پشایندهای شکل‌گیری روابط هم‌رقابتی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی - دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری - پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران

3 استاد مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

چکیده

چکیده
هم‌رقابتی، وجود همزمان رقابت و همکاری میان رقبا در یک صنعت خاص است. این استراتژی در دو دهه اخیر با اقبال فراوان در میان شرکت‌ها روبه‌رو شده؛ لذا تعداد مقالات چاپ شده در این حوزه نیز به صورت چشمگیری در سال‌های اخیر افزایش پیدا کرده است. اما خلاء وجود چارچوبی جامع، برای عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری هم‌رقابتی در ادبیات این حوزه احساس می‌شود. هدف از این پژوهش، ارائه چارچوبی برای عوامل موثر بر شکل‌گیری روابط هم‌رقابتی است. در این پژوهش از روش مرور سیستماتیک، جهت یکپارچه‌سازی و تجمیع یافته‌های مرتبط استفاده شده است. مرور سیستماتیک در سه مرحله‌ی اصلی: برنامه‌ریزی، اجرا و گزارش‌دهی انجام می‌گیرد که هر کدام از مراحل، شامل چندین گام مجزا می‌باشند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، همه‌ی عوامل موثر بر شکل‌گیری روابط هم‌رقابتی، در دو مقوله نهایی پیش‌آیند‌ها و انگیزه‌ها جای می‌گیرند. مقوله پیش‌آیندها، شامل 4 زیر مقوله: تغییرات محیطی، شرایط صنعت، ویژگی‌های رقیب و ویژگی‌های شرکت می‌شود. در حقیقت پیش آیندها، توصیف کننده‌ی وضعیت و شرایطی هستند که سبب بوجود آمدن رابطه‌ی هم‌رقابتی می‌شوند. از سویی دیگر، یک‌سری از عوامل وجود دارند که نقش موتور محرکه، برای شکل دادن رابطه هم‌رقابتی ایفا می‌کنند که این عوامل انگیزه‌های هم‌رقابتی هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Antecedents of Formation of Competitive Relationships

نویسندگان [English]

  • Minoo Sahebodari 1
  • Morteza Soltani 2
  • Asadollah Kordenaeij 3
1 Master of Business Administration - Faculty of Management and Accounting - Farabi Campus, University of Tehran
2 faculty of management and accounting, college of farabi, university of tehran
3 Professor of Business Management, Tarbiat Modares University
چکیده [English]

Aim and introduction: coopetition means the simultaneous existence of cooperation and competition between rivals in the particular industry. In fact, Coopetition is defined as a dynamic and contradictory relationship that occurs when two companies cooperate together in some areas, such as strategic alliances, but at the same time compete with each other in other areas. This strategy has met with great success among companies in the last two decades; Thus the number of published articles in this area has exponentially increased in the recent years. But the lack of a comprehensive framework for the factors influencing the formation of coopetition in the literature of this field is felt. The purpose of this study is to providing a framework for factors influencing on the formation of competitive relationship.
Methodology: In this study, systematic review method has been used to integrate and aggregate relevant findings. The systematic review is done in three stages which include planning, implementation and reporting. Each stage includes some many different and separate steps. To begin the systematic review process first, the articles were searched in five databases containing the keyword of coopetition in their title, abstract, and keywords. The language of all researched studies is English. Researchers were able to find 702 available articles. Then the articles were screened based on the lack of relationship between the title, abstract and their content with the main subject of the research. In the end, 99 articles were selected for coding. The journal Impact factor Index was used to evaluate the quality of the articles used in this study. data extraction process is as follows: any factor that these articles considered to be effective on coopetition was considered as code in this study. Then the Codes that were conceptually close to each other, were grouped together and presented as a concepts and in the same way, close concepts created categories.
Findings: The results show that all the factors affecting the formation of coopetitive relationships fall into the final two categories of Antecedents and motivations. The category of Antecedents includes 4 sub-categories that are: environmental changes, industry conditions, characteristics of rivals and company features. In fact, Antecedent describe the conditions that can cause and lead to the coopetition relationships. On the other hand, there are some factors that play the role of moving engine in order to shape coopetition relationship. These factors are called motivation of coopetition. The category of motivations include 10 concepts: Creating value and benefits, Strategic power, sharing Cost and risk, Innovation, Market access, Product development, Economic scale, sharing Knowledge and processes, Intellectual Property and Standardization.
Discussion and conclusion: Despite research identifying some of the factors affecting coopetition, no comprehensive research has focused on factors affecting coopetition. Therefore, in order to fill this scientific gap with a systematic review method, the researchers of this study analyzed all the researches that had been done in this field and provided a framework of factors affecting coopetition. The proposed research framework includes antecedents and motivations of coopetition, that can help future researchers and also firms comprehensively understand the factors shaping a competitive relationship. Theoretically, and extracting a comprehensive list of factors, this research is innovative in the field of coopetition.
The results show that all the factors affecting the formation of coopetitive relationships fall into the final two categories of Antecedents and motivations. The category of Antecedents includes 4 sub-categories that are: environmental changes, industry conditions, characteristics of rivals and company features.: In fact, Antecedent describe the conditions that can cause and lead to the coopetition relationships. On the other hand, there are some factors that play the role of moving engine in order to shape coopetition relationship. These factors are called motivation of coopetition.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: coopetition
  • cooperation
  • Competition
  • Systematic review
  1. Akdoğan, A. A., & Cingšz, A. (2012). An empirical study on determining the attitudes of small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) related to coopetition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,58, 252-258.
  2. Assens, C., & Coléno, F. (2014). How to manage free riders in a network of competitors: the case of animal genetic selection industry in France. Journal on Chain and Network Science,14(2), 129-135.
  3. Barretta, A. (2008). The functioning of co-opetition in the health-care sector: An explorative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 209-220.
  4. Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155-1168.
  5. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (1999). Cooperation and competition in relationships between Competitors in business networks. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178–194.
  6. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks — to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.
  7. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketin Dorn g Management, 57, 23-39.
  8. Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., & Wincent, J. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics–an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness review: An international business journal, 20(2), 194-214.
  9. Bonel, E., Pellizzari, P., & Rocco, E. (2008). Coopetition and complementarities: modeling coopetition strategy and its risks at an individual partner level. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 6(3), 189-205.
  10. Bouncken, R., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2015) Coopetition: a review, synthesis, and future research directions. RMS 9(3), 577–601.
  11. Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996) Co-opetition. Doubleday Publishing, New York.
  12. Brown, J. A., Gianiodis, P., & Santoro, M. D. (2017). Managing co-opetition for shared stakeholder utility in dynamic environments. California Management Review, 59(4), 114-139.
  13. Carayannis, E. G., & Sipp, C. M. (2010). Why, when, and how are real options used in strategic technology venturing? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 70-85.
  14. Chai, L., Li, J., Clauss, T., & Tangpong, C. (2019). The influences of interdependence, opportunism and technology uncertainty on interfirm coopetition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
  15. Chen, L. -T. (2014). Dynamic competitive approach of a closed loop system with remanufacturing for deteriorating items in e-markets. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(1), 166–176.
  16. Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  17. Chiambaretto, P., & Fernandez, A. S. (2016). The evolution of competitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: The Air France case. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 75-85.
  18. Chim-Miki, A. F., & Batista-Canino, R. M. (2017). The coopetition perspective applied to tourism destinations: a literature review. Anatolia, 28(3), 381-393.
  19. Chin, K. S., Chan, B. L., & Lam, P. K. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 437-454.
  20. Crick, J. M. (2018). The facets, antecedents and consequences of coopetition: An entrepreneurial marketing perspective. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,21(2), 253-272.
  21. Crick, J. M. (2020). Unpacking the relationship between a coopetition-oriented mindset and coopetition-oriented behaviors. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
  22. Crick, J.M. and Crick, D. (2021), “The yin and yang nature of coopetition activities: non-linear effects and the moderating role of competitive intensity for internationalised firms”,International Marketing Review.
  23. Cygler, J., & Sroka, W. (2017). Coopetition disadvantages: The case of the high tech companies.  Econ, 28, 494-504.
  24. Czakon, W., Klimas, P., & Mariani, M. (2020). Behavioral antecedents of coopetition: A synthesis and measurement scale. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101875.
  25. Dahl, J. (2014). Conceptualizing coopetition as a process: An outline of change in cooperative and competitive interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 272-279.
  26. Dal-Soto, F., & MONTICELLI, J. (2017). Coopetition strategies in the Brazilian higher education. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(1), 65-78.
  27. Damayanti, M., Scott, N., & Ruhanen, L. (2017). Competitive behaviors in an informal tourism economy. Annals of Tourism Research, 65, 25-35.
  28. D'aveni, R. A. (1995). Coping with hyper competition: Utilizing the new 7S's framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(3), 45-57.
  29. de Resende, L. M. M., Volski, I., Betim, L. M., de Carvalho, G. D. G., De Barros, R., & Senger, F. P. (2018). Critical success factors in coopetition: Evidence on a business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 177-187.
  30. Demirel, Y., Arzova, B., Ardıç, K., & Baş, T. (2013). Organizational learning on coopetition strategy: an exploratory research on a Turkish private banks credit card application. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 902-910.
  31. Devece, C., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2017). Coopetition as the new trend in inter-firm alliances: literature review and research patterns. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 207-226.
  32. Dołzbłasz, S., & Raczyk, A. (2017). Transborder Co‐Operation and Competition among Firms in the Polish‐German Borderland. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie,108(2), 141-156.
  33. Dorn, S., Schweiger, B., & Albers, S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 34(5), 484-500.
  34. Dowling, M. J., Roering, W. D., Carlin, B. A., & Wisnieski, J. (1996). Multifaceted relationships under coopetition — Description and theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 155–167.
  35. Eriksson, P. E. (2008). Procurement effects on coopetition in client-contractor relationships. Journal of construction Engineering and Management, 134(2), 103-111.
  36. Evens, T. (2014). Co-opetition of TV broadcasters in online video markets: a winning strategy? International Journal of Digital Television, 5(1), 61-74.
  37. Fathalikhani, S., Hafezalkotob, A., & Soltani, R. (2018). Cooperation and coopetition among humanitarian organizations: a game theory approach.Kybernetes, 47(8), 1642-1663.
  38. Fernandez, A. S., Le Roy, F., & Chiambaretto, P. (2018). Implementing the right project structure to achieve competitive innovation projects. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 384-405.
  39. Frisio, D. G., Ferrazzi, G., & Tesser, F. (2011, October). Coopetition: A strategic model for horticultural sector? The case of Lombardy region. In V Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes 960, 247-254.
  40. Galdeano-Gómez, E., Pérez-Mesa, J. C., & Giagnocavo, C. L. (2015). Food exporters and co-opetition relationships: An analysis on the vegetable supply chain. British Food Journal, 117(5), 1596-1609.
  41. Geraudel, M., & Salvetat, D. (2014). What are the antecedents of coopetition? An explanation in terms of centrality and personality traits. European Business Review, 26(1), 23-42.
  42. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.
  43. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663.
  44. Golnam, A., Sanchez, R., Ritala, P., & Wegmann, A. (2014). The Why and the How of Coopetition: Modeling the Incentives and Design of Competitive Value Networks. In A Focused Issue on Building New Competences in Dynamic Environments(pp. 29-60). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  45. Granata, J., Géraudel, M., Gundolf, K., Gast, J., & Marques, P. (2016). Organizational innovation and coopetition between smes: A tertius strategies approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2).
  46. Granata, J., Lasch, F., Le Roy, F., & Dana, L. P. (2018). How do micro-firms manage coopetition? A study of the wine sector in France. International Small Business Journal,36(3), 331-355.
  47. Gurnani, H., Erkoc, M., & Luo, Y. (2007). Impact of product pricing and timing of investment decisions on supply chain co-opetition. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(1), 228-248.
  48. Hora, W., Gast, J., Kailer, N., Rey-Marti, A., & Mas-Tur, A. (2018). David and Goliath: causes and effects of coopetition between start-ups and corporates. Review of Managerial Science,12(2), 411-439.
  49. Hsieh, C. C., & Lo, C. H. (2010, June). Trust in cross boundary co-opetition: an explorative case study. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video(pp. 229-236). ACM.
  50. Huang, H. C., & Chu, W. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of co-opetition strategies in small and medium-sized accounting agencies. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(6), 812-834.
  51. Ilvonen, I., & Vuori, V. (2013). Risks and benefits of knowledge sharing in competitive knowledge networks. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 13(3), 209-223.
  52. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
  53. Klimas, P., & Czakon, W. (2018). Organizational innovativeness and coopetition: a study of video game developers. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 469-497.
  54. Knein, E., Greven, A., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2020). Culture and cross-functional coopetition: The interplay of organizational and national culture. Journal of International Management, 26(2), 100731.
  55. Kostis, A., & Näsholm, M. H. (2020). Towards a research agenda on how, when and why trust and distrust matter to coopetition. Journal of Trust Research, 10(1), 66-90.
  56. Kraus, S., Klimas, P., Gast, J., & Stephan, T. (2018). Sleeping with competitors: Forms, antecedents and outcomes of coopetition of small and medium-sized craft beer breweries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
  57. Kraus, S., Meier, F., Niemand, T., Bouncken, R. B., & Ritala, P. (2018). In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science, 12(4), 1025-1053.
  58. Kumar, A., & Dutta, S. K. (2017). Tacit knowledge transfer in coopetition: An empirical investigation of the role of business group (BG) affiliation. Journal of Strategy and Management,10(4), 453-468.
  59. Lacomba, J. A., Lagos, F., & Neugebauer, T. (2013). Who makes the pie bigger? An experimental study on co-opetition. In Economic Psychology and Experimental Economics, 67-76. Routledge.
  60. Lascaux, A. (2020). Coopetition and trust: What we know, where to go next. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 2-18.
  61. Le Roy, F., & Sanou, F. H. (2014). Does coopetition strategy improve market performance? An empirical study in mobile phone industry. Journal of Economics & Management17, 64-92.
  62. Lechner, C., Soppe, B., & Dowling, M. (2016). Vertical coopetition and the sales growth of young and small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 67-84.
  63. Leite, E., Pahlberg, C., & Åberg, S. (2018). The cooperation-competition interplay in the ICT industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(4), 495-505.
  64. Lin, C. P., Wang, Y. J., Tsai, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1598-1606.
  65. Liu, R. (2013). Cooperation, competition and coopetition in innovation communities. Prometheus,31(2), 91-105.
  66. Luo, Y. (2004). A coopetition perspective of MNC–host government relations. Journal of International Management, 10(4), 431–451
  67. Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71–90
  68. Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of world business,42(2), 129-144.
  69. Mariani, M. M. (2016). Coordination in inter-network coopetition: Evidence from the tourism sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 103-123.
  70. Meyer, H. (1998). My enemy, my friend. Journal of Business Strategy, 19(5), 42-46.
  71. Mione, A. (2009). When entrepreneurship requires coopetition: the need for standards in the creation of a market. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1), 92-109.
  72. Monticelli, J. M., Garrido, I. L., & de Vasconcellos, S. L. (2018). Coopetition and institutions: a strategy for Brazilian wineries facing internationalization. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 30(1), 74-95.
  73. Nemeh, A., & Yami, S. (2016). The Determinants of the Emergence of Coopetition Strategy in R&D. International Studies of Management & Organization, 46(2-3), 159-178.
  74. Oliver, A. L. (2004). On the duality of competition and collaboration: network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(1-2), 151-171.
  75. Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. B. (2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 32-52.
  76. Panda, D. K. (2017). Coevolution and coexistence of cooperation and competition in inter organizational collaboration: Evidences from Indian management consulting industry. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(1), 18-41.
  77. Peng, T. J. A., & Bourne, M. (2009). The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management,20(3), 377-400.
  78. Peng, T. J. A., Pike, S., Yang, J. C. H., & Roos, G. (2012). Is cooperation with competitors a good idea? An example in practice. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 532-560.
  79. Petter, R. R. H., Resende, L. M., de Andrade Júnior, P. P., & Horst, D. J. (2014). Systematic review: an analysis model for measuring the competitive performance in horizontal cooperation networks mapping the critical success factors and their variables. The Annals of Regional Science, 53(1), 157-178.
  80. Poisson‐de Haro, S., & Myard, A. (2018). Cultural cluster coopetition: A look at the Montreal circus world. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 35(3), 390-402.
  81. Porto-Gomez, I., Aguirre-Larracoechea, U., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2017). Tacit coopetition: chimera or reality? Evidence from the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 611-634.
  82. Ratten, V. (2018). Sustainable farming entrepreneurship in the Sunraysia region. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(1/2), 103-115.
  83. Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy — when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324.
  84. Ritala, P., & Tidström, A. (2014). Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(4), 498-515.
  85. Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon. Com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 236-249.
  86. Ritala, P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,p, & Blomqvist,k. (2009). Tug of War in Innovation–Coopetitive Service Development. J. Services Technology and Management, 12(3), 225-272.
  87. Rusko, R. (2011). Exploring the concept of coopetition: A typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 311-320.
  88. Rusko, R. (2019). Is coopetitive decision-making a black box? Technology and digitisation as decision-makers and drivers of coopetition. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(8), 888-901.
  89. Sanou, F. H., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2016). How does centrality in coopetition networks matter? An empirical investigation in the mobile telephone industry. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 143-160.
  90. Schiavone, F. & Simoni, M. (2011). An experience-based view of co-opetition in R&D networks. European Journal of Innova_on Management, 14(2), 136-154.
  91. Schiavone, F., & Simoni, M. (2016). Prior experience and co-opetition in R&D programs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 819-835
  92. Sellitto, M. A., Pereira, G. S., Marques, R., & Lacerda, D. P. (2018). Systemic understanding of coopetitive behaviour in a Latin American technological park. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(5), 479-494.
  93. Shannon, S. (2002). Critical appraisal of systematic reviews. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 53(4), 195. Shu, C., Jin, J. L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2017). A contingent view of partner coopetition in international joint ventures. Journal of International Marketing, 25(3), 42-60.
  94. Shu, C., Jin, J. L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2017). A contingent view of partner coopetition in international joint ventures. Journal of International Marketing, 25(3), 42-60.
  95. Simoni, M., & Caiazza, R. (2012). Interlocks network structure as driving force of coopetition among Italian firms. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 12(3), 319-336.
  96. Soltani, M., &Jaafari, M.B., & Binndeh, R. (2016). Improving the performance of enterprises through a competitive strategy. Strategic Management Studies.7(26), 23-46
  97. Song, D. W. (2003). Port co-opetition in concept and practice. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(1), 29-44.
  98. Song, D. W., Cheon, S., & Pire, C. (2015). Does size matter for port coopetition strategy? Concept, motivation and implication. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications,18(3), 207-227.
  99. Soppe, B., Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2014). Vertical coopetition in entrepreneurial firms: theory and practice. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(4), 548-564.
  100. Strese, S., Meuer, M. W., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2016). Organizational antecedents of cross-functional coopetition: The impact of leadership and organizational structure on cross-functional coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 42-55.
  101. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207.
  102. Tseng, F. S., Chen, J. S., & Weng, H. H. (2013, May). Co-opetition and Service Innovation. In 2013 Fifth International Conference on Service Science and Innovation (ICSSI), 5-12.
  103. Van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2018). Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study on coopetition in healthcare. European Management Journal, 36(1), 135-144.
  104. Velu, C. (2016). Evolutionary or revolutionary business model innovation through coopetition? The role of dominance in network markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 124-135.
  105. Von Hippel, E. (1989). Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. In Industrial dynamics (pp. 157-175). Springer, Dordrecht.
  106. Walley, K. (2007). Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 11-31.
  107. Wright, R. W., Brand, R. A., Dunn, W., & Spindler, K. P. (2007). How to write a systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007), 455, 23-29.
  108. Yami, S., Nemeh, A. (2014). Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 250-260.
  109. Yan, Y., Dong, J.Q. and Faems, D. (2020), “Not every competitor is the same: the impact of technological, market and geographical overlap with coopetitors on firms’ breakthrough inventions”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 53 No. 1, forthcoming.
  110. Zhong, J., & Nieminen, M. (2015). Resource-based co-innovation through platform ecosystem: experiences of mobile payment innovation in China. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 283-29.
  111. Zineldin, M. (2004). Co-opetition: the organization of the future. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(7), 780-790.