Journal of Strategic Management Studies

Journal of Strategic Management Studies

Providing framework for success in crowdfunding acceptance in startups

Document Type : Research

Authors
1 Associate Professor., Department of Management and Accounting, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
2 MA Graduated, Department of Management and Accounting, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
10.22034/smsj.2025.527758.2163
Abstract
Introduction:
In the modern era, securing capital has always been one of the fundamental challenges of entrepreneurship in the early stages of establishing startups, and crowdfunding is one of the effective ways to provide the necessary funding for knowledge-based companies. Crowdfunding is a relatively new method for raising capital for new investments, facilitating the collection of funds from the public via the internet. Crowdfunding is an internet-based financing method used by project founders, enabling individuals to raise funds from the crowd to support their projects funding can also be referred to as a digital financial innovation that, by bypassing credit crises, banking system rigidities, and capital market limitations, allows new investments and established companies to obtain the necessary funding to support innovations. In essence, crowdfunding is the process of aggregating and distributing relatively small financial contributions from a large number of backers in exchange for equity, debt with returns, or non-financial rewards. In this method, the target community of backers consists of individuals or organizations typically networked through the internet to collectively support other individuals or organizations. Although the primary goal of many studies on crowdfunding is to provide strategies and tools to empower individuals in successfully utilizing crowdfunding so that they can ultimately meet the financial needs of projects through social participation, the success of a crowdfunding campaign depends on numerous factors. The main issue and theoretical gap in this field is how it is adopted by startups. Given this context, the main objective of this research is to answer the following questions: Who are the key players in the successful adoption of crowdfunding in the startup sector? What are the relationships between these key players? Ultimately, what is the appropriate framework for the successful adoption of crowdfunding in the startup sector?
The research results demonstrate that the outcome of an equity-based crowdfunding campaign is significantly associated with the signals entrepreneurs provide through hard information (company characteristics, financial data, business features, and project details) and soft information (intellectual capital, human capital, social capital, and social media networks). Furthermore, this financing mechanism is accelerated through digital media platforms that facilitate personal interactions between entrepreneurs and investors. In a complementary finding, revealed that policymakers can effectively influence investor participation through persuasive messaging and by establishing secure crowdfunding ecosystems.
Methodology:
The present study adopts a qualitative approach, is developmental in terms of purpose, and descriptive in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of this research consists of experts, managers, and specialists in startups who have either used crowdfunding to finance their businesses or intend to do so. The sampling method in this study is non-probabilistic (theoretical sampling), with data saturation achieved through exploratory interviews involving 18 participants. For data analysis, the Grounded Theory method employed.
Results and Discussion:
Through three-stage coding (open, selective, and theoretical), the analysis identified 67 instances categorized into 11 key concepts - marketing capability enhancement, risk management development, process intelligence, ecosystem development, infrastructural foundations, firm/company characteristics, supporters, competitors, networking, momentum building, and institutionalization - which were further classified into four core categories: multi-dimensional empowerment, inclusive capacity building, collaborative synergy, and dynamic reinvention. Successful execution of crowdfunding in startups proves particularly complex due to their dynamic and uncertain nature, with oversight of critical factors potentially creating significant challenges for founders. The crowdfunding process comprises three distinct phases—pre-launch, active campaign, and post-campaign—each requiring specific prerequisites. This study identifies these fundamental requirements as "multi-dimensional empowerment" (pre-launch), "inclusive capacity building" (active phase), "collaborative co-creation" (post-campaign), and "dynamic reinvention" (ongoing adaptation), forming a comprehensive framework for startup crowdfunding implementation.
Conclusion:
Addressing the low success rate of crowdfunding among startups, this study develops an adoption framework, noting that while popular, its success factors remain understudied. The findings identify two key dimensions: multi-dimensional empowerment (internal factors within startups' control including risk management development, process intelligence, and marketing capability enhancement) and inclusive capacity building (external ecosystem factors comprising ecosystem development and infrastructural foundations, requiring collaboration with science parks, evaluation institutions, venture funds, NGOs, and government agencies). Crucially, the research highlights stakeholder co-creation as pivotal - a strategic approach engaging diverse actors in collaborative product/service design from ideation to implementation to generate shared value, ultimately determining crowdfunding success for startups. This study faced certain constraints, particularly regarding the complexity of success metrics in crowdfunding, which were mitigated through the integration of standardized terminology. Another limitation was the exclusive focus on startups, necessitating further research to generalize the findings to other domains. With minor modifications, the proposed model can be adapted to other crowdfunding contexts.

Keywords
Subjects

Abdeldayem, M., & Aldulaimi, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial finance and crowdfunding in the Middle East. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(4), 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2021-2684
2.    Ahn, S. (2023). To buy or to back? Backers' motivations for fashion crowdfunding projects. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27(2), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2022-0013
3.    Al-Qershi, O. M., Kwon, J., Zhao, S., & Li, Z. (2022). Predicting crowdfunding success with visuals and speech in video ads and text ads. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1610-1649. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2020-0029
4.    Allah Pitchay, A., Aboue Eliz, N. M., Ganesan, Y., Mydin, A.-A., Ratnasari, R. T., & Mohd Thas Thaker, M. A. (2022). Self-determination theory and individuals’ intention to participate in donation crowdfunding. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2020-0424
5.    Arshad, N., Shneor, R., & Berndt, A. (2024). The reward crowdfunding campaign management process: an engagement perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2023-0480
6.    Baber, H., & Fanea-Ivanovici, M. (2023). Motivations behind backers’ contributions in reward-based crowdfunding for movies and web series. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(3), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2021-0073
7.    Bahadri, A. (2018). Qualitative Research Foundation data, "encoded" and the importance, process and method of its execution interns educators. The Journal of Theory and Practice in Teachers Education, 4(5), 69-88. https://itt.cfu.ac.ir/article_587_bd2e60c7857f4619179d1339b4868cfc.pdf
8.    Baldissarro, G., Farinelli, E., Iazzolino, G., Maiolini, R., & Morea, D. (2025). The link between crowdfunding and sustainability: A literature review in the field of entrepreneurs and academic spinoffs. Finance Research Letters, 107097.
9.    Bao, Z., & Huang, T. (2017). External supports in reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Online Information Review, 41(5), 626-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2016-0292
10.  Berné-Martínez, J.-M., Planells-Artigot, E., & Ortigosa-Blanch, A. (2023). The discussion of crowdfunding policies among policymakers. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113542.
11.  Böckel, A., Hörisch, J., & Tenner, I. (2021). A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters. Management review quarterly, 71(2), 433-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00189-3
12.  Böckel, A., Hörisch, J., & Tenner, I. (2021). A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters. Management review quarterly, 71, 433-453.
13.  Bonvino, C., Bosio, A. O., & Giudici, G. (2025). Gender disparity in the participation to equity crowdfunding campaigns. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106744
14.  Bukhari, F. A. S., Usman, S. M., Usman, M., & Hussain, K. (2020). The effects of creator credibility and backer endorsement in donation crowdfunding campaigns success. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-02-2019-0077
15.  Butticè, V., & Vismara, S. (2022). Inclusive digital finance: the industry of equity crowdfunding. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(4), 1224-1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09875-0
16.  Chang, J.-W. (2020). The economics of crowdfunding. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 12(2), 257-280.
17.  Chen, W. D. (2023). Crowdfunding for social ventures. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(3), 256-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2022-0051
18.  Chen, Y., Dai, R., Wang, L., Yang, S., Li, Y., & Wei, J. (2021). Exploring donor's intention in charitable crowdfunding: intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(7), 1664-1683. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2020-0631
19.  Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 2050312118822927. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
20.  Connor, J., Flenady, T., Dwyer, T., & Massey, D. (2025). Acknowledging: A classic grounded theory explaining how nurses' employ clinical judgement when complying with early warning system protocols. Int J Nurs Stud, 163, 104989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104989
21.  Cosma, S., Grasso, A. G., Pattarin, F., & Pedrazzoli, A. (2022). Platforms' partner networks: the missing link in crowdfunding performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 122-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2020-0230
22.  Cox, J., & Nguyen, T. (2018). Does the crowd mean business? An analysis of rewards-based crowdfunding as a source of finance for start-ups and small businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2017-0165
23.  Cumming, D., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Crowdfunding models: Keep‐It‐All vs. All‐Or‐Nothing. Financial Management, 49(2), 331-360. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:49:y:2020:i:2:p:331-360
24.  Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Crowdfunding models: Keep‐it‐all vs. all‐or‐nothing. Financial Management, 49(2), 331-360.
25.  Dabbous, A., Aoun Barakat, K., & Tarhini, A. (2024). Digitalization, crowdfunding, eco-innovation and financial development for sustainability transitions and sustainable competitiveness: Insights from complexity theory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(1), 100460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100460
26.  Dalla Chiesa, C., & Handke, C. (2020). 17. Crowdfunding. Handbook of cultural economics, 158.
27.  Dalla Chiesa, C., Pavlova, A., Lavanga, M., & Pysana, N. (2024). When fashion meets crowdfunding: exploring sustainable and innovative features of online campaigns. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 28(4), 688-708. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2021-0068
28.  Daskalakis, N., & Karpouzis, E. (2022). The importance of a continuous belief-update mechanism on crowdfunding with financial returns. Managerial Finance, 48(5), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2021-0455
29.  De Luca, V. V., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2019). Crowdfunding: a systemic framework of benefits. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(6), 1321-1339.
30.  Deng, L., Ye, Q., Xu, D., Sun, W., & Jiang, G. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 41.
31.  Dority, B., Borchers, S. J., & Hayes, S. K. (2021). Equity crowdfunding: US Title II offerings using sentiment analysis. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(4), 807-835. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-04-2020-0097
32.  Efrat, K., Gilboa, S., & Sherman, A. (2020). The role of supporter engagement in enhancing crowdfunding success. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2018-0337
33.  Evans, G. L. (2023). A novice researcher’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 22(01), 145-163.
34.  Foà, C. (2019). Crowdfunding cultural projects and networking the value creation. Arts and the Market, 9(2), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-05-2019-0017
35.  Fortezza, F., Pagano, A., & Bocconcelli, R. (2021). Serial crowdfunding in start-up development: a business network view. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(13), 250-262.
36.  Giakoumelou, A., Raimo, N., Petruzzella, F., & Vitolla, F. (2023). Are vegans generous? An exploration of the success factors of vegan crowdfunding projects. British Food Journal, 125(7), 2704-2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2022-0685
37.  Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley. CA: Sociology Press.
38.  Halim, M. A. (2024). Does crowdfunding contribute to digital financial inclusion? Research in Globalization, 9, 100238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100238
39.  Hoque, M. M. (2024). Crowdfunding for innovation: a comprehensive empirical review. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00387-5
40.  Hornuf, L., & Cumming, D. (2018). The Economics of Crowdfunding: Startups, Portals and Investor Behavior. Taylor & Francis Limited.
41.  Huang, Z., Chiu, C. L., Mo, S., & Marjerison, R. (2018). The nature of crowdfunding in China: initial evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 300-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2018-0046
42.  Jiao, H., Tang, W., Liu, T., Wang, X., & Ma, L. (2022). How do IT affordances support behavioral intention in charitable crowdfunding? The mediating effects of donor perceptions and motivations. Kybernetes, 51(11), 3172-3200. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2020-0575
43.  Kaminski, J., Hopp, C., & Tykvova, T. (2019). New technology assessment in entrepreneurial financing–Does crowdfunding predict venture capital investments? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 287-302.
44.  Kocollari, U., Pedrazzoli, A., Cavicchioli, M., & Girardi, A. (2022). Too tied to fail: a multidimensional approach to social capital in crowdfunding campaigns. Evidences from Italian agri-food businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(5), 719-741. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2021-0253
45.  Kościółek, S. (2021). Backers' motivations in sports clubs reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 1165-1171.
46.  Lacan, C., & Desmet, P. (2017). Does the crowdfunding platform matter? Risks of negative attitudes in two-sided markets. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(6), 472-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2126
47.  Lagazio, C., & Querci, F. (2018). Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. Journal of Business Research, 90, 318-324.
48.  Lee, C. H., Bian, Y., Karaouzene, R., & Suleiman, N. (2019). Examining the role of narratives in civic crowdfunding: linguistic style and message substance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1492-1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0370
49.  Levenshus, A. B., Lemon, L. L., Childers, C., & Cho, M. (2019). “I thought they’d do more”: conflicting expectations of crowdfunding communication. Journal of Communication Management, 23(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2018-0024
50.  Li, Y., Du, J., & Fu, W. (2020). Thirty days are enough: what determines the crowd's cash time in agri-food crowdfunding? China Agricultural Economic Review, 12(3), 553-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-10-2019-0176
51.  Li, Y., Ling, L., Wu, J., Zhang, D., & Fu, W. (2023). Conformity by information or relation? An exploration of investors' response in equity crowdfunding. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 5299-5318. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2021-0701
52.  Lima, A., & Araújo, F. F. M. (2019). Technology environment and crowdfunding platforms in Brazil. Revista de Gestão, 26(4), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-12-2018-0119
53.  Linzalone, R., Ammirato, S., & Felicetti, A. M. (2023). An exploration of the causal structure underlying crowdfunding: theoretical findings and practical implications. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 127-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0149
54.  Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623-651. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2017-0240
55.  Ma, Z. (2023). Early backers' social and geographic influences on the success of crowdfunding. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(4), 510-526. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2022-0008
56.  Macht, S., & Chapman, G. (2019). Getting more than money through online crowdfunding. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 11(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2019-0101
57.  Madrazo-Lemarroy, P., Barajas-Portas, K., & Labastida Tovar, M. E. (2019). Analyzing campaign’s outcome in reward-based crowdfunding. Internet Research, 29(5), 1171-1189. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0115
58.  Maehle, N. (2020). Sustainable crowdfunding: insights from the project perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-02-2019-0079
59.  Mazzocchini, F. J., & Lucarelli, C. (2023). Success or failure in equity crowdfunding? A systematic literature review and research perspectives. Management Research Review, 46(6), 790-831. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2021-0672
60.  Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. (2022). Exploration of coding in qualitative data analysis: Grounded theory perspective.
61.  Mohd Thas Thaker, M. A. B. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of the crowdfunding-waqf model (CWM) in the waqf land development. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(3), 578-597. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2016-0043
62.  Munim, Z. H., Shneor, R., Adewumi, O. M., & Shakil, M. H. (2021). Determinants of crowdfunding intention in a developing economy: ex-ante evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(6), 1105-1125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2019-0657
63.  Ndou, V., Scorrano, P., Mele, G., & Stefanizzi, P. (2022). Fundraising activities and digitalization: defining risk indicators for evaluating equity crowdfunding campaigns. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 1169-1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1237
64.  Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215-236.
65.  Petruzzelli, A. M., Natalicchio, A., Panniello, U., & Roma, P. (2019). Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 138-148.
66.  Prędkiewicz, K., & Kalinowska-Beszczyńska, O. (2021). Financing eco-projects: analysis of factors influencing the success of crowdfunding campaigns. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(2), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2020-0339
67.  Quero, M. J., & Ventura, R. (2019). Value proposition as a framework for value cocreation in crowdfunding ecosystems. Marketing Theory, 19(1), 47-63.
68.  Rahimpour, M., Yahyazadeh Far, M., Aghajani, H., & azar, a. (2021). Financing Strategies of Startups. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 12(45), 45-64. https://www.smsjournal.ir/article_118619_40ca3bce044ae29bfa09580b387eba54.pdf. [In Persian]
69.  Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Appolloni, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2023). Navigating the crowdfunding landscape: a study of knowledge trajectories based on main path analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 415-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2023-0201
70.  Rodriguez-Ricardo, Y., Sicilia, M., & López, M. (2018). What drives crowdfunding participation? The influence of personal and social traits. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 22(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-004
71.  Rossolini, M., Pedrazzoli, A., & Ronconi, A. (2021). Greening crowdfunding campaigns: an investigation of message framing and effective communication strategies for funding success. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(7), 1395-1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-01-2021-0039
72.  Sajjadi, M. S. (2024). Crowdfunding strategies for projects in line with the production leap. Economic Security, 12(4), 35-48. [In Persian]
73.  Salvi, A., Raimo, N., Petruzzella, F., & Vitolla, F. (2022). The role of communication in restaurant crowdfunding success. British Food Journal, 124(12), 4323-4338. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2021-0797
74.  Shafiee, R., Ekhlassi, A., & Ansari, F. (2016). e-retail branding by grounded theory. New Marketing Research Journal, 6(2), 188-167. https://doi.org/10.22108/nmrj.2016.20672. [In Persian]
75.  Shariatnejad, A., Mousavi, S. N., & Rezaeinejad, H. (2023). Designing an implementation model for growth hacking strategy for startups. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 14(54), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2023.165683. [In Persian]
76.  Sherman, A., & Axelrad, H. (2021). A qualitative study on money, well-being and serial crowdfunding. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-06-2020-0190
77.  Shneor, R., & Vik, A. A. (2020). Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 149-182.
78.  Silva, L., Silva, N. F., & Rosa, T. (2020). Success prediction of crowdfunding campaigns: a two-phase modeling. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 16(4), 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2020-0026
79.  St John, J., St John, K., & Han, B. (2022). Entrepreneurial crowdfunding backer motivations: a latent Dirichlet allocation approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2021-0248
80.  Steigenberger, N. (2017). Why supporters contribute to reward-based crowdfunding. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2016-0117
81.  Sun, Y., Sheng, Y., Yan, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Pricing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: Whether to introduce price guarantee? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 170, 103024.
82.  Troise, C. (2020). Discovering the underlying dynamics of crowdfunding networks: entrepreneurs’ ties, crowdfunders’ connections and community spin-offs. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14(2), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2020-0018
83.  Troise, C., & Camilleri, M. A. (2021). The use of digital media for marketing, CSR communication and stakeholder engagement. In Strategic corporate communication in the digital age (pp. 161-174). Emerald Publishing Limited.
84.  Troise, C., Matricano, D., Sorrentino, M., & Candelo, E. (2022). Investigating investment decisions in equity crowdfunding: The role of projects' intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 40(3), 406-418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.006
85.  Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Battisti, E., & Graziano, E. A. (2021). Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing and equity crowdfunding. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0258
86.  Wahjono, S. I., Fam, S.-F., Pakkanna, M., Rasulong, I., & Marina, A. (2021). Promoting creators intentions: Measurement of crowdfunding performance. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1084-1101.
87.  Wan Mohamad Nazarie, W. N. F., & Williams, R. (2021). Linguistic style and gender match in funding intention towards crowdfunding project. Review of International Business and Strategy, 31(3), 438-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-09-2020-0111
88.  Wang, T., Li, Y., Kang, M., & Zheng, H. (2019). Exploring individuals’ behavioral intentions toward donation crowdfunding: evidence from China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1515-1534. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2018-0451
89.  Wang, Y., Li, Y., Wu, J., Fu, L., & Liang, R. (2023). How the interplay of gender and culture shapes crowdfunding performance: a multilevel study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(2), 477-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2022-0401
90.  Wasiuzzaman, S., Chong, L. L., & Ong, H. B. (2022). Influence of perceived risks on the decision to invest in equity crowdfunding: a study of Malaysian investors. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(2), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-11-2020-0431
91.  Wasiuzzaman, S., & Suhili, N. F. (2023). Examination of the success drivers of equity crowdfunding campaigns in Malaysia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(2), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2021-0134
92.  Yeh, J.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2022). A machine learning approach to predict the success of crowdfunding fintech project. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1678-1696. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2019-0017
93.  Yin, C., Liu, L., & Mirkovski, K. (2019). Does more crowd participation bring more value to crowdfunding projects? The perspective of crowd capital. Internet Research, 29(5), 1149-1170. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0103
94.  Ziegler, T., Shneor, R., Wenzlaff, K., Odorović, A., Hao, R., & Ryll, L. (2021). The 4th European alternative finance benchmarking report. Available at SSRN 3772260.
95.  Ziegler, T., Shneor, R., Wenzlaff, K., Odorovic, A., Johanson, D., Hao, R., & Ryll, L. (2019). Shifting Paradigms - the 4th European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31246.20800
96.  Zribi, S. (2022). Effects of social influence on crowdfunding performance: implications of the covid-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01207-3
 
 
Volume 17, Issue 65
Winter 2026
Pages 325-350

  • Receive Date 01 June 2025
  • Revise Date 14 July 2025
  • Accept Date 28 August 2025