تأثیر مسئولیت شرکت بر مشارکت زنجیره تأمین و عملکرد مالی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 دانشکده اقتصاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تأثیر ابعاد مسئولیت شرکت (آگاهی درونی، نظارت و به‌اشتراک‌گذاری بهترین شیوه‌های مسئولیت شرکت) بر مشارکت زنجیره تأمین و عملکرد مالی در شرکت‌های تولیدی بزرگ و فعال استان خوزستان انجام شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش 180 شرکت تولیدی بزرگ استان خوزستان است که با توجه به فرمول کوکران و محدود بودن جامعه آماری تعداد 135 شرکت به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد و در هر شرکت پرسشنامه جهت تکمیل در اختیار مدیران عرضه/مالی قرار گرفت. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه است که روایی محتوای آن را خبرگان و استادان دانشگاهی تأیید کردند و روایی سازه آن، از طریق تحلیل عاملی تأییدی بررسی شد. تحلیل داده‌ها و آزمون فرضیه‌ها با بهره گرفتن از نرم‌افزارSPSS 22 و روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری صورت پذیرفت. نتایج نشان داد که کلیه ابعاد مسئولیت شرکت (آگاهی درونی، نظارت و به‌اشتراک‌گذاری بهترین شیوه‌ها) بر مشارکت زنجیره تأمین اثر مثبت و معناداری دارند، ولی این تأثیر بر عملکرد مالی چشم‌گیر نیست و مشارکت زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد مالی اثر مثبت و معناداری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact of corporate responsibility on supply chain partnership and financial performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Belghis Bavarsad 1
  • Faragilah Rahimi 2
  • Shima Moienfar 3
1 Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
2 Department of Economics, Faculty of Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
3 Department of Economics and social sciences, Faculty of Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the impact of corporate responsibility dimensions (internal awareness, monitoring and sharing the best practices of corporate responsibility) on the supply chain partnership and financial performance of large manufacturing firms in Khuzestan Province. The population of this applied research consisted of 180 large manufacturing firms and with using Cochran's formula for limited society, 135 firms were selected. Statistical unit of society were the supply/finance managers of said firms and research questionnaire was distributed to them for each firm. The data collection instrument is questionnaire and which its content validity was evaluated through experts and academics, and its construct validity was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis. Structural equation models and SPSS 22 have been used in order to analysis the data. The results indicate that all corporate responsibility dimensions (internal awareness, monitoring and sharing best practices) have significant impact on supply chain partnership but it is not significant on financial performance. In addition supply chain partnership have a positive and significant impact on financial performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • corporate
  • responsibility
  • SCP
  • FP

مراجع

  1. Agan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M.F., & Atif Açıkgoz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872-1881.
  2. Akacum, A., & Dale, B.G. (1995). Supplier partnering: case study experiences. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31(1), 38- 45.
  3. Amirhosseini, Z., & Ghobadi, M. (2016). Social responsibility, financial performance and institutional ownership reporting. Management Accounting, 9(28), 55-66. (In Persian)
  4. Andersen, M.L., & Dejoy, J.S. (2011). Corporate social and financial performance: the role of size, industry, risk, R&D and advertising expenses as control variables. Business Social Review, 116, 237-256.
  5. Anholon, R., Osvaldo Quelhas, L., G. Walter Leal Filho, W., L. Souza Pinto, J., S. & Feher, A. (2016).  Asessing corporate social responsibility concepts used by a Brazilian manufacturer of airplanes: A case study at Embraer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 740-749.
  6. Baier, C., Hartmann, E., & Moser, R. (2008). Strategic alignment and purchasing efficacy: an exploratory analysis of their impact on financial performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (4), 36-52.
  7. Bavarsad, B., Rahimi, F., & Sardari, S. (2019).  Investigating the impact of supply chain practices on financial performance. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 10(20), 1-26. (In Persian)
  8. Bavarsad, B., Ganjali, S., Rahimi, F., & Mehrabi, A. (2015). Elevated process model of financial performance on the basis of Just In Time, Agile and Total Quality Management. Journal of Strategic Management Strategies, 7(27), 107-123. (In Persian)
  9. Bavarsad, B., Nias, A.H., & Darabian, P. (2019). Impact of strategic agility on operational responsiveness and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Management Strategies, 9(36), 65-83. (In Persian)

10. Boyd, D. E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 341-356.

11. Bucur, M., Moica, S., Ardelean, F., & Ciprian Oțel, C. (2019). The importance of corporate social responsibility among organizations in the Centre Development Region of Romania. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 309-317.

  1. Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm's performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(9), 1032-1053.

13. Carr, A.S., Kaynak, H., Hartley, J.L., & Ross, A. (2008). Supplier dependence: impact on supplier’s participation and performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 28 (9), 899-916.

  1. Chauhan, Satyaveer, S.,  & Proth, J.-M. (2005). Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing.  International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 44-51.
  2. Chen, C.J., Guo, R.-S., Hsiao, Y.-C., & Chen, K.-L. (2018). How business strategy in non-financial firms moderates the curvilinear effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on corporate financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 92, 154-167.
  3. Cornett, M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. Commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 70, 137-159.
  4. Dess, G.G., & Robinson, R.B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265–273.
  5. Elmuti, D., Khoury, R., Omran, O., & Abou-Zaid, A. (2013). Challenges and opportunities of health care supply chain management in the United States. Health Mark.Q. 30 (2), 128-143.
  6. Famiyeh, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm's performance: Empirical evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 390-406.
  7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Vol.1). Boston: Pitman.

21. Gallear, D., Ghobadian, A., & Chen, W. (2012). Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 83-91.

22. Ghaderia, Z., Mirzapourb, M., Joan C. Henderson, J.C., & Richardson, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and hotel performance: A view from Tehran, Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 29, 41–47.

  1. Hajiha, Z., & Sarfaraz, B. (2015). The relation between corporate social responsibility and cost of equity capital of firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting, 4(2), 105-123.(In Persian)
  2. Haleem, F., Farooq, S., & Vejrum Wæhrens, B.  (2017). Supplier corporate social responsibility practices and sourcing geography.  Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 92-103.
  3. Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A., & Phillips, R.A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (1), 58-74.

26. Hategan, C., & Curea-Pitorac, R. (2017). Testing the correlations between corporate giving, performance and firm value. Sustainability, 9, 1-20.

27. Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261-277.

  1. Hofer, C.W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: analytical concepts. West Publishing, St. Paul.
  2. Hopkins, M. (2005). Measurement of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 6(3-4), 213-231

30. Hughes, J., Ralf, M., & Michels, W. (1999). Transform your supply chain. International Thomson, London.

31. Inman, R.A., Sal, R.S., Green Jr., K.W., & Whitten, D. (2011). Agile manufacturing: relationship to Just-in-time, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 343-355.

  1. Kwon, I.-W.G., Kim, S., H., & Martin, D. G. (2016). Healthcare supply chain management; strategic areas for quality and financial improvement. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,  113(Part B), 422-428.
  2. Laplume, A.O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R.A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34 (6), 1152-1189
  3. Lebas, M.J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41 (1-3), 23–35.

35. Liao, S.-H., Kuo, F.-I., Ding, & L.-W. (2017). Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 191(C), 143-153.

36. Lin, W. S., Sambasivan, M., Siong Hook Law, S. H., & Ho, J. A. (2019). The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility - corporate financial performance nexus: application of panel vector auto regression approach. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.najef.2019.03.004.

  1. Madsen, H., & Ulhoi, J.P. (2001). Greening of human resources: environmental awareness and training interests within the workforce. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(2), 57-65.

38. Maloni, M. J., & Benton, W. C. (1997). Supply chain partnerships: opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3), 419-429.

  1. Mani, V., Gunasegaram, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 259-272.

40. Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84-93.

  1. Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
  2. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
  3. Meamarain, S. (1392). Strategic supply chain partnership, green supply chain management techniques and performance results in the Automotive Industry. Master's Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Center. (In Persian)
  4. Mofokeng, T.M., & Chinomona, R. (2019). Supply chain partnership, supply chain collaboration and supply chain integration as the antecedents of supply chain performance. South African Journal of Business Management, 50(1), 1-10.
  5. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(5), 998-1014.
  6. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics, 15(4), 323-338.

47. Nabass, E. H., & Abdallah, A. B. (2018). Agile manufacturing and business performance: The indirect effects of operational performance dimensions. Business Process Management Journal, 25, 647-666.

48. Nawanir, G., Teong, L.K. & Othman, S.N. (2013). Impact of lean practices on operations performance and business performance: some evidence from Indonesian manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(7), 1019-1050.

  1. Noci, G. (1997). Designing ‘green’ vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 103–114.
  2. Oyewumi, O. R., Ogunmeru, O. A., & Oboh, C. S. (2018). Investment in corporate social responsibility, disclosure practices, and financial performance of banks in Nigeria. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 195-205.
  3. Park-Poaps, H., & Rees, K. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 305-322.
  4. Parto, A., Sofian, S., & Saat, M. M. (2016). The impact of enterprise resource planning systems on financial performance in developing county. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(1), 176-187.
  5. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35, 1518-1541.

54. Qayyum, M. N., Ali, M., & Shazad, K. (2013). The impact of supply chain management practices on the financial performance of the organization. International Journal of Operations and Logistics Management, 2(2), 22-40.

55. Rahmani Noroozabad, S., Sedaghat, P., & Habibi, F. (2014). The effect of internal strategic factors on the financial performance of manufacturing industries listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Strategic Management Strategies, 5(17), 51-72. (In Persian)

56. Ramanathan, U., & Gunasekaran, A. (2014). Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 252–259.

57. Rezaei, J., Ortt, R., & Trott, P. (2018). Supply chain drivers, partnerships and performance of high-tech SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 629-653.

  1. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: the role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly, 19, 137-151.
  2. Senobar, N., Khalili, M., & Saghafian, H. (2010). Investigating the relationship of social responsibility with corporate financial performance. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 2(4), 28-52.
  3. Shahin, A. (2011). An investigation on the influence of total quality management on financial performance the Case of Boutan Industrial Corporation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 105-112.
  4. Shieh-Liang, C., Tran, N. T. H., & Ha, N. T. T. (2016). Concerns of Vietnamese producing-exporting seafood SMEs (VPESSMEs) on supply chain. International Business Research, 9(6), 120-130.
  5. Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D.B., & Sheth, J. (2007). Firms of endearment: how world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

63. Siueia, T., T. Wang, J. L., & Deladem, T. G. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a comparative study in the SubSaharan Africa Banking Sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi: 10.1016/ j.jclepro 2019.04.027

64. Sohal, A. S., Perry, M., & Pratt, T. (1998). Developing partnerships and networks: learning from practices in Australia. Technovation, 18(4), 245-251.

65. Stadtler H. (2015). Supply chain management: an overview. In: H. Stadtler, C. Kilger, H. Meyr (Eds) Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  1. Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: a meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venture, 29, 152–173.
  2. Stuart, F.I. (1997). Supply-chain strategy: organizational influence through supplier alliances. British Journal of Management, 8 (3), 223–236.

68. Swami, S., Garg, E., Ghosh, D., & Swami, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains. reference module in materials science and materials engineering. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.10890-2.

69. Tabarsa, G., A. Rezaian, A., Azar, A., & Alikhani, H. (2012). Explanation and designing a model of social responsibility. Journal of Strategic Management Strategies, 2(8), 83-102.

70. Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 34(3), 2.

71. Vahabzadeh, A. H., Asiaei, A., & Zailani, S. (2015). Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 125-138.

72. Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5-42.

73. Waddock, S.A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S.B. (2002). Responsibility: the new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–148.

74. Whipple, J. M., & Russell, D. (2007). Building supply chain collaboration: a typology of collaborative approaches. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 174-196.

75. Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mavondo, F. T. (1999). Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 19(8), 507-518.

  1. Youn, H., Hua, N., & Lee, S. (2015). Does size matter? Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 127-134.
  2. Youn, S., Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Park, K. (2013). Strategic supply chain partnership, environmental supply chain management practices, and performance outcomes: An empirical study of Korean firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 121-130.
  3. Yu, W., Chavez, R., Mark A. JacobS, M.A., & Feng, M. (2018). Data-driven supply chain capabilities and performance: A resource-based view. Transportation Research Part E, 114, 371-385.
  4. Yuen, K.F., Thai, V.V., Wong, Y.D., & Wang, X. (2018). Interaction impacts of corporate social responsibility and service quality on shipping firms’ performance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 13, 397-409.
  5. Zehir, C., Altindag, E., & Acar, A. Z. (2011). The effects of relationship orientation through innovation orientation on firm performance: an empirical study on Turkish family-owned firms. 7th International Strategic Management Conference, 24, 896-908.
فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی
دوره 11، شماره 43
مهر 1399
صفحه 187-204

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 20 بهمن 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 04 فروردین 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 تیر 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار