فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

مبانی معرفت‌شناسی قرآنی تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مرضیه بخشی ریزی 1
اسدالله کرد نائیج 2
احمد آکوچکیان 3
سید حمید خداداد حسینی 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، مرکز تحقیقات راهبردی توسعه (رشد)، قم، ایران
10.22034/smsj.2022.342439.1670
چکیده
  هر حوزه‌ای از دانش مانند دانش تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی که در پی ورود به واقعیت تجربی برای ایجاد تغییر است، ریشه در جهان‌بینی حاکم بر آن دارد و نمی‌تواند بدون توجه به مبانی زاویۀ فکری خود طراحی و اجرا شود. بدین‌سان برای دستیابی به دانش تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی قرآن‌بنیان، چاره‌ای جز تنظیم معرفتی آن از سطح مبانی زاویۀ فکری تا سطح تجربی، مبتنی بر آموزه‌های وحیانی نیست. در این راستا، در پژوهش پیش رو، مبنی بر سازوکار ترکیبی روش دلالت‌پژوهی و منطق دلالت در پیشینه علم اصول، با استناد به سورۀ انفال کوشش شده است تا با استفاده از تحلیل تم و تحلیل محتوا در نرم‌افزار atlas.ti، نمونه‌هایی از دلالت‌های مبتنی بر مبانی معرفت‌شناسی مرتبط با موضوع تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی فهم و تبیین شود. حاصل این فرآیند استخراج 192 کد اولیه، 14 مضمون پایه و 6 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده شامل نقش و کیفیت پیوستگی ادراکات حقیقی، اعتباری و وجدانی در تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی، تبلور فاعل تصمیم‌گیرنده از جنبه نظری و کاربردی، دانش گفتمان‌آفرین تغییر و تحول در تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی، جایگاه ارزش‌ها در تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی، منابع معرفت در تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی و اعتبار منابع معرفت در تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی، در ذیل یک مضمون دلالی فراگیر، یعنی نمونه مبانی معرفت‌شناسی تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی بوده است. گفتنی است نتایج تحقیق در مبانی معرفت‌شناسی قرآن‌بنیان در حوزۀ تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی است و این مهم، زمینه‌ساز تولید، فرآوری تدوین جامع نظریه و دانش تصمیم‌گیری راهبردی قرآن‌بنیان از سوی پژوهشگران این حوزه و بدین‌سان ارائۀ مدل‌های کاربردی خودویژه برای مدیران راهبردی، از چشم‌انداز جریان فکر دینی (قرآنی) در عینیت تحقیق و توسعه‌ای است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تصمیم‌گیری استراتژیک
مبانی معرفت‌شناختی
پارادایم
قرآن
دلالت‌پژوهی

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Fundamentals of the Quran’s Epistemology of Strategic Decision-Making

نویسندگان English

Marzie Bakhshi rizi 1
Asadollah Kordnaiij 2
Ahmad Akouchakian 3
Seyyed Hamid Khodadad Hoseini 2
1 PhD student, Department of Business Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Strategic Development Research Center (Roshd), Qom, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
 The emergence and processing of thought, theory, conceptual, and operational model of theological management of development, and thus the production of Quranic strategic decision-making knowledge, and solving strategic social and civilizational problems and challenges of Islamic-Iranian society depend on their methodical production and processing from revelatory teachings. Like any other scientific structure, the proper establishment of the epistemological structure of strategic decision-making knowledge based on the Quran requires attention to its "nature of paradigm fundamentals". Thus, every field of knowledge, such as the knowledge of strategic decision-making that seeks to enter the empirical reality for change, is rooted in the dominant world-view, and it cannot be designed and implemented without considering its paradigmatic principles. Therefore, to acquire the Qur'an-based knowledge of strategic decision-making, there is no option to adjust it epistemologically from the level of paradigm principals to the empirical level, based on revelatory teachings.
Methodology
Based on the combined mechanism of the implication research method and implication logic in the literature of the science of principles and according to AL - ANFAL Surah, the present research sought to understand and explain examples of implications based on fundamentals of Epistemology related to the subject of strategic decision-making using thematic analysis and content analysis in ATLAS.ti software.
Results and Discussion
The research process led to the extraction of  192 primary codes, 14 basic themes, including1. The role of true and credible perceptions in strategic decision-making; 2. The role of the conscientious perceptions in strategic decision-making; 3. The role of the perceptions system in strategic decision making; 4. The decision-maker and in terms of subjectivity and objectivity; 5. The flow of thought elite knowledge in strategic decision making; 6. Discourse knowledge in contrivance and situation of management; 7. Discourse in the field of public knowledge and socio-cultural affairs; 8. Level of tendency (in the field of faith) in strategic decisions; 9. The level of action (in the field of piety) in strategic decisions; 10. The role and place of revelation, intuition, sense and reason in strategic decision making; 11. Credibility of intuitive and face-to-face resources in strategic decision making; 12. Credibility of product resources in strategic decision making, and 6 organizing themes, including: 1. The role and quality of the continuity of true, credible and conscientious perceptions in strategic decision-making; 2. Crystallization of the decision-maker in terms of subjectivity and objectivity; 3. discourse-creating knowledge of change in strategic decision-making; 4. the position of values in strategic decision-making; 5. resources of knowledge in strategic decision-making; 6. validity of knowledge resources in strategic decision-making, under an inclusive implication theme, namely the fundamentals of the Epistemology of strategic decision-making. The results of the present manuscript included an example of the fundamentals of Quran-based Epistemology in the field of strategic decision-making. The connection of this field of knowledge with religious sciences, on the one hand, gives a better and deeper understanding and analysis of events and problems, and consequently a more appropriate action, gives strategic decision-makers, and on the other hand  underlies the production, processing, and development of the theory and knowledge of strategic decision-making of the Quran by researchers, and thus the presentation of specific applied models for strategic managers from the perspective of religious (Quranic) thoughts in research and development objectivity.
Conclusion
Paradigms and models are realized in epistemic, historical, cultural, and social tools and contexts, and even in territorial and regional, and it is required to pay attention to their ecology. If progress is considered as an approach and style of life and specific life world that a school - for example, Islam - has provided for human perfection and life; in addition to inherent features embedded in this lifestyle, the situation of time and place should also be taken into account to implement it and then, an instance should be designed from that life-world and lifestyle so that it can be implemented in that situation of time and place. Accordingly, it is necessary to seriously modify the ideological and practical foundations of macro level decision makers as well as the educational and research system of the country in accordance with the requirements of an Iranian - Islamic culture to respond to the current strategic issues of the country and scientifically and practically update the academic textbooks in the field of strategic management (and particularly strategic decision making). Hence, while enjoying the achievements of today’s knowledge, the epistemic foundations of this knowledge should naturally be adopted from the Quranic teachings and the prophetic tradition - administrators and compatible with Iranian culture.   

کلیدواژه‌ها English

: strategic decision making
fundamentals of epistemology
Paradigm
Quran
implication research method
  1. The Holy Quran
  2. Abbaspoor, A. (2003). The status of decision making in management, searching for organizational decision, models and paradigms, Kamal Management Journal, (2&3), 29-56
  3. Ahmad, M., Shah, S. Z. A., & Abbass, Y. (2021). The role of heuristic-driven biases in entrepreneurial strategic decision-making: evidence from an emerging economy. Management Decision, 59(3), 669-691.‏ DOI:1108/MD-09-2019-1231
  4. Akuchekian, A. (2021). Hoda Interpretation. Limited printing. Qom: Foundation for Religious Thought and Development Studies. ]In Persian[
  5. Akuchekian, A. (2021). Advanced interpretive paradigmatic ijtihad. Qom: Foundation for Religious Thought and Development Studies. ]In Persian[
  6. Akuchekian, A. (2021). The system of Qur'anic revelation: a model of strategic futurism. Qom: Foundation for Religious Thought and Development Studies. ]In Persian[
  7. Alavi, S. A. (2007). An Introduction to the Impact of Islamic Culture Components on Decision Making. Management Thought. (1), 35-58. ]In Persian[
  8. Alipour, M. & Hassani S. H. (2016). The Ijtihad Paradigm of Religious Knowledge, Qom: Research Institution of University and Seminary. ]In Persian[
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.‏
  10. Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 365-401.‏
  11. Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 365-401.‏
  12. Camuffo, A., Gambardella, A., & Pignataro, A. (2022). Framing Strategic Decisions in the Digital World. Strategic Management Review.‏ 4(2):127-160. DOI:1561/111.00000055
  13. Chahardoli, A. & Delangiz, A. (2020). Analyzing and understanding the implications of the four philosophical paradigms with an Islamic approach, Tehran: University Publications and Higher Research Institute of National Defense and Strategic Research. ]In Persian[
  14. Danaeefard, H. (2010). The Paradigms in the Science of Organization and Management: A Comparative Approach to Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology, Bimonthly Research and Academic Shahed University, 14(26), 89-104. ]In Persian[
  15. Danaeifard, H. (2007). The Paradigms in the Science of Organization and Management: A Comparative Approach to Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology. Bimonthly Scientific-research Journal of Shahed University, 14(26), 89- 104. ]In Persian[
  16. Danaeifard, H. (2017). Methodology of Implication Research Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches and Implementation Stages. Humanities Methodology Quarterly, 22 (86), 39-71. ]In Persian[
  17. Darling, J. R., & Seristö, H. T. (2004). Key steps for success in export markets: A new paradigm for strategic decision making. European Business Review. 16(1):28-43. DOI:1108/09555340410512394.
  18. Dehghani, L., Shokrani, R. & Naghshineh Arjmand, H. (2012). Investigating the effect of perception of justice on managers' decision making based on Islamic teachings. Two Scientific-research Quarterly Journals of Islamic Management, 19(2), 35-64. ]In Persian[
  19. Dialameh, N. (2014). The effect of divine unity on management knowledge, Tehran: Imam Sadegh University. ]In Persian[
  20. Dialmeh, N. (2014). The Impact of Monotheistic Worldview on Management Knowledge. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University. ]In Persian[
  21. S. h.)1999(. Epistemology from the perspective of some Islamic and Western philosophers, Qom: Qom Seminary Islamic publicity Office Publishing Center. ]In Persian[
  22. Elna A. Orlova (1982). Interaction Paradigms of DecisionـMaking, International Political Science Review, 3(2), 212-217.
  23. Fadaei, G. (2016). An inquiry concerning Ontology and Epistemology, Tehran: Amirkabir publication.
  24. Faiz, Q. (1999). Criteria for recognizing verses and surahs of Makki and Madani. Articles and Reviews, (66), 47- 68.
  25. Foroutani, Z. (2019). Fundamentals of Imam Khomeini's Strategic Decision-Making, Tehran: Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute.
  26. Forozandeh Dehkordi, L., Mahmoodi Meimand, M., Abesi, S., & Haddad Zadeh, M. (2015). Identifying factors and components of intuition in decision making in viewpoint of Holy Quran. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 3(4), 75ـ ‏]In Persian[
  27. Gaeini, A. & Hoseinzadeh, A. (2012). Three positivist, interpretative and Hermeneutical paradigms in the studies about management and organization, Rabord e Farhang, (19), 103-138. ]In Persian[
  28. Gaeini, A. (2020). The Epistemology of theories of organization and management, Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University.
  29. Gerras, Stephen J. (2010). Strategic leadership primer, 3rd Edition, United States Army War College, 35-47.
  30. Goldoff, A. C. (2000). Decision-making in organizations: the new paradigm. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(11), 2017-2044.‏
  31. Goodarzi, Gh. (2007). Image theory and strategic decision. Management Thought, (1), 93-109.]In Persian[
  32. Haddadzadeh, M. (2018). Formulation of an Islamic model of intuition in strategic decision making. Management in Islamic University, 7(1), 179-199.
  33. Hamidi Nia, T. (2017). The relationship between man's knowledge and faith with their actions from the perspective of Allameh Tabatabai and Allameh Jafar. Master Thesis. University of Tabriz. ]In Persian[
  34. Hamlin, D. (1995). The history of epistemology, translated by Shapoor Etemad, Tehran: The Institute of Human sciences and cultural studies. ]In Persian[
  35. Hassani, S. H. R. (2020). Introduction to analytical paradigm of the practical knowledge, Qom: Research Institute of the Hawzah and University. ]In Persian[
  36. Hossainzadeh Yazdi, M. (2017). Comprehensive Inquiry in the depth of epistemology, Qom: Hekmate Islami. ]In Persian[
  37. Hossainzadeh, M. (2000). Foundations of the religious knowledge, Qom: The Imam Khomaini education and research institute. ]In Persian[
  38. Iman, M. T. & Kalateh Sadati, A. (2019). Philosophy of Research in Social Sciences. Tehran: SAMT and The Institute of Research and Development of Humanities.]In Persian[
  39. Iman, M. T. & Kalateh Sadati, A. (2020). Methodology of Humanities in Muslim Thinkers, Qom: Research Institution of University and Seminary.
  40. Iman, M. T. (2014). Paradigm Evaluation of Development Plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Qom: Research Institution of University and Seminary. ]In Persian[
  41. Javadi Amoli, A. (2014). Tafsir Tasnim (Vols. 32 ـ 33), Qom: Asraa.
  42. Karimi, sh. & Navabakhsh, M. (2019). Analysis of the concept of "subject" in discourse analysis approaches. Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies. 11 (2), 7-19. ]In Persian[
  43. Khanifar, H. & Muslimi, N. (2020). Fundamentals and principles of qualitative research methods (Volume 1). Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications. ]In Persian[
  44. Khashei, V. (2015). A theoretical introduction to strategic decision-making based on wisdom. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Islamic Management, 23(2), 43-66.
  45. Kordnaiij, A. (2018). Strategic Thinking and Management. Theory and Practice. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. ]In Persian[
  46. Leiblein, M. J., Reuer, J. J., & Zenger, T. (2018). What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Science, 3(4), 558-573.‏
  47. Lotfi, A. & Mirza, A. H. (2018). Approaches to theorizing decision-making verses in Islamic management resources. Two scientific-promotional Quarterly Journals of Quran and Science, 11 (20), 49-75. ]In Persian[
  48. Maarefat, M. H. (1992). Teaching Quranic sciences. Translation: Abu Muhammad Vakili. Tehran: Islamic Propaganda Organization. ]In Persian[
  49. Makarem Shirazi, N. (1993). Tafsir Nemooneh ( 7). Tehran: Islamic Library. ]In Persian[
  50. Mirzajani Bijarpasi, M. & Sadeghi Niri, R. (2020), Discourse of Quran against short measure, Journal of the Holy Quran and Islamic Texts,11(42), 179-200. ]In Persian[
  51. Moallemi, H. (2010), Looking at Epistemology in western philosophy, Tehran: Research Institute for Islamic culture and thought. ]In Persian[
  52. Mohammadpour, A. (2019). Method in Method (Second Edition). About the construction of knowledge in the humanities. Tehran: Logos. ]In Persian[
  53. Naqipoorfar, V. A. (2004). Essentials of Islamic managment and its patterns. Tehran: Publication of the Higher Institute of Management Education and Research and Planning. ]In Persian[
  54. Naseri Sadr, Z. (2020). The dialectic of enlightenment and human captivity. Scientific and specialized journal of philosophy of religion, theology and religious research, 2(3), 95-114. ]In Persian[
  55. Nazemi Ardakani, M. (2012). Dynamic and transformational organization, Tehran: Saqi. ]In Persian[
  56. Nooraie, M. (2008). Decision magnitude of impact and strategic decision‐making process output: The mediating impact of rationality  of the decision-making process. Management Decision. 46(4):640-655. DOI:1108/00251740810865102.
  57. Oppenheimer, D. M., & Kelso, E. (2015). Information processing as a paradigm for decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66(1), 277-294.‏
  58. Papulova, Z., & Gazova, A. (2016). Role of strategic analysis in strategic decision-making. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 571-579.
  59. Qaraati, M. (2010). Interpretation of Light (Volume 3). Tehran: Cultural Center for Quranic lessons. ]In Persian[
  60. Rahmani, N. (2016). Investigating the role of revelation in rational-intuitive decision making. Two Scientific-specialized Quarterly Journals of Islam and Management, 5(10), 29-52. ]In Persian[
  61. Razini, R. & Azizi, M. (2015). Designing a decision-making model with an Islamic approach. Tehran: Islamic Management Quarterly, 4(23), 100-73. ]In Persian[
  62. Rezaei Isfahani, M. A. (2009). Mehr Quran Interpretation (Vol. 3). Qom: Research on Quranic Interpretation and Sciences. ]In Persian[
  63. Rezanejad, L. (2016). Producing and Logical Relationship in the real and conventional perceptions, Sadra Magazine of Islamic Human Sciences, 5(19), 82-89. ]In Persian[
  64. Sadeghi Tehrani, M. (1986). Al-Furqan Fi Tafsir Al-Quran (Vol. 12). Qom: Islamic Culture. ]In Persian[
  65. Sadr, S.M. B. (1986). The Science of Principles, Nusratullah Hekmat, translator. Tehran: Amirkabir. ]In Persian[
  66. Sam Khanian, M. R., & Fayyaz, I. (2021). Explaining and criticizing the paradigmatic approach in Western educational thoughts. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 14(33), 166-188.‏] In Persian[
  67. Shakhsian, F. )2016(. Designing a strategic decision-making model with an Islamic approach. (Doctoral dissertation). Payam e Noor University. Tehran Iran. ]In Persian[
  68. Steen, E. V. D. (2017). A formal theory of strategy. Management Science, 63(8), 2616-2636.‏
  69. Tabarsi, F. (1993). Tafsir Majma 'al-Bayyan fi Tafsir al-Quran (Vol. 4), Tehran: Nasser Khosrow. ]In Persian[
  70. Tabatabai, M. T. (1995). Almizan Interpretation (Vol. 9). Qom: Qom Seminary Teachers Association, Islamic Publications Office. ]In Persian[
  71. The Fundamental Workgroup of Islamic Management (2019). Comperensive Map of Islamic Management (NAJMA). The Research Part. Qom: Qom University.
  72. Tusi, M. (1986). Al-Tebyan fi Tafsir al-Quran (Vol. 5). Arab Heritage Revival House. Lebanon: Beirut.
  73. Yathribi, Y. (2011). Interpretation of the Day (Vol. 3). Tehran: Amirkabir. ]In Persian[
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 14، شماره 56
زمستان 1402
صفحه 189-209

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 آبان 1401