The Role of Strategic Foresight in Creating Strategic Flexibility and Rational Decision Making

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Student, Shahed University

2 Associate Professor, Business Administration Department, Shahed University

Abstract

Aim and Introduction: Increasing environmental uncertainty has brought increasing challenges to various organizations. Today, environmental uncertainty has spread in the business environment; the advent of globalization, highly destructive business models, and rapid technological change have increased the instability and complexity of the competitive landscape. The growing entanglement of organizations with their environment often results in emerging and unpredictable behaviors. It is very unlikely that unforeseen events, with significant consequences, will only affect one company individually and not affect the entire industry. The growing uncertainty of today's environment has faced significant challenges for organizations, and all companies, depending on the type of environment in which they operate, more or less deal with it. One of the most effective ways that organizations can cope with these changing conditions is to develop dynamic capabilities. One of the most important areas for the development of dynamic capabilities, which is also mentioned in the strategic management literature, is strategic foresight. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the role of strategic foresight in creating dynamic capabilities of strategic flexibility and rational decision making with the moderating effect of environmental uncertainty.
Methodology: Given that the main purpose of this study is to determine the role of strategic foresight in creating strategic flexibility and rational decision making with the moderating effect of environmental uncertainty. This research is a descriptive-survey research in terms of the purpose of an applied research and in terms of the nature or method of data collection and is correlational in terms of the relationships between research variables. The data of this research were collected using a simple random sampling method and a researcher-made questionnaire using the indicators and research questions of Herhaus and Lining (2020). The opinions of professors and experts were used to validate this questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability which was set to 0.943. SPSS and smart pls software have been used to test the hypotheses of this research. The research data were collected from 156 knowledge-based companies in the field of electricity, electronics, photonics, telecommunications and automated systems in Tehran that is according to the limited statistical population and based on the Cochrane Limited Society formula.
Findings: The results show that strategic foresight is effective in creating dynamic capabilities of strategic flexibility and rational decision-making, as well as environmental uncertainty that moderates the relationship between strategic foresight and rational decision-making. Therefore, from the research hypotheses, the first, second and third hypotheses were confirmed and the fourth hypothesis was not confirmed.
Hypothesis 1: Strategic foresight is effective in creating strategic flexibility.
Hypothesis 2: Strategic foresight is effective in creating rational decision making.
Hypothesis 3: Environmental uncertainty modulates the relationship between strategic foresight and strategic flexibility.
    Hypothesis 4: Environmental uncertainty does not moderate the relationship between strategic foresight and rational decision making.
Discussion and conclusion: The first, second and third hypotheses of this study were confirmed by path coefficients and appropriate statistics. The fourth hypothesis of this research was rejected from 1.96 due to its lower statistical value. According to statistical tests, the highest correlation is between strategic foresight and strategic flexibility. In order to improve dynamic capabilities, it is better to focus more on creating strategic flexibility. Increasing environmental uncertainty is an undeniable part of today's business environment, and all companies, depending on the type of environment in which they operate, more or less deal with it. To overcome these environmental unrests and tensions, every company has to take steps to survive otherwise, like hundreds of prominent companies, after something unexpected happens in their environment. , Unable to survive, will be excluded from the competition. One of the most important and efficient ways to deal with this environmental uncertainty is to create and strengthen dynamic capabilities. These dynamic capabilities play a very important role in creating competitive advantage. One of the important measures that can bring dynamic capabilities and is one of the results of this research is strategic foresight activities. The first component of strategic foresight activities is environmental studies. Companies should do their best to identify, review and evaluate changes and environmental trends so as not to be taken by surprise. Nokia is the best example of this. The company was once the leader in the production of mobile phones, but due to lack of proper environmental research and failure to discover the growing trends of customers to smart phones, the market leadership was handed over to Apple and Samsung. The second part of strategic forward-looking activities is scenario planning. Companies need to plan ahead for all the different situations and events so that they can respond quickly and accurately if needed. Companies cannot withstand environmental change if they have only one specific plan and strategy, such as stores that only serve their customers in person, with many problems after the outbreak of the Corona virus. They met and their sales fell sharply, but in the face of stores that provided online sales in addition to face-to-face sales, they were able to continue to make money and profitability. The next part is the creation of knowledge. To implement any proper strategy, knowledge related to it is needed. If companies want to adopt appropriate strategies with turbulent environmental conditions, they have to create knowledge in this area. Organizational structure and culture are the last components of strategic foresight. If the organizational structure and culture is in conflict with a particular goal, no matter how hard one tries to achieve that goal, nothing special will happen in the end, so if companies want dynamic capabilities, they need to create a structure and culture. Proper organization and support of strategic forward-looking activities provide a good basis for achieving dynamic capabilities.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Bourgeois III, L.J., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1988(. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry. Mgt. Sci. 34(7), 816–835.
  2. Burgelman, R.A. (1983(.A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28(2), 223–244.
  3. Chawla, C., Mangaliso, M., Knipes, B., Gauthier, J., (2012). Antecedents and implications of uncertainty in management: A historical perspective, Journal of Management History, 18 2, 200-218.
  4. Y., Wang, Y., Nevo. S., Benitez, J., & Kou, G. (2015). Improving strategic flexibility with information technologies: insights for firm performance in an emerging economyJournal of Information Technology, 32)1(, 1–16.
  5. Choo, C.W. (2001(. Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Inf. Res. 7(1), 72.
  6. Cornish, E. (2004). Futuring: the Exploration of the Future. World Future Society, Washington, D.C.
  7. Dean Jr, J.W., & Sharfman, M.P. (1993(. Procedural rationality in the strategic decision‐making process. J. Manag. Stud. 30(4), 587–610.
  8. Dixon, S., Meyer, K., & Day, M. (2014(. Building dynamic capabilities of adaptation and innovation: a study of micro-foundations in a transition economy. Long Range Plann.47(4), 186–205.
  9. Donth, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research Journal of Business Research, Vol,117.284-289
  10. Duncan, R.B. (1972(. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17(3), 313–327.
  11. Elbanna, S., & Child, J., (2007). The influence of decision, environmental and firm characteristicson the rationality of strategic decision‐ J. Manag. Stud. 44(4), 561–591.
  12. Fredrickson, J.W. (1984(. The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension,observations, future directions. Acad. Manag. J., 27(3), 445–466.
  13. Grant, R.M.) 2003. ( Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oilMajors. Strateg. Manag. J., 24(6), 491–517.
  14. Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. J. Mark. 65(2), 67–80.
  15. Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155(33), 1-15.
  16. Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. )2007(. Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations.Wiley, New York.3
  17. Levy, D.L. (2000(. Alications and limitations of complexity theory in organization theory and strategy. In: Rabin, J., Miller, G.J., Hildreth, W.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Marcel Dekker, New York, 67–87.
  18. D., & Liu. J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from ChinaJournal of Business Research, 67, 93-99.
  19. Lin, Y., Zhao, S., & Li, N. (2014(. A study of network-building HR practices for TMT, strategic flexibility and firm performance: the moderating role of environmental uncertainty.
  20. Linnenluecke, M.K. (2017(. Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev., 19(1), 4–30.
  21. Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983(. Strategy‐making and environment: the third link. Strateg.Manag. J., 4(3), 221–235
  22. Miller, R. (2011). Futures literacy: embracing complexity and using the future. Ethos, 10(10), 23–28.
  23. Milliken, F.J. (1987(. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state,effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Manag. Rev., 12 (1), 133–143.
  24. Mohsenin, S., & Rahimesfandiani, M. (2017). Structural equations based on the partial least squares approach using smart pls software. Mehraban. 2, 19-59. (in Persian)
  25. Paliokaitė, A., & Pačėsa, N. )2015(. The relationship between organisational foresight andorganisational ambidexterity Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 165–181.
  26. Porter, A.L., Ashton, B., Clar, G., Coates, J.F., Cuhls, K., Cunningham, S.W., Ducatel, K., Van Der Duin, P., Georghiou, L., Gordon, T., Linstone, H., Marchau, V., Massari, G.,Miles, I., Mogee, M., Salo, A., Scapolo, F., Smits, & R., Thissen, W. )2004(. Technology futures analysis: toward integration of the field and new methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 287–303.
  27. Ramirez, R., Osterman, R., & Gronquist, D. (2013(. Scenarios and early warnings as dynamic capabilities to frame managerial attention Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 825–838.
  28. Rhisiart, M., Miller, R., & Brooks, S. (2015). Learning to use the future: developing foresight capabilities through scenario processes Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 124–133.
  29. Ringland, G., & Schwartz, P.P. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing For the Future. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.2
  30. Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015(. Corporate foresight: an emerging fieldwith a rich tradition Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1–9.
  31. Rohrbeck, R., & Gemunden, H.G. (2011(. Corporate foresight: its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 231–243.
  32. Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M.E. )2018(. Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: alongitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105–116.
  33. Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C.E. ) 2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research.Acad. Manag. Ann. 12(1), 390–439.
  34. Schwarz, J.O. (2006). German delphi on corporate foresight. Institute for Futures Research at the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.76
  35. Sharfman, M.P., & Dean Jr, J.W. (1997(. Flexibility in strategic decision making: informational and ideological perspectives. J. Manag. Stud. 34(2), 191–217.
  36. Shimizu, K., & Hitt, M.A.) 2004(. Strategic flexibility: organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 18 (4), 44–59.
  37. Teece, D., & Leih, S. (2016). Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic capabilities: an introduction .Calif. Manag. Rev. 58(4), 5–12.
  38. Teece, D.J.)2007(. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic. Management. 28(13), 1319–1350.
  39. Vecchiato, R. )2015(. Strategic planning and organizational flexibility in turbulent environments.Foresight Foresight, 17 (3), 257–273.
  40. Vecchiato, R. (2012(. Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making:an integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436–447.
  41. Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2010(. Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1527–1539.
  42. Wilkinson, A., & Kupers, R. (2013). Living in the futures. Har. Bus. Rev. 91(5), 118–127.
  43. Winter, S.G. (2003(. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic. Management. J. 24(10), 991–995.