فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

تاثیر استراتژی‌های هم‌رقابتی، یادگیری سازمانی و کسب‌وکار بر توسعه خدمات جدید فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه شاهد
چکیده
رقابت روزافزون در عصر کنونی و روبرو بودن با نیازها و خواسته‌های متنوع و متغیر مشتریان،امکان تغییر و ابتکار در محصولات و  خدمات شرکت‌ها را امری بسیار مهم و ضروری ساخته است. خدمات جدید را می‌توان هسته اصلی مزیت‌های رقابتی شرکت‌ها به‌حساب آورد. انطباق با محیط متلاطم، نیازمند جریانی مداوم از توسعه و ارائه محصولات جدید است. بر این اساس در پژوهش حاضر تاثیر استراتژی‌های هم‌رقابتی، یادگیری سازمانی و کسب‌وکار بر توسعه خدمات جدید مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. تحقیق حاضر از حیث هدف، کاربردی و از حیث ماهیت یا روش گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی (غیر آزمایشی) از شاخه مطالعات میدانی به شمار می‌آید. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه محقق ساخته با بهره‌گیری از شاخص‌های پیشینه تحقیق است. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه با نظر خبرگان و اساتید مورد تایید قرار گرفت و پایایی پرسشنامه از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به میزان 899/0 تایید گردید. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، مدیران فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای استان تهران مشتمل بر 699 فروشگاه از فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای افق کورش، شهروند، رفاه، اتکا، میادین میوه و تره‌بار شهرداری، هایپراستار، نجم خاورمیانه، هایپرسان، هایپرمی، ایران مال و شهر فرش می‌باشد و تعداد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای در دسترس و با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 248 فروشگاه زنجیره‌ای انتخاب گردید. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از رویکرد مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. یافته‌های این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد: استراتژی‌های هم‌رقابتی، یادگیری سازمانی و کسب‌وکار بر توسعه خدمات جدید در فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای استان تهران تاثیر دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The effect of competitive strategies, organizational learning and business on the development of new services in chain stores

نویسندگان English

Reza Moradi Latrei 1
Naser Yazdani 2
1 M.A. Student, Business dministration Department, University of Shahed, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate professor, Business Administration Department, Shahed University
چکیده English

Introduction:
Increasing competition in the current era and facing diverse and changing needs and demands of customers and the possibility of change and innovation in the products offered by companies in the service sector, which is due to the flexible nature of these products, make innovation and providing new services very important. It has made it important and necessary. New services can be considered as the core of competitive advantages of companies. Adapting to a turbulent environment requires a constant stream of new product development and delivery. Services are an indispensable part of every economy, and all successful economies, including industrial and commercial economies, owe a high share of their national gross product to the service sector. The increasing growth of this field and the consequent development of competition between companies are among the factors that highlight the importance of developing new services. The truth is that without paying attention to improving services and providing new services, organizations can never experience a sustainable and favorable growth for a long time. Due to many changes (such as the development of markets, globalization, changes in the rules of competition in industries and technological advances) that have affected the service industry, companies have both the opportunity and the need to use their skills and resources in a creative way to use there are potential and unprecedented advantages of this field. The development of new services is a set of activities that lead to partial or total changes and modifications in providing services to different parts of the market. Due to rapid changes in the state of technology and customer preferences, organizations cannot always rely on their existing services. Based on this, in the current research, the impact of competitive strategies, organizational learning and business on the development of new services has been investigated.
Methodology:
The research is an applied one in terms of its purpose, and a descriptive (non-experimental) one in terms of the nature or method of data collection, from the branch of field studies. The data collection tool is a researcher-made questionnaire using the indicators obtained from the research background. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the opinion of experts and professors, and the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which was more than 0/899. The statistical population of this research is the managers of chain stores in Tehran province, including 699 stores from the chain stores of Ofogh Koresh, Shahrvand, Refah, Etka, Fruit and Vegetable Squares, Hyper Star, Najm Middle East, Hypersun, Hyperme, Iran Mall., Shahr Farash, and the number of samples was selected using the available cluster random sampling method and using Cochran's formula, 248 chain stores. Data analysis was done using the structural equation modeling approach.
Results and Discussion:
According to the purpose of this research to investigate the impact of competitive strategies, organizational learning and business on the development of new services in chain stores of Tehran province, the findings of this research show that competitive strategies, organizational learning and business have an effect on the development of new services in chain stores in Tehran province.
Conclusion
Therefore, these are suggested: 1. Senior managers who have the competence to build culture, be the pioneers of an internal revolution and a new dynamic, the alignment of individual goals and strategic goals will facilitate the strategy implementation process, and the adoption of a suitable strategy requires change whether we like it or not that directing and managing this change requires an adequate understanding of human resources.2. People who have capabilities in their field of work be given the necessary space to grow in the stores because it causes the growth of the store. 3. In the store, employees should be given the necessary training to learn and apply business strategy so that they can improve in their field of work. 4. By improving the quality and suitable human resources, high learning can be achieved, which will lead to the achievement of the focus strategy and can cause the retention and attraction of customers. 5. Personnel should provide services in new ways and benefit from new and updated technology compared to other competitors, and also remove existing old methods and procedures in order to achieve differentiation. 6. Managers should focus their activities in line with the chosen strategy and organize the necessary management decisions and actions. 7. Managers should prepare a comprehensive and coordinated action plan according to the organizational goals in the next 5 years that they are involved in drafting. It is better for these programs to be evaluated and operationally controlled in the expected time according to the allocated budget and the progress of the program.8. The personnel should have a proper way of dealing with the requests of the customers and have a customer-oriented culture and proper attention to the demands of the customers so that the customers buy the things they need. 9. The implementation of appropriate management methods using business strategy leads to the increase of service development, and finally, reducing the price of services increases the competitiveness of stores. 10. Redesigning jobs prevents employees from wasting their time, and also selecting and hiring the most qualified people provides profitable areas and reducing store costs. 11. Increasing the quality of providing technical guidance and how to inform about the store's product and service capabilities. 12. The necessary guidance should be provided transparently to perform requested services through the training of store personnel to increase customer satisfaction and ultimately sales. 13. Increasing the quality of providing services and solving product problems, as well as timely delivery and determining the duration of solving problems and how to inform in the store. 14. Regular handling of customer complaints and differentiation in the warranty period of their products compared to similar products in the store.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

"Competitive strategy"
"Organizational learning"
"Business strategy"
"New service development"
  1. Acquaah, M., & Yasai-Ardkani, M. (2008). Does the implementation of a combination competitive strategy yield incremental performance benefits? A new perspective from a transition economy in SubSaharan Africa. Journal of Business Research, 61(4), 346–354. https://DOI.org/1016/j.jbusres.2007,06,021
  2. Kalani, A., Tarkhni E., Mohamadi, S., A. M., & Tayebi, S. (2016). The relationship between organizational agility, learning organization in the Ministry of Youth and Sports of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Sports; 2(8), 73-84. https://DOI.org/10.22044/shm.2014.277]in Persian[
  3. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://DOI.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  4. Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge5(2), 140-149. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002
  5. Anderage, L., Vijeh, A., & Zarbazo, M. (2019). “Investigating the impact of transformational leadership on supply chain coordination with the mediating role of organizational learning”, Amad Scientific Journal, 19(72), 121- magiran.com/p2138214] in Persian[
  6. Argyris, c., & schon D.A. (1987). Organhzational learning, Addison-Wesly.at: (http://www.adeptlm. com/images/Full_NPD_Flow.gifandimgrefurl)
  7. Bagherzadeh M., Kobra, D. A. (2015). Relationship between intelligence and organizational agility. Journal of business, 2(5):103-21. https://net/dor/20.1001.1.22520104.1389.2.5.5.0]in Persian[
  8. Chevalley, T., Cruz-Tochon, A., Portela, M., Padlina, I., Brulhart-Citozi, D., & Ferrari, S. (2021). Development and evaluation of fracture liaison service in Switzerland. Journal of Revue Medicale Suisse, 17(735), 780-783. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0523-8.
  9. Czakon, W., Fernandez, A. S. & Minà, A. (2019). Editorial–From paradox to practice: the rise of coopetition strategies. International Journal of Business Environment, 6(1), 1-10. DOI:1504/IJBE.2014.058040
  10. Edvardsson, B., Meiren, T., Schäfer, A., & Witell, L. (2013). Having a strategy for new service development – does it really matter? Journal of Service Management, 24 (1), 25-44. DOI:1108/09564231311304170
  11. Exworthy, M., and Lafond, S. (2021). New development: Commercialization of the english national health service: a necessity in times of financial austerity? Journal of Public Money and Management, 41(1), 81-84. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2020.1795359
  12. Fang, J., Shao, Y., & Wen, C. (2016). Transactional quality, relational quality, and consumer e-loyalty: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1205– 1217. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.006
  13. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40, 650–663. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009
  14. Hamidi, D., Wennberg, K., & Berglund, H. (2008). Creativity in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 304–320. DOI:1108/14626000810871691
  15. Hamidizadeh, M., R. (2023). Designing and Creating Businesses, Tehran: Adibanrooz Pub.]in Persian[
  16. Larbig-Wüst, C. (2015). Measuring Customer Involvement in New Service Development Projects, Ph. D thesis, Faculty of Management, Cass Business School, City University of London.
  17. Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2020). Untact: a new customer service strategy in the digital age. Journal of Service Business, 14(1), 1-22. DOI:10.1007/s11628-019-00408-2
  18. Lestari, S. D., Leon, F. M., WIdyastuti, S., BRabo, N. A., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of innovation and business strategy on performance and competitive advantage of SMEs. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business7(6), 365-378.‏ http://dx.DOI.org/ ۱13106/JAFEB.2029.
  19. Levy, M., Loebbecke, C. & Powell, P. (2013). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 3-17. DOI:1057/palgrave.ejis.3000439
  20. Li, C. B., & Li, J. J. (2008). Achieving superior financial performance in China: Differentiation, cost leadership, or both? Journal of International Marketing, 16(3), 1–22. DOI:1509/jimk.16.3.1
  21. Linan, F. (2006). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 257-272. DOI:1007/s11365-008-0093-0
  22. Liu, C. H., Chang, A. Y. P., Horng, J. S., Chou, S. F., and Huang, Y. C. (2020). Co-competition, learning, and business strategy for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 40(7-8), 585-609. DOI:1080/02642069.2019.1571045
  23. Mallén F., Chiva R., Vidal J.A., Guinot J., Ziderman A., & Lange T. (2015). Are altruistic leader’s worthy? the role of organizational learning capability. International Journal of Manpower; 36(3), 271-95. DOI:1108/IJM-09-2013-0212
  24. Mirvahedi, S. S., Hosseinpour, D., & Soltan Mohammadlou, E. (2018). The effect of virtual social networks on the entrepreneurial intention of students, Scientific Journal of Smart Business Management Studies, 8(29), Fall, pp. 35-60. https://DOI.org/10.22054/ims.2019.10375 ]in Persian[
  25. Parnell, J. A. (2011). Strategic capabilities, competitive strategy, and performance among retailers in Argentina, Peru and the United States. Management Decision, 49(1), 139–155. DOI:1108/00251741111094482
  26. Parnell, J. A., Lester, D. L., Long, Z., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2012). How environmental uncertainty affects the link between business strategy and performance in SMEs: Evidence from China, Turkey, and the USA. Management Decision, 5(4), 546–568. DOI:1108/00251741211220129
  27. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York, NY: Free.
  28. Ragin, C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux and C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods, (pp. 87–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  29. Ritala, P. (2017). Coopetition strategy–when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307-324. DOI:1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
  30. Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, JÁ, & Trespalacios, J. A. (2012). How organizational learning affects a firm’s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1079–1089. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.002
  31. Salehi Haqi, N. (2011). Examining the relationship between company strategy, capital structure and performance of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange”. Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, East Azerbaijan Science and Research Unit. ]in Persian[
  32. Seran, T., Pellegrin-Boucher, E., & Gurau, C. (2016). The management of coopetitive tensions within multi-unit organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 31–41. DOI:1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.009
  33. Shapero, A. (1985). The entrepreneurial event. College of Administrative Science, Ohio State University.
  34. Tamayo-Torres, I., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. J., Llorens-Montes, F. J., & Martínez-López, F. J. (2016). Organizational learning and innovation as sources of strategic fit. Journal of Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(8), 1445-1467. DOI:1108/IMDS-12-2015-0518
  35. Tho, N. D., & Trang, N. T. M. (2015). Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1332–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.003
  36. Varnali, K. (2018). Understanding customer journey from the lenses of complexity theory. The Service Industries Journal, 1–16. DOI:1080/02642069.2018.1445725
  37. Wenna, F., and Ruyue, L. (2021). Interaction orientation, strategic flexibility and service innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Science Research Management, 42(3), 80.https://www.kygl.net.cn/EN/Y2021/V42/I3/80. https://www.kygl.net.cn/EN/
  38. Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. DOI:1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
  39. Yu, E., & Sangiorgi, D. (2019). Service design as an approach to implement the value cocreation perspective in new service development. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 40-58. https://DOI.org/10.1177/1094670517709356
  40. Zineldin, M. (2019). Co-opetition: the organisation of the future. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 22(7), 780-790. DOI:1108/02634500410568600
  41. Zhang, P., & Cain, K. W. (2017). Reassessing the link between risk aversion and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of the determinants of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(5), 793–811.DOI:1108/IJEBR-08-2016-0248
دوره 14، شماره 56
زمستان 1402
صفحه 169-187

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 بهمن 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 03 اردیبهشت 1402