فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

پیشایندها و پسایندهای خودسانسوری کارکنان سازمان‌های دولتی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه لرستان، خرّم‌آباد، لرستان، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش، شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای خودسانسوری کارکنان سازمان‌های دولتی است. این پژوهش در حیطه پژوهش‌های آمیخته با رویکرد کیفی-کمّی در رهیافت استقرایی‌قیاسی است لذا از نظر هدف، کاربردی و ازحیث ماهیت و روش، توصیفی - پیمایشی است. جامعه پژوهش بخش کیفی اساتید رشته مدیریت و روانشناسی بوده که با نمونه‌گیری هدف‌مند به حجم  16 نفر است. جامعه آماری بخش کمّی مدیران میانی و ارشد سازمان‌های دولتی ارومیه هستند که با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری غیراحتمالی در دسترس به حجم نمونه 32 نفر تعیین شد. در بخش کیفی پژوهش برای گردآوری داده‌ها از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته استفاده شد که روایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از ضریب CVR و آزمون کاپای کوهن تأیید شد. علاوه بر این، در بخش کمی از پرسشنامه مقایسه زوجی استفاده شد و پایایی با آزمون مجدد و روایی با روایی محتوا مورد تایید قرار گرفت. برای کدگذاری داده‌ها از نرم افزار نسخه 2020 MAXQDA بهره گرفته شد که منجر به شناسایی پیشایندها و پسایندهای خودسانسوری شد. سپس با بهره‌گیری از فن دلفی فازی، رتبه‌بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای خودسانسوری کارکنان انجام پذیرفت. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که جوسازمانی، عدم امنیت شغلی و ترس از دست دادن موقعیت شغلی، مهم‌ترین عوامل به وجودآورنده خودسانسوری در کارکنان و آسیب‌های روحی، کارشکنی در تحولات، کاهش بهره‌وری سازمان و فلات یادگیری از جمله مهم‌ترین پیامدهای خودسانسوری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Antecedents and consequences of self-censorship of employees in Public Organizations

نویسندگان English

Morteza Piri 1
Meysam Jafari 2
Mahdieh Vishlaghi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 PhD student, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
3 PhD student, Faculty of Management and Economics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
   Human resources in organizations, by sharing their knowledge, attitude, ideas and experiences, are the most essential factors in moving the cycles of the organization, the expertise and capabilities of human resources can make organizations flexible. Make it acceptable and realize strategic goals in challenging conditions (Dudokh, 2020). Knowledge sharing is a behavior in which a person voluntarily provides his knowledge, expertise and experiences to other actors inside and outside the organization (Hosseinpour, Qurbani and Vishalghi, 2018). Thus, self-censorship is a phenomenon that hinders the transfer and sharing of knowledge (Hamari et al., 2017). Self-censorship of employees is a deliberate and voluntary action that employees refrain from disclosing when they have information, and it increases the tendency of employees to provide false information (Bartel, 2017) Organizational self-censorship is a dangerous obstacle for organizational change and transformation and hinders the development of pluralistic organizations. Self-censorship in organizations can have harmful effects on the decision-making and change process (Hamari et al., 2017). The issue of organizational self-censorship and efforts to solve it are very important and require the serious attention of managers of organizations. This phenomenon can be effective in learning and discovering errors, reduce organizational effectiveness and cause pessimism and dissatisfaction among employees, so it is necessary to address this important issue. Also, due to the existence of a theoretical gap in the field of self-censorship, it is necessary to carry out research in this field and solve this existing theoretical gap. Considering the scope of the research problem and the need to use strategies to counter self-censorship, this research aims to identify and explain the antecedents and consequences of self-censorship of employees in Urmia government organizations.
           Methodology
     The current research is in the field of combined and inductive-comparative research, in such a way that it is done qualitatively-quantitatively. The purpose of this research is applied and descriptive-survey. Due to the fact that the current research is a hybrid one, the tools and methods used in the qualitative and quantitative sections are expressed separately. The statistical population of the research in the qualitative part consists of management and psychology professors. In this regard, using the purposeful sampling method, 16 professors were selected as samples. The sample size was determined using the principle of theoretical saturation in such a way that the interview process ended with the sixteenth participant. The tool for collecting information in the qualitative part of the research is a semi-structured interview, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed using the CVR coefficient and the Kappa-Cohen test, respectively. The statistical population of the research in the quantitative part is the middle and senior managers of Urmia government organizations, which was determined using the non-probability sampling method with a sample size of 32 people. In the quantitative part of the research, a pairwise comparison questionnaire was used, whose reliability was confirmed by retesting and its validity by content validity. In the fuzzy Delphi approach, questionnaires are distributed and collected in two stages and at different times. Therefore, based on the average difference of de-fuzzification and compatibility rate, reliability can be checked. If the difference of the de-fuzzified average is less than 0.1, it can be said that the questionnaire has the necessary reliability, and according to the result of the de-fuzzified average in two stages, it can be said that the questionnaire has the necessary reliability.
   Results and Discussion
   Based on the results of the antecedents and factors affecting the self-censorship of employees in government organizations, the organizational climate is authoritarian, maintaining the current position, fear of losing the job position, low job motivation, organizational structure based on bureaucracy, common perceptions, prioritizing individual interests, time monopolies, weak effective communication, lack of effective cooperation, protection of the organization's reputation and identity, compliance with values, conformity with the group, expediency of employees, lack of accountability, lack of security. The results containing the identification of the consequences of self-censorship of employees show that the reduction of enthusiasm of employees, mental injuries, emotional fatigue, performance problems, inertia, reduction of organizational productivity, lack of peace, job burnout, inattention to the mission and goals, weakening of organizational entrepreneurship, decision-making challenges, tendency to leave the service, disruption in transformations, weakening of loyalty, weakening of dynamic capabilities, learning plateau. Also, the findings of the research show that the fear of losing the job position, authoritarian atmosphere, conformity with the crowd, insecurity and maintaining the current position, expediency and preferring the individual interests of human resources to the collective interests are among the most important antecedents and factors affecting the self-censorship of employees in government organizations. In addition to this, factors such as mental injuries, disruptions in transformations, reduction of organizational productivity, learning plateaus, performance problems, inertia and weakening of loyalty are among the most important consequences or consequences of self-censorship of employees in government organizations.
   Conclusion
   Dutiful and authoritarian organizational atmosphere is the most important factor that creates self-censorship of employees. Spreading the culture of knowledge sharing and increasing employee participation, which is basically not a process that can be realized all at once, can lead to increasing the participation of human resources and knowledge sharing among employees. Therefore, it is necessary to spread and strengthen the culture of participation and knowledge sharing in organizations in order to become the basis for increasing creativity in the organization. By organizing brainstorming sessions, organizations challenge employees and increase participation and interactions between work groups, which leads to innovation and creativity, all of which lead to increased organizational learning, increased courage and boldness of employees in stating the truth and adopting Strategies to prevent self-censorship will be provided to employees.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Climate organization
Lack of job security
Fear of employment
Learning plateau
Mental injuries
  1. Adamska, K. (2017). Self-censorship in organizations. Peace Psychology Book Series, 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63378-7_3
  2. Afshani, S., & Mahmoudabadi, F. (2019). Relationship between Yazd Citizens' Societal Security and Self-censorship. Societal Security Studies, 10(59), 75-101.[ in Persian] .
  3. Ahmadi, N. (2009). Introduction and critique of Delphi method. Social Science Quarterly, 22, 100-109.[Text in Persian]
  4. Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective, 217, 240.
  5. Bar-Tal D., Nets-Zehngut R., & Sharvit K. (2017). Self-censorship in contexts of conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63378-7
  6. Bar-Tal, D. (2017). Self-censorship as a socio-political-Psychological phenomenon: Conception and research. Political Psychology, 38, 37-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12391
  7. Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006
  8. Ben-Ze'ev, E., Ginio, R., & Winter, J. (2010). Shadows of war: A social history of silence in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511676178.001
  9. Cook, P, & Heilmann, C. (2010). Censorship and two types of self-censorship. Available at SSRN 1575662, 25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1575662.
  10. Dashtizad, S., Farahmand, M., Afrasiyabi, H., & Afshani, S. A. (2021). Phenomenology of Self-Censorship in Public Relations of Government Organizations. Public Organizations Management, 10(1(Series 37)), 11-28.

doi: 10.30473/ipom.2021.59192.4387.(in persian).

  1. Dodokh, A. (2020). Impact of human resources management practices on workplace knowledge-hiding behaviour. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 11(3), 298-324. https://doi.org/210.1504/ijkms.2020.10031287.
  2. Elbaz, S., & Bar-Tal, D. (2019). Voluntary silence: Israeli media self-censorship during the Second Lebanon War. Conflict & Communication, 18(2).
  3. Farahmand, M., & Dashtizad, S. (2022). A Paradigmatic Model of Self-Censorship in Iranian Government Institutions. Sociology of Social Institutions, 8(18), 321-347. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2022.22949.1964 (in persian).
  4. Fernandes, A. J., Hartono, H., & Aziza, C. (2020). Assessment IT governance of human resources information system using COBIT 5. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(4), 59-63.
  5. Festenstein, M. (2018). Self-censorship for democrats. European Journal of Political Theory, 17(3), 324-342.https://doi.org/310.1177/1474885115587480.
  6. Gray, G, & Bishop Kendzia, V. (2009). Organizational Self‐Censorship: Corporate Sponsorship, Nonprofit Funding, and the Educational Experience. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 46(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/110.1111/j.1755-1618x.2009.01209.x.
  7. Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of management Review, 28(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925239
  8. Hameiri, B, Sharvit, K, Bar-Tal, D, Shahar, E, & Halperin, E. (2017). Support for self‐censorship among Israelis as a barrier to resolving the Israeli‐Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology, 38(5), 795-813.https://doi.org/710.1111/pops.12346.
  9. Hammack, P. (2011). Narrative and the politics of identity: The cultural psychology of Israeli and Palestinian youth: Oxford University Press.
  10. Hayes, A. (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785-802. https://doi.org/710.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00368.x.
  11. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh072
  12. Hayes, A, & Matthes, J. (2017). Self-censorship, the spiral of silence, and contemporary political communication .The Oxford handbook of political communication.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.31.
  13. Horton, J. (2011). Self-censorship. Res publica, 17(1), 91-106.
  14. Hosseinpour, D, Ghorbani paji, A, & vishlaghi, M. (2019). The Effect of Cooperative Organizational Atmosphere on Knowledge Sharing: Moderating Role of Intrinsic Motivation and Job Autonomy. Socio-Psychological Studies of Women (Women's Studies), 17(1), 131-164. https://doi.org/110.22051/JWSPS.22019.21422.21791.[Text in Persian].
  15. Khorramshahi, B. (1995). Self-censorship. Revolution University (2), 51-56. [ t in Persian]
  16. Kuo, Y., & Chen, P. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using fuzzy Delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930-1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068
  17. Lee, F, & Chan, J. (2009). Organizational production of self-censorship in the Hong Kong media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 112-133. https://doi.org/110.1177/1940161208326598.
  18. Nets-Zehngut, R., Pliskin, R., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). Self-censorship in conflicts: Israel and the 1948 Palestinian exodus. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(3), 479. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000094
  19. Petronio, S. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of family theory & review, 2(3), 175-196. https://doi.org/110.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x.
  20. Porat, R., Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). The effect of sociopsychological barriers on the processing of new information about peace opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713499719
  21. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers: sage.
  22. Selnes, F. (2020). Journalist Safety and Self-Censorship (A. G. Larsen, I. Fadnes & R. Krøvel Eds. 1 ed.). London: Routledge.
  23. Seyednaghavi, Mir Ali, Din Mohammadi, Tayyaba, Khaganizadeh, Ainullah. (2018). Designing a model of self-censorship in government organizations based on Granded Theory. Behavioral studies in management. 10(20). 101-118 (in persian).
  24. Sharvit, K., Bar-Tal, D., Hameiri, B., Shahar, E., Zafran, A., & Raviv, A. (2017). Attitudes towards self-censorship: Development of a scale. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  25. Shen, X., & Truex, R. (2021). In search of self-censorship. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1672-1684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000735
  26. Shrouf, H, Al-Qudah, Sh, Khawaldeh, K, Obeidat, A, & Rawashdeh, A. (2020). A study on relationship between human resources and strategic performance: The mediating role of productivity. Management Science Letters, 10(13), 3189-3196.https://doi.org/3110.5267/j.msl.2020.3185.3002.
  27. Tërstena, A, Goga, A, & Jashari, B. (2020). Improving the efficiency of human resources with the use of new technologies and reorganization process. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 9(1), 31 38. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v20529i20521.20606.
دوره 15، شماره 57
بهار 1403
صفحه 233-256

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 آذر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 دی 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 مرداد 1402