Identifying negative images and it's causes towards Iran's export nation brand

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD student, Shahid Beheshty university, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

   Introduction: Review of researches in the field of nation brand shows a few studies in recognizing and examining negative images of exporting countries. Identifying negative image about a country's export activities and finding the root causes of these mentalities used as a first step in planning national branding programs. This will be doubly important, especially for countries that are politically different from the mainstream of international media or faces some negative stereotypes among foreign consumers. The objective is to identify the negative images toward the export aspect of Iran's nation brand and to investigate the causes of these mentalities.
   Methodology: The researcher's philosophical approach based on the perspective of pragmatism. This qualitativ research conducted based on in-depth interviews and data analysis based on the grounded theory approach using content analysis. The statistical population includes knowledgeable and active people in exporting to Iraq and Syria and using theoretical sampling and snowball method, 26 interviews conducted to achieve theoretical adequacy.
   Results and Discussion: Negative images toward Iran's export nation brand include 14 concepts were identified in four categories of images related to 1."Iranian export product" including improper packaging, non-compliance with standards, unstable product presence, unstable product quality, surplus product Domestic needs, 2."Iranian exporter" including: fraud in trade, lack of commitment in trade, lack of expertise in trade, lack of trust in the other party, 3." the export environment" including: large number of intermediaries, high rate of trade disputes, confusion in trade and 4."Export consequences" including damage to domestic production, sanctions problems. Exporter’s wrong view to export including: "short-term view to export", "contemptuous view to export market" and wrong view of policymakers in this field including: "exports as a surplus of domestic demand" and a "partiality approach in export management", are among the most important formation roots of negative images toward export aspect of Iran's nation brand. Three categories including political roots, ethnic roots and religious roots are also effective as underlying factors in reinforcing these negative mentalities.
   Conclusion: The concepts related to "Iranian product" and "Iranian exporter" include the largest number of negative images of Iran's export nation brand. "Establishing an evaluation system to assess the qualifications of exporters", "creating collective trade mark", "strengthening chambers of commerce", "establishing export consortia" and "developing export management companies" are the suggestions to address the roots of these negative mentalities. Then, unfavorable economic conditions in countries of export-target because that price as a determining factor, reduces the impact of consumer political animosity in response to foreign products. However, in the face of equal price and product quality, political hostility will affect consumer behavior. In other words, consumer animosity, even at low levels, reduces the competitiveness of the product in foreign market, even if it does not lead to a boycott of the export product. It should be noted that political animosity if combined or strengthened by cultural animosity (religious animosity (Shia-Sunni) and ethnic animosity (Arab-Iranian) in this study), will have a strong and lasting effect on consumer behavior.  
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Abraham, A., & Patro, S. (2014). Country-of-Origin Effect and Consumer Decision-making. Management and Labour Studies, 39(3), 309–318.
  2. Anholt, S. (2005). Three interlinking concepts: Intellectual property, nation branding and economic development. In WIPO International Seminar on Intellectual Property and Development, Geneva, 2-3.
  3. Asshidin, N. H. N., Abidin, N., & Borhan, H. B. (2016). Perceived quality and emotional value that influence consumer's purchase intention towards American and local products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 639-643.
  4. Augusta, E. D., Mardhiyah, D., & Widiastuti, T. (2019). Effect of country of origin image, product knowledge, brand familiarity to purchase intention Korean cosmetics with information seeking as a mediator variable: Indonesian women’s perspective. Dermatology Reports, 11(s1).
  5. Avraham, E. (2018). Nation branding and marketing strategies for combatting tourism crises and stereotypes toward destinations. Journal of Business Research. 116, 711-720
  6. Avraham, E., & Ketter, E. (2016). Marketing tourism for developing countries: Battling stereotypes and crises in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. London: Palgrave-McMillan.
  7. Glaser, B. G., & Hon. (2005), Staying open: the use of theoretical codes in GT. The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1-20.
  8. Cheah, I. & Phau, I., & Kea, G., & Huang, Y. A. (2016). Expression of an Activated Integrin Promotes Long-Distance Sensory Axon Regeneration in the Spinal Cord. J Neurosci. 36(27), 7283-97.
  9. Chunhao, W., Han, Ch., & Yee Ming, L. (2021). Factors influencing customers’ dine out intention during COVID-19 reopening period: The moderating role of country-of-origin effect, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 1-11
  10. De Nisco, A., Mainolfi, G., Marino, V., Napolitano, M.R. Effect of economic animosity on consumer ethnocentrism and product-country images. A binational study on the perception of Germany during the Euro crisis. European Management Journal, 34(1), 59-68.
  11. Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice (1th ed.). Routledge.
  12. Dinnie, K., Melewar, T. C., Seidenfuss, K. U., & Musa, G. (2010). Nation branding and integrated marketing communications: An Asian perspective. International Marketing Review, 27(4), 388-403.
  13. Echeverri, L., Ter Horst, E., Molina, G., &Mohamad, Z. (2019). Nation Branding: Unveiling Factors that Affect the Image of Colombia from a Foreign Perspective. Tourism Planning & Development, 16(1), 1-21.
  14. Gertner, D., & Kotler, P. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4–5), 249–261.
  15. GfK Roper Public Affair & Media. (2009). The Anholt-GfK Roper Nation Brands Index 2009 Highlights Report. GfK Custom Research North America
  16. Glaser, B. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
  17. Goldstein, B. (2013). Sensation and perception. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
  18. Hinck, W. (2004). The role of domestic animosity in consumer choice: empirical evidence from Germany, Journal of Euro-Marketing, 14(1-2), 87-104.
  19. Hoang, H. T., Ho, K. N. B., Tran, T. P., & Le, T. Q. (2022). The extension of animosity model of foreign product purchase: Does country of origin matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102758.
  20. Jung, K., Ang, S. H., Leong, S. M., Tan, S. J., Pornpitakpan, C., & Kau, A. K. (2002). A typology of animosity and its cross-national validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 525-539.
  21. Heine, K., Atwal, G., & He, J. (2019). Managing country-of-origin affiliations for luxury brand building in China. Australasian marketing journal, 27(1), 14-23.
  22. Kaeeni, A. A., & Heidarzadeh, K. (2014). Exploring the moderating effect of consumer animosity and ethnocentrism on process of accepting foreign products among Islamic countries. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 3(5), 112-131.
  23. Keller, K.L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education Limited.
  24. Khan, S. (2013). An insight into stereotypical images and encountered reality of south Asia as tourism destination. Asia-Pacific Journal of Innovation Hospitality and Tourism, 2(1), 17-36
  25. Kim, C., Yan, X., Kim, J., Terasaki, S., & Furukawa, H. (2022). Effect of consumer animosity on boycott campaigns in a cross-cultural context: Does consumer affinity matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 69, 103123.
  26. Klein, J. G., & Ettensoe, R. (1999). Consumer animosity and consumer ethnocentrism: An analysis of unique antecedents. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(4), 5-24.
  27. Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People's Republic of China. Journal of marketing, 62(1), 89-100.
  28. Listiana, E. (2015). Country of origin image and its impact on brand association, perceived quality and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research, 10(2015), 19-29.
  29. Bahaee, M.J. Pisani, Iranian consumer animosity and U.S. products: A witch’s brew or elixir? International Business Review, 18 (2009) 199-210.
  30. Martinez, S.C., & Alvarez, M. D. (2010). Country versus destination image in a developing country. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(7), 748-764.
  31. Mishra, S., Saxena, G., & Chatterjee, R. (2022). Battle between psychological ownership and consumer animosity to influence consumers' buying behavior: a moderated mediation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, (ahead-of-print).
  32. Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of marketing, 34(1), 68-74.
  33. Nes, E. B., Yelkur, R., & Silkoset, R. (2012). Exploring the animosity domain and the role of affect in a cross-national context. International Business Review, 21(5), 751-765.
  34. Nijssen, E. J., & Douglas, S. P. (2004). Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 23-38.
  35. Olins, Wally. (2003). Wally Olin on Brand, Thames & Hudson publisher, London. Szondi.
  36. Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. A. (1993). Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing. Routledge.
  37. Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization, 68(1), 143-176.
  38. Rossanty, Y., & Putra Nasution, M. D. T. (2018). Information search and intentions to purchase: the role of country of origin image, product knowledge, and product involvement. Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(10), 3075-3085.
  39. Šapić, S., Kocić, M., & Radaković, K. (2019). THE EFFECT OF A PRODUCT'S COUNTRY OF ORIGIN ON THE CUSTOMER LOYALTY CREATION PROCESS. TEME: Casopis za Društvene Nauke, 12(4).
  40. Seo, E. J., & Park, J. W. (2018). A study on the effects of social media marketing activities on brand equity and customer response in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 66, 36-41.
  41. Shangian, B., Abdolvand, M. A., Nikoomaram, H., Khoonsiavash, M. (2019). Factors affecting the permanent and temporary animosity of Iranian consumers towards Arab countries and its consequences on judging the quality and willingness to buy foreign products. Journal of Business Management, 41, 145-174. (in Persian)
  42. Shimp, T. A., Dunn, T. H., & Klein, J. G. (2004). Remnants of the US Civil War and modern consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 21(2), 75-91.
  43. Shoham, A., Davidow, M., Klein, J. G., & Ruvio, A. (2006). Animosity on the home front: The Intifada in Israel and its impact on consumer behavior. Journal of International marketing, 14(3), 92-114.
  44. Stock, F. (2009). Identity, image and brand: A conceptual framework. Place Branding & Public Diplomacy, 5(2), 118-125.
  45. White, C., & Radic, D. (2014). Comparative public diplomacy: Message strategies of countries in transition. Public Relations Review, 40, 459–465.
  46. Li, Y., Li, B., Wang, G., & Yang, S. (2021). The effects of consumer animosity on demand for sharing-based accommodations: evidence from Airbnb. Decision Support Systems, 140, 113430.
Journal of Strategic Management Studies
Volume 14, Issue 54
June 2023
Pages 35-60

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 10 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 12 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics