فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

نقش اتحاد راهبردی، ابعاد دوسوتوانی و چابکی راهبردی بر عملکرد بین ‏المللی سازمان‏ های ایرانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
امروزه با توجه به تغییرات ناگهانی و چالش‏‌های محیطی گوناگون در بازارهای بین‏‌المللی، عملکرد شرکت‌‏ها دارای اهمیت فراوان است. از این رو چابکی در سطح راهبردی به عاملی تبدیل گردیده که سازمان‏‌ها با استفاده از آن به این تغییرات پاسخ مناسبی دهند. این پاسخ‏‌ها می‏تواند بر مبنای اتخاذ راهبرد‏های اکتشاف و بهره‌‏برداری باشد که بر چابکی راهبردی سازمان تاثیر‏گذار است. این دو بعد دوسوتوانی می‏‌توانند منشا اتحاد‏های راهبردی باشند. اتحادهای راهبردی که توسط شرکت‏‌ها انجام می‏‌گیرد، می‏‌توانند عاملی برای پاسخگویی مناسب به چالش‏‌های محیطی باشد. از این رو هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش اتحاد راهبردی بر عملکرد بین‏‌المللی سازمان‌‏ها با توجه به متغیر‏هایی همچون ابعاد دوسوتوانی و چابکی راهبردی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر را شرکت‏‌هایی تشکیل داده‏‌اند که دارای فعالیت بین‌‏المللی هستند. حجم نمونه شامل 227 شرکت است. ابزار پژوهش حاضر، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته است که روایی و پایایی آن مورد تایید قرار گرفته است. همچنین برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‏‌ها از آزمون معادلات ساختاری و از برنامه Smart-PLS 3.2 استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که اتحاد راهبردی بر اکتشاف و بهره‏‌بردای تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که اتحاد راهبردی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر ابعاد دوسوتوانی دارد. ابعاد دوسوتوانی (اکتشاف و بهره‌‏برداری) نیز تاثیر مثبت و معناداری برچابکی راهبردی دارند. سرانجام چابکی راهبردی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر عملکرد بین‏‌الملل سازمان‏‌ها ایرانی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Examining the international performance of organizations based on strategic alliance, strategic agility, and dimensions of organizational ambivalence

نویسندگان English

Soheila Khoddami 1
Bahareh Osanlou 2
Payam Partovinia 3
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 MA student, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
During the past few decades, the evolution of the international economy has encouraged many companies to search for international markets, therefore, organizations need organizational changes in accordance with the environmental conditions in order to improve their performance. So, organizations need to be aware of their international performance.    Due to sudden changes and various environmental challenges in international markets, the performance of companies is very important. Therefore, agility at the strategic level has become a factor that organizations can use to respond appropriately to these changes. These answers can be based on adopting exploration and exploitation strategies that affect the organization's strategic agility. These two ambidexterity dimensions can be the source of strategic alliances. Strategic alliances made by companies can be a factor in responding appropriately to environmental challenges. Therefore, the current research aims to investigate the impact of strategic alliances on the international performance of organizations about variables such as ambidexterity dimensions and strategic agility. The statistical population of the current research consists of companies that have international activities. The sample size includes 227 companies. The tool of the present research is a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity and reliability have been confirmed. Also, the structural equation test and Smart-PLS 3.2 program were used for data analysis. The results of the present study showed that strategic alliance has a positive and significant effect on exploration and exploitation. Also, the results showed that strategic alliance has a positive and significant effect on the dimensions of ambivalence. The dimensions of ambidexterity (exploration and exploitation) also positively and significantly affect strategic agility. Finally, strategic agility has a positive and significant effect on international performance. International performance is influenced by organizational strategies. One of these strategies is creating strategic agility in the organization. On the other hand, the decision to adopt agile strategies is submerged at the macro level, as is the adoption of two-way strategies (exploration or exploitation). The dimensions of the two pillars allow the organization to respond appropriately to environmental changes in an agile manner. But all these strategies are influenced by organizational alliances. Alliances that are seen today at the strategic level are actually the ultimate level of alliance between two or more organizations. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate the international performance of organizations based on strategic alliance, two-column dimensions (exploration and exploitation), and strategic agility.
Methodology
The current research is in the descriptive-survey category in terms of its nature and collection method. Also, the current research is practical in terms of its purpose. The statistical population of this research is made up of senior managers of Iranian companies that have an international unit. In structural equations, the sample size can be obtained based on the number of research subjects. In between, 227 companies and 364 people completed the questionnaire of this research. Structural equation modeling (SEM) using software PLS was used to examine the relationships between the constructs of this research.
Results and Discussion
The results of the first and second hypothesis point to the positive impact of strategic alliance on exploration and exploitation. Based on this, it can be suggested that by adopting strategic alliances with other companies in the current competitive environment, further exploitation and exploration can be done. It is suggested to the companies to encourage people working in the organization to cooperate with partners by creating a sense of belonging in inter-organizational relations. Also, understanding the sharing of efforts with partners in the face of problems causes these alliances to have a longer lifespan, which makes them explore using research and development in addition to exploiting the existing situation. Also, it is suggested to the senior managers to be aware of the market and business conditions and be fully aware of the existing differences, because start-up companies, especially small and medium-sized companies, are always accompanied by a lack of environmental resources and knowledge. So, it is better to form exploration or exploitation alliances with other companies that have sufficient experience in the relevant business. Organizational managers suggested to gain more knowledge by adopting strategic alliances and make decisions to lead their organization to discover new opportunities in new markets. Of course, the impact of strategic alliances on exploitation is greater than exploration. Therefore, it can be suggested to the senior managers of companies that creating exploitative alliances can be more effective than exploratory alliances. In fact, in these alliances, companies can adjust products, expand services, and increase savings.
According to the third and fourth hypothesis, which refers to the positive and significant impact of exploration and exploitation on strategic agility, it can be suggested to managers to adopt each of these strategies according to environmental changes. It can cause agility at different organizational levels. In fact, with these strategies, the organization adapts itself to environmental challenges. It is suggested that in order to expand products quickly and easily in a new environment, it is better to use discovery-based strategies such as commercializing new products, inventing new products, and using new distribution channels. According to the discovery of emerging products, step pricing methods can be used and in case of increased competition, the type of pricing can be changed in an agile way. Also, for the rapid expansion of products in the current environment, frequent modifications and changes in products and services can be used as well as the introduction of these modified products. Considering the greater impact of discovery strategies than exploitation on strategic agility, it is suggested to use discovery strategies such as inventing new products and using new environmental opportunities that arise from creating strategic alliances. According to the fifth hypothesis, it can be suggested to managers that by acquiring agility at the strategic level, many environmental challenges can be easily solved, which requires rapid changes in the organization's strategies and as a result, products. Therefore, it is suggested to increase their sales volume by changing the variety of products or services available in the markets. Customizing products and services can also increase market share. Other factors, such as quick reaction to competitors' price changes in the international arena and the use of new technologies in production, increase profitability and thus improve the organization's performance.
Conclusion
According to the data analysis, in the current research, it was found that strategic alliance has a positive and significant effect on the dimensions of ambivalence (exploration and exploitation). It was also found that the dimensions of two pillars (exploration and exploitation) have a positive and significant effect on strategic agility. Finally, this research showed that strategic agility has a positive and significant effect on the international performance of organizations.
The findings of the present research led to a better understanding of the managers of the factors that affect the international performance of the organization. In fact, it can be said that managers of international companies can influence their international performance by making appropriate decisions. According to the assumptions of the research, it showed that organizations should form strategic alliances with other organizations to easily overcome these obstacles due to the uncertainty and lack of resources they need. On the other hand, the formed strategic alliances are more inclined to take advantage of the existing situation, hence they form strategic alliances of the type of exploitation. Also, the adoption of two-dimensional strategies (exploration and exploitation) will increase the strategic agility of organizations. This effect is much greater when organizations intend to use an exploration strategy than when they have an exploitation strategy. The research showed that strategic agility in today's complex environment improves the international performance of organizations.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategic alliance
Organizational ambidexterity
Strategic agility
International performance
  1. Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Donbesuur, F., Ahsan, M., Danso, A., & Uddin, M. (2022). Strategic agility of SMEs in emerging economies: Antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions. International Business Review31(6), 102032. ‏ doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102032
  2. Aghajani (2014). The effect of Strategic Alliance on Organizational Performance (The case of Alliance between Navard Aluminum Arak & Aluminum Pars). Strategic Management Researches, 20(55), 9-34. (In Persian)
  3. Ahammad, M. F., Basu, S., Munjal, S., Clegg, J., & Shoham, O. B. (2021). Strategic agility, environmental uncertainties and international performance: The perspective of Indian firms. Journal of World Business56(4), 101218.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101218
  4. Ahammad, M. F., Glaister, K. W., & Gomes, E. (2020). Strategic agility and human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100700. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100700
  5. Ferraris, A., Degbey, W. Y., Singh, S. K., Bresciani, S., Castellano, S., Fiano, F., & Couturier, J. (2022). Microfoundations of strategic agility in emerging markets: empirical evidence of Italian MNEs in India. Journal of World Business57(2), 101272. ‏ doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100700
  6. Ahmadi, Parviz, Fayaz Ghaziani, Mina, (2018). Dosotovani. Tehran: Safar Publications. (In Persian)
  7. AlTaweel, I. R., & Al-Hawary, S. I. (2021). The mediating role of innovation capability on the relationship between strategic agility and organizational performance. Sustainability13(14), 7564.‏ org/10.3390/su13147564
  8. Azar, A., Zabihi, M., & Mollaei, M. (2020). The Impact of Organizational Agility on Increasing the Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Development & Evolution Mnagement, 12(42), 11-18. (In Persian)
  9. Badkoobei, M., & Esfidani, M. R. (2022). Designing a model of international marketing strategy and export performance in small and medium-sized companies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(52), 255-285. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.163805. (In Persian)
  10. Beverland, M. B., Wilner, S. J., & Micheli, P. (2015). Reconciling the tension between consistency and relevance: design thinking as a mechanism for brand ambidexterity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43, 589-609.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8
  11. Brand, M., Tiberius, V., Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. (2021). Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework. Review of Managerial Science15(1), 157-187.‏ doi: 10.1007/s11846-019-00373-0
  12. Cacciolatti, L., Rosli, A., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & Chang, J. (2020). Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. Journal of Business Research106, 106-117.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047
  13. Camargo Benavides, A. F., Ehrenhard, M., De Visser, M., & de Weerd‐Nederhof, P. C. (2022). Interfirm cooperatives enabling organizational ambidexterity, a case study of the printing industry in Colombia.Thunderbird International Business Review64(5), 477-491.‏ doi: 10.1002/tie.22283
  14. Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge6(4), 203-213.‏ doi:10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003
  15. Ebrahimpuor azbari, M., nopasand asil, S. M., & kazemi, O. (2017). The effect of market exploitation and exploration on market performance. New Marketing Research Journal, 6(4), 107-124. (In Persian)
  16. Esmaeilpour, R., parishani, A., & eivazinezhad, S. (2022). Challenges in implementing the strategic plan in the bank Industry. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(49), 123-143. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.125228. (In Persian)
  17. Farhana, M., & Swietlicki, D. (2020). Dynamic capabilities impact on innovation: Niche market and startups. Journal of technology management & innovation15(3), 83-96.‏ doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242020000300083 
  18. Faryabi, M., Rahimiaghdam, S., Kousheshi, M., PourAghabalaei, A. (2019). Effect of market orientation and international experience on export performance with the mediating role of international marketing strategy. Journal of International Business Administration, 2(1), 23-44. (In Persian)
  19. Ferraris, A., Degbey, W. Y., Singh, S. K., Bresciani, S., Castellano, S., Fiano, F., & Couturier, J. (2022). Microfoundations of strategic agility in emerging markets: empirical evidence of Italian MNEs in India. Journal of World Business57(2), 101272. ‏‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101272
  20. Ferraris, A.Santoro, G.Bresciani, S.and Carayannis, E.G. (2018), "HR practices for explorative and exploitative alliances in smart cities: Evidences from smart city managers’ perspective", Management Decision, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 1183-1197. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0384
  21. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2021). The influence of strategic alliances on innovation and new product development through the effects of exploration and exploitation. Management decision59(3), 524-567.‏ ‏ doi: 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1239
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research18(1), 39-50. ‏doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
  23. Ghamkhari, S. M. (2021). Providing a Model of Strategic Agility Determining its Status in Knowledge-Based Industries. Public Organizations Management9(2), 137-152. doi: 10.30473/ipom.2020.52908.4092 (In Persian)
  24. Gibbs, R., & Humphries, A. (2009). Strategic alliances and marketing partnerships: gaining competitive advantage through collaboration and partnering. Kogan Page Publishers.‏
  25. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal49(4), 693-706. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
  26. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, Cengage Learning.
  27. Hair, J.F.Risher, J.J.Sarstedt, M.and Ringle, C.M. (2019), "When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM", European Business Review, 31( 1), pp. 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  28. Hatameh, A., & Khalilnezhad, S. (2022). The impact of explorative learning on business model innovation with the mediating role of strategic agility. Journal of Strategic Management Studies13(51), 27-47. (In Persian)
  29. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science43, 115-135. ‏DOI:1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  30. Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship3, 223-243. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-005-1133-2
  31. ‏Junni, P., Chang, Y. Y., & Sarala, R. M. (2020). Ambidextrous orientation and performance in corporate venture units: A multilevel analysis of CV units in emerging market multinationals. Long range planning53(6), 101930.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101930
  32. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. Y., & Weber, Y. (2015). The role of strategic agility in acquisitions. British Journal of Management26(4), 596-616. ‏doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12115
  33. Kauppila, O. P. (2015). Alliance management capability and firm performance: Using resource-based theory to look inside the process black box. Long Range Planning48(3), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.006
  34. Lee, O. K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research26(2), 398-417. doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0577
  35. Lyn Chan, J. I., & Muthuveloo, R. (2021). Antecedents and influence of strategic agility on organizational performance of private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Studies in Higher Education46(8), 1726-1739.‏ org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1703131
  36. Nikbakht, M., Moshabaki, A., Kordnaeij, A., & Khodadad Hosseini, S. H. (2019). Identifying and Ranking of Factors Influencing the Formation of Types of International Strategic Alliance. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 18(39). doi: 10.29252/jbmp.18.39.13.(In Persian)
  37. Rashnavadi, Y., Sadeghvaziri, F., & Nosrat Panah, R. (2021). Improve company performance through knowledge management capabilities, strategic flexibility and strategic agility; The mediating role of business model innovation. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 4(1), 79-106. (In Persian)
  38. Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of management journal44(6), 1263-1280. ‏ doi: 10.5465/3069400
  39. Russo, A., & Schena, R. (2021). Ambidexterity in the context of SME alliances: Does sustainability have a role? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management28(2), 606-615. ‏ doi: 10.1002/csr.2072
  40. Samadovich, S. M., & Zarnigor, V. (2023). Features of Strategic Alliances in the Global Economy. American Journal of Economics and Business Management6(1), 100-105.‏
  41. Simeoni, F., Brunetti, F., Mion, G., & Baratta, R. (2020). Ambidextrous organizations for sustainable development: the case of fair-trade systems. Journal of Business Research112, 549-560.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.020
  42. Talebi, K., Farsi, J. Y., & Miriasl, H. (2017). Identifying the impact of strategic alliances on the performance of SMEs (case study: the industry of automotive parts manufacturers in Iran). International business research10(6), 227-235. ‏ doi:10.5539/ibr.v10n6p227
  43. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis48(1), 159-205.‏
  44. Voss, K. E., Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., Sakano, T., & Takenouchi, H. (2006). Relational exchange in US‐Japanese marketing strategic alliances.International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330610712139
  45. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195. ‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  46. Xue, R., & Li, L. (2023). Strategic alliances and firms’ chances to survive “black swans” in B2B industries. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing38(3), 444-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0530
  47. Yan, J., Tsinopoulos, C., & Xiong, Y. (2021). Unpacking the impact of innovation ambidexterity on export performance: Microfoundations and infrastructure investment. International Business Review30(1), 101766.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101766
  48. Zahoor, N., Al‐Tabbaa, O., & Khan, Z. (2023). R&D alliances and SMEs post‐entry internationalization speed: The impact of alliance management capability and co‐innovation ambidexterity.Global Strategy Journal. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1481
دوره 15، شماره 58
تابستان 1403
صفحه 193-211

  • تاریخ دریافت 14 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 24 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 خرداد 1402