فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

یکپارچه‌سازی راهبرد‌‌‌ چرخه عمر زیست‌‌‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
محمدحسین یوسفیان 1
سید حمید خداداد حسینی 2
اصغر مشبکی اصفهانی 2
علی شایان 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
10.22034/smsj.2023.376406.1759
چکیده
در سال‌های اخیر تحقیقات متعددی درحوزه زیست‌‌‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار انجام شده و این توجه در حال افزایش می‌‌‌باشد. با توجه به ویژگی‌های خاص زیست‌‌‌بوم‌ها، انتظار می‌‌‌رود بسیاری از مفاهیم کسب‌‌‌وکار و از جمله راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در زیست‌‌‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار نیز از الزامات و ویژگی‌های خاص خود برخوردار باشد. به منظور شناسایی موضوعات راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در زیست‌‌‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار و با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، مقالات منتشر شده در این حوزه در بازه زمانی سال‌های 1993 تا 2021 و در برترین مجلات و پایگاه‌های داده مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و در نهایت 107 مقاله انتخاب و بررسی شد. نتایج حاصل از ترکیب یافته‌‌‌های این مقاله‌‌‌ها منجر به استخراج 10 زمینه اصلی مرتبط با راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در زیست‌‌‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار شامل محرک‌های تشکیل زیست‌‌‌بوم، پیشران‌های زیست‌بوم، هدف زیست‌‌‌بوم، مرز زیست‌‌‌بوم، جایگاه‌های راهبردی، نقش‌های راهبردی، عوامل کلیدی سلامت زیست‌‌‌بوم، چالش‌های زیست‌‌‌بوم، پویایی زیست‌‌‌بوم و راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در زیست‌‌‌بوم گردید که هر کدام شامل زمینه‌‌‌های فرعی و مفاهیم مرتبط می‌‌‌باشند. در ادامه با توجه به این زمینه‌‌‌ها و همچنین با مد نظر قرار دادن روابط بین آنها، مدلی یکپارچه جهت راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در چرخه عمر زیست‌بوم کسب‌‌‌وکار طراحی گردید. مدل طراحی شده جامع‌ترین مدل موجود در مبانی نظری جهت راهبرد‌‌‌سازی در زیست‌‌‌بوم‌‌‌های کسب‌‌‌وکار می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
: زیست بوم کسب وکار
برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک
پیشران‌های زیست بوم
پویایی استراتژی
بینش استراتژیک

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Integrating the life cycle strategy of the business ecosystem

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Hossein Yousefiyan 1
Seyyed Hamid Khodadad Hoseini 2
Asghar Moshabaki Esfahani 2
Ali Shayan 3
1 PhD student, Department of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Recently there are remarkable interests about business ecosystems in businesses and academic environments and increasing. Regarding special characteristics of business ecosystems, it is expected that management concepts including strategy and strategizing are different in business ecosystems and they have special specifications and require special considerations. In this research and using related articles published in this area, we review previous researches and extract related concepts and themes about strategazing in business ecosystems and realation between them and to design an integrated model for strategizing in business ecosystem’s life cycle.
Methodology
To identify related themes about strategizing in business ecosystems, we use Metasynthesis and Sandelowski and Barroso method in this research that the mothod includes seven steps. Published articles in this area between 1993 to 2021 and in top scientific databases are reviewed by the research group. These databases include Science Direct, Emerald, Scopus and EBSCO. In addition and regarding the importance of some journals, the resarch group considered articles of four pioneer journals by Berry-picking and Journal Runs and Hand Searching method to be sure that all influential articles are reviewed. These four pioneer journals include Harvard Business Review, MIT Sloan Management Review, California Management Review and Strategic Management Journal. We reviewed related articles and screened articles three times and at the end, 107 articles selected and studied in this research. We extracted required information from these selected articles and then categorized and synthesized them to extract concepts and themes.
Results and Discussion
Using Metasynthesis results, 10 themes about strategizing in business ecosystems are identified including Ecosystem Creation Motivators, Ecosystem Drivers, Ecosystem Goal, Ecosystem Boundary, Strategic Positions in Ecosystem, Strategic Roles in Ecosystem, Critical Health Factors of Ecosystem, Ecosystem Challenges, Ecosystem Dynamism, and Strategizing in Ecosystem that every theme has its sub-themes and concepts. These themes are related together and can make an integrated model to describe how different factors influence strategizing in business ecosystems and how designers and managers of an ecosystem can nurture an acosystem by deliberately strategic initiatives.
Conclusion
In the end and using identified themes and regarding the relationships between them, an integrated model for strategizing in business ecosystems’ life cycle are designed by the researchers. In this model and based on the research question, strategizing has a dynamic charactristics and is a continuous attempt during whole life cycle of business ecosystem and plays as a core of the model. There are several motivators that encourage different ecosystem players to participate in the ecosystem. While these motivators exist, the ecosystem evolve and otherwise will collapse. On the other hand, customer value proposition is the core goal that whole ecosystem moves toward that goal and strategizing is a leading engine that pushes the ecosystem toward this goal. In addition to strategizing, there are some soft and hard drivers that provide dynamism for ecosystem. After creating ecosystem, different participants play various roles in the ecosystem that based on their responsibiliy, they are assigned to special positions and these positions determine the strategic role of every participant in the ecosysetm. Participants influence the strategizing in the ecosystem by these strategic roles. Also, strategic positions maybe change by ecosystem dynamism and then they are dynamic. By prticipation of players in the ecosystem, the boundary of ecosystem will be detremined that include players in different strategic positions. According to the model, this boundary is dynamic and based on the different factor, the boundary can change during ecosystem’s life cycle. Survival and competitiveness of an ecosystem deponds on its health. During evolution of the ecosystem, different factors emerge that based on these factors we can evaluate healthiness of ecosystem that we call them Critical Health Factors. These factors play a very important role in decision about ecosystem strategies. Ecosystem challenges are other factors that influence strategizing in ecosystem that these challenges related to charactristics of ecosystems and these challenges must be considered for any strategic initiatives. But ecosystem dynamism is the crucial issue in ecosystem strategizing that accomplish by ecosystem’s life cycle. Comprehensive understanding of this dynamism is so important for strategizing in an ecosystem. Also, dynamism variables are the most important issue about ecosystem dynamism. These variables make dynamism in the ecosystem or they will be affacted by ecosystem dynamism. These dynamism variables influence on strategizing in ecosystem and also will be affacted by new strategies and changes. In addition to strategic roles, strategic challenges and dynamism variables, there are another factors that impact on strategizing that we call them as Effective Factors on Strategizing. These factors have mutual relationship with strategizing and they have dynamism charactristics. In addition, Strategic Approach is another factor that can influence strategizing in ecosystem. Every strategic approach has its own requirements and can make different effect on strategizing in ecosystem. These strategic approaches are related to strategic positions and ecosystem dynamism. Regarding complexity of strategizing in ecosystems, it is necessary to consider all these themes together simultaneously and also their relationship. This comprehensive understanding leads to a best decision during strategy develpoment and execution and this designed model is the most comprehensive known model for strategizing in business ecosystems. 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategizing
Strategic planning
Strategy dynamics
Ecosystem dynamics
  1. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem
  2. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
  3. Adner, R., & Kapoor , R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1353582
  4. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic management journal, 37(4), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2363
  5. Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem. Strategic management journal, 37(9), 1829-1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2442
  6. Appleyard, M. M., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: from adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004
  7. Baldwin, C. Y. (2012). Organization design for business ecosystems. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.1.1.6334
  8. Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online review, 13, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320
  9. Beltagui, A., Rosli, A., & Candi, M. (2020). Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing. Research policy, 49(1), 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103833
  10. Birkinshaw, J. (2019). Ecosystem Businesses Are Changing the Rules of Strategy. Harvard business review, 8. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/08/ecosystem-businesses-are-changing-the-rules-of-strategy
  11. Blasco-Arcas, L., Alexander, M., Sörhammar, D., Jonas, J. M., Raithel, S., & Chen, T. (2020). Organizing actor Engagement: A platform perspective. Journal of business research, 118, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.050
  12. Bosch, J., & Olsson, H. H. (2018). Ecosystem traps and where to find them. Journal of Software: Evolution Process, 30(11), e1961. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1961
  13. Büge, M., & Ozcan, P. (2021). Platform Scaling, Fast and Slow. MIT sloan management Review, 62(3), 40-46. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/platform-scaling-fast-and-slow/
  14. Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social science & medicine, 56(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3
  15. Cao, X., Ouyang, T., Balozian, P., & Zhang, S. (2020). The Role of Managerial Cognitive Capability in Developing a Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Xiaomi. Sustainability, 12(17), 7176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177176
  16. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3'and'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International journal of technology management, 46(3-4), 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
  17. Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2015). How to avoid platform traps. MIT sloan management Review, 57(1), 11-15. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-avoid-platform-traps/
  18. Cha, H. (2020). A paradigm shift in the global strategy of MNEs towards business ecosystems: A research agenda for new theory development. Journal of International Management, 26(3), 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100755
  19. Chae, B. K. (2019). A General framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.023
  20. Chen, J., Liu, X., & Hu, Y. (2016). Establishing a CoPs-based innovation ecosystem to enhance competence-the case of CGN in China. International journal of technology management, 72(1-3), 144-170. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2016.10001576
  21. Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California management review, 50(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166416
  22. Cui, Z., Ouyang, T., Chen, J., & Li, C. (2019). From peripheral to core: a case study of a 3D printing firm on business ecosystems reconstruction. Technology Analysis Strategic management journal, 31(12), 1381-1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1614554
  23. Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT sloan management Review, 43(3), 51. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-elements-of-platform-leadership/
  24. Darking, M. L., & Whitley, E. A. (2007). Towards an understanding of floss: Infrastructures, materiality and the digital business ecosystem. Science Studies, 20(2). . https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55210
  25. Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466-498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0869
  26. Davidson, S., Giesen, E., Harmer, M., & Marshall, A. (2018). How industry leaders enhance the value of ecosystems. Strategy & Leadership, 46(2), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-12-2017-0121
  27. Davidson, S., Harmer, M., & Marshall, A. (2015). Strategies for creating and capturing value in the emerging ecosystem economy. Strategy & Leadership, 43(2), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-01-2015-0003
  28. Davis, J. P. (2016). The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: Collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative science quarterly, 61(4), 621-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216649350
  29. de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
  30. Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
  31. Dedehayir, O., & Seppänen, M. (2015). Birth and expansion of innovation ecosystems: A case study of copper production. Journal of technology management and innovation, 10(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242015000200010
  32. Ding, L., Ye, R. M., & Wu, J. X. (2019). Platform strategies for innovation ecosystem: Double-case study of Chinese automobile manufactures. Journal of cleaner production, 209, 1564-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.139
  33. Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425493
  34. Feng, N., Fu, C., Wei, F., Peng, Z., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, K. H. (2019). The key role of dynamic capabilities in the evolutionary process for a startup to develop into an innovation ecosystem leader: An indepth case study. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 54, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.11.002
  35. Finfgeld‐Connett, D. (2006). Meta‐synthesis of presence in nursing. Journal of advanced nursing, 55(6), 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03961.x
  36. Fuller, J., Jacobides, M. G., & Reeves, M. (2019). The myths and realities of business ecosystems. MIT sloan management Review, 60(3), 1-9. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-myths-and-realities-of-business-ecosystems/
  37. Furr, N., & Shipilov, A. (2018). Building the right ecosystem for innovation. MIT sloan management Review, 59(4), 59-64. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-the-right-ecosystem-for-innovation/
  38. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT sloan management Review, 68-75. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-companies-become-platform-leaders/
  39. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 31(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
  40. Graça, P., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2017). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems—Literature review and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change

116, 237-255.  . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.012

  1. Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
  2. Gupta, R., Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2019). Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.004
  3. Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT sloan management Review, 55(2), 70-80. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/strategic-decisions-for-multisided-platforms/
  4. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Marante, C. A. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159-1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
  5. Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(12), 3163-3192. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2808034
  6. Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research policy, 47(8), 1391-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019
  7. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-78. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2004/03/strategy-as-ecology
  8. Jacobides, M. G. (2019). In the Ecosystem Economy, What’s Your Strategy? Harvard business review, 97(5), 128-137. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/09/in-the-ecosystem-economy-whats-your-strategy
  9. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  10. Joo, J., & Shin, M. M. (2018). Building sustainable business ecosystems through customer participation: A lesson from South Korean cases. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.01.001
  11. Kamalaldin, A., Sjödin, D., Hullova, D., & Parida, V. (2021). Configuring ecosystem strategies for digitally enabled process innovation: A framework for equipment suppliers in the process industries. Technovation, 105, 102250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102250
  12. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14, 1-25. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/strategy-drives-digital-transformation/
  13. Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and Competing in Ecosystems: How Organizational Forms Shape New Technology Investments. Strategic management journal, 34(3), 274-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2010
  14. Khademi, B. (2020). Ecosystem value creation and capture: A systematic review of literature and potential research opportunities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(1). . https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1311
  15. Kim, H., Lee, J. N., & Han, J. (2010). The role of IT in business ecosystems. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735260
  16. Klimas, P., & Czakon, W. (2021). Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems. Review of Managerial Science, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00439-4
  17. Kolk, M., Eagar, R., Boulton, C., & Mira, C. (2018). How hyper-collaboration accelerates ecosystem innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 46(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-10-2017-0100
  18. Kolloch, M., & Dellermann, D. (2018). Digital innovation in the energy industry: The impact of controversies on the evolution of innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.033
  19. Kramer, M. R., & Pfitzer, M. W. (2016). The ecosystem of shared value. Harvard business review, 94(10), 80-89. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-ecosystem-of-shared-value
  20. Kumar, P., Dass, M., & Kumar, S. (2015). From competitive advantage to nodal advantage: Ecosystem structure and the new five forces that affect prosperity. Business horizons, 58(4), 469-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.04.001
  21. Letaifa, S. B. (2014). The uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems: The value-creation/value-capture dilemma. Management Decision, 52(2), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2013-0329
  22. Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
  23. Lingens, B., Miehé, L., & Gassmann, O. (2021). The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102043
  24. Liu, G., & Rong, K. (2015). The nature of the co-evolutionary process: Complex product development in the mobile computing industry’s business ecosystem. Group Organization Management, 40(6), 809-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115593830
  25. Lu, C., Rong, K., You, J., & Shi, Y. (2014). Business ecosystem and stakeholders’ role transformation: Evidence from Chinese emerging electric vehicle industry. Expert Systems with applications, 41(10), 4579-4595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.026
  26. Majava, J., Rinkinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2020). Business ecosystem perspective on innovation policy: a case study of San Diego life sciences. International Journal of Innovation Learning, 27(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2020.10025527
  27. Marshall, A., Lipp, A., Ikeda, K., & Singh, R. R. (2020). Ecosystems boost revenues from innovation initiatives. Strategy & Leadership, 48(4), 17-27. . https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-04-2020-0055
  28. Masucci, M., Brusoni, S., & Cennamo, C. (2020). Removing bottlenecks in business ecosystems: The strategic role of outbound open innovation. Research policy, 49(1), 103823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103823
  29. McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic management journal, 38(1), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2596
  30. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition
  31. Nachira, F., Dini, P., & Nicolai, A. (2007). A network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: roots, processes and perspectives. European Commission, Bruxelles, Introductory Paper, 106. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009925.00010
  32. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self–regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37(5), 1071-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00519.x
  33. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11): Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985000
  34. Palmié, M., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Caglar, U. (2020). The evolution of the financial technology ecosystem: an introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779
  35. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis (Vol. 3). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985017
  36. Phillips, M. A., & Ritala, P. (2019). A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119739
  37. Phillips, M. A., & Srai, J. S. (2018). Exploring emerging ecosystem boundaries: defining ‘the game’. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(08), 1840012. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919618400121
  38. Pidun, U., Reeves, M., & Wesselink, E. (2021). How Healthy Is Your Business Ecosystem? MIT sloan management Review, 62(3), 31-38. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-healthy-is-your-business-ecosystem/
  39. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281060
  40. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. The Oxford handbook of innovation, 78, 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0003
  41. Ramezani, J., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2020). Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119846
  42. Reeves, M., Lotan, H., Legrand, J., & Jacobides, M. G. (2019). How business ecosystems rise (and often fall). MIT sloan management Review, 60(4), 1-6. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-business-ecosystems-rise-and-often-fall/
  43. Rinkinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2018). The business ecosystem concept in innovation policy context: Building a conceptual framework. Innovation: the European journal of social science research, 31(3), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1300089
  44. Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: a comparative case study. International journal of technology management, 63(3-4), 244-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2013.056900
  45. Rong, K., Lin, Y., Li, B., Burström, T., Butel, L., & Yu, J. (2018). Business ecosystem research agenda: More dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized. Asian Business & Management, 17, 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0038-6
  46. Rong, K., Lin, Y., Shi, Y., & Yu, J. (2013). Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: a triple view of technology, application and organisation. International journal of technology management, 62(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2013.053042
  47. Rong, K., Patton, D., & Chen, W. (2018). Business models dynamics and business ecosystems in the emerging 3D printing industry. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 134, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.015
  48. Rong, K., & Shi, Y. (2014). Business ecosystems: Constructs, configurations, and the nurturing process: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405920
  49. Rong, K., Shi, Y., & Yu, J. (2013). Nurturing business ecosystems to deal with industry uncertainties. Industrial management & data systems, 113(3), 385 - 402. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571311312677
  50. Rong, K., Wu, J., Shi, Y., & Guo, L. (2015). Nurturing business ecosystems for growth in a foreign market: Incubating, identifying and integrating stakeholders. Journal of International Management, 21(4), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.07.004
  51. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research: springer publishing company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203409527.ch26
  52. Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023
  53. Sebastian, I. M., Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2020). Driving Growth in Digital Ecosystem. MIT sloan management Review, 62(1), 58-62. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/driving-growth-in-digital-ecosystems/
  54. Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., & Svahn, F. (2013). Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. Journal of information Technology, 28(3), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.14
  55. Senyo, P. K., Liu, K., & Effah, J. (2019). Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.002
  56. Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 136, 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030
  57. Straub, R. (2019). What Management Needs to Become in an Era of Ecosystems. Harvard business review(6), 1-5. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/06/what-management-needs-to-become-in-an-era-of-ecosystems
  58. Subramaniam, M. (2020). Digital ecosystems and their implications for competitive strategy. Journal of Organization Design, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-020-00073-0
  59. Subramaniam, M., Iyer, B., & Venkatraman, V. (2019). Competing in digital ecosystems. Business horizons, 62(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.013
  60. Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2018). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning, 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
  61. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  62. Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms, 37, 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-332220170000037008
  63. Trischler, J., Johnson, M., & Kristensson, P. (2020). A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of business research, 116, 552-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.011
  64. Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032
  65. Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard business review, 94(4), 54-62. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/04/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-rules-of-strategy
  66. Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., Pöyhönen, J., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Bringing ecosystem thinking to sustainability-driven wooden construction business. Journal of cleaner production, 292, 126029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126029
  67. Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011
  68. Wei, F., Feng, N., Yang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2020). A conceptual framework of two-stage partner selection in platform-based innovation ecosystems for servitization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121431
  69. Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2015). Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT sloan management Review, 56(4), 27. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/thriving-in-an-increasingly-digital-ecosystem/
  70. Westerman, G., & Bonnet, D. (2015). Revamping your business through digital transformation. MIT sloan management Review, 56(3), 10. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/revamping-your-business-through-digital-transformation/
  71. Williamson, P. J., & De Meyer, A. (2012). Ecosystem advantage: How to successfully harness the power of partners. California management review, 55(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.55.1.24
  72. Yablonsky, S. (2020). A multidimensional platform ecosystem framework. Kybernetes, 49(7), 2003-2035. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2019-0447
  73. Yaghmaie, P., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2019). Identifying and describing constituents of innovation ecosystems: A systematic review of the literature. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(3), 283-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-03-2019-0042
  74. Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004
  75. Zhang, J., & Liang, X. J. (2011). Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: The case of China Mobile. Telecommunications policy, 35(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.009
  76. Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 15، شماره 57
بهار 1403
صفحه 21-54

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 آذر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 بهمن 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 فروردین 1402