مدل‌سازی شناختی-هیجانی تبلیغات یکپارچه

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

2 استادیار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

3 دانشیار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف، مدل‌سازی شناختی- هیجانی تبلیغات یکپارچه صورت گرفته است. در این پژوهش، با شناسایی و کشف عناصر و مولفه‌های شناختی و هیجانی در ابزارهای مختلف تبلیغاتی، مدلی متشکل از ابزارهای مختلف تبلیغاتی، همراه با عناصر شناختی و هیجانی شناسایی شده‌، تبیین شده است. رویکرد این پژوهش نظریه داده‌بنیاد کلاسیک می‌باشد؛ در این رویکرد بعد از مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختاریافته، کدگذاری باز ضمن پیاده‌سازی‌های مصاحبه‌ها، انجام گردید. در این مرحله، شکل‌گیری مقوله‌ها و مفاهیم و همچنین کدگذاری انتخابی که به جهت اشباع مقوله‌ها و مفاهیم کشف شده می‌باشد، صورت می‌گیرد. در این پژوهش پس از ۱۶ مصاحبه، اشباع نظری حاصل شد؛ سپس در کد گذاری نظری، چگونگی ارتباط مقوله‌ها با یکدیگر مفهوم سازی گردید. در این مرحله و از طریق کدهای نظری، مفاهیم به یکدیگر مرتبط و مدل پژوهش ایجاد و تبیین گردید. پس از انجام مراحل بیان شده، ۱۱۳ کد استخراج شده است که منجر به پیدایش سه مقوله‌ ۱) برقراری ارتباط دوسویه و دوستانه با مشتری بالقوه با استفاده از عناصر شناختی و هیجانی وب‌سایت سازمانی، ۲) افزایش اثربخشی ابعاد بصری شناختی و هیجانی تبلیغات محیطی سازمان، و ۳) توسعه تعامل و مشارکت مخاطبان پلتفرم اینستاگرام در انتشار محتوای شناختی و هیجانی، گردیده، این سه مقوله دارای نه مفهوم سازنده می‌باشند. برای موفقیت در کمپین‌های تبلیغاتی، می‌بایست، عناصر شناختی و هیجانی کشف شده در تبلیغات یکپارچه به درستی طرح‌ریزی و اجرا شود، تا همراه با برانگیختی هیجانات نسبت به تبلیغات، باعث ایجاد و افزایش توجه و شناخت گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Cognitive-emotional modeling of integrated advertising

نویسندگان [English]

  • Allahyar Ghasemi 1
  • Ahmad Rahchamani 2
  • Hamid Reza Saeednia 3
1 PhD student, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

IntroductionThe research’s aim is cognitive-emotional modeling of integrated advertising by identifying and discovering cognitive and emotional elements and components in different advertising tools. we achieve a model consisting of different advertising tools, along with identified cognitive and emotional elements.
Methodology: The approach of this research is classical Grounded Theory; in this approach, after depth semi-structured interviews with experts and informants in this field, open coding is done while implementing the interviews. Sequential review, review and return to the previous step are the principles of this approach. At this stage, the formation of categories and concepts, which is the main concern of the interviewees and informants, as well as the selective coding that, did to saturate the categories and concepts discovered. In this study, after 16 depth interviews, theoretical saturation obtained. After saturation, sorting takes place; this sorting provides a theoretical blueprint or conceptual framework for formulating classical grounded theory; then in theoretical coding, we conceptualize how categories relate to each other. At this stage, through theoretical codes, we relate the concepts to each other and create a research model.    
Results and Discussion:  After performing the GT’s steps, 113 codes were extracted, which led to the emergence of three categories and nine concepts. These categories include: two-side and friendly communication with the potential customer using the cognitive and emotional elements of the corporate website, which includes four concepts, 1) Designing visual motions and using particles in the corporate website with a focus on Emotional Arousal and Increase cognition (cognitive/emotional). 2) Customer-orientation pop-up design with the aim of expanding two-side and friendly relationships with the role of emotion arousal and intensifying the Cognition of the potential        customer(cognitive/emotional). 3) Innovation in organizational color design in the website with the aim of arousing emotion and visual cognition of the organization (cognitive / emotional). Four- Using organizational slogans on the website with the effect of increasing cognition(cognitive). The second category, increasing the effectiveness of the visual cognitive and emotional dimensions of the organization's environmental advertising, has four concepts: 1) Minimal Design and implementation of the organizational logo in environmental advertising with the effect of increasing cognition (cognitive). 2) Innovation in organizational color design in environmental advertising with the aim of arousing emotion and visual cognition of the organization (emotional / cognitive) 3) Using organizational slogans in environmental advertising with the effect of increasing cognition (cognitive).  
 4) Using a short and sustainable domain name of the website in environmental advertising with an impact on cognition(cognitive). third category, the development of interaction and participation of the audience of the Instagram platform in the dissemination of cognitive and emotional content, including the concept of arousing emotion in the audience using famous personalities in the implementation of content and cognitive impact on the organization.
Conclusion: In order to succeed in advertising campaigns, the cognitive and emotional elements discovered in integrated advertising had properly designed and implemented, in order to create and increase attention and cognition along with arousing emotions towards advertising.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cognition reflection
  • Emotion reflection
  • Organizational slogans
  • Integrated advertising
  • Innovation
  1. Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., & Donato, C. (2020). An investigation on the effectiveness of hedonic versus utilitarian message appeals in luxury product communication. Psychology & Marketing, 37(4), 523-534.
  2. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.
  3. Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009). Affective as a psychological primitive. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 167–218.
  4. Bradshaw, J.L., (1968). Pupil size and problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol. 20, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746808400139.
  5. Binet, L., & Field, P. (2009). Empirical generalizations about advertising campaign success. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 113–114.
  6. Bolls, P., Annie Lang, D., & Robert, F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements, Communication Research, 28 (5), 627–51.
  7. Bossel, V., Geyskens, K., & Goukens, C. (2019). Facing a trend of brand logo simplicity: The impact of brand logo design on consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 129-135.
  8. Borges, L. R., Alves, C. M., Rezende, A. R., Zambalde, E. P., & Naves, E. L. M. (2019). Analysis of complementary colors through brain response and human perception. In XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering(531-536). Springer, Singapore.
  9. Burke, M. C., & Edell, J. E. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. Mark. Res. 26, 69–83. doi: 10.1177/002224378902600106
  10. Cerf, M., & Garcia-Garcia, M. (2017). Consumer Neuroscience(Vol. 1). The MIT Press.
  11. Chamarz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
  12. Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Grounding grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  13. Coleman, N. V., & Williams, P. (2013). Feeling like my self: Emotion profiles and social identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 203– 222.
  14. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Strategies for qualitative data analysis. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3.
  15. Cuesta, U., Martínez-Martínez, L., & Niño, J. I. (2018). A case study in neuromarketing: Analysis of the influence of music on advertising effectivenes through eye-tracking, facial emotion and GSR.  J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Res, 5(2), 84 92.
  16. Clum, L. (2013). A look at flat design and why it's significant. https://uxmag.com/articles/a-look-at-flat-design-and-why-its-significant. Accessed 22 November 2017.
  17. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Berkeley Group.
  18. Damasio, A. R., Everitt, B. J., & Bishop, D. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 351, 1413–1420.
  19. Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of affective sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
  20. De Vries, P., & Van Rompay, T. J. L. (2009, April). Subtle persuasion: The unobtrusive effect of website-banner congruence on trust. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive '09, Claremont, CA.
  21. Delbaere, M., Michael, B., & Phillips, B. J. (2021). Social media influencers: A route to brand engagement for their followers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 101–112
  22. Eijlers, E., Boksem, M. A., & Smidts, A. (2020). Measuring neural arousal for advertisements and its relationship with advertising success. Frontiers in neuroscience, 14, 736. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00736
  23. Escera, C., & Corral, M. J. (2007). Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(3), 251–264.
  24. Farhamgi, A. A., Karoubi, M., & Saadeghvaziri, F., (2015). Classic Grounded Theory; description of generating Gravity Center of Iranian Health Tourism Brand Identity Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 162-145. [in Persian]
  25. Faali, M. (2019). 20 golden tricks to choose the best internet domain name. https://virgool.io/@hamid.faali/
  26. Foroudi, P., Dinnie, K., Kitchen, J.P., Melewar, T.C., & Foroudi, M.M. (2017). IMC antecedents and the consequences of planned Brand identity in higher education, European Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 528-550.
  27. Filieri, R., Lin, Z., Pino, G., Alguezaui, S., & Inversini, A. (2021). The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers' behavioral intention and decisions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 663–675.
  28. Fischer, C., Morlet, D., & Giard, M. (2000). Mismatch negativity and N100 in comatose patients. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5(3–4): 192– 197.
  29. Geuens, M., & Patrick, D. P. (2017). Planning and Conducting Experimental Advertising Research and Questionnaire Design, Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 83–100
  30. Ghosh, T., Sreejesh, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Brand logos versus brand names: A comparison of the memory effects of textual and pictorial brand elements placed in computer games. Journal of Business Research, 147, 222-235.
  31. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Aldine Publishing Company. Chicago.
  32. Glaser, B. G., & Anselm L. S. (1971). Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research, In, W. J. Filstead (ed.) Qualitative Methodology, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company
  33. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.
  34. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs. forcing, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.
  35. Glaser, B. (1993). Examples of grounded theory: A reader, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.
  36. Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.
  37. Glaser, Barney, (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical Coding, Sociology Press.
  38. Glaser B. G., & Holton J, (2005). Staying open: the use of theoretical codes in grounded theory, The Grounded Theory Review, 5(10), 1-20.
  39. Glaser, B. (2013). What is grounded theory? It’s online at: http://www.groundedtheory.com/what-is-gt.aspx
  40. Harari, Y. (2015). Techno religions and silicon prophets [video file]. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6BK5Q_Dblo
  41. Hasangholipour, H., Gholipour, A., ghazimahaleh, M. M., & Arbatani, T. R. (2010). Requirements, necessities and mechanisms of knowledge commercializing in Management Schools/ Faculties. Journal of business Management, 2(6): 41-61. [in Persian]
  42. Heesup, H., Hong Ngoc, N., HakJun, S., Sanghyeop, L., & Bee-Lia, Ch. (2019). Impact of functional/cognitive and emotional advertisements on image and repurchase intention, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28:4, 446-471, DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2019.15318031
  43. He, L., Pelowski, M., Yu, W., & Liu, T. (2021). Neural resonance in consumers' right inferior frontal gyrus predicts attitudes toward advertising. Psychol Mark, 38, 1538– 1549. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21523
  44. Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992). Grounded theory and psychological theorising, British Journal of Psychology, (83), 97-111
  45. Heidarzadeh, K., & Ghasemi, A. (2021). Advertising and integrated brand promotion, 8th Tehran. Elm publication. [in Persian]
  46. Hoeken, H., Hornikx, J., & Linders, Y. (2020). The importance and use of normative criteria to manipulate argument quality. Journal of Advertising, 49(2), 195–201
  47. Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Consum. Res. 14, 404–420
  48. Iyenger, S., & Lepper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006
  49. Jin, C., Yoon, M., & Lee, J. (2019). The influence of brand color identity on brand association and loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 28(1), 50-62. Doi: 1108/JPBM-09-2017-1587.
  50. Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 3310–3315.
  51. Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1, 99–113.
  52. Kityama, S. (1990). Interaction between affect and cognition in word perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 209– 217
  53. Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021a). Influencer advertising on social media: The multiple inference model on influencer‐product congruence and sponsorship disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 130, 405–415.
  54. Kim, M. J., & Lim, J. H. (2019). A comprehensive review on logo literature: research topics, findings, and future directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1291–1365.
  55. Konecnik, M., & Go, F. (2008). Tourism destination brand identity: The case of Slovenia. Journal of Brand Management, 15(3), 177–189
  56. LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Neuroscience Reviews, 7, 54–64.
  57. Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Psychol. 84, 437–450. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007
  58. Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1–19.
  59. Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology, 14(4), 261–292. doi:10.1007/ BF02686918
  60. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
  61. Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Anti-method: Logic and qualitative methodology design. Tehran. Logos Publications. [in Persian]
  62. Morris, J. D., Woo, C., Geason, J. A., & Kim, J. (2002). The power of affect: predicting intention. Advert. Res. 42, 7–17. doi: 10.2501/jar-42-3-7-17
  63. Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2012). The effects of emotion and encoding strategy on associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1056–1069.
  64. Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2014). The route to an integrative associative memory influenced by emotion. PLOS One, 9, 1–8
  65. Myers, M. D. (2016). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.
  66. Olney, T. J., Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1991). Consumer responses to advertising: The effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. Consum. Res. 17, 440–453
  67. O'guinn, T., Allen, C., Semenik, R. J., & Scheinbaum, A. C. (2017). Advertising and Integrated Brand Promotion (Book Only, 8th Edition). Cengage Learning.
  68. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 466–478.
  69. Pham, M. T., Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2013). The influence of adevoked feelings on brand evaluations: empirical generalizations from consumer responses to more than 1000 TV commercials. J. Res.Mark. 30, 383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.04.004
  70. Pieters, R., & Wedel, M. (2004). Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text‐size effects. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 36–50.
  71. Pike, S., & Ryan, C. (2004). Destination positioning analysis through a comparison of cognitive, affective, and conative perceptions. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4), 333–342
  72. Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2019). The role of emotions in advertising: A call to action. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 81-90.
  73. Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Getting a Line on Print Ads: Pleasure and Arousal Reactions Reveal an Implicit Advertising Mechanism, Journal of Advertising, 37 (4), 63–74.
  74. Pozharliev, R., Rossi, D., & De Angelis, M. (2022). A picture says more than a thousand words: Using consumer neuroscience to study instagram users' responses to influencer advertising. Psychology & Marketing. 39, 1336-1349. Doi: 1002/mar.21659.
  75. Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W. J., Van Strien, J.W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: Using EEG to understand consumers' emotional experience with luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 546–558.
  76. Qu, Y., Cao, L., & Xu, F. (2021). Design of an attention-grabbing destination slogan using the attenuation model. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100415.
  77. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology review, 8(4), 364-382.
  78. Richmond, W. (2019). Video ad spending stays strong on social, with CTV gaining. https://www.videonuze.com/article/video-ad-spendingstays- strong-on-social-with-ctv-gaining
  79. Richardson, J. (1996). Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences, Leicester: PBS Books
  80. Riche, N., Mancas, M., Culibrk, D., Crnojevic, V., Gosselin, B., & Dutoit, T. (2012). Dynamic saliency models and human attention: A comparative study on videos. Asian Conference on Computer Videos.
  81. Ries, A. (1996). Focus – the future of your company depends on it. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  82. Rupsiene, L., & Pranskuniene, R. (2010). The variety of grounded theory: Different versions of the same method or different methods? Social Sciences, 4(70), 7-19.
  83. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
  84. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
  85. Russell, J., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal Research in Personality, 11(3), 273–294. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X
  86. Su, Y., Kunkel, T., & Ye, N. (2021). When abs do not sell the impact of male influencers conspicuously displaying a muscular body on female followers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(2), 286–297.
  87. Sadeh, D. (2020). Consumer Neuroscience. Tehran. Anateb. [in Persian]
  88. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics 72, 672–682.
  89. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332-348.
  90. Scott, H. (2007). The temporal integration of connected study into a structured life: A grounded theory. PhD Dissertation, University of Portsmouth. It’s online at: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=Z3JvdW5kZWR0aGVvcnlvbmxpbmUuY29tfHd3d3xneDoyODQ1OWIwNmJmYzRhNzVj.
  91. Shiv, B., & Alexander, F. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making, Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–82.
  92. Simmonds, L., Bogomolova, S., Kennedy, R., Nenycz‐Thiel, M., & Bellman, S. (2020). A dual‐process model of how incorporating audio‐visual sensory cues in video advertising promotes active attention. Psychology & Marketing, 37(8), 1057–1067.
  93. Singh, S. (2006). Impact of color on marketing, Management Decision, 44(6), 783-789.
  94. Stayman, D. M., & Aaker, D. A. (1988). Are all the effects of ad-induced feelings mediated by AAd? Consum. Res. 15, 368–373.
  95. Talmi, D., Luk, B. T. C., McGarry, L. M., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). The contribution of relatedness and distinctiveness to emotionallyenhanced memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 555–574
  96. Talmi, D., Anderson, A. K., Riggs, L., Caplan, J. B., & Moscovitch, M. (2008). Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 15, 172–182.
  97. Talari, M., Khodadad Hosseini, S. H., Kordnaeij, A., & Azar, A. (2017). Portfolio Ambidextrous conceptualization in holding companies: Classical Grounded Theory. Journal of Business Strategies, 9(2), 57-67. [in Persian]
  98. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
  99. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135 (2), 77–99.
  100. Torres, P., Augusto, M., & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1267–1276.
  101. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the theory back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-81.
  102. Vakratsas, D., & Tim, A. (1999). How advertising works: what do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63 (1), 26–43.
  103. Van der Wel, P., & Van Steenbergen, H., (2018). Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: a review. Bull. Rev. 25, 2005–2015
  104. Van Rompay, T. J. L., De Vries, P. W., & Van Venrooij, X. G. (2010). More than words: On the importance of picture-text congruence in the online environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 22-30.
  105. Van Rompay, T. J., & Pruyn, A. T. (2011). When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape‐typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 599-610
  106. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K.C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 189-217. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  107. Winkielman, P., Kent C., B., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 121–35.
  108. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. PsychonomicBulletin & Review 9(4): 625–636.
  109. Wundt, W. (1897/1998). Outlines of psychology (C. H. Judd, Trans.Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.
  110. Yun Yoo, C., & Kim, K. (2005). Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Interactive Marketing, 19, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20047
  111. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-22.