فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تبیین نقشه راهبردی مدیریت نااطمینانی زنجیره تامین صنایع غذایی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
چکیده
عدم اطمینان نسبت به وقایع احتمالی آینده، از مهم‌ترین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تصمیمات زنجیره تأمین است. در صنایع غذایی به دلیل تنوع زیاد محصولات و تغییرات مداوم در ذائقه مشتریان، مدیریت عدم اطمینان اهمیتی دوچندان دارد. با طراحی راهبردهای مدیریت عدم اطمینان و توجه به ارتباط میان آن‌ها می‌توان فعالیت‌های دارای بالاترین ارزش افزوده را شناسایی کرد. هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی انواع عدم اطمینان و راهبردهای مدیریت آن‌ها در زنجیره تأمین صنایع غذایی و بررسی روابط علی‌ومعلولی بین آن‌هاست. پژوهش از بعد هدف، کاربردی و از حیث چگونگی جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، توصیفی است. بعد از مرور ادبیات موضوع و شناسایی منابع عدم اطمینان و راهبردهای مدیریت آن‌ها، رابطه بین 21 استراتژی شناسایی شده از طریق مصاحبه با 9 خبره از صنایع غذایی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. این افراد متشکل از مدیران تولید، کارخانه و مدیران عامل صنایع غذایی هستند که مدرک تحصیلی کارشناسی به بالا و تجربه کافی دارند. طبق نتایج تکنیک نگاشت شناختی با بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزار یوسینت، راهبردهای شناسایی شده به پنج خوشه قابل دسته‌بندی بوده که یکی از آن‌ها پس از تحلیل‌ها حذف شد. چهار خوشه باقی مانده دارای تعامل بالایی با یکدیگرند و هم‌افزایی میان آن‌ها سبب ارتقای عملکرد شرکت‌ها و زنجیره‌های تأمین در مدیریت عدم اطمینان می‌شود. این چهار خوشه عبارت‌اند از: بهبود سیستم‌ها و روش‌ها، بهبود تصمیمات، مدیریت محصول و مدیریت فرایند. هرکدام از این عوامل از زاویه‌ای خاص، زنجیره تأمین را در راستای مدیریت عدم اطمینان یاری می‌رسانند و در صورت تنظیم صحیح روابط میان آن‌ها می‌توان شاهد بهبود عملکرد زنجیره‌های تأمین بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Modeling uncertainty management strategies in the supply chain: Causal cognitive mapping approach

نویسندگان English

Fatemeh Soltani Horand 1
Mohammad Rahim Ramazanian 2
Mahmoud Moradi 2
Keikhosro Yakideh 3
1 PhD student, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Irann
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Uncertainty about possible future events is one of the most important factors affecting supply chain decisions. This factor is sometimes considered as one of the objective dimensions of the external environment and sometimes as an interpretation of the perception process that helps decision makers in conceptualizing the environment. Many researchers are looking for uncertainty management solutions in order to make effective decisions. The correct management of the factors that cause uncertainty takes place when when strategies are designed for this purpose and communication and interaction between them are taken into consideration. But the review of the studies done on uncertainty management shows that these studies lack a coherent structure to understand the conditions affecting the optimal management of uncertainty. The proposed models often pointed to separate activities and different tasks in the chain, and different researchers discussed the uncertainty of the supply chain according to their research field. This issue causes industrial managers to have problems in understanding how to implement and use uncertainty management strategies, and after spending a lot of money, they cannot achieve the expected results from uncertainty management. Especially in the food industry, due to the wide variety of products and continuous changes in customers' tastes, there is intense competition in this industry. For success in this competition, it is necessary to manage the uncertainties governing this industry well. Therefore, the aim of this research is to identify the factors that cause uncertainty in the supply chain of the food industry, as well as to identify uncertainty management strategies and to examine the cause and effect relationships between these strategies in order to prioritize the necessary activities in order to improve the performance of the supply chain and policy making in this field.
Methodology: This research is applied in terms of purpose, because the purpose of this research is to apply and test theoretical concepts in the situations of real issues of uncertainty management in the supply chain of the food industry so that a solution can be found to strengthen the infrastructure of uncertainty management. In addition, in terms of data obtaining method, it is a descriptive research because in this research, the conditions and relationships between different factors in the field of supply chain uncertainty management have been described and interpreted. In the framework of mixed research methodology, the process of modeling uncertainty management strategies in this article is done in three stages. In the first stage, based on the subject literature and analysis of semi-structured interviews with experts, the initial conceptual framework of uncertainty management strategies of the food industry supply chain is extracted. In the second stage, the mental model of food industry experts is extracted based on semi-structured interviews and the results are analyzed based on causal mapping method. In the third stage, the relevant integration map is extracted and after performing the necessary analysis, a model is presented for examining uncertainty management strategies in the food industry. At this stage, causal mapping technique has been used for analysis and modeling. The target statistical population of the research consists of production and factory managers as well as CEOs of the food industry who have a higher than bachelor's degree and have sufficient experience in their field of work.
Results and discussion: In this research, after identifying the sources of uncertainty and their management strategies through the review of various researches, the relationship and interaction between the 21 identified strategies was studied through interviews with 9 experts from the food industry. Then, by completing the matrix of relationships between factors based on the opinion of experts, the data obtained from these matrices were analyzed and explained through the method of causal mapping. According to the findings of the research, these 21 factors can be classified into five groups or clusters, one of the clusters was removed after path analysis, and four clusters containing 18 factors remained. These four clusters have a high interaction with each other and the positive synergy between them improves the performance of companies and supply chains in the field of uncertainty management. These four clusters are: improving systems and methods, improving decisions, product management and process management. Each of these factors, from a unique angle, helps the supply chain in the management of uncertainties, and if the relationships between them are properly adjusted, we can witness the growth of supply chain performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Uncertainty management
supply chain
causal cognitive mapping
food industries
performance
  1. Aman, S., Seuring, S., & Khalid, R. U. (2023). Sustainability performance measurement in risk and uncertainty management: An analysis of base of the pyramid supply chain literature. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2373-2398. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3254
  2. Angkiriwang, R., Pujawan, I. N., & Santosa, B. (2014). Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs. proactive approaches. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.882804
  3. Besiou, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Closed‐loop supply chains for photovoltaic panels: A case‐based approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 929-937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12297
  4. Coenen, J., van Der Heijden, R. E., & van Riel, A. C. (2018). Understanding approaches to complexity and uncertainty in closed-loop supply chain management: Past findings and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.216
  5. De Lima, F. A., Seuring, S., & Sauer, P. C. (2022). A systematic literature review exploring uncertainty management and sustainability outcomes in circular supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 60(19), 6013-6046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1976859
  6. Ebrahimpour Azbari, M., Akbari, M., & Rafiei Rashtabadi, F. (2016). The effect of environmental uncertainty, production flexibility and operational efficiency on company performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Industrial Management Studies, 16(49): 37–66. https://doi.org/10.22054/jims.2018.8785 [In Persian]
  7. Etim, E. O. (2019). Management Accounting System, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, and Corporate Performance of the Nigerian Breweries Sector. Archives of Business Research (ABR), 7 (7): 255, 268. DOI: 10.14738/abr.77.6550
  8. García-Pérez, A. M., & Yanes-Estévez, V. (2022). Longitudinal study of perceived environmental uncertainty. An application of Rasch methodology to SMES. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(5), 760-780. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-02-2022-0033
  9. Goknil, A., Nguyen, P., Sen, S., Politaki, D., Niavis, H., Pedersen, K. J., ... & Ziegenbein, A. (2023). A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593043
  10. Golboo, M. A., & Yazdani, N. (2023). Strategic foresight in creating strategic flexibility and rational decision making. Strategic Management Studies, (51): 127–147. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2022.138204 [In Persian]
  11. Hasanpour, H. A., Taheri, S. M., & Mikaili, F. (2022). Food supply chain network design based on customer satisfaction in conditions of uncertainty. Scientific Journal of Commercial Management Studies, 13(26): 396–431. https://doi.org/10.22034/bar.2022.14142.3563 [In Persian]
  12. Hendijani, Roza;Saidi Sai, Reza (2019).The effect of supply chain integration and demand uncertainty on company performance.Scientific Quarterly of Industrial Management Studies, 18th year. 59,1-45. https://doi.org/10.22054/jims.2021.45200.2360 [In Persian]
  13. Kolade, O., Egbetokun, A., Rae, D., & Hussain, J. (2020). 18. Entrepreneurial resilience in turbulent environments: the role of spiritual capital. Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: A Contextualized Approach, 354.
  14. Kreye, M. E. (2019). Does a more complex service offering increase uncertainty in operations?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2018-0009
  15. Kundu, A., Sarkar, D. N., & Bhattacharya, A. (2021). The effect of uncertainty on the formulation of strategies: a study of selected Indian organizations. SN Business & Economics, 1, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-020-00010-z
  16. Lehr, C. B., Thun, J. H., & Milling, P. M. (2013). From waste to value–a system dynamics model for strategic decision-making in closed-loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 4105-4116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.774488
  17. Makhlughi, A., & Khodaparasti, R. B. (2021). The effect of effective decision-making on the speed of internationalization with environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Studies, 14(55): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.176428 [In Persian]
  18. Nazari, R., Sohrabi, Z., & Moharramzadeh, M. (2022). Strategic scenarios of cultural sports club. Strategic Management Studies, 12(47): 301–319. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286853.1400.12.47.16.4 [In Persian]
  19. Oh, E., & Son, S. Y. (2020). Theoretical energy storage system sizing method and performance analysis for wind power forecast uncertainty management. Renewable Energy, 155, 1060-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.170
  20. Peng, H., Shen, N., Liao, H., Xue, H., & Wang, Q. (2020). Uncertainty factors, methods, and solutions of closed-loop supply chain—A review for current situation and future prospects. Journal of cleaner production, 254, 120032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120032
  21. Reddy, K. R. K., Gunasekaran, A., Kalpana, P., Sreedharan, V. R., & Kumar, S. A. (2021). Developing a blockchain framework for the automotive supply chain: A systematic review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 157, 107334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107334
  22. Rezvani, H., & Sohamkhed, M. (2012). Correspondence of business strategy with environmental uncertainty (Case study: Pegah Fars and Sham-Sham companies). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Business Management Studies, 4(7): 88–104. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2645386.1391.4.7.4.7 [In Persian]
  23. Rohaninejad, M., Janota, M., & Hanzálek, Z. (2023). Integrated lot-sizing and scheduling: Mitigation of uncertainty in demand and processing time by machine learning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 118, 105676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105676
  24. Ruimin, M. A., Lifei, Y. A. O., Maozhu, J. I. N., Peiyu, R. E. N., & Zhihan, L. V. (2016). Robust environmental closed-loop supply chain design under uncertainty. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 89, 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.10.028
  25. Sazgari, S., & Yazdani, B. (2016). Investigating the moderating role of environmental uncertainty in the relationships between ISO 9001, product innovation, and financial performance (Case study: Production organizations of Isfahan province). Journal of Quality Engineering and Management, 7(3): 223–245. [In Persian]
  26. Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2012). Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4493-4523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.613864
  27. Sniazhko, S. (2019). Uncertainty in decision-making: A review of the international business literature. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1650692. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1650692
  28. Sopha, B. M., Jie, F., & Himadhani, M. (2021). Analysis of the uncertainty sources and SMEs’ performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 33(1),1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1764737
  29. Yang, F., Kong, J., Liu, T., & Ang, S. (2022). Cooperation and coordination in green supply chain with R&D uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(3), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1848359
  30. Zarghamifard, M., & Azar, A. (2014). An analysis of cognitive mapping method in structuring qualitative data of organizational studies. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 3(8–9): 159–185. [In Persian]

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 21 بهمن 1402