasan Razavi Islamic Azad University. Research in Educational Systems, 12(special issue), 489-507. (In Persian)
  23. Mirspasi, N., Memarzadeh, Gh., Alam Tabriz, A., Najaf Beigi, R., & Alizadeh, M. (2011). Identifying organizational excellence criteria in the public sector. Development and Transformation Management, 4(11), 1-6. https://sid.ir/paper/205784/fa. (In Persian)
  24. Ngbottom, D. (2008). The need for education and training in the use of the organizational excellence models for quality management in UK higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in education, 10(1), 26-36. doi:1108/09684880210416085.
  25. Omidian, F., Omidian, M., & Safari, M. (2014). Evaluation of the quality of the performance of the educational groups of the Master's course of Dezful Islamic Azad University based on the European Quality Management Fundamental Excellence Model (EFQM) in 2013. Development of Jundishapour Education, 6(2), 147-157. https://sid.ir/paper/228808/fa (In Persian)
  26. Osseo A Sari Jar, E., & Long bottom, D. (2010). The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK high education institution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(10), 26- 36. doi:1108/09684880210416085.
  27. Panahi, E., Alamdari, Misham., Panahi, M., & Jamshidi, A. (2013). Investigating the relationship between the indicators of top organizations according to Peters and Waterman and the performance of the organization (case study: Special Economic Zone, Imam Khomeini Port). Third National Accounting Conference and management, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/343096 (In Persian)
  28. Qalavandi, H., Beheshtirad, R., & Qalaei, A. (2011). Investigating the status of the quality of educational services of Urmia University based on the SERQUAL model. Development Management Process Journal, 25(3), 49-66. doi: 1001.1.17350719.1391.25.3.3.6 (In Persian)
  29. Rezaei, Y., & Hamidifar, D. F. (2017). The banking service quality based on EFQM model and ITS impact on customer satisfacion (Case Study: Customer in Branches of Nour Finanial and Credit Institution in Hormozgan Province). Denisia, 73(3), 64-73 (In Persian)
  30. Riahi, B. (2005). Evaluation of the organization's performance based on the organizational excellence model. Administrative Transformation Quarterly, 47. (In Persian)
  31. Rodriguez, M., & Alvarez, M. J. (2014). Does the EFQM model identify and reinforce information capability. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 716-721. doi:1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.535.
  32. Shams Morkani, Gh., Ghahrani, M., Ma'rifovand, Z., & Zanganeh, F. (2013). Performance evaluation of Shahid Beheshti University based on EFQM organizational excellence model. Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 7(1), 39-67 (In Persian)
  33. Tari, J. (2010). Self-assessment Processes: The importance of follow Up for success. Quality Assurance in Education,18(1), 19-33. doi:1108/09684881011015972.
  34. Yazidi, S., & Salehi, I., & Qarabaghi, M. M. (2008). Examining the degree of student satisfaction according to the customer results criteria of the EFQM model (a case study of Mazandaran University students). Higher Education of Iran, 1(3), 19-53. https://sid.ir/paper/135911/fa. (In Persian)
  35. Entezari, Y. (2015). Building knowledge-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Case of Iran. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 195, 1206-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.242
  36. Fallah Haghighi, N., Ramezanpour Nargesi, G., Mirtorabi, M. S., & Bijani, M. (2020). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of launching knowledge-based companies by faculty members at Iranian research organization for science and technology (IROST). Journal of technology development management, 8(1), 47-91.‏ 22104/jtdm.2020.4035.2431 (In Persian)
  37. Ghafoury, S., Elyasi, M., Amiri, M. & Seyed Naqavi, M. (2019). Identification of organizational leadership dimensions in Iranian successful New Technology-based Firms in successful transition to fast-growing stage-Multiple case study. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 11(4), 701-718.  22059/JED.2019.272443.652849  (In Persian)
  38. Gürlek, M., & Çemberci, M. (2020). Understanding the relationships among knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge management capacity, innovation performance and organizational Kybernetes. 49 (11): 2819-2846. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/K-09-2019-0632
  39. Hamrin, S., Johansson, C. & Jahn, J. L. (2016). Communicative leadership: Fostering coworker agency in two Swedish business organizations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 21(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/ 1108/CCIJ-09-2015-0056
  40. Holland, P. J., Teicher, J., & Donaghey, J. (Eds.). (2019). Employee Voice at Work. Springer.
  41. Hwang, Y.(2016), A study on the multidimensional information management capability of knowledge workers, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 138-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2015-0093
  42. Imani, M.N., & Yousefi, Z. (2021). Developing a model of ethical leadership prediction based on normative and individual (behavioral) variables. Career and Organizational Counseling.13, 183-200.‏  https://doi.org/10.52547/JCOC.13.1.183 (In Persian)
  43. Jayasingam, S., Ansari, M. A. & Jantan, M. (2010). Influencing knowledge workers: the power of top management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), 134-151. https://doi.org/ 1016/j.lisr.2019.100998
  44. Ladkin, D. (2020). Rethinking leadership: A new look at old questions. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing 3(01), 21. https://doi.org/1177/1742715012444678
  45. Lakshman, C. (2007). Organizational knowledge leadership: a grounded theory approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1): 51-75. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/01437730710718245
  46. Lakshman, C. (2009). Organization knowledge leadership: An empirical examination of knowledge management by top executive leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(4): 338-364. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/01437730910961676.
  47. Latif, Kh. F., Afzal, O., Saqib, A., Sahibzada, U.F. & Alam, W. (2020). Knowledge-oriented leadership, entrepreneurial orientation, and knowledge management processes to project success. Journal of Intellectual Capital, https://doi.org/1108/JIC-09-2019-0228.
  48. López, V. M. (2013). Leadership in organization knowledge to Mexico. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 661-668. https://doi.org/ 1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.103
  49. Lund, A. K. (2019). Leading knowledge-workers through situated ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101060. https://doi.org/ 1016/j.scaman.2019.101060
  50. Mas-Machuca, M. (2014). The Role of Leadership: The Challenge of Knowledge Management and Learning in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(1): 97-116. https://doi.org/ 4471/ijelm.2014.10
  51. McLoughlin, D. (2014). Knowledge worker trust within organisations. Emu Plains, S.W.: Ithikos.
  52. Mládková, L. (2015). Knowledge workers and the principle of 3S (Self-management, Self-organization, Self-control). Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181(1), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.879
  53. Moeinian, B., Elyasi, M., Bamdadsoofi, J., & Naghavi, M. S. (2021). Developing a knowledge worker retention model in knowledge-based companies (Case Study: IT, Communication, and Biotechnology Companies). Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 3(4), 89-111.‏22080/SHRM.2021.3321 (In Persian)
  54. Naqshbandi, J. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International business review, 27: 701-713. https://doi.org/ 1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001
  55. Rastegar, A., & Golshahi, B. (2019). The challenges of relationship between individuals and organization in knowledge based companies, Management Studies in Development and Evolution. 28 (92): 115-133. https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2019.10107 (In Persian)
  56. Rouhani Rad, S., & Tayebi Abolhasani, A. (2020). The requirements of successful market entry for startup knowledge-based companies (Case Study: ICT Companies in Tehran). Journal of Technology Development management, 8(1), 185-220.‏  22104/jtdm.2020.3607.2248 (In Persian)
  57. Sahibzada, U. F., Latif, K. F., Xu, Y., & Khalid, R. (2020). Catalyzing knowledge management processes towards knowledge worker satisfaction: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management. 24 (10): 2373-2400. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0093.
  58. Salamzadeh, A., & Kesim, K. H. (2017). The enterprising communities and startup ecosystem in Iran, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11 (4): 456-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2015-0036
  59. Sohrabi, H., Razavi, A. A., & Taherkhani, L. (2018). Examining the relationship between knowledge leadership and organizational improvement from the viewpoint of central library librarians of State universities of Tehran. Journal of Knowledge Studies, 11(43), 32-46.‏ https://journals.iau.ir/article_676270.html (In Persian)
  60. Tafreshi, S. M., Hosseinzadeh, A., Nafti, M., & Abdollahi, M. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting innovation speed with the mediating role of knowledge sharing (Case Study: Alis Corporate in Mashhad). Transformation Management Journal, 9(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/22067/PMT.V9I1.60974.‏ (In Persian)
  61. Viitala, R.(2004), Towards knowledge leadership, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(6), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410556761
  62. Wu, W. L., & Lee, Y. C. (2017). Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management. 21(2): 474-491. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0318
  63. Yang, L. R., Huang, C. F., & Hsu, T. J. (2014). Knowledge leadership to improve project and organizational performance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1): 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.01.011
دوره 15، شماره 58
تابستان 1403
صفحه 85-103

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 خرداد 1402