The impact of explorative learning on business model innovation with the mediating role of strategic agility

Document Type : Research

Authors

Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

Aim and Introduction: Given the competitive nature of today's business and knowledge-based economy and increasing the efficiency of knowledge and information, knowledge-based organizations are of particular importance. Field studies show that the majority of knowledge-based companies have low competitiveness and the results of the performance of knowledge-based companies in Iran show that most of these companies face the problem of competition with other companies. In order to survive in today's competitive environment, these organizations, due to their nature, need constant improvement, which is one of the methods of re-engineering previous business models and innovating new models; in other words, the search for competitive advantage based on the acquisition of value from innovation in the business model. Therefore, it can be concluded that just having a business model is not a guarantee for the success of organizations. It should be noted that what is necessary is to maintain and continuously optimize it throughout the life of the organization that the organization can benefit from elements such as exploratory learning and strategic agility to advance this issue. Since knowledge-based companies are recognized as the main agents of commercialization and innovation in developing countries, having innovation in the business model in line with environmental changes is one of the main success factors and a mechanism for creating competitive advantage in knowledge-based companies in changing environments. It is now recognized that having a comprehensive and dynamic business model is essential. The aim of the this study is to provide a conceptual framework to companies to help them achieving business model innovation using exploratory learning and strategic agility.
 
Methodology: This research is cross-sectional in terms of time, quantitative in terms of approach, applied research in terms of purpose, and a descriptive-survey in terms of how information is collected. The statistical population of the research is the knowledge-based companies located at the Science and Technology Park of the University of Tehran. Data collection about these organizations has been done by senior and middle managers of the mentioned organizations; thus, 280 questionnaires have been distributed among the managers of 120 companies, and finally, data analysis with 232 returned questionnaires has been performed on 120 organizations.  To answer the research questions, different statistical methods and tests were used by using SPSS22 and SMART PLS3 softwares as follows: confirmatory factor analysis was applied to confirm the validity of the questions and characterize the key factors of each component, and structural equation modeling technique has been used to investigate the fitness of the research model with the collected data. To evaluate the validity of the questionnaire, face, content and structural validity was used. The face and content validity was under the supervision of supervisors and the construct validity was through confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and divergent validity. Combined reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor loading coefficient were used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire.
Findings: After interpreting the data, the research hypotheses and the described relationship between the variables of the research model were confirmed. Based on the results, strategic agility as a mediator has a positive effect on the relationship between exploratory learning and business model innovation, and this shows that if the company wants to implement business model innovation, a wise choice can be improving strategic agility with the help of exploratory learning. Companies must actively encourage employees to acquire information and knowledge from customers, partners, competitors, and institutions and promote knowledge flow. The more agile the organization, the more it absorbs the knowledge gained through exploratory learning and thus promotes business model innovation. By comparing the findings of this study and previous researches, it can be inferred that the results of this research are consistent with the researches of Clauss et al. (2019) and Liao et al. (2019). Further, in studies such as Zhao & Jie (2018), Bao, Cheng, and Zhang (2016), Schneider and Spieth (2014), and Abbasi and Fattahian (1396) that the studied variables are somewhat different, the results overlap with the results of the present study.
Discussion and Conclusion: This study tries to expand the research literature, especially the Iranian's research literature in the field of business model innovation and its relationship with exploratory learning and strategic agility. Since no research has so far specifically examined the impact of exploratory learning on business model innovation, the findings of this study can be a new step in expanding the foundations of business model reengineering methods. In addition, considering the special importance of knowledge-based organizations in the economy and the need to maintain and continuously optimize their business models, the use of analysis and interpretations based on these organizations will play an important role in increasing their competitive advantage.
Finally, according to the results of this study, suggestions at the managerial and research level can be made as follows:
Since exploratory learning has a positive effect on business model innovation and strategic agility, it is suggested that the knowledge acquired in knowledge-based companies should always be categorized and institutionalized. Moreover, by participating in collaborative knowledge creation projects, we can provide the ground for exploratory learning in the organization. In order to acquire knowledge from external sources and beyond the current market of the organization, the educational and training needs of employees should be continuously monitored, and specialized and applied courses appropriate to the job and organizational context should be provided for them.  In addition, due to the positive and significant impact of strategic agility on business model innovation, knowledge-based organizations can increase their ability to respond to environmental changes with more careful planning and more flexible organizational arrangements to pave the way for business model innovation. It is also recommended that business processes and revenue structure be continuously evaluated and improved if necessary.
Since knowledge-based organizations operate in a competitive and innovative environment, the innovation rate in the business model is expected to be high, so in order to measure the generalizability of the proposed model, more research is needed in different organizational structures like other manufacturing and service sectors, both governmental and non-governmental. It is suggested that another study be conducted to identify and rank the factors affecting exploratory learning using the methods of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Moreover, to generalize the obtained results to higher levels, the present model should be examined with a wider statistical sample.

Keywords


  1. Abbasi, H., & Fattahian, N. (2018). The effect of strategic learning on organizational performance with the mediating role of strategic agility (Case study: Sports and Youth Departments of Hamadan and Kermanshah). Contemporary Research in Sports Management, 8 (15), 29-43. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=542748. (In Persian)
  2. Asadnejad, M., Hejazi, R., & Zarei, H. (2014). Investigating the impact of business model on the performance of knowledge-based companies, International Conference on Industrial Management and Engineering, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/415516. (In Persian).
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing15(2), 1-29.
  4. Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological innovation. Long range planning46(6), 419-426.
  5. Bao, Y., Cheng, L., & Zhang, J. (2016). Organizational learning, strategic flexibility and business model innovation: an empirical research based on logistics enterprises. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Applied Mechanics, Mechatronics and Intelligent Systems (AMMIS2015)(883-893).
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management17(1), 99-120.
  7. Bock, A. J., Opsahl, T., George, G., & Gann, D. M. (2012). The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation. Journal of Management studies49(2), 279-305.
  8. Casadesus‐Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor‐based business models. Strategic management journal34(4), 464-482.
  9. Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management47(3), 385-403.
  10. Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2019). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation. IEEE transactions on engineering management.
  11. Clauss, T., Kesting, T., & Naskrent, J. (2019). A rolling stone gathers no moss: the effect of customers' perceived business model innovativeness on customer value co‐creation behavior and customer satisfaction in the service sector. R&D Management, 49(2), 180-203.
  12. Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long range planning43(2-3), 370-382.
  13. Doz, Y., Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. Pearson Education.
  14. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go?. Journal of Management43(1), 200-227.
  15. Gebauer, H., Worch, H., & Truffer, B. (2012). Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation. European Management Journal30(1), 57-73.
  16. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?. Journal of marketing62(4), 30-45.
  17. Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., Couzin, I. D., & Cognitive Search Research Group. (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in cognitive sciences19(1), 46-54.
  18. Hock, M., Clauss, T., & Schulz, E. (2016). The impact of organizational culture on a firm's capability to innovate the business model. R&d Management, 46(3), 433-450.
  19. Johansson, F. (2017). The Medici Effect, with a new preface and discussion guide: what elephants and epidemics can teach us about innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
  20. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard business review86(12), 57-68.
  21. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of management journal49(4), 797-818.
  22. Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California management review56(3), 58-77.
  23. Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision.
  24. Liao, S., Liu, Z., & Ma, C. (2019). Direct and configurational paths of open innovation and organisational agility to business model innovation in SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(10), 1213-1228.
  25. Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, Jr, G., & Deimler, M. (2012). Business model innovation: When the game gets tough, change the game. Own the future: 50 ways to win from The Boston Consulting Group, 291-298.
  26. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science2(1), 71-87.
  27. Massa, L., & Tucci, C. L. (2013). Business model innovation. The Oxford handbook of innovation management20(18), 420-441.
  28. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of business research58(6), 726-735.
  29. Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach(Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des hautes études commerciales).
  30. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
  31. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems16(1), 1.
  32. Rezaei Mirqaed, A., Seyed Naghavi, M., Dehghanan, H., & Amiri, M. (2017). Investigating and determining the efficient functions of human resources based on the architectural model of human resources. Productivity Management (Beyond Management), 10 (40), 185-220. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=351439. (In Persian)
  33. Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2014). Business model innovation and strategic flexibility: insights from an experimental research design. International Journal of Innovation Management18(06), 1440009.
  34. Schumpeter, J. A. (2001). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934). Transaction Publishers.–1982.–January1, 244.
  35. Spieth, P., & Schneider, S. (2016). Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. Journal of business Economics, 86(6), 671-696.
  36. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning43(2-3), 172-194.
  37. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal18(7), 509-533.
  38. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), 13-35.
  39. Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California Management Review56(3), 5-12.
  40. Yang, C., & Liu, H. M. (2012). Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure. Management Decision.
  41. Zhao, Y., & Jie, X. (2018, December). A Study on the relationship between organizational learning and business model innovation. In Third International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2018). Atlantis Press.
  42. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long range planning43(2-3), 216-226.